Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Can we predict protein from mRNA levels?

Nature volume 547, pages E19–E20 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

A Brief Communications Arising to this article was published on 27 July 2017

Arising from M. Wilhelm et al. Nature 509, 582–587 (2014); doi:10.1038/nature13319

Prediction of protein levels from mRNA levels has long been fraught with unreliability and a lack of precision. However, Wilhelm et al.1 claimed that using estimated gene-specific translation rates together with mRNA levels accurately predicts protein levels in any given tissue, reporting correlations of approximately 0.9 between predictions and measurements across genes. Here we show that these correlations greatly overestimate the accuracy of per-gene predictions. Using simple and standard statistical evaluation methods, we demonstrate that the gene-specific translation rates estimated by Wilhelm et al. are, in general, not useful to predict protein levels from mRNA levels, with a median correlation of 0.21. There is a Reply to this Comment by Wilhelm, M. et al. Nature 547, 10.1038/nature22294 (2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Across-genes correlations versus within-genes correlations between observed and predicted protein levels.

References

  1. Wilhelm, M. et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 509, 582–587 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, J. J. & Biggin, M. D. Gene expression. Statistics requantitates the central dogma. Science 347, 1066–1067 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Y., Beyer, A. & Aebersold, R. On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance. Cell 165, 535–550 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, J. J., Bickel, P. J. & Biggin, M. D. System wide analyses have underestimated protein abundances and the importance of transcription in mammals. PeerJ 2, e270 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friendly, M., Monette, G. & Fox, J. Elliptical insights: understanding statistical methods through elliptical geometry. Stat. Sci. 28, 1–39 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Berman, S. DalleMule, L., Greene, M. & Lucker, J. Simpson’s paradox: a cautionary tale in advanced analytics. Significancehttps://www.statslife.org.uk/the-statistics-dictionary/2012-simpson-s-paradox-a-cautionary-tale-in-advanced-analytics (2012)

  7. Hocking, R. R. Methods and Applications of Linear Models: Regression and the Analysis of Variance (Wiley, 2013)

  8. Schwanhäusser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Edfors, F. et al. Gene-specific correlation of RNA and protein levels in human cells and tissues. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 883 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British, Columbia, Canada

    Nikolaus Fortelny & Christopher M. Overall

  2. Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British, Columbia, Canada

    Nikolaus Fortelny & Paul Pavlidis

  3. Centre for Blood Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British, Columbia, Canada

    Nikolaus Fortelny & Christopher M. Overall

  4. Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British, Columbia, Canada

    Christopher M. Overall

  5. Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British, Columbia, Canada

    Paul Pavlidis

  6. Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British, Columbia, Canada

    Gabriela V. Cohen Freue

Authors
  1. Nikolaus Fortelny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher M. Overall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Pavlidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gabriela V. Cohen Freue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.F. and G.V.C.F. designed the research project. C.M.O. and P.P. contributed to the design of the project and provided funding. N.F. designed the manuscript and analysed the data. P.P. and G.V.C.F. wrote the paper. G.V.C.F. supervised the research project. All authors contributed to extensive discussions and revisions of all drafts of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela V. Cohen Freue.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Relation between gene-specific protein predictions and observed protein levels.

a, mRNA and protein in simulated data for three genes (colours) in five tissues. The data points for one tissue are highlighted and the error from the ratio-based prediction is indicated. b, Predicted and observed protein in simulated data for three genes (colours) in one tissue from a. The error in the prediction is indicated by the distance from the point to the 45° line. c, mRNA (open symbols) and predicted protein (solid symbols) on the x-axis and observed protein on the y-axis. The plot shows real data for four example genes. Data points from one tissue and their modification by the prediction of Wilhelm et al.1 are indicated by an error.

Extended Data Figure 2 mRNA contribution to protein prediction.

mRNA and protein in simulated data for three genes (A, B, and C, colours) in five tissues. a, Three gene-specific models (grey lines) to predict protein levels from mRNA levels as in Wilhelm et al. b, Three gene-specific models (grey lines) to predict protein levels without using mRNA.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fortelny, N., Overall, C., Pavlidis, P. et al. Can we predict protein from mRNA levels?. Nature 547, E19–E20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22293

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22293

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing