Letter | Published:

Hurricane intensification along United States coast suppressed during active hurricane periods

Nature volume 541, pages 390393 (19 January 2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

The North Atlantic ocean/atmosphere environment exhibits pronounced interdecadal variability that is known to strongly modulate Atlantic hurricane activity1,2,3,4,5,6. Variability in sea surface temperature (SST) is correlated with hurricane variability through its relationship with the genesis and thermodynamic potential intensity of hurricanes7. Another key factor that governs the genesis and intensity of hurricanes is ambient environmental vertical wind shear8,9,10 (VWS). Warmer SSTs generally correlate with more frequent genesis and greater potential intensity, while VWS inhibits genesis and prevents any hurricanes that do form from reaching their potential intensity. When averaged over the main hurricane-development region in the Atlantic, SST and VWS co-vary inversely11,12, so that the two factors act in concert to either enhance or inhibit basin-wide hurricane activity. Here I show, however, that conditions conducive to greater basin-wide Atlantic hurricane activity occur together with conditions for more probable weakening of hurricanes near the United States coast. Thus, the VWS and SST form a protective barrier along the United States coast during periods of heightened basin-wide hurricane activity. Conversely, during the most-recent period of basin-wide quiescence, hurricanes (and particularly major hurricanes) near the United States coast, although substantially less frequent, exhibited much greater variability in their rate of intensification, and were much more likely to intensify rapidly. Such heightened variability poses greater challenges to operational forecasting and, consequently, greater coastal risk during hurricane events.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & in Hurricanes: Climate and Socioeconomic Impacts (eds & ) 15–53 (Springer, 1997)

  2. 2.

    , , & The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: causes and implications. Science 293, 474–479 (2001)

  3. 3.

    & Atlantic hurricane trends linked to climate change. Eos 87, 233–244 (2006)

  4. 4.

    et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat. Geosci. 3, 157–163 (2010)

  5. 5.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds et al.) 867–952 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014)

  6. 6.

    et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 65–89 (2016)

  7. 7.

    The hurricane–climate connection. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 89, ES10–ES20 (2008)

  8. 8.

    The effect of vertical shear on tropical cyclone intensity change. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 2076–2088 (1996)

  9. 9.

    & Vertical wind shear influences on tropical cyclone formation and intensification during TCM-92 and TCM-93. Mon. Weath. Rev. 124, 1374–1387 (1996)

  10. 10.

    & Tropical cyclone intensity in vertical wind shear. J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 1859–1876 (2004)

  11. 11.

    & The Atlantic meridional mode and hurricane activity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L07709 (2007)

  12. 12.

    & A more general framework for understanding Atlantic hurricane variability and trends. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1767–1781 (2007)

  13. 13.

    Misuse of landfall as a proxy for Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. Eos Trans. AGU 88, 349–356 (2007)

  14. 14.

    , , , & A relationship between all Atlantic hurricanes and those that make landfall in the USA. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 371–379 (2009)

  15. 15.

    , , , & On the relationship between North Atlantic sea surface temperatures and U.S. hurricane landfall risk. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 48, 111–129 (2009)

  16. 16.

    & Estimating annual numbers of Atlantic hurricanes missing from the HURDAT database (1878–1965) using ship track density. J. Clim. 24, 1736–1746 (2011)

  17. 17.

    , & landfalling and North Atlantic hurricanes: statistical modeling of their frequencies and ratios. Mon. Weath. Rev. 140, 44–65 (2012)

  18. 18.

    Comments on “Monitoring and understanding trends in extreme storms: state of knowledge.”. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1175–1176 (2015)

  19. 19.

    et al. Reply to “Comment on ‘Monitoring and understanding trends in extreme storms: state of knowledge”’. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1177–1179 (2015)

  20. 20.

    et al. Evaluating environmental impacts on tropical cyclone rapid intensification predictability utilizing statistical models. Weather Forecast. 30, 1374–1396 (2015)

  21. 21.

    Will global warming make hurricane forecasting more difficult? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. (2016)

  22. 22.

    , , , & Ocean impact on decadal Atlantic climate variability revealed by sea-level observations. Nature 521, 508–510 (2015)

  23. 23.

    , & Active Atlantic hurricane era at its end? Nat. Geosci. 8, 737–738 (2015)

  24. 24.

    Global warming effects on U.S. hurricane damage. Weather Clim. Soc. 3, 261–268 (2011)

  25. 25.

    & The frequency and duration of U.S. hurricane droughts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 3482–3485 (2015)

  26. 26.

    , & The arbitrary definition of the current Atlantic major hurricane landfall drought. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 713–722 (2016)

  27. 27.

    & Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon. Weath. Rev. 141, 3576–3592 (2013)

  28. 28.

    , & Trend analysis with a new global record of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Clim. 26, 9960–9976 (2013)

  29. 29.

    The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996)

  30. 30.

    et al. Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature version 4 (ERSST.v4). Part I: upgrades and intercomparisons. J. Clim. 28, 911–930 (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgements

NOAA_ERSST_V4 and NCEP reanalysis data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. HURDAT2 data were provided by the US National Hurricane Center at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Center for Weather and Climate, 1225 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

    • James P. Kossin

Authors

  1. Search for James P. Kossin in:

Contributions

All analyses and writing were conducted by J.P.K.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Kossin.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks G. Holland and A. Sobel for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20783

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.