Structural phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 driven by electrostatic doping

Abstract

Monolayers of transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) exhibit numerous crystal phases with distinct structures, symmetries and physical properties1,2,3. Exploring the physics of transitions between these different structural phases in two dimensions4 may provide a means of switching material properties, with implications for potential applications. Structural phase transitions in TMDs have so far been induced by thermal or chemical means5,6; purely electrostatic control over crystal phases through electrostatic doping was recently proposed as a theoretical possibility, but has not yet been realized7,8. Here we report the experimental demonstration of an electrostatic-doping-driven phase transition between the hexagonal and monoclinic phases of monolayer molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2). We find that the phase transition shows a hysteretic loop in Raman spectra, and can be reversed by increasing or decreasing the gate voltage. We also combine second-harmonic generation spectroscopy with polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy to show that the induced monoclinic phase preserves the crystal orientation of the original hexagonal phase. Moreover, this structural phase transition occurs simultaneously across the whole sample. This electrostatic-doping control of structural phase transition opens up new possibilities for developing phase-change devices based on atomically thin membranes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Electrostatic-doping-driven structural phase transition in a gating device.
Figure 2: The 2H-to-1T′ phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 under electrostatic bias.
Figure 3: Preservation of crystal orientation before and after structural transition.
Figure 4: Spatial mapping of phase transitions in a MoTe2 monolayer by SHG spectroscopy.

References

  1. 1

    Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L. & Li, J. Quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346, 1344–1347 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Ma, Y. et al. Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in two-dimensional square transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 92, 085427 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lin, Y.-C., Dumcenco, D. O., Huang, Y.-S. & Suenaga, K. Atomic mechanism of phase transition between metallic and semiconducting MoS2 single-layers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 391–396 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Keum, D. H. et al. Bandgap opening in few-layered monoclinic MoTe2 . Nat. Phys. 11, 482–486 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kappera, R. et al. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 transistors. Nat. Mater. 13, 1128–1134 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Li, Y., Duerloo, K.-A. N., Wauson, K. & Reed, E. J. Structural semiconductor-to-semimetal phase transition in two-dimensional materials induced by electrostatic gating. Nat. Commun. 7, 10671 (2016)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Zhang, C. et al. Charge mediated reversible metal-insulator transition in monolayer MoTe2 and WxMo1−xTe2 alloy. ACS Nano 10, 7370–7375 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 699–712 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Xiao, D., Liu, G.-B., Feng, W., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Cao, T. et al. Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 3, 887 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Mak, K. F., McGill, K. L., Park, J. & McEuen, P. L. The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors. Science 344, 1489–1492 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Ye, Z. et al. Probing excitonic dark states in single-layer tungsten disulfide. Nature 513, 214–218 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Wilson, J. A. & Yoffe, A. D. The transition metal dichalcogenides discussion and interpretation of the observed optical, electrical and structural properties. Adv. Phys. 18, 193–335 (1969)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Imada, M., Fujimori, A. & Tokura, Y. Metal-insulator transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039–1263 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wang, Q. et al. Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials. Nat. Photon. 10, 60–65 (2016)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Wuttig, M. & Yamada, N. Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 824–832 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Rhodes, D. et al. Engineering the structural and electronic phases of MoTe2 through W substitution. Nano Lett. 17, 1616–1622 (2017)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Cho, S. et al. Phase patterning for ohmic homojunction contact in MoTe2 . Science 349, 625–628 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Ge, J.-F. et al. Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO3 . Nat. Mater. 14, 285–289 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Xi, X. et al. Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe2 atomic layers. Nat. Phys. 12, 139–143 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ye, J. T. et al. Superconducting dome in a gate-tuned band insulator. Science 338, 1193–1196 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Seyler, K. L. et al. Electrical control of second-harmonic generation in a WSe2 monolayer transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 407–411 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ruppert, C., Aslan, O. B. & Heinz, T. F. Optical properties and band gap of single- and few-layer MoTe2 crystals. Nano Lett. 14, 6231–6236 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Petrov, G. I., Yakovlev, V. V. & Squier, J. Raman microscopy analysis of phase transformation mechanisms in vanadium dioxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1023–1025 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Colomban, P. & Slodczyk, A. Raman intensity: an important tool to study the structure and phase transitions of amorphous/crystalline materials. Opt. Mater. 31, 1759–1763 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Li, Y. et al. Probing symmetry properties of few-layer MoS2 and h-BN by optical second-harmonic generation. Nano Lett. 13, 3329–3333 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Sercombe, D. et al. Optical investigation of the natural electron doping in thin MoS2 films deposited on dielectric substrates. Sci. Rep. 3, 3489 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Yu, Y. et al. Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2 . Nat Nanotechnol. 10, 270–276 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Yoshida, M. et al. Controlling charge-density-wave states in nano-thick crystals of 1T-TaS2. Sci. Rep. 4, 7302 (2014)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Li, L. J. et al. Controlling many-body states by the electric-field effect in a two-dimensional material. Nature 529, 185–189 (2016)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Tsen, A. W. et al. Structure and control of charge density waves in two-dimensional 1T-TaS2 . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15054–15059 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Yoshida, M., Suzuki, R., Zhang, Y., Nakano, M. & Iwasa, Y. Memristive phase switching in two-dimensional crystals. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500606 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Shiogai, J., Ito, Y., Mitsuhashi, T., Nojima, T. & Tsukazaki, A. Electric-field-induced superconductivity in electrochemically etched ultrathin FeSe films on SrTiO3 and MgO. Nat. Phys. 12, 42–46 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Deng, K. et al. Experimental observation of topological Fermi arcs in type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe2 . Nat. Phys. 12, 1105–1110 (2016)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Ruppert, C., Aslan, B. & Heinz, T. F. Optical properties and band gap of single-and few-layer MoTe2 crystals. Nano Lett 14, 6231–6236 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Park, J. C. et al. Phase-engineered synthesis of centimeter-scale 1T′- and 2H-molybdenum ditelluride thin films. ACS Nano 9, 6548–6554 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Song, Q. et al. Anomalous in-plane anisotropic Raman response of monoclinic semimetal 1T′-MoTe2 . Sci. Rep. 7, 1758 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Pack, J. D. & Monkhorst, H. J. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 16, 1748–1749 (1977)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Xi, X. et al. Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer NbSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 765–769 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Fonari, A. & Stauffer, S. vasp_raman.py. https://github.com/raman-sc/VASP/ (2013)

  46. 46

    Chernikov, A., Ruppert, C., Hill, H. M., Rigosi, A. F. & Heinz, T. F. Population inversion and giant bandgap renormalization in atomically thin WS2 layers. Nat. Photon. 9, 466–470 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Ramírez, J. G., Sharoni, A., Dubi, Y., Gómez, M. E. & Schuller, I. K. First-order reversal curve measurements of the metal-insulator transition in VO2: signatures of persistent metallic domains. Phys. Rev. B 79, 235110 (2009)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Hadjipanayis, G. C . (ed.) Magnetic Hysteresis in Novel Magnetic Materials (Springer, 1997)

  49. 49

    Shi, W. et al. Superconductivity series in transition metal dichalcogenides by ionic gating. Sci. Rep. 5, 12534 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Chandra Shekar, N. V. & Rajan, K. G. Kinetics of pressure induced structural phase transitions—a review. Bull. Mater. Sci. 24, 1–21 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Zhou, K. Deng and W. Yang from Tsinghua University for providing a 1T′ MoTe2 crystal for reference. This work was supported in part by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231, within the ‘Light-Material Interactions in Energy Conversion’ Energy Frontier Research Center (for optical measurements); under the ‘van der Waals Heterostructures Program’ (for transport studies); and by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant EFMA-154274 (for device design and fabrication). Y.L., Y.Z., and E.J.R. acknowledge support from the Army Research Office (grant W911NF-15-1-0570); the Office of Naval Research (grant N00014-15-1-2697); the NSF (grants DMR-1455050 and EECS-1436626); and from the Stanford Graduate Fellowship programme.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ying W., J.X. and X.Z. initiated the research and designed the experiments; Ying W., J.X. and H.Z. performed Raman measurements; J.X. and Ying W. conducted gate-dependent SHG spectroscopy and mapping; Y.A. and J.X. prepared monolayer MoTe2; and Ying W. fabricated and characterized devices. Ying W. measured the doping level with assistance from K.Y.F., S.W. and W.S. (W.S. was under the guidance of A.Z); Y.L. and Y.Z. performed theoretical calculations under the guidance of E.J.R.; Ying W., J.X., H.Z., Y.Z, W.S., Yuan W., E.J.R. and X.Z. analysed data; Ying W., J.X., H.Z., Y.Z., Yuan W., E.J.R. and X.Z. wrote the manuscript. X.Z. and Yuan W. guided the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks A. Castro Neto, Y. Iwasa and R. Simpson for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Raman features of pristine 2H-and 1T′-phase monolayer MoTe2 at 220 K.

Raman spectra for the 2H and 1T′ phases of monolayer MoTe2 are plotted in green and red, respectively. The Raman modes at 171.5 cm−1 and 236 cm−1 are the and oscillation modes, belonging to the 2H phase. Excited by the same wavelength (632.8 nm), the 1T′ monolayer has just one dominant mode, at 166.8 cm−1. The blue curve, from bare ionic liquid, shows no Raman modes and so acts as a clear and flat background in all Raman measurements.

Extended Data Figure 2 Calculated shift in the Raman peak of the Ag mode of the 1T′-phase MoTe2 monolayer owing to strain.

The lattice constants range from (aT′ bT′) at x = 0 to (aH, bH) at x = 1. All lattice constants can be found in the Methods. Inset, top and side views of the atomic displacement pattern of the Ag mode. The magnitude of the displacements is proportional to the length of the red arrows. Purple and yellow spheres denote molybdenum and tellurium atoms, respectively.

Extended Data Figure 3 Fitting of the Lorentz function for Raman spectra at different biases.

a, b, Raman spectra at 0 V and 4.4 V are well fitted by only one Lorentz function, representing a single Raman mode ( in the 2H phase, and Ag in the 1T′ phase). c, A typical Raman spectrum taken during transition from one phase to another (for example, at a bias of 3.6 V) is well fitted by two Lorentz functions, centred at and Ag.

Extended Data Figure 4 Gate-dependent SHG spectroscopy of monolayer and bilayer 2H MoTe2.

a, The SHG intensity of monolayer MoTe2 displays notable hysteresis during forward and backward alteration of the positive top gate (thereby altering the doping of the sample with electrons). The large variation in SHG intensity results mainly from a change in inversion symmetry during phase transition. b, The SHG intensity of a bilayer sample shows no hysteresis under sweeping of the top gate bias. c, Doping with holes (that is, by applying a negative top gate voltage) into 2H monolayer MoTe2 slightly increases the SHG intensity by 1.5 times; a reserve gate sweep shows no hysteresis.

Extended Data Figure 5 Angular polarized Raman (Ag mode) pattern on an exfoliated 1T′-phase MoTe2 monolayer.

The position of zero degrees is arbitrary. By rotating the polarization of the excitation laser, we detected a twofold pattern, verifying the anisotropic xx and yy components in the Ag Raman tensor.

Extended Data Figure 6 SHG intensity versus excitation energy before and after phase transition.

At a gate bias of 0 V and a pump wavelength of 1,100 nm, a notable excitonic resonance is observed in a 2H-phase MoTe2 monolayer. At the same pump power but a bias of 4.4 V, the SHG intensity drops by more than one order of magnitude over the entire excitation spectrum range. The incident excitation power for each wavelength was fixed at the same level. The sample was kept at a temperature of 220 K during the measurements.

Extended Data Figure 7 SHG mapping at several typical voltage biases.

a–d, These biases correspond to before (0 V and 2.2 V; a, b), during (3.1 V; c) and after (4.1 V; d) phase transition.

Extended Data Figure 8 Analysis of the mechanism of phase transition from 2H to 1T′ by the Hall effect.

a, c, Gate-dependent Raman intensity ratio. The ratio (1T′/1T′ + 2H)) is extracted from Lorentz fitting of Raman spectroscopy at each gate (as in Fig. 2b). Red arrows show forward and backward gate sweeping. From a, we determine the threshold for transition from phase 2H to 1T′ to be 3.2 V (red dashed line) on the basis of fitting with the Preisach model. The corresponding carrier density at this threshold is higher than that predicted theoretically7, perhaps because of the presence of kinetic barriers during transition, which were not considered in the theoretical calculation. In order to compare with the predicted critical doping level, where the two phases are energetically degenerate, we determined the corresponding critical voltage in c, following a typical method50. The red dashed lines indicate that transition from phase 2H to 1T′ occurred at a bias of 2.6 V while the reverse process began at 2.2 V. The average (2.4 V) refers to the critical voltage at which the two phases are energetically degenerate. b, d, The Hall resistance [Rxy – Rxy(0)] for the same sample at 3.2 V (b) and 2.4 V (d), as a function of the magnetic field, B. Here Rxy is the transverse resistance under the magnetic field while Rxy(0) is the transverse resistance without magnetic field. The slopes of their linear fittings (dashed lines) give the corresponding carrier densities to be 2.2 × 1014 cm−2 and 8.5 × 1013 cm−2, respectively. The latter, which excludes the kinetic barrier, matches the carrier range that is predicted7 to drive this phase transition (0.4–1 × 1014 cm−2).

Extended Data Figure 9 Evidence that the phase transition is not thermally driven during Raman measurements.

a, Raman spectra of monolayer 2H MoTe2 before and after exposure to a 1 mW μm−2, 633-nm laser for 20 hours. A shift in neither peak intensity nor peak position is observed. b, Gate-dependent Raman intensity ratio (1T′/(2H + 1T′)) under different laser-power excitations: 1 mW μm−2 or 0.1 mW μm−2. At each gate voltage, the intensity for the 2H phase (or 1T′ phase) Raman mode (or Ag) was extracted by Lorentz fitting of the Raman mixture in the range 160–180 cm–1. The error bars represent standard errors propagated from the fitting parameters. Given that the thresholds and hysteresis loops are the same at both powers, the transition between the 2H and the 1T′ phase must be independent of laser power and is determined purely by the electrostatic doping level rather than by a thermal effect. All experiments were conducted in a vacuum of 2 × 10-6 torr and at a temperature of 220 K.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Xiao, J., Zhu, H. et al. Structural phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 driven by electrostatic doping. Nature 550, 487–491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24043

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing