The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is the principal target of the psychoactive constituent of marijuana, the partial agonist Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)1. Here we report two agonist-bound crystal structures of human CB1 in complex with a tetrahydrocannabinol (AM11542) and a hexahydrocannabinol (AM841) at 2.80 Å and 2.95 Å resolution, respectively. The two CB1–agonist complexes reveal important conformational changes in the overall structure, relative to the antagonist-bound state2, including a 53% reduction in the volume of the ligand-binding pocket and an increase in the surface area of the G-protein-binding region. In addition, a ‘twin toggle switch’ of Phe2003.36 and Trp3566.48 (superscripts denote Ballesteros–Weinstein numbering3) is experimentally observed and appears to be essential for receptor activation. The structures reveal important insights into the activation mechanism of CB1 and provide a molecular basis for predicting the binding modes of Δ9-THC, and endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids. The plasticity of the binding pocket of CB1 seems to be a common feature among certain class A G-protein-coupled receptors. These findings should inspire the design of chemically diverse ligands with distinct pharmacological properties.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Mechoulam, R., Hanuš, L. O., Pertwee, R. & Howlett, A. C. Early phytocannabinoid chemistry to endocannabinoids and beyond. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 757–764 (2014)
Hua, T. et al. Crystal structure of the human cannabinoid receptor CB1. Cell 167, 750–762 e714 (2016)
Ballesteros, J. A. & Weinstein, H. in Methods in Neurosciences Vol. 25 (ed. Sealfon Stuart, C. ) 366–428 (Academic, 1995)
Lemberger, L. Potential therapeutic usefulness of marijuana. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 20, 151–172 (1980)
Li, H.-L. An archaeological and historical account of cannabis in China. Econ. Bot. 28, 437–448 (1973)
Makriyannis, A. 2012 Division of Medicinal Chemistry Award Address. Trekking the cannabinoid road: a personal perspective. J. Med. Chem. 57, 3891–3911 (2014)
Shao, Z. et al. High-resolution crystal structure of the human CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Nature 540, 602–606 (2016)
Nikas, S. P. et al. The role of halogen substitution in classical cannabinoids: a CB1 pharmacophore model. AAPS J. 6, e30 (2004)
Nikas, S. P. et al. Novel 1′,1′-chain substituted hexahydrocannabinols: 9β-hydroxy-3-(1-hexyl-cyclobut-1-yl)-hexahydrocannabinol (AM2389) a highly potent cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) agonist. J. Med. Chem. 53, 6996–7010 (2010)
Xie, X. Q., Melvin, L. S. & Makriyannis, A. The conformational properties of the highly selective cannabinoid receptor ligand CP-55,940. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10640–10647 (1996)
Makriyannis, A. & Rapaka, R. S. The medicinal chemistry of cannabinoids: an overview. NIDA Res. Monogr. 79, 204–210 (1987)
Ahn, K. H., Bertalovitz, A. C., Mierke, D. F. & Kendall, D. A. Dual role of the second extracellular loop of the cannabinoid receptor 1: ligand binding and receptor localization. Mol. Pharmacol. 76, 833–842 (2009)
Feigenbaum, J. J. et al. Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid acts as a functional N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor blocker. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9584–9587 (1989)
Mechoulam, R. et al. Enantiomeric cannabinoids: stereospecificity of psychotropic activity. Experientia 44, 762–764 (1988)
Hanson, M. A. et al. Crystal structure of a lipid G protein-coupled receptor. Science 335, 851–855 (2012)
Rasmussen, S. G. et al. Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor–Gs protein complex. Nature 477, 549–555 (2011)
Singh, R. et al. Activation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor may involve a W6.48/F3.36 rotamer toggle switch. J. Pept. Res. 60, 357–370 (2002)
Tiburu, E. K. et al. Structural biology of human cannabinoid receptor-2 helix 6 in membrane-mimetic environments. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 384, 243–248 (2009)
Zhang, K. et al. Structure of the human P2Y12 receptor in complex with an antithrombotic drug. Nature 509, 115–118 (2014)
Zhang, J. et al. Agonist-bound structure of the human P2Y12 receptor. Nature 509, 119–122 (2014)
Nikas, S. P. et al. A concise methodology for the synthesis of (−)-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and (−)-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin metabolites and their regiospecifically deuterated analogs. Tetrahedron 63, 8112–8113 (2007)
Kulkarni, S. et al. Novel C-ring-hydroxy-substituted controlled deactivation cannabinergic analogues. J. Med. Chem. 59, 6903–6919 (2016)
D’Antona, A. M., Ahn, K. H. & Kendall, D. A. Mutations of CB1 T210 produce active and inactive receptor forms: correlations with ligand affinity, receptor stability, and cellular localization. Biochemistry 45, 5606–5617 (2006)
Caffrey, M. & Cherezov, V. Crystallizing membrane proteins using lipidic mesophases. Nat. Protocols 4, 706–731 (2009)
Cherezov, V. et al. Rastering strategy for screening and centring of microcrystal samples of human membrane proteins with a sub-10 microm size X-ray synchrotron beam. J. R. Soc. Interface 6 (suppl. 5), S587–S597 (2009)
Chun, E. et al. Fusion partner toolchest for the stabilization and crystallization of G protein-coupled receptors. Structure 20, 967–976 (2012)
Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010)
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007)
Adams, P. D . et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010)
Smart, O. S. et al. Exploiting structure similarity in refinement: automated NCS and target-structure restraints in BUSTER. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 368–380 (2012)
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)
Friesner, R. A . et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1739–1749 (2004)
Friesner, R. A. et al. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J. Med. Chem. 49, 6177–6196 (2006)
Halgren, T. A . et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1750–1759 (2004)
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015)
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)
Sousa da Silva, A. W. & Vranken, W. F. ACPYPE – AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE. BMC Res. Notes 5, 367 (2012)
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000)
Skjærven, L., Yao, X. Q., Scarabelli, G. & Grant, B. J. Integrating protein structural dynamics and evolutionary analysis with Bio3D. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 399 (2014)
This work was supported by the NSF of China grant 31330019 (Z.-J.L.), the MOST of China grants 2014CB910400 (Z.-J.L.) and 2015CB910104 (Z.-J.L.), NSF of Shanghai 16ZR1448500 grant (S.Z.), Key R&D Program of China grant 2016YCF0905902 (S.Z.), NIH grants R01DA041435 (R.C.S., A.M.), P01DA009158 (A.M., L.M.B.), R37DA023142 (A.M.), NSF grants, Shanghai Municipal Government, ShanghaiTech University and GPCR Consortium. The diffraction data were collected at GM/CA@APS of Argonne National Laboratory, X06SA@SLS of the Paul Scherrer Insitute, and BL41XU@Spring-8 with JASRI proposals 2015B1031 and 2016A2731. We thank M. Wang, C.-Y. Huang, V. Olieric, M. Audet and M.-Y. Lee for their help with data collection, A. Walker for critical review of the manuscript, and F. Sun for high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis.
A.M. is a founder of MAKScientific, LLC. R.C.S. is a board member and shareholder with Birdrock Bio. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Reviewer Information Nature thanks G. Kunos and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Reagents and conditions: (a) CH3I, NaH, DMF, 0 °C to room temperature, 2 h, 95%; (b) DIBAL-H, CH2Cl2, −78 °C, 0.5 h, 87%; (c) Br− P+Ph3(CH2)5OPh, (Me3Si)2NK, THF, 0–10 °C, 30 min, then addition to 3, 0 °C to room temperature, 2 h, 96%; (d) H2, 10% Pd/C, AcOEt, room temperature, 2.5 h, 89%; (e) BBr3, CH2Cl2, −78 °C to room temperature, 6 h, 85%; (f) diacetates, p-TSA, CHCl3, 0 °C to room temperature, 4 days, 64%; (g) TMSOTf, CH2Cl2/MeNO2, 0 °C to room temperature, 3 h, 71%; (h) TBDMSCl, imidazole, DMAP, DMF, room temperature, 12 h, 85%; (i) Cl− Ph3P+CH2OMe, (Me3Si)2NK, THF, 0 °C to room temperature, 1 h, then addition to 9, 0 °C to room temperature, 1.5 h, 73%; (j) Cl3CCOOH, CH2Cl2, room temperature, 50 min, 95%; (k) K2CO3, EtOH, room temperature, 3 h, 84%; (l) NaBH4, EtOH, 0 °C, 30 min, 98%; (m) TBAF, THF, −40 °C, 30 min, 96%; (n) TMG-N3, CHCl3/MeNO2, room temperature, 18 h, 84%; (o) PPh3, CS2, THF, room temperature, 10 h, 76%; (p) (+)-cis/trans-p-mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol, p-TSA, benzene, reflux 4 h, 65%.
Extended Data Figure 2 Analytical size exclusion chromatography profile and crystals of CB1–AM11542/AM841 complex.
a, Analytical size exclusion chromatography and crystal image of the CB1–AM11542 complex. Scale bar, 70 μm. b, Analytical size exclusion chromatography and crystal image of the CB1–AM841 complex. Scale bar, 70 μm. c, The overall structures of CB1–AM11542 and CB1–AM841 complexes and crystal packing of CB1–AM11542; receptor is in orange (AM11542)/green (AM841) colour and the flavodoxin fusion protein is in purple-blue colour. The agonists AM11542 (yellow) and AM841 (pink) are shown in sticks representation. The four single mutations T2103.46A, E2735.37K, T2835.47V and R3406.32E are shown as green spheres in the CB1–AM11542 structure.
Extended Data Figure 3 Representative electron density of the CB1 agonists-bound structures and cholesterol binding sites.
a, The |Fo| − |Fc| omit maps of AM11542 and AM841 contoured at 3.0σ at 2.80 Å and 2.95 Å, respectively. b, The cholesterol binding site in the CB1–AM11542 structure (orange) with CB1–AM6538 structure (blue) superposed.
Extended Data Figure 4 Mutations of the CB1 receptor and the effects on agonist-induced activity as assessed by the forskolin-stimulated accumulation of cAMP.
a, Primers used to generate mutations in 3×HA–CB1 and validation of cell-surface expression of wild-type and mutant CB1 in CHO-K1 cell lines quantitative flow cytometry. b, Dose response studies of agonist (AM11542, AM841 and CP55,940) activity for each mutant compared to wild type (in blue filled circles) from Fig. 3c. c, Assessment of the effect of the individual point mutations that were made to stabilize the receptor, in absence of the flavodoxin insert, on receptor activity. All experiments were repeated at least three times, and error bars denote s.e.m. of duplicate measurements (parameters are in Extended Data Table 2).
a–f, The r.m.s.d. values of ligand heavy atoms show that the docked poses are stable during the 1 μs molecular dynamics simulations: Δ9-THC (a), AEA (b), JWH-018 (c), HU-210 (d), 2-AG (e), WIN 55,212-2 (f). g, h, j, k, The poses of HU-210 (g), JWH-018 (h), 2-AG (j) and WIN 55,212-2 (k) are shown. i, The superimposition of HU-210 (yellow sticks) and HU-211 (blue sticks) in the binding pocket. The binding pose of HU-210 explains why HU-211, the enantiomer of HU-210, failed to stimulate CB1 because superimposed HU-211 on HU-210 shows severe clashes with H1782.65 in CB1.
Extended Data Figure 6 Structural conformation changes of solved agonist- and antagonist-bound class A GPCRs.
a, The pattern of r.m.s.d. values of transmembrane helices between agonist- and antagonist-bound class A GPCR structures. The structures used for analysis are the same as described in Extended Data Table 3. b, Measurement of the degree of helix VI bending observed in class A GPCRs structures. All structures were superimposed onto inactive-state β2-adrenergic receptor by UCSF Chimera. The direction of helices VI were defined by vectors ηi which starts from the centre of Cα of residues 6.45–6.48 to the centre of Cα of residues 6.29-30–6.32-33. The two vectors η0 and η1 of helices VI in the inactive-state and active-state β2-adrenergic receptor were selected as reference to form a plane α. The vector ηi of helix VI of other structure was projected to the plane α as a new vector ηi′. The bending angle of each helix VI was then defined by the angle between ηi′ and η0. The structures are: ETB (PDB code 5GLH), β1-adrenergic receptor (PDB code 2Y02), P2Y12 (PDB code 4PXZ), β2-adrenergic receptor (PDB code 3PDS), FFA1 (PDB code 4PHU), 5HT2B (PDB code 4IB4), 5HT1B (PDB code 4IAR), Rho (PDB code 2HPY), A2A (PDB code 3QAK), NTS1 (PDB code 4BUO), CB1 (bound to AM11542; PDB code 5XRA), μ-opioid receptor + nanobody (NB) (PDB code 5C1M), Rho + NB (PDB code 2X72), Rho + arrestin (PDB code 4ZWJ), M2R + NB (PDB code 4MQS), β2-adrenergic receptor + NB (PDB code 4LDL), A2A + mini-Gs (PDB code 5G53), β2-adrenergic receptor + Gs (PDB code 3SN6).
About this article
Cite this article
Hua, T., Vemuri, K., Nikas, S. et al. Crystal structures of agonist-bound human cannabinoid receptor CB1. Nature 547, 468–471 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23272
Cell Communication and Signaling (2022)
Nature Biotechnology (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)