Letter | Published:

Light-field-driven currents in graphene

Nature volume 550, pages 224228 (12 October 2017) | Download Citation


The ability to steer electrons using the strong electromagnetic field of light has opened up the possibility of controlling electron dynamics on the sub-femtosecond (less than 10−15 seconds) timescale. In dielectrics and semiconductors, various light-field-driven effects have been explored, including high-harmonic generation1,2,3,4, sub-optical-cycle interband population transfer5 and the non-perturbative change of the transient polarizability6,7. In contrast, much less is known about light-field-driven electron dynamics in narrow-bandgap systems or in conductors, in which screening due to free carriers or light absorption hinders the application of strong optical fields6,8. Graphene is a promising platform with which to achieve light-field-driven control of electrons in a conducting material, because of its broadband and ultrafast optical response, weak screening and high damage threshold9,10. Here we show that a current induced in monolayer graphene by two-cycle laser pulses is sensitive to the electric-field waveform, that is, to the exact shape of the optical carrier field of the pulse, which is controlled by the carrier-envelope phase, with a precision on the attosecond (10−18 seconds) timescale. Such a current, dependent on the carrier-envelope phase, shows a striking reversal of the direction of the current as a function of the driving field amplitude at about two volts per nanometre. This reversal indicates a transition of light–matter interaction from the weak-field (photon-driven) regime to the strong-field (light-field-driven) regime, where the intraband dynamics influence interband transitions. We show that in this strong-field regime the electron dynamics are governed by sub-optical-cycle Landau–Zener–Stückelberg interference11, composed of coherent repeated Landau–Zener transitions on the femtosecond timescale. Furthermore, the influence of this sub-optical-cycle interference can be controlled with the laser polarization state. These coherent electron dynamics in graphene take place on a hitherto unexplored timescale, faster than electron–electron scattering (tens of femtoseconds) and electron–phonon scattering (hundreds of femtoseconds)12,13,14. We expect these results to have direct ramifications for band-structure tomography2 and light-field-driven petahertz electronics8.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal. Nat. Phys. 7, 138–141 (2011)

  2. 2.

    et al. Linking high harmonics from gases and solids. Nature 522, 462–464 (2015)

  3. 3.

    et al. Lightwave-driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale. Nature 533, 225–229 (2016)

  4. 4.

    , & High harmonics generated in semiconductor nanostructures by the coupled dynamics of optical inter- and intraband excitations. Phys. Rev. B 77, 075330 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. Attosecond band-gap dynamics in silicon. Science 346, 1348–1352 (2014)

  6. 6.

    et al. Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics. Nature 493, 70–74 (2012)

  7. 7.

    et al. Attosecond dynamical Franz–Keldysh effect in polycrystalline diamond. Science 353, 916–919 (2016)

  8. 8.

    & Attosecond metrology: from electron capture to future signal processing. Nat. Photon. 8, 205–213 (2014)

  9. 9.

    , , , & The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009)

  10. 10.

    Graphene plasmonics: challenges and opportunities. ACS Photonics 1, 135–152 (2014)

  11. 11.

    , & Landau–Zener–Stückelberg interferometry. Phys. Rep. 492, 1–30 (2010)

  12. 12.

    et al. Ultrafast nonequilibrium carrier dynamics in a single graphene layer. Phys. Rev. B 83, 153410 (2011)

  13. 13.

    et al. Direct view of hot carrier dynamics in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 027403 (2013)

  14. 14.

    et al. Snapshots of non-equilibrium Dirac carrier distributions in graphene. Nat. Mater. 12, 1119–1124 (2013)

  15. 15.

    et al. Observation of coherently controlled photocurrent in unbiased, bulk GaAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 306–309 (1997)

  16. 16.

    et al. Coherent control of ballistic photocurrents in multilayer epitaxial graphene using quantum interference. Nano Lett. 10, 1293–1296 (2010)

  17. 17.

    Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system. Phys. Rev. A 22, 1786–1813 (1980)

  18. 18.

    , , , & High-harmonic generation from Bloch electrons in solids. Phys. Rev. A 91, 043839 (2015)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Signatures of carrier-wave Rabi flopping in GaAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 057401 (2001)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Strong-field resonant dynamics in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 197401 (2016)

  21. 21.

    et al. Controlling ultrafast currents by the nonlinear photogalvanic effect. New J. Phys. 17, 123026 (2015)

  22. 22.

    Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307–1314 (1965)

  23. 23.

    Electronic response of graphene to an ultrashort intense terahertz radiation pulse. New J. Phys. 15, 055021 (2013)

  24. 24.

    , & Graphene in ultrafast and superstrong laser fields. Phys. Rev. B 91, 045439 (2015)

  25. 25.

    Mach–Zehnder interferometry in a strongly driven superconducting qubit. Science 310, 1653–1657 (2005)

  26. 26.

    , , & Atomic Bloch–Zener oscillations and Stückelberg interferometry in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 215301 (2010)

  27. 27.

    et al. Nonadiabatic quantum control of a semiconductor charge qubit. Phys. Rev. B 84, 161302 (2011)

  28. 28.

    et al. Three-dimensional momentum imaging of electron wave packet interference in few-cycle laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 053001 (2009)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Intracycle and intercycle interferences in above-threshold ionization: the time grating. Phys. Rev. A 81, 021403 (2010)

  30. 30.

    , & Attosecond strong-field interferometry in graphene: chirality, singularity, and Berry phase. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155434 (2016)

Download references


This work has been supported in part by the European Research Council (Consolidator Grant NearFieldAtto) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant SFB 953). We thank M. I. Stockman for discussions.

Author information


  1. Laser Physics, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Staudtstrasse 1, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

    • Takuya Higuchi
    • , Christian Heide
    •  & Peter Hommelhoff
  2. Applied Physics, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Staudtstrasse 7, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

    • Konrad Ullmann
    •  & Heiko B. Weber


  1. Search for Takuya Higuchi in:

  2. Search for Christian Heide in:

  3. Search for Konrad Ullmann in:

  4. Search for Heiko B. Weber in:

  5. Search for Peter Hommelhoff in:


T.H. and P.H. conceived the study. T.H. and C.H. conveyed the current measurement experiments, analysed the data and provided the plots. K.U. and H.B.W. designed the sample, which was fabricated by K.U. und C.H. T.H. conveyed the numerical simulation. T.H. and P.H. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors discussed the obtained results.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Takuya Higuchi or Peter Hommelhoff.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks K. Ishikawa, R. Kienberger and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains methods 1-11 and references.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.