Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparative glycoproteomics of stem cells identifies new players in ricin toxicity

Nature volume 549, pages 538–542 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Glycosylation, the covalent attachment of carbohydrate structures onto proteins, is the most abundant post-translational modification1. Over 50% of human proteins are glycosylated, which alters their activities in diverse fundamental biological processes2,3. Despite the importance of glycosylation in biology4, the identification and functional validation of complex glycoproteins has remained largely unexplored. Here we develop a novel quantitative approach to identify intact glycopeptides from comparative proteomic data sets, allowing us not only to infer complex glycan structures but also to directly map them to sites within the associated proteins at the proteome scale. We apply this method to human and mouse embryonic stem cells to illuminate the stem cell glycoproteome. This analysis nearly doubles the number of experimentally confirmed glycoproteins, identifies previously unknown glycosylation sites and multiple glycosylated stemness factors, and uncovers evolutionarily conserved as well as species-specific glycoproteins in embryonic stem cells. The specificity of our method is confirmed using sister stem cells carrying repairable mutations in enzymes required for fucosylation, Fut9 and Slc35c1. Ablation of fucosylation confers resistance to the bioweapon ricin5,6, and we discover proteins that carry a fucosylation-dependent sugar code for ricin toxicity. Mutations disrupting a subset of these proteins render cells ricin resistant, revealing new players that orchestrate ricin toxicity. Our comparative glycoproteomics platform, SugarQb, enables genome-wide insights into protein glycosylation and glycan modifications in complex biological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Glycoproteomics.
Figure 2: The glycoproteomes of hESCs and mESCs.
Figure 3: Detection of specific fucosylated proteins.
Figure 4: Validation of fucosylated proteins involved in ricin toxicity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moremen, K. W., Tiemeyer, M. & Nairn, A. V. Vertebrate protein glycosylation: diversity, synthesis and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 448–462 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Goto, Y., Uematsu, S. & Kiyono, H. Epithelial glycosylation in gut homeostasis and inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1244–1251 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennis, J. W., Lau, K. S., Demetriou, M. & Nabi, I. R. Adaptive regulation at the cell surface by N-glycosylation. Traffic 10, 1569–1578 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Varki, A. Biological roles of glycans. Glycobiology 27, 3–49 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elling, U. et al. Forward and reverse genetics through derivation of haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 9, 563–574 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Patnaik, S. K. & Stanley, P. Lectin-resistant CHO glycosylation mutants. Methods Enzymol. 416, 159–182 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wollscheid, B. et al. Mass-spectrometric identification and relative quantification of N-linked cell surface glycoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 378–386 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Toghi Eshghi, S., Shah, P., Yang, W., Li, X. & Zhang, H. GPQuest: a spectral library matching algorithm for site-specific assignment of tandem mass spectra to intact N-glycopeptides. Anal. Chem. 87, 5181–5188 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin, X. et al. Glycoproteomic analysis of the secretome of human endothelial cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 956–978 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rauniyar, N. & Yates, J. R., III . Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 13, 5293–5309 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Savitski, M. M., Mathieson, T., Becher, I. & Bantscheff, M. H-score, a mass accuracy driven rescoring approach for improved peptide identification in modification rich samples. J. Proteome Res. 9, 5511–5516 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh, P., Dahms, N. M. & Kornfeld, S. Mannose 6-phosphate receptors: new twists in the tale. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 202–212 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zielinska, D. F., Gnad, F., Wis´niewski, J. R. & Mann, M. Precision mapping of an in vivo N-glycoproteome reveals rigid topological and sequence constraints. Cell 141, 897–907 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, P., Stalnaker, S. H. & Wells, L. Approaches for site mapping and quantification of O-linked glycopeptides. Methods Mol. Biol. 951, 229–244 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hart, G. W., Housley, M. P. & Slawson, C. Cycling of O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine on nucleocytoplasmic proteins. Nature 446, 1017–1022 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang, H. et al. O-GlcNAc regulates pluripotency and reprogramming by directly acting on core components of the pluripotency network. Cell Stem Cell 11, 62–74 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers, S. A., Panning, B. & Burlingame, A. L. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is necessary for the normal site-specific O-GlcNAc distribution in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9490–9495 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ginis, I. et al. Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev. Biol. 269, 360–380 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Satomaa, T. et al. The N-glycome of human embryonic stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 10, 42 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nairn, A. et al. Changes in glycan-related gene transcripts following human embryonic stem cell differentiation into cell types derived from ectoderm, mesoderm or endoderm lineages. Glycobiology 22, 1590 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nairn, A. V. et al. Regulation of glycan structures in murine embryonic stem cells: combined transcript profiling of glycan-related genes and glycan structural analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 37835–37856 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yagi, H., Yanagisawa, M., Kato, K. & Yu, R. K. Lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 is a major SSEA-1-carrier protein in mouse neural stem cells. Glycobiology 20, 976–981 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Taubenschmid, J . et al. A vital sugar code for ricin toxicity. Cell Res. (in the press)

  25. Hellbusch, C. C. et al. Golgi GDP-fucose transporter-deficient mice mimic congenital disorder of glycosylation IIc/leukocyte adhesion deficiency II. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 10762–10772 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu, L., Hou, X., Shi, S., Körner, C. & Stanley, P. Slc35c2 promotes Notch1 fucosylation and is required for optimal Notch signaling in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 36245–36254 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson, A. et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75, 1895–1904 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Probst, O. C. et al. The mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor restricts the tumourigenicity and invasiveness of squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 124, 2559–2567 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Probst, O. C. et al. The mannose 6-phosphate-binding sites of M6P/IGF2R determine its capacity to suppress matrix invasion by squamous cell carcinoma cells. Biochem. J. 451, 91–99 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Foxwell, B. M. J., Donovan, T. A., Thorpe, P. E. & Wilson, G. The removal of carbohydrates from ricin with endoglycosidases H, F and D and α-mannosidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 840, 193–203 (1985)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Varki, A. et al. Symbol nomenclature for graphical representations of glycans. Glycobiology 25, 1323–1324 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, J., Sundaram, S., Shaper, N. L., Raju, T. S. & Stanley, P. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells may express six β4-galactosyltransferases (β4GalTs). Consequences of the loss of functional β4GalT-1, β4GalT-6, or both in CHO glycosylation mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13924–13934 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pabst, M. et al. Comparison of fluorescent labels for oligosaccharides and introduction of a new postlabeling purification method. Anal. Biochem. 384, 263–273 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Taus, T. et al. Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5354–5362 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Simmons, B. M. & Russell, J. H. A single affinity column step method for the purification of ricin toxin from castor beans (Ricinus communis). Anal. Biochem. 146, 206–210 (1985)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of our laboratories for discussions, Life Science Editors for editorial support, M. Novatchkova for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis, and J. Zuber for CRISPR/Cas9 vectors. K.M. is funded by the Austrian Science Fund (SFB F3402-B03, TRP308-N15, and I1469-B16). J.M.P. is supported by grants from IMBA, the Austrian Academy of Sciences, an ERC Advanced Grant, and an Era of Hope Innovator award. J.S. is a Wittgenstein Prize Fellow.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Johannes Stadlmann and Jasmin Taubenschmid: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IMBA, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, Vienna, A-1030, Austria

    Johannes Stadlmann, Jasmin Taubenschmid, Daniel Wenzel, Anna Gattinger, Gerhard Dürnberger, Ulrich Elling, Karl Mechtler & Josef M. Penninger

  2. Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Dr. Bohr Gasse 7, Vienna, A-1030, Austria

    Anna Gattinger, Gerhard Dürnberger, Frederico Dusberger & Karl Mechtler

  3. GMI, Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, Vienna, A-1030, Austria

    Gerhard Dürnberger

  4. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, A-1190, Austria

    Lukas Mach

Authors
  1. Johannes Stadlmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jasmin Taubenschmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Wenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Gattinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gerhard Dürnberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frederico Dusberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ulrich Elling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lukas Mach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Karl Mechtler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Josef M. Penninger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.S., J.T., and J.M.P. conceived the study. J.S. designed and performed glycoproteomics experiments and conceived the bio-informatic analysis algorithm. J.T. performed in vitro cell culture experiments. D.W. provided hESCs and U.E. mESCs. A.G., G.D. and F.D. programmed algorithms for glycoproteomics. L.M. provided Igf2r mutant lines. K.M. supervised glycoproteomics experiments. J.S., J.T., and J.M.P. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef M. Penninger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks L. Wells and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Identification of N-glycopeptides and N-glycans.

a, Glycopeptide MS/MS raw data were pre-processed and identified using different MS/MS search engines: Mascot (orange), SEQUEST-HT (blue), and X!Tandem (green). The glycopeptide sequences identified by these algorithms were highly similar, both with respect to identities and to numbers. Data are representative of two independent mESC glycoproteomics experiments with similar results. b, The N-glycosylation sites identified in our study (orange) were mapped to published annotated N-glycosylation sites in Uniprot (grey) and those identified in ref. 7 (green). c, Negative-mode MALDI–TOF analysis of 2-aminobenzoic-acid-labelled N-glycans from mESCs directly correlated with the N-glycan profiles identified using our glycoproteomics approach.

Extended Data Figure 2 Quantitative proteomics.

Comparative proteomics of (a) Slc35c1 KO and (b) Fut9 KO versus their respective genetically repaired WT sister mESCs did not show significant changes in the overall protein expression as determined by quantitative proteomics. Differential peptide abundances are represented as scatter plots of the corresponding TMT-reporter ion intensities. Data are representative of two independent mESC glycoproteomics experiments with similar results. c, Coverage of the predicted (RNA-seq) mESC proteome by the quantitative proteomics data set.

Extended Data Figure 3 Stemness of KO mESC lines.

The parental control mESC line AN3.12, as well as mutant Hs2st1, Igf2r, Itgb1, Lamp1, Ly75, Slc39a14 mESC lines, were stained for the prototypic mESC markers Oct4, SSEA-1, and alkaline phosphatase. DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) is shown to visualize nuclei. Of note, no obvious growth defects or morphological phenotypes were observed. All mESCs were diploid as determined by Hoechst staining (not shown). Scale bars are indicated. The experiments were repeated three times. Each image is representative of five images.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-8. (PDF 1396 kb)

Reporting Summary (PDF 79 kb)

Supplementary Data

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-12. (XLSX 12731 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stadlmann, J., Taubenschmid, J., Wenzel, D. et al. Comparative glycoproteomics of stem cells identifies new players in ricin toxicity. Nature 549, 538–542 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24015

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing