Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Newly born peroxisomes are a hybrid of mitochondrial and ER-derived pre-peroxisomes

Nature volume 542, pages 251–254 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Peroxisomes function together with mitochondria in a number of essential biochemical pathways, from bile acid synthesis to fatty acid oxidation1. Peroxisomes grow and divide from pre-existing organelles2, but can also emerge de novo in the cell3. The physiological regulation of de novo peroxisome biogenesis remains unclear, and it is thought that peroxisomes emerge from the endoplasmic reticulum in both mammalian and yeast cells4. However, in contrast to the yeast system5,6,7,8, a number of integral peroxisomal membrane proteins are imported into mitochondria in mammalian cells in the absence of peroxisomes, including Pex3, Pex12, Pex13, Pex14, Pex26, PMP34 and ALDP9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Overall, the mitochondrial localization of peroxisomal membrane proteins in mammalian cells has largely been considered a mis-targeting artefact in which de novo biogenesis occurs exclusively from endoplasmic reticulum-targeted peroxins16. Here, in following the generation of new peroxisomes within human patient fibroblasts lacking peroxisomes, we show that the essential import receptors Pex3 and Pex14 target mitochondria, where they are selectively released into vesicular pre-peroxisomal structures. Maturation of pre-peroxisomes containing Pex3 and Pex14 requires fusion with endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicles carrying Pex16, thereby providing full import competence. These findings demonstrate the hybrid nature of newly born peroxisomes, expanding their functional links to mitochondria.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Pex3–YFP restores peroxisomal biogenesis in Pex3mut fibroblasts.
Figure 2: Pex3–YFP is enriched within mitochondria-derived pre-peroxisomal structures.
Figure 3: Mitochondria-derived pre-peroxisomes are mechanistically and structurally distinct from mitochondrial division or vesicle formation.
Figure 4: Peroxisome assembly requires both mitochondrial and ER-derived pre-peroxisomes.

References

  1. Mohanty, A. & McBride, H. M. Emerging roles of mitochondria in the evolution, biogenesis, and function of peroxisomes. Front. Physiol . 4, 268 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lazarow, P. B. & Fujiki, Y. Biogenesis of peroxisomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol . 1, 489–530 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, G. & Subramani, S. De novo peroxisome biogenesis: Evolving concepts and conundrums. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 892–901 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, J. J. & Aitchison, J. D. Peroxisomes take shape. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol . 14, 803–817 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Titorenko, V. I., Chan, H. & Rachubinski, R. A. Fusion of small peroxisomal vesicles in vitro reconstructs an early step in the in vivo multistep peroxisome assembly pathway of Yarrowia lipolytica. J. Cell Biol . 148, 29–44 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Zand, A., Braakman, I. & Tabak, H. F. Peroxisomal membrane proteins insert into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2057–2065 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lam, S. K., Yoda, N. & Schekman, R. A vesicle carrier that mediates peroxisome protein traffic from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21523–21528 (2010)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agrawal, G., Joshi, S. & Subramani, S. Cell-free sorting of peroxisomal membrane proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9113–9118 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sacksteder, K. A. et al. PEX19 binds multiple peroxisomal membrane proteins, is predominantly cytoplasmic, and is required for peroxisome membrane synthesis. J. Cell Biol . 148, 931–944 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. South, S. T., Sacksteder, K. A., Li, X., Liu, Y. & Gould, S. J. Inhibitors of COPI and COPII do not block PEX3-mediated peroxisome synthesis. J. Cell Biol . 149, 1345–1360 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muntau, A. C., Mayerhofer, P. U., Paton, B. C., Kammerer, S. & Roscher, A. A. Defective peroxisome membrane synthesis due to mutations in human PEX3 causes Zellweger syndrome, complementation group G. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 967–975 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, P. K., Mullen, R. T., Schumann, U. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER. J. Cell Biol . 173, 521–532 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Halbach, A. et al. Targeting of the tail-anchored peroxisomal membrane proteins PEX26 and PEX15 occurs through C-terminal PEX19-binding sites. J. Cell Sci . 119, 2508–2517 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Toro, A. A. et al. Pex3p-dependent peroxisomal biogenesis initiates in the endoplasmic reticulum of human fibroblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 107, 1083–1096 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aranovich, A., Hua, R., Rutenberg, A. D. & Kim, P. K. PEX16 contributes to peroxisome maintenance by constantly trafficking PEX3 via the ER. J. Cell Sci . 127, 3675–3686 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, P. K. & Hettema, E. H. Multiple pathways for protein transport to peroxisomes. J. Mol. Biol. 427 (6 Pt A), 1176–1190 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt, F. et al. The role of conserved PEX3 regions in PEX19-binding and peroxisome biogenesis. Traffic 13, 1244–1260 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayerhofer, P. U., Bano-Polo, M., Mingarro, I. & Johnson, A. E. Human peroxin PEX3 is co-translationally integrated into the ER and exits the ER in budding vesicles. Traffic 17, 117–130 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita, S., Abe, K., Tatemichi, Y. & Fujiki, Y. The membrane peroxin PEX3 induces peroxisome-ubiquitination-linked pexophagy. Autophagy 10, 1549–1564 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Soubannier, V. et al. A vesicular transport pathway shuttles cargo from mitochondria to lysosomes. Curr. Biol . 22, 135–141 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang, Y. C., Nalbant, P., Birkenfeld, J., Chang, Z. F. & Bokoch, G. M. GEF-H1 couples nocodazole-induced microtubule disassembly to cell contractility via RhoA. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2147–2153 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schrader, M., Bonekamp, N. A. & Islinger, M. Fission and proliferation of peroxisomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1822, 1343–1357 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Braschi, E. et al. Vps35 mediates vesicle transport between the mitochondria and peroxisomes. Curr. Biol . 20, 1310–1315 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fang, Y., Morrell, J. C., Jones, J. M. & Gould, S. J. PEX3 functions as a PEX19 docking factor in the import of class I peroxisomal membrane proteins. J. Cell Biol . 164, 863–875 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuzaki, T. & Fujiki, Y. The peroxisomal membrane protein import receptor Pex3p is directly transported to peroxisomes by a novel Pex19p- and Pex16p-dependent pathway. J. Cell Biol . 183, 1275–1286 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neufeld, C. et al. Structural basis for competitive interactions of Pex14 with the import receptors Pex5 and Pex19. EMBO J . 28, 745–754 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. South, S. T. & Gould, S. J. Peroxisome synthesis in the absence of preexisting peroxisomes. J. Cell Biol . 144, 255–266 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bolte, K., Rensing, S. A. & Maier, U. G. The evolution of eukaryotic cells from the perspective of peroxisomes: phylogenetic analyses of peroxisomal beta-oxidation enzymes support mitochondria-first models of eukaryotic cell evolution. BioEssays 37, 195–203 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gould, S. B., Garg, S. G. & Martin, W. F. Bacterial vesicle secretion and the evolutionary origin of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Trends Microbiol . 24, 525–534 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeyaraju, D. V. et al. Phosphorylation and cleavage of presenilin-associated rhomboid-like protein (PARL) promotes changes in mitochondrial morphology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18562–18567 (2006)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yao, J. & Shoubridge, E. A. Expression and functional analysis of SURF1 in Leigh syndrome patients with cytochrome c oxidase deficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet . 8, 2541–2549 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Neuspiel, M., Zunino, R., Gangaraju, S., Rippstein, P. & McBride, H. Activated mitofusin 2 signals mitochondrial fusion, interferes with Bax activation, and reduces susceptibility to radical induced depolarization. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 25060–25070 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Neuspiel, M. et al. Cargo-selected transport from the mitochondria to peroxisomes is mediated by vesicular carriers. Curr. Biol . 18, 102–108 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McBride, H. M., Millar, D. G., Li, J. M. & Shore, G. C. A signal-anchor sequence selective for the mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Cell Biol . 119, 1451–1457 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Walter, P. & Blobel, G. Preparation of microsomal membranes for cotranslational protein translocation. Methods Enzymol . 96, 84–93 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen, M., Millar, D. G., Yong, V. W., Korsmeyer, S. J. & Shore, G. C. Targeting of Bcl-2 to the mitochondrial outer membrane by a COOH-terminal signal anchor sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25265–25268 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McBride, H. M., Goping, I. S. & Shore, G. C. The human mitochondrial import receptor, hTom20p, prevents a cryptic matrix targeting sequence from gaining access to the protein translocation machinery. J. Cell Biol . 134, 307–313 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sugiura, A., McLelland, G. L., Fon, E. A. & McBride, H. M. A new pathway for mitochondrial quality control: mitochondrial-derived vesicles. EMBO J . 33, 2142–2156 (2014). 10.15252/embj.201488104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CIHR grant MOP#133549 and a Canada Research Chair to H.M.M. A.S. was supported by a JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad, S.M. through a Quebec FRQS Studentship, and J.P. by a CIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship (MFE-140925). The authors thank P. Kim for critical reagents and advice, and M. Nguyen for help with import assays.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Ave, Montreal, H3A 2B4, Quebec, Canada

    Ayumu Sugiura, Sevan Mattie, Julien Prudent & Heidi M. McBride

Authors
  1. Ayumu Sugiura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sevan Mattie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julien Prudent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heidi M. McBride
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.M.M. and A.S. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript, S.M. performed the EM analysis, J.P. contributed to the experimental design and to the quantitative microscopic analysis, and A.S. performed all experiments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi M. McBride.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Characterization of cell lines used in this study.

a, Levels of PEX19, PEX3 and PEX16 mRNA in each cell line were quantified by qRT–PCR. Data show mean ± s.e.m. of each mRNA normalized to control cells from three biological independent experiments. b, Levels of PMP70 and Pex14 protein were determined by immunoblotting analysis using the indicated antibodies. c, Control, Pex3mut and Pex16mut cells were subjected to immunfluorescence using the indicated antibodies. Representatives of captured images: Ctrl (16), Pex3mut (51), Pex16mut (98) shown. Scale bars, 10 μm. d, Subcellular fractionation of control and mutant cells. Isolation of whole-cell extracts (WCE), a 2.3K pellet enriched for mitochondria, a 23K pellet containing ER and peroxisomes, and a 100K pellet as a light membrane fraction showed clear separation of resident markers of these organelles. We analysed 7.5 μg of each fraction isolated from cells by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies as organelle markers. 2.3K, 23K and 100K: precipitates after centrifugation at indicated speeds. Cyt: supernatants after centrifugation at 100,000g. e, f, The 23K fraction isolated from control cells or 2.3K fraction isolated from mutant cells were further separated into soluble (S) and membrane (P) fractions by alkaline carbonate extraction (e) or digested with trypsin at indicated concentrations (f). After the treatments, samples were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 2 Pex3–YFP is inserted into mitochondrial outer membrane and assembles into mitochondria-derived pre-peroxisomal structures.

a, Left, 23K fraction enriched for peroxisomes, isolated from control cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP for 1 day, was separated into soluble and membrane fractions by alkaline carbonate extraction. Internal controls for the efficiency of extraction are shown using antibodies detecting endogenous mitochondrial proteins. Right, protease sensitivity of each protein. Isolated peroxisomes were digested by trypsin at indicated concentrations in the absence or presence of 1% tritonX-100 to ensure full protease accessibility as control (right). After the treatments, samples were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. b, Pex3, but not Pex16, was imported efficiently into the mitochondrial outer membrane in vitro. In vitro translated Pex3 and Pex16 were incubated with mitochondria isolated from mouse heart34,37. Following the reaction, mitochondria were isolated by centrifugation (P), and the supernatants collected (S). The initial total reaction (T) was also loaded for comparison. Fractions were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. Arrowheads indicate Pex-myc-His. Single and double asterisks indicate nonspecific signals from mitochondria and rabbit reticulocyte lysate, respectively. c, Post-import fractionation of Pex3–YFP. Left, following the import reaction, membrane proteins were extracted using sodium carbonate and pelleted, with soluble proteins remaining in the supernatant. Right, protease protection experiment with increasing concentrations of trypsin and samples analysed by immunblotting, along with the indicated internal controls. Pex3–YFP is shown to be trypsin sensitive and alkali resistant, confirming its carbonate-resistant import into the mitochondrial outer membrane in vitro. d, Co-translational import of Pex3 into microsomes in vitro. Synthesized RNA was incubated with rabbit reticulocyte lysate and canine pancreas microsomes (cpm)35. Supernatants and pellets after centrifugation at 100,000g were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. In contrast to a previous study18, but consistent with the primary mitochondrial localization of Pex3–YFP in Pex3mut fibroblasts, Pex3 was very weakly detected in the microsome fraction following the import reaction. Calnexin (CNX) reveals the efficient isolation of microsomal membranes in the pellet fraction. e, Captured images from live cell imaging of Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP for 1 day and stained with MitoTracker deep red (sVideo4). Arrowheads indicate Pex3–YFP-enriched structure budding from mitochondrion and lacking MitoTracker, distinguishing the release of Pex3–YFP-positive structure from normal mitochondrial fission. Representative of 47 movies is shown. Scale bar: 2 μm. f, Z series images of Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP were acquired (21 sections, 0.1 μm per section). Left, stacked image. Numbers in right panels indicate Z sections of inset in left (all sections shown in Supplementary Video 6). Representative of 60 captured cells is presented. Scale bar: left, 10 μm; right, 2 μm.

Extended Data Figure 3 Endogenous Pex14 is sorted into mitochondrial pre-peroxisome with Pex3–YFP.

a, PMP70 is rapidly incorporated into pre-peroxisomes. Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP for 1 day were subjected to immunofluorescence using the indicated antibodies. Representatives of 50 captured cells are presented. Arrowheads, Pex3–YFP- and Pex14-positive but PMP70-negative pre-peroxisomes, defined as stage I. Circles, all positive structures. Scale bars: 2 μm. b, Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-GFP or Ad-Pex3–YFP for 1 or 2 days were fractionated. Each fraction was loaded with 7.5 μg protein, and cellular levels of Pex3–YFP and PMP70 increased throughout the rescue. PMP70 is known to be degraded when peroxisomes are absent, and stabilized upon the generation of import-competent organelles. Quantification of Pex3–YFP, Pex14 and PMP70 in each fraction at each time point was normalized to the total expression in whole cell extracts (WCE). The graphs represent means from three independent experiments. Two days after infection, Pex3–YFP was enriched in the 23K peroxisomal fraction by more than twofold, and PMP70 levels were stabilized in the newly generated peroxisomes. Endogenous Pex14 was found in the mitochondrial fraction (2.3K) of both GFP and Pex3–YFP infected cells, and shifted into the peroxisomal fraction after 2 days of Pex3–YFP expression.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 4 N-terminal YFP-tagged Pex3 fails to import into mitochondria and cannot rescue peroxisomal biogenesis in Pex3mut cells.

a, b, Control (a) or Pex3mut cells (b) transfected with Pex3–YFP or YFP–Pex3 were subjected to immunofluorescence using the indicated antibodies. Representatives of captured cells: Ctrl + Pex3–YFP (12), Ctrl + YFP–Pex3 (27), Pex3mut + Pex3–YFP (27), Pex3mut + YFP–Pex3 (62) are presented. YFP–Pex3 inefficiently targets peroxisomes in control cells and mitochondria in Pex3mut cells. Scale bars: low magnification, 10 μm; high magnification, 5 μm. c, Representatives of counted cells from 1 day after transfection are shown. The graph represents percentage of cells at each stage of de novo synthesis. Error bars show means from three biological replicates. Pex3–YFP: day 1 (52, 51, 51), day 2 (51, 53, 51); YFP–Pex3: day 1 (50, 50, 52), day 2 (50, 50, 51) cells were counted in each experiment. Scale bars: 20 μm

Source data

Extended Data Figure 5 Pex3–YFP localization in the presence or absence of peroxisomes.

a, Control, Pex3mut, and Pex16mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP for 1 day were subjected to immunofluorescence using the indicated antibodies. Representative of counted cells are presented. Quantification of the Pex3–YFP localization was performed from fixed confocal images. Error bars represent the mean from three biological independent experiments. Cells counted in each experiment: control (59, 81, 79), Pex3mut (69, 62, 73), Pex16mut (40, 45, 51). Scale bars: 10 μm. b, Control cells infected with varying amounts of Ad-GFP or Pex3–YFP were analysed by immunoblotting using indicated antibodies. c, Captured images from live cell imaging (Supplementary Video 7). Control cells were monitored for 2 days after infection with Ad-Pex3–YFP. Times indicate hours after infection. At 20 h, Pex3–YFP is exclusively peroxisomal within the cell (asterisk). The number of peroxisomes then steady declines between 20 and 32 h. Pex3–YFP expression is very low between 32 and 35 h, and slowly rises as it is imported into mitochondria, evident by 38–41 h. Representative of 30 movies is shown. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 6 Pex3-mediated peroxisomal biogenesis is blocked upon addition of MG132 or nocodazole.

a, Ad-Pex3–YFP did not colocalize with lysosomal markers within Pex3mut cells. Representative of 171 captured cells shown. Scale bars: low magnification, 10 μm; high magnification, 5 μm. b, Representative images of PMP70 and catalase staining shown in Fig. 3c. Scale bars: low magnification, 10 μm; high magnification, 5 μm. c, Ten hours after infection with Ad-Pex3–YFP, Pex3mut cells were incubated with 0.02% DMSO, 1.5 μM nocodazole or 5 μM Y-27632 for 14 h. Stages of de novo synthesis were classified and quantified using confocal imaging. The graphs represent mean from three biological replicates. Cells counted in each experiment: DMSO (50, 56, 51), Noc (50, 54, 51), Y-27632 (53, 51, 53), Noc + Y-27632 (51, 54, 51).

Source data

Extended Data Figure 7 Pex3 is rapidly turned over from both mitochondrial and peroxisomal locations.

a, b, Control and Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP or not infected for 1 day were chased with 20 μg ml−1 cycloheximide (CHX) for indicated times. Protein levels were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies and quantified by densitometric analysis. Line graphs and plots of different shapes represent mean and each value from three independent experiments. Pex14 levels were very stable over the 5-h period, but Pex3–YFP was rapidly depleted between 1 and 5 h. c, One day after infection, cells were incubated with 20 μg ml−1 CHX and 2 μM MG132 for 5 h. Protein levels were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. Asterisks, nonspecific bands. The data show that loss of Pex3–YFP upon cyclohexamide treatment is through proteasome-dependent degradation from both the peroxisomal location (in control human fibroblasts) and from mitochondria (in Pex3mut cells). Note that total expression of Pex3–YFP in Pex3mut cells is significantly lower than in control fibroblasts. d, Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP for 1 day were treated under the indicated conditions and subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-FP antibody. Input and immunoprecipitates were analysed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. GFP, Ad-GFP; Pex3–YFP, Ad-Pex3–YFP; MG132, 500 nM for 14 h. The immunoprecipitation shown in the last lane reveals the accumulation of ubiquitin-conjugated forms of Pex3–YFP in the presence of MG132 (Pex3–YFPUb), indicating that a ubiquitin E3 ligase is required for the steady-state turnover of Pex3.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 8 Pex3–YFP pre-peroxisomes are released from mitochondria by distinct machinery from mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial vesicular transport to peroxisomes.

a, b, Pex3mut cells were silenced with siRNAs targeting Drp1, Vps35 or Pex19 for 3 days. Drp1 is a fission GTPase that is essential for mitochondrial and peroxisomal membranes22. Mitochondrial vesicle formation occurs in a manner independent of Drp1 (ref. 38), and this experiment was to test whether exit of Pex3–YFP from mitochondria in vesicular profiles requires this GTPase. Vps35 is a subunit of the retromer complex, which plays a critical role in the steady-state transport of mitochondrial vesicles to peroxisomes23. Pex19 is the cytosolic chaperone that binds and delivers peroxisomal membrane proteins to Pex3–Pex16 for insertion9,17. This experiment was to test whether Pex19 was required for Pex3 import into mitochondria. Knockdown efficiency was determined by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies (a) or qRT–PCR (b). c, Pex3mut cells silenced (as indicated) for 3 days were infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP. One or two days after infection, cells were subjected to immunofluorescence using the indicated antibodies. Left panels, representatives of counted cells at day 2. The graph represents the percentage of cells at each stage. Error bars show mean from three biologically independent experiments. Cells counted in each experiment: control (N): day 1 (55, 86, 55), day 2 (90, 90, 70); Drp1: day 1 (56, 63, 65), day 2 (103, 103, 87); Vps35: day 1 (59, 81, 77), day 2 (83, 83, 88); Pex19: day 1 (39, 66, 68), day 2 (61, 61, 59). Although Drp1 was essential for peroxisomal division, its loss did not alter peroxisome biogenesis or import competence. Loss of Vps35 appeared to enhance the rate of peroxisomal biogenesis, but Vps35 was clearly not required for Pex3–YFP-mediated rescue. Loss of Pex19 did not alter Pex3–YFP insertion into mitochondria or the generation of stage I pre-peroxisomes. These peroxisomes did not mature, suggesting that the roughly 60% loss of Pex19 was functionally sufficient to completely block peroxisomal protein import. Scale bars: 20 μm.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 9 Ad-Pex16–YFP restores peroxisomal biogenesis in human fibroblasts lacking Pex16 from a patient with Zellweger.

a, Pex16mut cells infected with Ad-Pex16–YFP for 1 day were subjected to immunofluorescence using anti-Tom20 (mitochondria) and anti-KDEL (ER) antibodies. A representative of 34 captured cells is presented. Scale bar: 10 μm. The ER is primarily sheet-like rather than reticular within Pex16mut cells, and Pex16–YFP primarily follows that pattern, which is completely distinct from the mitochondrial staining. b, Each fraction isolated from Pex16mut cells infected with Ad-GFP or Ad-Pex16–YFP for 1 or 4 days was analysed by immunoblotting. c, Pex16-positive vesicular profiles localize to mitochondrial tubules where they acquire endogenous Pex14. Z series images of Pex16mut cells infected with Ad-Pex16–YFP and immunostained with anti-Pex14 and anti-Tom20 (32 sections, 0.1 μm per section). The numbers represent images at indicated Z (all sections shown in Supplementary Video 8). Representatives of 31 captured cells are presented. Scale bar: 2 μm. d, Pex16–YFP transition to stage I is unaffected by nocodazole. Ten hours after infection with Ad-Pex16–YFP, Pex16mut cells were incubated with 0.02% DMSO or 1.5 μM nocodazole for 14 h. Representatives of counted cells are presented. Stages of de novo synthesis (left) or localization of Pex16–YFP (right) were determined under the confocal microscope. Error bars show mean from three biologically independent experiments. Cells counted in each experiment: DMSO (56, 51, 52), Noc (54, 53, 51). Representative images of Pex16–YFP are shown. Scale bars: 20 μm.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 10 Peroxisome assembly requires both mitochondrial and ER-derived pre-peroxisomes.

a, One day after transfection with Pex16–mRFP, Pex3mut cells were infected with Ad-Pex3–YFP for further 1 day. Cells were subjected to immunofluorescence using anti-Pex14 and anti-PMP70 antibodies. Insets in left images are shown in right panels. Representatives of 32 captured cells are presented. Scale bars: low magnification, 20 μm; high magnification, 5 μm. b. Pex3mut cells were transfected with mRFP or Pex16–mRFP for 24 h before infection with Ad-Pex3–YFP. Cells were subjected to immunofluorescence 1 or 2 days after Pex3–YFP infection. The graph represents the percentage of cells at each stage of de novo synthesis as defined in Fig. 1a. The graph represents mean from three biological replicates. Cells counted in each experiment: mRFP: day 1 (58, 49, 68), day 2 (47, 73, 61); Pex16–mRFP: day 1 (37, 52, 55), day 2 (54, 50, 50). c, Pex16mut cells expressing Pex3–YFP and Pex3mut cells expressing Pex16–mRFP were co-plated in a glass-bottom cell culture dish. A representative of 17 images captured before addition of PEG is presented. Scale bar: 20 μm. d, Pex16mut cells expressing Pex3–YFP and Pex3mut cells expressing Pex16–mRFP were fused by PEG. Captured images are from live-cell imaging 3 h after PEG-mediated whole-cell fusion (Supplementary Video 10). Circles highlight Pex16 vesicle structures that fuse with Pex3 vesicle structures. Scale bar: 4 μm. e, Model of peroxisomal biogenesis in mammalian system. Pex16-containing pre-peroxisomes emerge from the ER. They then fuse with Pex3–Pex14 pre-peroxisomes at the mitochondrial surface, thereby generating an import-competent, functional peroxisome that proliferates through growth and division.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the uncropped blots. (PDF 4310 kb)

Long term imaging of Pex3-YFP exit from mitochondria

Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP were subjected to long-term live cell imaging with Viva View microscope. Cells were chased 25 h to 45 h after the infection every 1 h. Following a cell division event Pex3-YFP exits mitochondria in only one of the two daughter cells, illustrating the stochastic nature of peroxisomal biogenesis. Captured images are shown in Fig. 2c. (AVI 1393 kb)

Generation of Pex3-YFP enriched vesicular profile from mitochondria

Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP for 24 h were observed with spinning disk confocal microscope. Images were acquired every second. Captured images are shown in Fig. 2d (AVI 197 kb)

Additional examples documenting the generation of Pex3-YFP enriched profiles from mitochondria

Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP (yellow) for 24 h were stained with 100 nM MitoTracker deep red (magenta). Images were acquired every second with spinning disk confocal microscope. Captured images of sVideo4 are shown in extended Fig. 2f. (AVI 542 kb)

Additional examples documenting the generation of Pex3-YFP enriched profiles from mitochondria

Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP (yellow) for 24 h were stained with 100 nM MitoTracker deep red (magenta). Images were acquired every second with spinning disk confocal microscope. Captured images of sVideo4 are shown in extended Fig. 2f. (AVI 360 kb)

Serial section revealing the segregation of Pex3-YFP from Tom20 labelled mitochondria

Bottom to top z series images of Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP (yellow) for 1 day and immunostained with anti-Tom20 (magenta) antibody (21 sections, 0.1 μm / section). Section 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26 are shown in extended Fig. 2g (AVI 214 kb)

Serial section revealing the incorporation of endogenous Pex14 within Pex3-YFP containing vesicular profiles emerging from mitochondria

Bottom to top z series images of Pex3mut cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP (yellow) for 1 day and immunostained with anti-Pex14 (magenta) and -Tom20 (cyan) antibodies (36 sections, 0.1 μm / section). Section 10, 14, 18 22 and 26 are shown in Fig. 2e. (AVI 679 kb)

Peroxisomal Pex3-YFP is imported into mitochondria following pexophagy in wild type human fibroblast cells

Control cells infected with Ad-Pex3-YFP were subjected to long-term live cell imaging with Viva View microscope. Cells were chased 24 h to 56 h after the infection every 1 h. Captured images are shown in extended Fig. 5c. (AVI 441 kb)

Serial sections of ER derived Pex16-YFP that colocalize with mitochondrial Pex14 in vesicular profiles that segregate from Tom20

Bottom to top z series images of Pex16mut cells infected with Ad-Pex16-YFP (yellow) for 1 day and immunostained with anti-Pex14 (magenta) and -Tom20 (cyan) antibodies (32 sections, 0.1 μm / section). Section 10, 14, 18 22 and 26 are shown in extended Fig. 9c (AVI 546 kb)

ER derived Pex16-mRFP fused with mitochondrial Pex3-YFP enriched domains are released together from the mitochondria

Pex3mut cells expressing Pex16-mRFP and Pex16mut cells expressing Pex3-YFP for 1 day were fused by PEG. 3 h after, cells were observed with spinning disk confocal microscope. Captured images are shown in Fig. 4d (AVI 9 kb)

ER derived Pex16-mRFP fusing with mitochondrial Pex3-YFP enriched domains

Another example of PEG assay. Captured images are shown in extended Fig. 10d. (AVI 18 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugiura, A., Mattie, S., Prudent, J. et al. Newly born peroxisomes are a hybrid of mitochondrial and ER-derived pre-peroxisomes. Nature 542, 251–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21375

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing