Letter | Published:

Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X-ray vector nanotomography

Nature volume 547, pages 328331 (20 July 2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

In soft ferromagnetic materials, the smoothly varying magnetization leads to the formation of fundamental patterns such as domains, vortices and domain walls1. These have been studied extensively in thin films of thicknesses up to around 200 nanometres, in which the magnetization is accessible with current transmission imaging methods that make use of electrons or soft X-rays. In thicker samples, however, in which the magnetization structure varies throughout the thickness and is intrinsically three dimensional, determining the complex magnetic structure directly still represents a challenge1,3. We have developed hard-X-ray vector nanotomography with which to determine the three-dimensional magnetic configuration at the nanoscale within micrometre-sized samples. We imaged the structure of the magnetization within a soft magnetic pillar of diameter 5 micrometres with a spatial resolution of 100 nanometres and, within the bulk, observed a complex magnetic configuration that consists of vortices and antivortices that form cross-tie walls and vortex walls along intersecting planes. At the intersections of these structures, magnetic singularities—Bloch points—occur. These were predicted more than fifty years ago4 but have so far not been directly observed. Here we image the three-dimensional magnetic structure in the vicinity of the Bloch points, which until now has been accessible only through micromagnetic simulations, and identify two possible magnetization configurations: a circulating magnetization structure5 and a twisted state that appears to correspond to an ‘anti-Bloch point’. Our imaging method enables the nanoscale study of topological magnetic structures6 in systems with sizes of the order of tens of micrometres. Knowledge of internal nanomagnetic textures is critical for understanding macroscopic magnetic properties and for designing bulk magnets for technological applications7.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures (Springer, 1998)

  2. 2.

    , & Point singularities and magnetization reversal in ideally soft ferromagnetic cylinders. IEEE Trans. Magn. 15, 1228–1235 (1979)

  3. 3.

    , & Three-dimensional visualization of the magnetic microstructure in bulk Fe-6.6 pct Si. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44, 4239–4247 (2013)

  4. 4.

    Mikromagnetisch Stetige und Unstetige Magnetisierungskonfigurationen. Z. Angew. Phys. 19, 530 (1965)

  5. 5.

    & Magnetization structure of a Bloch point singularity. Eur. Phys. J. B 82, 159 (2011)

  6. 6.

    Topological effects in nanomagnetism: from superparamagnetism to chiral quantum solitons. Adv. Phys. 61, 1–116 (2012)

  7. 7.

    et al. Magnetic materials and devices for the 21st century: stronger, lighter, and more energy efficient. Adv. Mater. 23, 821–842 (2011)

  8. 8.

    et al. Retrieving spin textures on curved magnetic thin films with full-field soft X-ray microscopies. Nat. Commun. 6, 7612 (2015)

  9. 9.

    , & Three-dimensional study of the vector potential of magnetic structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 253901 (2010)

  10. 10.

    et al. Visualization of the magnetic structure of sculpted three-dimensional cobalt nanospirals. Nano Lett. 14, 759–764 (2014)

  11. 11.

    et al. Three-dimensional observation of magnetic vortex cores in stacked ferromagnetic discs. Nano Lett. 15, 1309–1314 (2015)

  12. 12.

    Curvature-induced magnetochirality. Spin 3, 134009 (2013)

  13. 13.

    et al. Magnetism in curved geometries. J. Phys. D 49, 363001 (2016)

  14. 14.

    Visualization and interpretation of magnetic configurations using magnetic charge. IEEE Magn. Lett. 7, 1108505 (2016)

  15. 15.

    , & Multiscale and multimodel simulation of Bloch-point dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 89, 134403 (2014)

  16. 16.

    & Exchange explosions: magnetization dynamics during vortex–antivortex annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177202 (2006)

  17. 17.

    et al. Micromagnetic study of Bloch-point-mediated vortex core reversal. Phys. Rev. B 67, 094410 (2003)

  18. 18.

    Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 483002 (2016)

  19. 19.

    et al. Three-dimensional imaging of magnetic fields with polarized neutrons. Nat. Phys. 4, 399–403 (2008)

  20. 20.

    et al. Three-dimensional imaging of magnetic domains. Nat. Commun. 1, 125 (2010)

  21. 21.

    et al. High-resolution non-destructive three-dimensional imaging of integrated circuits. Nature 543, 402–406 (2017)

  22. 22.

    et al. High-resolution hard x-ray magnetic imaging with dichroic ptychography. Phys. Rev. B 94, 064421 (2016)

  23. 23.

    , & Vector field electron tomography of magnetic materials: theoretical development. Ultramicroscopy 108, 503–513 (2008)

  24. 24.

    Paramagnetic behavior of some rare-earth cobalt compounds. Phys. Rev. B 6, 2882–2887 (1972)

  25. 25.

    in Physics of Ferromagnetism Ch. 7.2 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009)

  26. 26.

    & Magnetism: From Fundamentals to Nanoscale Dynamics Ch. 9 (Springer, 2006)

  27. 27.

    et al. Linear polarization scans for resonant X-ray diffraction with a double-phase-plate configuration. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 778–787 (2009)

  28. 28.

    Domains in ‘extremely’ soft magnetic materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215–216, 652–663 (2000)

  29. 29.

    et al. Full-field hard x-ray microscopy below 30 nm: a challenging nanofabrication achievement. Nanotechnology 19, 395302 (2008)

  30. 30.

    et al. Holotomography: quantitative phase tomography with micrometer resolution using hard synchrotron radiation x rays. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2912–2914 (1999)

  31. 31.

    , & Diffraction-limited storage rings—a window to the science of tomorrow. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 837–842 (2014)

  32. 32.

    , & Coherent imaging at the diffraction limit. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 1011–1018 (2014)

  33. 33.

    et al. X-ray ptychographic computed tomography at 16 nm isotropic 3D resolution. Sci. Rep. 4, 3857 (2014)

  34. 34.

    et al. Hard-x-ray lensless imaging of extended objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 034801 (2007)

  35. 35.

    et al. High-resolution scanning x-ray diffraction microscopy. Science 321, 379–382 (2008)

  36. 36.

    et al. Dichroic coherent diffractive imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13393–13398 (2011)

  37. 37.

    et al. Energy-dispersive phase plate for magnetic circular-dichroism experiments in the X-ray range. J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 232–240 (1994)

  38. 38.

    et al. Ptychographic X-ray computed tomography at the nanoscale. Nature 467, 436–439 (2010)

  39. 39.

    et al. PILATUS: A single photon counting pixel detector for X-ray applications. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 607, 247–249 (2009)

  40. 40.

    et al. Characterization and calibration of PILATUS detectors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56, 758–764 (2009)

  41. 41.

    & Phase retrieval with transverse translation diversity: a nonlinear optimization approach. Opt. Express 16, 7264–7278 (2008)

  42. 42.

    & Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging. New J. Phys. 14, 063004 (2012)

  43. 43.

    et al. Performance of phase plates on the XMaS beamline at the ESRF. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 10, 172–176 (2003)

  44. 44.

    , & Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. Opt. Lett. 33, 156–158 (2008)

  45. 45.

    et al. High-throughput ptychography using Eiger: scanning X-ray nano-imaging of extended regions. Opt. Express 22, 14859–14870 (2014)

  46. 46.

    et al. Phase tomography from x-ray coherent diffractive imaging projections. Opt. Express 19, 21345–21357 (2011)

  47. 47.

    et al. Quantitative interior x-ray nanotomography by a hybrid imaging technique. Optica 2, 259–266 (2015)

  48. 48.

    et al. X-ray resonance exchange scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1245–1248 (1988)

  49. 49.

    & Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 250–262 (2005)

  50. 50.

    et al. An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 170, 4–12 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

X-ray measurements were performed at the cSAXS beamline at the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Switzerland. We thank R. M. Galera for providing and performing magnetic characterizations of the GdCo2 nugget, and S. Stutz and E. Müller for the sample fabrication, as well as K. Metlov, A. Arrott and G. Hrkac for discussions. S.G. was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 708674.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Mesoscopic Systems, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland

    • Claire Donnelly
    • , Valerio Scagnoli
    •  & Laura J. Heyderman
  2. Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland

    • Claire Donnelly
    • , Manuel Guizar-Sicairos
    • , Valerio Scagnoli
    • , Mirko Holler
    • , Jörg Raabe
    •  & Laura J. Heyderman
  3. SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

    • Sebastian Gliga

Authors

  1. Search for Claire Donnelly in:

  2. Search for Manuel Guizar-Sicairos in:

  3. Search for Valerio Scagnoli in:

  4. Search for Sebastian Gliga in:

  5. Search for Mirko Holler in:

  6. Search for Jörg Raabe in:

  7. Search for Laura J. Heyderman in:

Contributions

J.R. and L.J.H. conceived the project. C.D., M.G.-S., V.S., M.H. and J.R. designed the experiment. M.H. and J.R. modified the instrument for the 30° tilt measurement. C.D., M.G.-S., V.S., M.H. and J.R. performed the experiment. C.D. and M.G.-S. developed the vector tomography reconstruction algorithm. C.D. performed the data analysis (with support from M.G.-S. and V.S.). C.D., S.G. and J.R. interpreted the magnetic results. C.D., M.G.-S. and S.G. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Claire Donnelly or Manuel Guizar-Sicairos or Sebastian Gliga.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Circulating Bloch point

    The magnetic configuration in the vicinity of an energetically stable circulating Bloch point. The magnetic structure is shown in a radius of 125 nm.

  2. 2.

    Twisted magnetic structure surrounding an anti-Bloch point

    The magnetic configuration in the vicinity of an energetically unstable anti-Bloch point. The magnetisation is twisted to shield the Bloch point structure at length scales greater than the exchange length. The magnetic structure is shown in a radius of 125 nm.

  3. 3.

    Intersection of a magnetic vortex with a vortex domain wall

    The intersection of a magnetic vortex (purple-orange tube) with a vortex domain wall (white surface with a blue-red core). Across the intersection points the direction of the magnetisation in the core of the vortex (indicated by the colour) reverses (from red to blue, and orange to purple). At these points, magnetic singularities occur.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23006

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing