Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Vigorous atmospheric motion in the red supergiant star Antares

Nature volume 548, pages 310–312 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Red supergiant stars represent a late stage of the evolution of stars more massive than about nine solar masses, in which they develop complex, multi-component atmospheres. Bright spots have been detected in the atmosphere of red supergiants using interferometric imaging1,2,3,4,5. Above the photosphere of a red supergiant, the molecular outer atmosphere extends up to about two stellar radii6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Furthermore, the hot chromosphere (5,000 to 8,000 kelvin) and cool gas (less than 3,500 kelvin) of a red supergiant coexist at about three stellar radii15,16,17,18. The dynamics of such complex atmospheres has been probed by ultraviolet and optical spectroscopy19,20,21,22. The most direct approach, however, is to measure the velocity of gas at each position over the image of stars as in observations of the Sun. Here we report the mapping of the velocity field over the surface and atmosphere of the nearby red supergiant Antares. The two-dimensional velocity field map obtained from our near-infrared spectro-interferometric imaging reveals vigorous upwelling and downdrafting motions of several huge gas clumps at velocities ranging from about −20 to +20 kilometres per second in the atmosphere, which extends out to about 1.7 stellar radii. Convection alone cannot explain the observed turbulent motions and atmospheric extension, suggesting that an unidentified process is operating in the extended atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Reconstructed velocity-resolved images of Antares.
Figure 2: Spatially resolved spectra over the stellar disk and atmosphere of Antares.
Figure 3: Velocity field map over the stellar disk and atmosphere of Antares.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buscher, D. F., Haniff, C. A., Baldwin, J. E. & Warner, P. J. Detection of a bright feature on the surface of Betelgeuse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 245, 7–11 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuthill, P. G., Haniff, C. A. & Baldwin, J. E. Hotspots on late-type supergiants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 285, 529–539 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Young, J. S. et al. New views of Betelgeuse: multi-wavelength surface imaging and implications for models of hotspot generation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 315, 635–645 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haubois, X. et al. Imaging the spotty surface of Betelgeuse in the H band. Astron. Astrophys. 508, 923–932 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baron, F. et al. CHARA/MIRC observations of two M supergiants in Perseus OB1: temperature, Baysian modeling, and compressed sensing imaging. Astrophys. J. 785, 46 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsuji, T. Water on the early M supergiant stars α Orionis and μ Cephei. Astrophys. J. 538, 801–807 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsuji, T. Water in emission in the Infrared Space Observatory spectrum of the early M supergiant star μ Cephei. Astrophys. J. 540, L99–L102 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perrin, G. et al. Interferometric observations of the supergiant stars α Orionis and α Herculis with FLUOR at IOTA. Astron. Astrophys. 418, 675–685 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohnaka, K. Warm water vapor envelope in the supergiants α Ori and α Her and its effects on the apparent size from the near-infrared to the mid-infrared. Astron. Astrophys. 421, 1149–1158 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harper, G. M. et al. TEXES observations of M supergiants: dynamics and thermodynamics of wind acceleration. Astrophys. J. 701, 1464–1483 (2009)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohnaka, K. et al. Spatially resolving the inhomogeneous structure of the dynamical atmosphere of Betelgeuse with VLTI/AMBER. Astron. Astrophys. 503, 183–195 (2009)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohnaka, K. et al. Imaging the dynamical atmosphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse in the CO first overtone lines with VLTI/AMBER. Astron. Astrophys. 529, A163 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohnaka, K. et al. High spectral resolution imaging of the dynamical atmosphere of the red supergiant Antares in the CO first overtone lines with VLTI/AMBER. Astron. Astrophys. 555, A24 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Montargès, M. et al. Properties of the CO and H2O MOLsphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse from VLTI/AMBER observations. Astron. Astrophys. 572, A17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilliland, R. L. & Dupree, A. K. First image of the surface of a star with the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 463, L29–L32 (1996)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim, J., Carilli, C. L., White, S. M., Beasley, A. J. & Marson, R. G. Large convection cells as the source of Betelgeuse’s extended atmosphere. Nature 392, 575–577 (1998)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harper, G. M. & Brown, A. Spatially resolved, semiempirical model for the extended atmosphere of α Orionis (M2 Iab). Astrophys. J. 551, 1073–1098 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harper, G. M. & Brown, A. Electron density and turbulence gradients within the extended atmosphere of the M supergiant Betelgeuse (α Orionis). Astrophys. J. 646, 1179–1202 (2006)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lobel, A. & Dupree, A. K. Modeling the variable chromosphere of α Orionis. Astrophys. J. 545, 454–474 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lobel, A. & Dupree, A. K. Spatially resolved STIS spectroscopy of α Orionis: evidence for nonradial chromospheric oscillation from detailed modeling. Astrophys. J. 558, 815–829 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gray, D. F. Mass motions in the photosphere of Betelgeuse. Astron. J. 135, 1450–1458 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Josselin, E. & Plez, B. Atmospheric dynamics and the mass loss process in red supergiant stars. Astron. Astrophys. 469, 671–680 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Leeuwen, F. Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction. Astron. Astrophys. 474, 653–664 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrov, R. et al. AMBER, the near-infrared spectro-interferometric three-telescope VLTI instrument. Astron. Astrophys. 464, 1–12 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Burns, D. et al. The surface structure and limb-darkening profile of Betelgeuse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 290, L11–L16 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Montargès, M. et al. The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse IV. VLTI/PIONIER interferometric monitoring of the photosphere. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A130 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiavassa, A., Freytag, B., Masseron, T. & Plez, B. Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars. IV. Gray versus non-gray opacities. Astron. Astrophys. 535, A22 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arroyo-Torres, B. et al. What causes the large extensions of red supergiant atmospheres? Comparison of interferometric observations with 1D hydrostatic, 3D convection, and 1D pulsating model atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A50 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gray, D. F. & Pugh, T. The third signature of granulation in bright-giant and supergiant stars. Astron. J. 143, 92 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kervella, P. et al. The diameters of α Centauri A and B. A comparison of the asteroseismic and VINCI/VLTI views. Astron. Astrophys. 404, 1087–1097 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tatulli, E. et al. Interferometric data reduction with AMBER/VLTI. Principle, estimators, and illustration. Astron. Astrophys. 464, 29–42 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chelli, A. et al. Optimised data reduction for the AMBER/VLTI instrument. Astron. Astrophys. 502, 705–709 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hestroffer, D. Centre to limb darkening of stars. New model and application to stellar interferometry. Astron. Astrophys. 327, 199–206 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Efron, B . & Tibshirani, R. J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman & Hall, 1993)

  35. Thiébaut, E. MIRA: an effective imaging algorithm for optical interferometry. Proc. SPIE 7013, 70131I (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Millour, F. et al. Imaging the spinning gas and dust in the disc around the supergiant A[e] star HD 62623. Astron. Astrophys. 526, A107 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the ESO VLTI team for supporting our VLTI/AMBER observations. This work is based on AMBER observations made with the VLTI of the ESO (program ID: 093.D-0468A/B). K.O. acknowledges the grant from the Universidad Católica del Norte.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Católica del Norte, Avenida Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile

    K. Ohnaka

  2. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, Bonn, 53121, Germany

    G. Weigelt & K.-H. Hofmann

Authors
  1. K. Ohnaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Weigelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K.-H. Hofmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.O. wrote the telescope proposal and the first draft of the paper, carried out the observations, data reduction, and image reconstruction, and worked on data interpretation. G.W. and K.-H.H. were co-authors on the telescope proposal and worked on data reduction and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ohnaka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 The u–v coverage of our VLTI/AMBER observations with four different Auxiliary Telescope configurations.

Extended Data Figure 2 Limb-darkened disk fit to the AMBER data of Antares.

a, Power-law-type limb-darkened (LD) disk diameter as a function of wavelength (red dots). The scaled, observed spectrum is shown in black. b, Limb-darkening parameter as a function of wavelength. In both panels, the error bars represent 1σ.

Extended Data Figure 3 Limb-darkened disk fit to the observed visibilities as a function of spatial frequency.

The fit at a wavelength channel is shown in the continuum in a and b, in the CO band head in c and d, and at the centre of one of the CO lines in e and f. The observed visibilities are plotted with the dots with the 1σ errors computed over Nf × Nexp frames as listed in Extended Data Table 1. The limb-darkened disk fit is shown with the curves.

Extended Data Figure 4 Comparison between the measured interferometric observables and those from the images reconstructed near the CO band head.

The filled circles in the top row (a–d) show the wavelength channels in the observed spectrum, which correspond to the wavelengths of the images shown in Fig. 1a–d. The second, third, fourth and fifth rows show comparisons of the visibility at spatial frequencies lower than 55 arcsec−1, visibility at spatial frequencies higher than 55 arcsec−1, Fourier phase, and closure phase, respectively. In these panels, the observed data are plotted by the red dots with the error bars (1σ as described in the legend of Extended Data Fig. 3). The blue triangles represent the values from the image reconstruction. The reduced values including the visibilities, Fourier phases and closure phases, are given in the bottom row.

Extended Data Figure 5 Comparison between the measured interferometric observables and those from the images reconstructed across one of the CO lines.

The panels are shown in the same manner as Extended Data Fig. 4. The filled circles in the top row (a–d) show the wavelength channels in the observed spectrum, which correspond to the wavelengths of the images shown in Fig. 1e–h.

Extended Data Table 1 Summary of VLTI/AMBER observations of Antares
Full size table

Related audio

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G. & Hofmann, KH. Vigorous atmospheric motion in the red supergiant star Antares. Nature 548, 310–312 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23445

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23445

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing