Letter | Published:

Symmetry-protected collisions between strongly interacting photons

Nature volume 542, pages 206209 (09 February 2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Realizing robust quantum phenomena in strongly interacting systems is one of the central challenges in modern physical science. Approaches ranging from topological protection to quantum error correction are currently being explored across many different experimental platforms, including electrons in condensed-matter systems1, trapped atoms2 and photons3. Although photon–photon interactions are typically negligible in conventional optical media, strong interactions between individual photons have recently been engineered in several systems4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Here, using coherent coupling between light and Rydberg excitations in an ultracold atomic gas, we demonstrate a controlled and coherent exchange collision between two photons that is accompanied by a π/2 phase shift. The effect is robust in that the value of the phase shift is determined by the interaction symmetry rather than the precise experimental parameters7,10,11,12,13, and in that it occurs under conditions where photon absorption is minimal. The measured phase shift of 0.48(3)π is in excellent agreement with a theoretical model. These observations open a route to realizing robust single-photon switches and all-optical quantum logic gates, and to exploring novel quantum many-body phenomena with strongly interacting photons.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Topological quantum computation—from basic concepts to first experiments. Science 339, 1179–1184 (2013)

  2. 2.

    & Scaling the ion trap quantum processor. Science 339, 1164–1169 (2013)

  3. 3.

    , & Topological photonics. Nat. Photon. 8, 821–829 (2014)

  4. 4.

    et al. Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom. Nature 436, 87–90 (2005)

  5. 5.

    , & Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon. Nat. Photon. 8, 685–694 (2014)

  6. 6.

    & Strongly interacting Rydberg excitations of a cold atomic gas. Science 336, 887–889 (2012)

  7. 7.

    , , & A photon–photon quantum gate based on a single atom in an optical resonator. Nature 536, 193–196 (2016)

  8. 8.

    et al. Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms. Nature 488, 57–60 (2012)

  9. 9.

    et al. Cooperative atom-light interaction in a blockaded Rydberg ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 193603 (2010)

  10. 10.

    , , & Large conditional single-photon cross-phase modulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9740–9744 (2016)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Single photon transistor mediated by Rydberg interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053601 (2014)

  12. 12.

    , , , & Single-photon transistor using a Förster resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053602 (2014)

  13. 13.

    , , & Optical π phase shift created with a single-photon pulse. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600036 (2016)

  14. 14.

    et al. Nonlinear spectroscopy of photons bound to one atom. Nat. Phys. 4, 382–385 (2008)

  15. 15.

    et al. Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001)

  16. 16.

    , , & Long-range interactions and entanglement of slow single-photon pulses. Phys. Rev. A 72, 043803 (2005)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Photon-photon interactions via Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133602 (2011)

  18. 18.

    , & Electromagnetically induced transparency with Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 213601 (2011)

  19. 19.

    et al. Attractive photons in a quantum nonlinear medium. Nature 502, 71–75 (2013)

  20. 20.

    et al. Storage and control of optical photons using Rydberg polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 103001 (2013)

  21. 21.

    et al. Coherent dipole–dipole coupling between two single Rydberg atoms at an electrically-tuned Forster resonance. Nat. Phys. 10, 914–917 (2014)

  22. 22.

    , & Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010)

  23. 23.

    et al. Enhancement of Rydberg-mediated single-photon nonlinearities by electrically tuned Förster resonances. Nat. Commun. 7, 12480 (2016)

  24. 24.

    , & Many-body decoherence dynamics and optimized operation of a single-photon switch. New J. Phys. 18, 092001 (2016)

  25. 25.

    Random-matrix theory of Majorana fermions and topological superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1037–1066 (2015)

  26. 26.

    , , & Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

  27. 27.

    Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Phys. Uspekhi 44 (Suppl.), 131–136 (2001)

  28. 28.

    et al. Signatures of Majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire devices. Science 336, 1003–1007 (2012)

  29. 29.

    et al. Fractional quantum Hall states of Rydberg polaritons. Phys. Rev. A 91, 033838 (2015)

  30. 30.

    , & Quantum crystals and Laughlin droplets of cavity Rydberg polaritons. Preprint at (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge conversations with A. V. Gorshkov, M. J. Gullans, O. Firstenberg, S. Hofferberth and R. Johne. Funding was provided by the NSF, the Center for Ultracold Atoms, DARPA, ARO, ARO MURI, AFOSR MURI, the ARL, U-FET grant number 512862 (HAIRS), the H2020-FETPROACT-2014 grant number 640378 (RYSQ), the DFG (SPP 1929) and the Kwanjeong Educational Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

    • Jeff D. Thompson
    • , Travis L. Nicholson
    •  & Thomas Pohl

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    • Jeff D. Thompson
    • , Aditya V. Venkatramani
    • , Soonwon Choi
    •  & Mikhail D. Lukin
  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

    • Jeff D. Thompson
  3. Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Travis L. Nicholson
    • , Qi-Yu Liang
    • , Sergio H. Cantu
    •  & Vladan Vuletić
  4. Russian Quantum Center, Moscow 143025, Russia

    • Ilya A. Fedorov
  5. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany

    • Daniel Viscor
    •  & Thomas Pohl

Authors

  1. Search for Jeff D. Thompson in:

  2. Search for Travis L. Nicholson in:

  3. Search for Qi-Yu Liang in:

  4. Search for Sergio H. Cantu in:

  5. Search for Aditya V. Venkatramani in:

  6. Search for Soonwon Choi in:

  7. Search for Ilya A. Fedorov in:

  8. Search for Daniel Viscor in:

  9. Search for Thomas Pohl in:

  10. Search for Mikhail D. Lukin in:

  11. Search for Vladan Vuletić in:

Contributions

The experiment and analysis were carried out by J.D.T., T.L.N., Q.-Y.L., S.H.C., A.V.V. and I.A.F. Theoretical modelling was done by S.C., D.V. and T.P. All work was supervised by M.D.L. and V.V. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mikhail D. Lukin or Vladan Vuletić.

Reviewer Information

Nature thanks M. Saffman and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-8, Supplementary Figures 1 -10, Supplementary Table 1 and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20823

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.