Self-motion triggers complementary visual and vestibular reflexes supporting image-stabilization and balance. Translation through space produces one global pattern of retinal image motion (optic flow), rotation another. We examined the direction preferences of direction-sensitive ganglion cells (DSGCs) in flattened mouse retinas in vitro. Here we show that for each subtype of DSGC, direction preference varies topographically so as to align with specific translatory optic flow fields, creating a neural ensemble tuned for a specific direction of motion through space. Four cardinal translatory directions are represented, aligned with two axes of high adaptive relevance: the body and gravitational axes. One subtype maximizes its output when the mouse advances, others when it retreats, rises or falls. Two classes of DSGCs, namely, ON-DSGCs and ON-OFF-DSGCs, share the same spatial geometry but weight the four channels differently. Each subtype ensemble is also tuned for rotation. The relative activation of DSGC channels uniquely encodes every translation and rotation. Although retinal and vestibular systems both encode translatory and rotatory self-motion, their coordinate systems differ.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 23 May 2022
Nature Communications Open Access 26 March 2021
Nature Communications Open Access 11 February 2020
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Vaney, D. I., He, S., Taylor, W. R. & Levick, W. R. in Motion Vision — Computational, Neural, and Ecological Constraints (eds Zanker, J. M . & Zeil, J. ) 13–56 (Springer, 2001)
Wei, W., Hamby, A. M., Zhou, K. & Feller, M. B. Development of asymmetric inhibition underlying direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 469, 402–406 (2011)
Taylor, W. R., He, S., Levick, W. R. & Vaney, D. I. Dendritic computation of direction selectivity by retinal ganglion cells. Science 289, 2347–2350 (2000)
Oesch, N., Euler, T. & Taylor, W. R. Direction-selective dendritic action potentials in rabbit retina. Neuron 47, 739–750 (2005)
Demb, J. B. Cellular mechanisms for direction selectivity in the retina. Neuron 55, 179–186 (2007)
Ding, H., Smith, R. G., Poleg-Polsky, A., Diamond, J. S. & Briggman, K. L. Species-specific wiring for direction selectivity in the mammalian retina. Nature 535, 105–110 (2016)
Kim, J. S. et al. Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 509, 331–336 (2014)
Briggman, K. L., Helmstaedter, M. & Denk, W. Wiring specificity in the direction-selectivity circuit of the retina. Nature 471, 183–188 (2011)
Park, S. J., Kim, I. J., Looger, L. L., Demb, J. B. & Borghuis, B. G. Excitatory synaptic inputs to mouse on-off direction-selective retinal ganglion cells lack direction tuning. J. Neurosci. 34, 3976–3981 (2014)
Angelaki, D. E. & Hess, B. J. Self-motion-induced eye movements: effects on visual acuity and navigation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 966–976 (2005)
Angelaki, D. E. & Cullen, K. E. Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 125–150 (2008)
Yang, G. & Masland, R. H. Receptive fields and dendritic structure of directionally selective retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 14, 5267–5280 (1994)
Cruz-Martín, A. et al. A dedicated circuit links direction-selective retinal ganglion cells to the primary visual cortex. Nature 507, 358–361 (2014)
Huberman, A. D. et al. Genetic identification of an on-off direction-selective retinal ganglion cell subtype reveals a layer-specific subcortical map of posterior motion. Neuron 62, 327–334 (2009)
Rivlin-Etzion, M. et al. Transgenic mice reveal unexpected diversity of on-off direction-selective retinal ganglion cell subtypes and brain structures involved in motion processing. J. Neurosci. 31, 8760–8769 (2011)
Chan, Y. C. & Chiao, C. C. The distribution of the preferred directions of the ON-OFF direction selective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina requires refinement after eye opening. Physiol. Rep. 1, e00013 (2013)
Oyster, C. W. Analysis of image motion by rabbit retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 199, 613–635 (1968)
Oyster, C. W. & Barlow, H. B. Direction-selective units in rabbit retina: distribution of preferred directions. Science 155, 841–842 (1967)
Kanjhan, R. & Sivyer, B. Two types of ON direction-selective ganglion cells in rabbit retina. Neurosci. Lett. 483, 105–109 (2010)
Kwong, J. M. K., Quan, A., Kyung, H., Piri, N. & Caprioli, J. Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell survival with Rbpms immunolabeling in animal models of optic neuropathies. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 9694–9702 (2011)
Trenholm, S., Johnson, K., Li, X., Smith, R. G. & Awatramani, G. B. Parallel mechanisms encode direction in the retina. Neuron 71, 683–694 (2011)
Dhande, O. S. et al. Genetic dissection of retinal inputs to brainstem nuclei controlling image stabilization. J. Neurosci. 33, 17797–17813 (2013)
Kay, J. N. et al. Retinal ganglion cells with distinct directional preferences differ in molecular identity, structure, and central projections. J. Neurosci. 31, 7753–7762 (2011)
Simpson, J. I., Leonard, C. S. & Soodak, R. E. The accessory optic system of rabbit. II. Spatial organization of direction selectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 2055–2072 (1988)
Simpson, J. I., Leonard, C. S. & Soodak, R. E. The accessory optic system — analyzer of self motion. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 545, 170–179 (1988)
Wallace, D. J. et al. Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion. Nature 498, 65–69 (2013)
Nilsson, D. E. The evolution of eyes and visually guided behaviour. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 2833–2847 (2009)
Ivanova, E., Toychiev, A. H., Yee, C. W. & Sagdullaev, B. T. Optimized protocol for retinal wholemount preparation for imaging and immunohistochemistry. J. Vis. Exp. e51018, http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/51018 (2013)
Naarendorp, F. et al. Dark light, rod saturation, and the absolute and incremental sensitivity of mouse cone vision. J. Neurosci. 30, 12495–12507 (2010)
Govardovskii, V. I., Fyhrquist, N., Reuter, T., Kuzmin, D. G. & Donner, K. In search of the visual pigment template. Vis. Neurosci. 17, 509–528 (2000)
Szél, A. et al. Unique topographic separation of 2 spectral classes of cones in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 325, 327–342 (1992)
Dai, X. et al. The frequency-response electroretinogram distinguishes cone and abnormal rod function in rd12 mice. PLoS One 10, e0117570 (2015)
Borghuis, B. G., Marvin, J. S., Looger, L. L. & Demb, J. B. Two-photon imaging of nonlinear glutamate release dynamics at bipolar cell synapses in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 33, 10972–10985 (2013)
Borghuis, B. G. et al. Imaging light responses of targeted neuron populations in the rodent retina. J. Neurosci. 31, 2855–2867 (2011)
Kim, I. J., Zhang, Y. F., Yamagata, M., Meister, M. & Sanes, J. R. Molecular identification of a retinal cell type that responds to upward motion. Nature 452, 478–483 (2008)
Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013)
Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E. Bayes factors. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 90, 773–795 (1995)
Venkataramani, S. & Taylor, W. R. Orientation selectivity in rabbit retinal ganglion cells is mediated by presynaptic inhibition. J. Neurosci. 30, 15664–15676 (2010)
Maloney, L. T. Evaluation of linear-models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1673–1683 (1986)
Oommen, B. S. & Stahl, J. S. Eye orientation during static tilts and its relationship to spontaneous head pitch in the laboratory mouse. Brain Res. 1193, 57–66 (2008)
Oh, S. W. et al. A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature 508, 207–214 (2014)
Yonehara, K. et al. Identification of retinal ganglion cells and their projections involved in central transmission of information about upward and downward image motion. PLoS One 4, e4320, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004320 (2009)
We thank J. Demb and W. Wei for providing us with Trhr-GFP and Drd4-GFP mice. Countless colleagues provided theoretical, data-analytic and technical advice, including imaging, electronics and device synchronization, intracranial and intraocular injections, electrophysiological recordings and statistical analysis. They included J. McIlwain, B. Borghuis, G. Williams, C. Deister, J. Voigts, C. Moore, D. Sheinberg, K. Briggman, M. Fogerson, M. E. Stabio, J. Renna, S. Cruikshank, S. Crandall, B. Connors, S. Guan, J. Sanes, W. Truccolo and C. Aizenman. D. Boghossian maintained the mouse colony and genotyped experimental mice. K. Boghossian, C. Papendorp and P.-N. Chiang contributed to digital image analysis. J. Murphy constructed microscope stages and retinal mounts. We thank V. Jayaraman, D. S. Kim, L. L. Looger and K. Svoboda from the GENIE Project, Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute for sharing their GCaMP6f calcium indicator. This project was supported by the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship of Canada (S.S.), The Sidney A. Fox and Dorothea Doctors Fox Postdoctoral Fellowship in Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (S.S.), NSF-RTG grant DMS-1148284 (J.A.G.), and NIH grant R01 EY12793 and an Alcon Research Institute Award (D.M.B.).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Reviewer Information Nature thanks J. Demb, A. Rosenberg, J. R. Sanes and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Direction selectivity of ON-DSGCs and ON-OFF-DSGCs revealed by their calcium and voltage responses.
a–d, Calcium transients of representative ON-OFF-DSGCs (a, b) and ON-DSGCs (c, d) in response to bright bars (a, c) or sinusoidal contrast gratings (b, d) drifting in eight directions at 45° intervals. Preferred direction and direction-selectivity index (DSI) were determined from grating responses, cell class (ON-DSGC or ON-OFF-DSGC) from the bar responses. Traces plot somatic GCaMP6f Ca2+ signal over time (Methods); red shows mean; grey, single trials. Black marker indicates when stimulus bar was within the cell’s receptive field. Polar plots show response amplitude (normalized to maximum) for each direction (bold curves, mean of four repetitions; thin, single trials). Red vectors show preferred direction (bold, mean; thin, single trials; N, nasal; D, dorsal; T, temporal; V, ventral). Direction-selectivity index (DSI) was higher for gratings than bars, especially for ON-DSGCs (Supplementary Note 9). e–k, Morphological and functional validation of DSGC subtypes inferred from Ca2+ imaging. e, GCaMP6f fluorescence (top right) revealed DS tuning in a cell that was then targeted for patch recording (top left) and dye filling (bottom left; see Extended Data Fig. 3h for representative morphological data). f, g, Calcium (f) and voltage (g) traces for representative ON-DSGCs and ON-OFF-DSGCs in response to a drifting bright bar. h, i, Mean calcium responses (h) and peristimulus time spike histograms (PSTH) (i) for patched ON-DSGCs (n = 8) and ON-OFF-DSGCs (n = 6) in response to a drifting bright bar (grey bands: ±1 s.d.). The bar’s trailing edge evoked a small OFF Ca2+ transient in ON-DSGCs (h; see also f, left trace) and a very slight uptick in the PSTH (i). j, k, DS preference inferred from Ca2+ signal closely matches that inferred from spiking for both ON-DSGCs (red) and ON-OFF-DSGCs (black) (j), despite having significantly broader tuning (k; lower DSI; paired t-test, t = −4.068, P < 0.001). l, Bath application of a selective ON-channel blocker (L-AP4) abolished the ON response, but left an OFF transient of reduced amplitude in ON-DSGCs (n = 10) and ON-OFF-DSGCs (n = 43) alike. OFF responses of ON-DSGCs are presumably mediated by excitatory input from OFF bipolar cells to the sparse OFF dendritic arbors of ON-DSGCs22.
Calcium is correlated with immunofluorescence, retrograde labelling and morphological asymmetries. a–f, Correlating Ca2+ imaging and post hoc immunofluorescence in a single imaged field. a, A two-photon image of GCaMP6f-expressing cells in live retina, in vitro. Numbers indicate regions of interest (ROIs) for assessing somatic DS responses. Cell-free zones are blood vessels. b–f, Confocal image of the same field after fixation, immunolabelling, and alignment with the live image (a). b, Immunolabelling for CART, a specific marker for 3 of 4 ON-OFF-DSGC subtypes (N-, V- and D-cells). c, Anti-GFP immunofluorescence, to enhance GCaMP6f signal which faded after fixation. d, Immunofluorescence for RBPMS, a marker for all RGCs. e, f, Merged images combining GCaMP6f (anti-GFP) signal with either RBPMS (e) or CART (f). g–j, Single imaged field demonstrating that identification of cells labelled by retrograde transport from the AOS can be linked to specific Ca2+-imaged cells. g, Two-photon image of GCaMP6f fluorescence in live retina in vitro; ROIs marked as in a. h, i, Live confocal images of same field, showing (h) two cells retrolabelled from the MTNd (h; fluorescent cholera toxin beta-subunit, CTb) and GCaMP6f fluorescence (i). j, Merged image of h and i. k, Confocal images of coronal sections showing retrograde-tracer deposits (red) in 12 different mice, three mice each (#1–3) for four AOS targets (rows): superior fasciculus of the accessory optic tract (SF-AOT); inferior fasciculus of the AOT (IF-AOT); dorsal division of the medial terminal nucleus (MTNd); and nucleus of the optic tract (NOT). Far right column shows enlarged images from third column. These deposits spared retinorecipient nuclei outside the AOS, visible from nonspecific labelling by GCaMP6f fluorescence (green). l–s, Structure and function of GFP-labelled DSGCs in Hb9-GFP mice. l, Voltage responses to drifting gratings (conventions as for Extended Data Fig. 1b, d). m, n, Spike responses to a bright bar moving in the preferred direction. Dashed line indicates roughly when the stimulus overlapped the receptive field. m, Voltage response of representative Hb9-GFP cell on a single trial. n, Mean peristimulus time histogram (PSTH) for all recorded Hb9-GFP cells (n = 32; 4 retinas). Grey band represents ± 1 s.d. o, Preferred directions of all recorded GFP+ cells (n = 32 cells; 4 retinas). All point generally ventral, but scatter is substantial. (Arrow length not scaled to DSI). p–s, Dendritic asymmetry in Hb9 cells correlates with preferred direction. p, Typical Hb9 cell dye-filled during patch recording; maximum-intensity projected (MIP) confocal image. Blue vector indicates displacement of centroid of dendritic arbor (red dot) from the soma (black dot), a measure of the magnitude and direction of asymmetry. q, Dendritic asymmetry correlates strongly with physiologically determined DS preference (n = 12). r, Assessment of dendritic-field asymmetry in Hb9-GFP cells based on GFP fluorescence alone. In this MIP image, coloured polygons show estimated dendritic-field envelopes for four cells. Vectors mark magnitude and direction of asymmetry as in p. s, Polar plot of direction and magnitude of dendritic asymmetry among a large sample of Hb9-GFP cells (n = 82 cells; 3 retinas) estimated as in r. Estimates made blinded to retinal location. Vector length indicates magnitude of arbor asymmetry (displacement of dendritic-field centroid from soma, normalized by the arbor circumference). Nearly all markedly asymmetric fields were displaced in a ventral direction from their somatic location, but with substantial scatter.
Extended Data Figure 3 Differentiation of ON-DGSCs from ON-OFF-DSGCs by unsupervised clustering and projections to accessory optic system.
a, DSGCs can be clustered into two classes (ON and ON-OFF) based on two parameters of Ca2+ responses to moving bars: (1) the latency of the ON peak (relative to the arrival of the bar at the receptive-field; assumes 300 μm field diameter and accounts for cell position within the imaged field); and (2) the slope of decay for 300 ms following the ON peak, a measure of the transience. Each cell is shown by a point coloured to represent its posterior probability of belonging to the ON-OFF-DSGC cluster. Most cells are very likely to be one type or the other. b–g, Average Ca2+ signals (ΔF/F ; mean (coloured line) ± s.d. (grey area)) evoked by light bar moving in the preferred direction for various samples of DSGCs (ON-OFF-DSGCs: red traces; ON-DSGCs: blue): b, all imaged DSGCs; c, morphologically identified (dye-filled) DSGCs; d, CART-immunopositive DSGCs (comprising mainly N-, D-, and V-type ON-OFF-DSGCs); e–g, DSGCs retrolabelled from three components of the AOS: superior (e) and inferior fasciculi (f) of the AOT, and dorsal division of the MTN (g). See Supplementary Note 10 and ref. 41 for additional details. h, Representative morphology of ON-OFF-DSGCs (left) and ON-DSGCs (right) revealed by dye injection after Ca2+ imaging, and illustrated as MIP confocal images, projected onto the retinal plane (top) and an orthogonal one (bottom). ON-OFF-DSGCs stratify about equally in ON and OFF sublaminae; ON-DSGCs mainly in the ON sublamina. i–m, Ca2+ imaging of retrolabelled cells shows ON-DSGC subtypes project differentially to AOS. Each panel includes DS preferences plotted on a standard flat retina with superimposed best-fitting optic flow for each subtype (left); translatory optic-flow-tuning plots (middle), one for the actual data (top) and a second for the best-fitting model (bottom); and model-derived weighting coefficients (right), providing an estimate of relative subtype abundance. D- and V-cells selectively innervated the medial terminal nucleus (MTN) (i–k), while T- and N-cells supplied the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT)/ dorsal terminal nucleus (DTN) (l). The superior fasciculus of the AOT (SF-AOT) apparently carries only D-cell axons (j), whereas the inferior fasciculus (IF-AOT) and dorsal MTN (MTNd) contain mixed V and D fibres (k) (but see ref. 42). Thus, two cardinal translatory axes are separately represented in the AOS, one in the NOT/DTN and the other in the MTN.
a, Representative experimental retina after GCaMP6f imaging (confocal image). Bright patches (mostly central) are GCaMP6f fluorescence. Magenta vectors show locations and DS preferences of imaged DSGCs. Four radial relieving cuts were made to promote flattening; blue circles mark their termini. The nasal and temporal cuts were made at medial and lateral rectus insertions; the line connecting these (the ‘horizontal reference line’) effectively parallels the horizontal plane in ambulating mice. Curl at retinal margins developed gradually and was taken into account. b, Map of estimated strain energy density, reflecting local stretching during flattening. c–f, Mapping of cell locations onto a standardized spherical coordinate system for pooling data across retinas and display in flattened (d) or hemispherical form (f). c, Data in a remapped into standardized spherical coordinates, followed by remapping into flattened form using modelled relieving cuts approximating the actual ones; close similarity to a indicates these transformations are accurate and reversible. d, Same as c but in the form of a standardized flat-mounted retina (four virtual radial cuts, 90° apart, extending 60% of the distance from retinal margin to optic disk). e, f, Schematic illustration of the mathematical approaches used for mapping to, and transformation between, coordinate systems. See Supplementary Equations for details. In e, s is arc length as measured from the optic disk; θ is the longitudinal coordinate, 0° corresponds to the nasal terminus of the horizontal reference line, 90° to the dorsal retina, and so forth. Four red meridional arcs show the reconstructed positions of the four radial cuts in a and c. These have angular coordinates of θi and an arc length of M − mi. M was approximated from the flat-mount as the average length of lines extending from the optic disk to the retinal margin (green lines, including the curled portions in a); mi was estimated as the distance on the flat-mount from optic disk to the terminus of the corresponding radial cut (blue lines in a, e and f). Numerical reconstruction of the flat-mounted retina allowed empirical cell locations to be mapped to the spherical retina via the mapping xº F−1. Other mappings are shown on the double and single arrows.
Extended Data Figure 5 Flow-tuning plots, correction for errors of rotatory orientation in vitro, and development of a flow-tuning model.
a–d, Generation of flow-tuning plots. a, DS preferences of all imaged ON-OFF-DSGCs mapped onto standard flattened retina. Each black vector marks one cell’s location and preferred direction. How well do these DS preferences align with the local retinal optic flow produced by the mouse’s translation along specific axes? Two flow fields are shown (blue and red lines and arrowheads); many more were tested (2,701 axes; 5° intervals of spherical angle). For each tested translation, we measured the angle θ between each cell’s preferred direction and the local direction of optic flow (inset: θ1 for the blue flow field, θ2 for the red one). N, nasal; D, dorsal; T, temporal; V, ventral. b, Distributions of angles θ1 (top) and θ2 (bottom) among all cells in a. Concordance index comprises the percentage of cells with DS preferences differing <10° from the local motion in a specific flow field (green rectangles). Alignment was much greater with ‘blue’ than ‘red’ optic flow (concordance index = 11.7 and 2.6, respectively). c, Spherical translatory-flow-tuning plot displaying concordance index as a function of the axis of the animal’s translation through space. Location of data for ‘blue’ and ‘red’ optic flows are indicated. d, Schematic representation of translatory optic flow induced in visual space (bottom hemisphere) and on retina (upper hemisphere) by animal’s (and eye’s) translation along the indicated axis (best axis of V-cell subtype). Translation along the indicated axis yields flow with a centre of contraction in the ventral retina (as for V-cells; Figs 1m and 2a) and in the corresponding locus in superior visual field. e, Correcting for errors of rotatory orientation of retina in chamber. Flattened translatory-flow-tuning plots for ON-OFF-DSGCs in four different retinas with large samples of imaged cells. Plots are highly stereotyped in form, but exhibit some variation in phase (that is, horizontal position; compare positions of hot spots to the arbitrary red vertical reference line). To correct for this experimental error, we phase-shifted each retina’s heat map (that is, offset it along the x-axis) to produce the best match with a reference heat map (an average of the four maps in e). See Methods for details. f–i, Stepwise development of the model of global DS geometry. Note the progressive improvement in the agreement between the flow-tuning plots of modelled and actual imaged ON-OFF-DSGCs (j). f, Basic version of the model. Modelled DSGCs were uniformly distributed over the retina. DS preferences set to local flow produced by translation in one direction along one of two orthogonal axes, derived in Fig. 3b. g, After restricting modelled cells to the locations of actual imaged cells. Smearing of hot pots reflects degraded certainty about the position of the best axes due to undersampling of cells in retinal regions near the singularities (centres of expansion or contraction). h, After mimicking biological and experimental variability by adding angular noise (standard deviation = 10°) to the preferred directions of cells used in g. i, After accounting for the unequal abundances of subtypes by differentially weighting them before summation. Below: local polar plots of preferred directions of modelled DSGCs. Equivalent plots for cells in the final, refined model (i) are shown in Fig. 3j (black). k–n, Evidence for the predictive power of the model across data sets. ON-OFF-DSGCs were arbitrary divided into two samples, a training set (flow tuning plot in k) and a test set (l). Best translatory axes derived from the training set were used to generate a 4-subtype translatory flow-matching model of the same form as in i. m, flow-tuning plot for these modelled cells closely resembles that for imaged cells in the test set (l; R2 = 0.95). n, A model with translatory axes derived from ON-OFF-DSGCs predicts the DS preferences of imaged ON-DSGCs (R2 = 0.83). Weighting coefficients giving the best fit recapitulated those from direct modelling of ON-DSGC (Fig. 4j,m). See Supplementary Note 11 for details.
Extended Data Figure 6 Four ON-DSGC subtypes are still apparent when stringent criteria are used to distinguish them from ON-OFF-DSGCs.
Even when we apply a more stringent criterion to differentiate ON- from ON-OFF-DSGCs, we detect four ON-DSGC subtypes rather than the expected three (Fig. 4). a, Cluster analysis identical to Extended Data Fig. 3a but including only cells very likely to belong to the ON- or ON-OFF-DSGC classes (posterior probabilities >0.95 of membership in one of the classes). This excluded 457 cells from analysis. b, Average calcium signals (ΔF/F; mean ± s.d.) to moving bars for these stringently classified samples of ON-OFF-DSGCs (red traces) or ON-DSGCs (blue traces). See Extended Data Fig. 3b for details. c, d, Four subtypes remain evident in both ON-OFF DSGCs (c) and ON DSGCs (d) and after application of the stringent classification criterion. These subtypes are evident in the four lobes of local polar plots of preferred direction (left) and in the four hot spots in the associated flattened translatory-flow-tuning plots (centre). Bar plots (right) display the weighting coefficients of the best fitting model, a measure of the relative abundance of the four subtypes. These weighting coefficients were similar to those obtained using the standard posterior-probability criterion (>0.5), suggesting that the cells excluded due to the stringent criteria were distributed roughly equally across the four subtypes for each class.
a, Polar plots of local DS preference among ON-DSGCs, plotted on standard flat retinas (above) and in reconstructed hemispherical form (below). Increasing the stringency of the criterion for direction-selectivity index (DSI) from 0.3 to 0.5 reduced the number of N-cells (top left) by 95%, but other subtypes by only 42%–60% (sample zone: red rectangle). Thus, N-type ON-DS cells are unusually poorly tuned, and may have been excluded on that basis in previous studies reporting only three ON-DSGC subtypes. b, Leftmost panels of a reproduced with colour coded subtypes. Each cell’s subtype assignment was determined by which of the four cardinal translatory flow fields was most closely aligned with its preferred direction. N, blue; T, green; D, orange; V, magenta. c, Line histograms showing the distribution of DSIs among each ON-DSGC subtype. The distribution for N-type ON-DSGCs is shifted to lower DSI values. d, Median DSI and first and third quartiles for each ON-DSGC subtype. N-cells were significantly less well tuned. e–h, Same analysis as a–d, but for ON-OFF DSGCs. There were significant differences among subtypes but the stringency of the DSI criterion did not affect the relative abundance of subtypes. i, j, Mean calcium responses to preferred direction of bar motion of individual subtypes of ON-DSGCs (n = 497) (i) and ON-OFF-DSGC (n = 1,949) (j). k, l, Histograms (k) and mean values (plus first and third quartiles) (l) of latency to ON peak for each DSGC subtype, measured from estimated time of arrival bar edge at receptive field (see Methods). Latency differed significantly between each ON-DSGC subtype and its matching (homonymous) ON-OFF-DSGC subtype. m, n, Histograms (n) and median plus first and third quartiles (n) of the slope following the ON peak for each subtype of ON- and ON-OFF-DSGCs (see Methods). See Supplementary Note 12 for statistics and further details.
Extended Data Figure 8 Direction preferences of both ON-DSGCs and ON-OFF-DSGCs are better aligned with translatory optic flow fields than with rotatory ones.
a, Flattened rotatory flow-tuning plot illustrating the concordance of DS preferences of all imaged ON-OFF-DSGCs with rotatory optic flow fields as a function of rotatory axis orientation (plate carré projection; compare Fig. 2j, k; Supplementary Note 13). b, Same as a but using modelled cells drawn from the best-fitting model. Model as for Extended Data Fig. 5i, but with subtypes (d) aligning DS preferences with rotatory instead of translatory optic flow fields (Supplementary Note 13). c, Weighting coefficients for the four subtypes in the best-fitting model. d, Rotatory-flow-tuning plots for the four individual rotatory-flow-matching subtypes used in the model, each with DS preferences aligned (±10° noise) with one of the four cardinal rotatory flow fields. e–g, Local polar plots of DS preferences predicted for two sets of modelled DS cells, aligning their DS preferences either with translatory optic flow (Fig. 3d–h) or with rotatory optic flow (this figure, b and d). e, Comparison of translatory and rotatory flow-matching models (green and blue polar plots, respectively). Predictions are similar in the central retina but diverge sharply in the periphery, especially ventrally and temporally. f, Observed preferred directions of imaged ON-OFF-DSGCs (red vectors; n = 1,949) compared with those predicted by the model comprising four translatory-flow-matching channels (black vectors; n = 8,100). g, Same as f but with preferred directions predicted from the rotatory-flow-matching model (black vectors; n = 8,100). Optic flow preferred by each channel shown in pastel lines and arrowheads (N-cells, blue; D, green; T, red; V, magenta). h–n, Same as for a–g but comparing modelled and imaged ON-DSGCs. o, Comparison of real and modelled responses to translatory and rotatory flow for an ensemble comprising a single ON-OFF-DSGC subtype (T-cells). Modelled cells were aligned with their respective canonical translatory optic flows and were uniformly distributed over the retina. Top: response of modelled T-cell ensemble to translatory optic flow. Middle: modelled ensemble response of same cells to rotatory optic flow. Bottom: same as middle, but for real imaged T-cells. p–s, Flow-tuning plots for all imaged ON-OFF-DSGCs (p, r) and ON-DSGCs (q, s) probed with translatory (p, q) or rotatory (r, s) flow. t–w, Translatory-flow-matching model outperforms its rotatory equivalent overall, but especially temporally (green sector in t and v), where model predictions are most divergent (see e). u, w, Bar plots of R2 for fit to data of translatory (grey) and rotatory (black) models, assessed separately for the retina overall (left) or the temporal sample region alone. Similar trends were also apparent near the ventral translatory singularity (not shown).
Extended Data Figure 9 Ensemble coding by DSGCs of all possible translatory and rotatory optic flows, mapped in retinal or global coordinates.
a, Average directional tuning curve of imaged DSGCs (mean Ca2+ response, normalized to maximum, as a function of the angular offset from preferred directions). Tuning curves did not differ for ON- and ON-OFF-DSGC classes (see Methods). b, Flattened map of summed spike output of a single modelled ON-OFF-DSGC subtype—the D-cells—as a function of direction of the animal’s translation, expressed in retinal coordinates. Hot spot indicates location in retinal space of the centre of contraction of the preferred translatory flow field (Supplementary Note 14). c, Alternative flow-tuning plot for the same subtype but plotting the concordance index (as elsewhere in this report; compare Fig. 2d–k; Supplementary Note 14). d, Flow-tuning plots of estimated summed ensemble spike output for each of four modelled translatory-flow-matching DSGC subtypes in response to optic flow generated by translation along (left column) or rotation about any axis (right column). e, Same as d but remapped in space and shown separately for the left and right eyes. Azimuth of zero is anterior; elevation of 90° is overhead. Hot spots in maps for translatory optic flow (first and third columns) indicate the best mouse-centred direction of heading for activating that DS subtype ensemble (Supplementary Note 14). f, g, Decoder model showing the brain could discriminate rotatory from translatory optic flow and identify the axis of self-motion by exploiting unique patterns of relative activation of the eight DS-channels (4 subtypes × 2 eyes) induced by specific optic flow fields. f. Left column, heat plots showing, as a function of axis orientation, the Euclidean distance (dissimilarity) between two patterns of relative activation of the eight DS channels induced by: (1) translation along that axis; and (2) translation along a single ‘input’ axis (the unknown to be inferred by decoding, indicated at left, in green). Each probed axis is represented by a single pixel in the global map. Coldest colour marks the coordinates in space of the axis of translation evoking eight-channel outputs closest in Euclidean distance (black number, upper right), and thus highest in similarity, to the eight-channel outputs evoked by the reference (unknown) axis. Right column, same as left except that the eight-channel outputs induced by the input translatory optic flow are now compared to those of the same eight channels when induced by rotation about any possible axis. The coldest spot in this plot marks the orientation of the rotatory axis producing an 8-channel output pattern most similar to that produced by translation along the input (unknown) axis. g, Same as f except that the input axis listed at left (the unknown) is an axis of rotation, rather than of translation. In each case, the flow field generating eight-channel outputs most like those induced by rotation about the input axis (minimum Euclidean distance and darkest blue) is rotatory (right column of plots), not translatory (left column), and the orientation of the best-matching rotatory axis corresponds to that of the input axis of rotation. See Supplementary Note 14 for further explanation and interpretation.
Extended Data Figure 10 Modelled postsynaptic cells differentially tuned for rotation or translation are easily generated by summing or subtracting specific DS channels in the two eyes.
a, We devised a ‘tuning index’ to quantify the strength of tuning of single modelled subtype-ensembles for specific optic flow fields (Extended Data Fig. 9). The index consisted simply of the range of the Euclidean-distance values for the individual modelled DSGC ensembles. Individual DSGC subtype ensembles are nearly as well tuned to a specific axis of rotation as they are to their best axis of translation (Extended Data Figs 8a, h, 9e). b, Design of a simple model for generating postsynaptic cells with a selective preference for translation over rotation (T1–T4), or for rotation over translation (R1–R6), through linear summation or subtraction of multiple DSGC channels in the two eyes (see Supplementary Note 15 for details on model design). c, Selectivity of modelled postsynaptic cell types for specific translations (T1–T4) or rotations (R1–R6), reflected in the tuning index as in a; note the enhanced ability to distinguish between translation and rotation relative to the input DSGCs (a). d, Flattened spherical ensemble-output plots, showing variations in net excitation of specific modelled postsynaptic cell classes as a function of the axis of translation or rotation, all in mouse-centred (global) coordinates (see Extended Data Fig. 9e). In heat maps, red and blue represent maximum and minimum channel activation, respectively. The model thus demonstrates that arithmetic combinations of signals from specific retinal DS channels could allow the brain to decompose optic flow into its translatory and rotatory components, paralleling the biomechanical decomposition of self-motion into these components by the vestibular labyrinth.
This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Notes 1-15, a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Equations, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Supplementary References. (PDF 1455 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Sabbah, S., Gemmer, J., Bhatia-Lin, A. et al. A retinal code for motion along the gravitational and body axes. Nature 546, 492–497 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22818
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2020)
Nature Communications (2020)
Scientific Reports (2019)