Letter | Published:

Impacts and mitigation of excess diesel-related NOx emissions in 11 major vehicle markets

Nature volume 545, pages 467471 (25 May 2017) | Download Citation


Vehicle emissions contribute to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and tropospheric ozone air pollution, affecting human health1,2,3,4,5, crop yields5,6 and climate5,7 worldwide. On-road diesel vehicles produce approximately 20 per cent of global anthropogenic emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), which are key PM2.5 and ozone precursors8,9. Regulated NOx emission limits in leading markets have been progressively tightened, but current diesel vehicles emit far more NOx under real-world operating conditions than during laboratory certification testing10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Here we show that across 11 markets, representing approximately 80 per cent of global diesel vehicle sales, nearly one-third of on-road heavy-duty diesel vehicle emissions and over half of on-road light-duty diesel vehicle emissions are in excess of certification limits. These excess emissions (totalling 4.6 million tons) are associated with about 38,000 PM2.5- and ozone-related premature deaths globally in 2015, including about 10 per cent of all ozone-related premature deaths in the 28 European Union member states. Heavy-duty vehicles are the dominant contributor to excess diesel NOx emissions and associated health impacts in almost all regions. Adopting and enforcing next-generation standards (more stringent than Euro 6/VI) could nearly eliminate real-world diesel-related NOx emissions in these markets, avoiding approximately 174,000 global PM2.5- and ozone-related premature deaths in 2040. Most of these benefits can be achieved by implementing Euro VI standards where they have not yet been adopted for heavy-duty vehicles.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , , , & Estimating source-attributable health impacts of ambient fine particulate matter exposure: global premature mortality from surface transportation emissions in 2005. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 104009 (2014)

  2. 2.

    , , , & The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015)

  3. 3.

    , , & The impact of individual anthropogenic emissions sectors on the global burden of human mortality due to ambient air pollution. Environ. Health Perspect. 124, 1776–1784 (2016)

  4. 4.

    et al. Transport for Health: The Global Burden of Disease from Motorized Road Transport. (accessed 14 September 2016) (Global Road Safety Facility, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, The World Bank, 2014)

  5. 5.

    et al. Climate, health, agricultural and economic impacts of tighter vehicle-emission standards. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 59–66 (2011)

  6. 6.

    , , & Impacts of foreign, domestic, and state-level emissions on ozone-induced vegetation loss in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 806–813 (2016)

  7. 7.

    et al. Attribution of climate forcing to economic sectors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3382–3387 (2010)

  8. 8.

    et al. Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 10529–10566 (2015)

  9. 9.

    ECLIPSE Emissions Inventory. Global Emission Fields of Air Pollutants and GHGs. , (accessed 23 June 2016) (The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2016)

  10. 10.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency. Notice of Violation (18 September 2015) sent by EPA to Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (accessed 13 September 2016) (US EPA, 2015)

  11. 11.

    , , & Real-World Exhaust Emissions From Modern Diesel Cars. (accessed 12 June 2016) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2014)

  12. 12.

    United Kingdom Department for Transport. Vehicle Emissions Testing Programme: Moving Britain Ahead. (accessed 14 September 2016) (UK DoT, 2016)

  13. 13.

    Some Japanese Car Diesel Emissions Higher On The Road Than In Lab Tests. (accessed 13 September 2016) (The Wall Street Journal, 4 March 2016)

  14. 14.

    International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). Deficiencies In The Brazilian Proconve P-7 And The Case For P-8 Standards. (accessed 14 September 2016) (ICCT, 2016)

  15. 15.

    Comparing Real-World Off-Cycle NOx Emissions Control in Euro IV, V, and VI. (accessed 13 January 2017) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2015)

  16. 16.

    & Urban Off-Cycle NOx Emissions from Euro IV/V Trucks and Buses: Problems and Solutions for European Countries. , (accessed 13 January 2017) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2012)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Recent evidence concerning higher NOx emissions from passenger cars and light duty vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 45, 7053–7063 (2011)

  18. 18.

    & NOx emissions from diesel passenger cars worsen with age. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3327–3332 (2016)

  19. 19.

    & Reactive nitrogen species emission trends in three light-/medium-duty United States fleets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11234–11240 (2015)

  20. 20.

    & The Future of Vehicle Emissions Testing and Compliance: How to Align Regulatory Requirements, Customer Expectations, and Environmental Performance in the European Union. (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2015)

  21. 21.

    et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1659–1724 (2016)

  22. 22.

    Policies to Reduce Fuel Consumption, Air Pollution, And Carbon Emissions from Vehicles in G20 Nations. (accessed 14 January 2017) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2015)

  23. 23.

    U.S. Tier 3 Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Quality Standards, Final Rule. (accessed 14 January 2017) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2014)

  24. 24.

    California Air Resources Board (CARB). Optional Reduced NOx Emission Standards for On-Road Heavy-duty Engines. (accessed 14 January 2017) (CARB, 2014)

  25. 25.

    European Commission (EC). Commission Regulation (EU) EU 2016/646 of 20 April 2016 Amending Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards Emissions from Light Passenger and Commercial Vehicles (Euro 6) (Text with EEA relevance) (accessed 14 January 2017) (EC, 2016)

  26. 26.

    et al. Impact of the Volkswagen emissions control defeat device on US public health. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 114005 (2015)

  27. 27.

    , , & Damages and expected deaths due to excess NOx emissions from 2009 to 2015 Volkswagen diesel vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 1111–1117 (2016)

  28. 28.

    , & Valuing the human health damage caused by the fraud of Volkswagen. Environ. Pollut. 212, 121–127 (2016)

  29. 29.

    , , & Public health impact and economic costs of Volkswagen’s lack of compliance with the United States’ Emission Standards. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 891 (2016)

  30. 30.

    & Beyond RDE: Impact of Improved Regulation on Real-World NOx Emissions from Diesel Passenger Cars in the EU, 2015-2030. (accessed 13 January 2017) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2016)

  31. 31.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds et al.) Ch. 8, 659–740 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013)

  32. 32.

    Global Transportation Roadmap Model version 2-0. (accessed 13 January 2017) (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2016)

  33. 33.

    , & Higher than expected NOx emission from trucks may affect attainability of NO2 limit values in the Netherlands. Atmos. Environ. 45, 3025–3033 (2011)

  34. 34.

    Sibyl version 4.1 (modified). , (accessed 13 January 2017) (Emisia, 2016)

  35. 35.

    & New insights from comprehensive on-road measurements of NOx, NO2 and NH3 from vehicle emission remote sensing in London, UK. Atmos. Environ. 81, 339–347 (2013)

  36. 36.

    , , , & Comparison of NOx emissions from China III and China IV in-use diesel trucks based on on-road measurements. Atmos. Environ. 123, 1–8 (2015)

  37. 37.

    et al. The challenge to NOx emission control for heavy-duty diesel vehicles in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 9365–9379 (2012)

  38. 38.

    et al. Can Euro V heavy-duty diesel engines, diesel hybrid and alternative fuel technologies mitigate NOx emissions? New evidence from on-road tests of buses in China. Appl. Energy 132, 118–126 (2014)

  39. 39.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). MOVES 2014a: Latest Version of MOtor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES). (accessed 13 January 2017) (US EPA, 2015)

  40. 40.

    , & Heavy-duty truck emissions in the South Coast air basin of California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9523–9929 (2013)

  41. 41.

    West Virginia University (WVU) Center for Alternative Fuels Engines and Emissions. (accessed 19 December 2016) (Integrated Bus Information System (IBIS), 2011)

  42. 42.

    et al. In-use NOx emissions from diesel and liquefied natural gas refuse trucks equipped with SCR and TWC respectively. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2017)

  43. 43.

    et al. Real-world emissions from modern heavy-duty diesel, natural gas, and hybrid diesel trucks operating along major California freight corridors. Emission Control Sci. Technol. 2, 156–172 (2016)

  44. 44.

    ., . & 2016 Emission Factors for Diesel Euro-6 Passenger Cars, Light Commercial Vehicles and Euro-VI trucks. (TNO, 2016)

  45. 45.

    , , & Implications of diesel emissions control failures to emission factors and road transport NOx evolution. Atmos. Environ. 141, 542–551 (2016)

  46. 46.

    United States Energy Information Administration (US EIA). Table: Light-Duty Vehicle Sales by Technology Type. Annual Energy Outlook 2016. (accessed 13 January 2017) (US EIA, 2016)

  47. 47.

    & A decade of on-road emissions measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 1651–1656 (2008)

  48. 48.

    , , , & Final Report: In-Use Emissions Testing of Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles in the United States. (accessed 13 January 2017) (Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines and Emissions, West Virginia University, 2014)

  49. 49.

    California Air Resources Board (CARB). Letter to Manufacturer, Reference No. IUC-2015-008. (accessed 19 December 2016) (CARB, 2014)

  50. 50.

    et al. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106 (D19), 23073–23095 (2001)

  51. 51.

    , & Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 2413–2433 (2007)

  52. 52.

    et al. Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3762–3772 (2016)

  53. 53.

    & The effect of grid resolution on estimates of the burden of ozone and fine particulate matter on premature mortality in the USA. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 6, 563–573 (2013)

  54. 54.

    et al. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 8057–8066 (2015)

  55. 55.

    et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 397–403 (2014)

  56. 56.

    et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380, 2224–2260 (2012)

  57. 57.

    et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1085–1095 (2009)

  58. 58.

    et al. An estimate of the global burden of disease due to anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter using atmospheric modeling. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 1189–1195 (2010)

  59. 59.

    et al. Global air quality and health co-benefits of mitigating near-term climate change through methane and black carbon emission controls. Environ. Health Perspect. 120, 831–839 (2012)

  60. 60.

    , & Valuing the ozone-related health benefits of methane emission controls. Environ. Resour. Econ. 66, 45–63 (2017)

  61. 61.

    et al. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 885–889 (2013)

  62. 62.

    et al. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation. Atmos. Environ. 43, 604–618 (2009)

  63. 63.

    et al. The influence of ozone precursor emissions from four world regions on tropospheric composition and radiative climate forcing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D07306 (2012)

  64. 64.

    , & A linearized discrete ordinate radiative transfer model for atmospheric remote-sensing retrieval. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 68, 689–735 (2001)

  65. 65.

    et al. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7017–7039 (2010)

  66. 66.

    et al. Spatially refined aerosol direct radiative forcing efficiencies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 9511–9518 (2012)

  67. 67.

    United Nations Environment Programme/World Meteorological Organization (UNEP/WMO). Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone. (accessed 13 January 2017) (UNEP/WMO, 2011)

  68. 68.

    et al. Forty years of improvements in European air quality: regional policy-industry interactions with global impacts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3825–3841 (2016)

  69. 69.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen – Health Criteria (2016 Final Report). EPA/600/R-15/068, (US EPA, 2016)

  70. 70.

    et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality in a large prospective study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 193, 1134–1142 (2016)

  71. 71.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2008 Final Report: Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur—Ecological Criteria. EPA/600/R-08/082F, (US EPA, 2008)

  72. 72.

    & Cause-specific premature mortality from ambient PM2.5 exposure in India: estimates adjusted for baseline mortality. Environ. Int. 91, 283–290 (2016)

  73. 73.

    et al. On-road measurement of regulated pollutants from diesel and CNG buses with urea selective catalytic reduction systems. Atmos. Environ. 99, 1–9 (2014)

  74. 74.

    et al. On-board measurements of emissions from diesel trucks in five cities in China. Atmos. Environ. 54, 159–167 (2012)

  75. 75.

    Transport Research Laboratory (TRL). Road vehicle emission factors 2009. (accessed 1 October 2016) (TRL, 2009)

  76. 76.

    et al. Detailed investigations and real-world emission performance of Euro 6 diesel passenger cars. TNO report 2015 R10702. (accessed 1 October 2016) (2015)

  77. 77.

    et al. Emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulates of diesel vehicles. TNO report 2015 R10838. (accessed 1 October 2016) (2015)

Download references


Support was provided by the Hewlett Foundation, the ClimateWorks Foundation, the European Climate Foundation, Energy Foundation China and the NASA Health and Air Quality Applied System Team. We are grateful to F. Posada, T. Dallman, J. German, R. Muncrief, A. Bandivadekar, H. He, D. Rutherford and F. Kamakaté for assistance with regional diesel NOx emissions inventories; G. Bishop for access to US remote sensing data; J. Apte and N. Fann for discussions on the health impact methodology; and R. van Dingenen for assistance with the crop impact methodology.

Author information

Author notes

    • Forrest Lacey
    •  & Vicente Franco

    Present addresses: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA (F.L.); European Commission Directorate-General for Environment, Brussels, Belgium (V.F.).

    • Susan C. Anenberg
    •  & Joshua Miller

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Environmental Health Analytics LLC, Washington DC, USA

    • Susan C. Anenberg
  2. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington DC, USA

    • Joshua Miller
    • , Ray Minjares
    • , Li Du
    •  & Vicente Franco
  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

    • Daven K. Henze
    •  & Forrest Lacey
  4. Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York, York, UK

    • Christopher S. Malley
    •  & Lisa Emberson
  5. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    • Zbigniew Klimont
    •  & Chris Heyes


  1. Search for Susan C. Anenberg in:

  2. Search for Joshua Miller in:

  3. Search for Ray Minjares in:

  4. Search for Li Du in:

  5. Search for Daven K. Henze in:

  6. Search for Forrest Lacey in:

  7. Search for Christopher S. Malley in:

  8. Search for Lisa Emberson in:

  9. Search for Vicente Franco in:

  10. Search for Zbigniew Klimont in:

  11. Search for Chris Heyes in:


S.A. and J.M. contributed equally. S.A., J.M., V.F., D.H. and R.M. planned the research, J.M., L.D., V.F. and R.M. developed the on-road diesel NOx emissions inventories, Z.K. and C.H. developed the inventories of all other emissions, D.H. performed the model simulations, S.A., C.M., F.L. and D.H. performed the impact calculations, all authors analysed the results, and S.A. and J.M. wrote the paper with help from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Susan C. Anenberg or Joshua Miller.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks R. Burnett and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods which include additional detail on the emission scenario development, impact assessment methods, and results. It also contains Supplementary Tables 1-6, which show policy implementation timelines, emission factor studies reviewed, comparison of mortality results to other studies, mortality results by vehicle type, years of life lost results, and crop impact parameters.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.