Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Safikhani et al. reply

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Consistency between drug sensitivity measures (AUC) across FIMM, CGP and CCLE.


  1. Mpindi, J. P. et al. Consistency in drug response profiling. Nature 540 (2016)

  2. Haibe-Kains, B. et al. Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. Nature 504, 389–393 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483, 570–575 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barretina, J. et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 483, 603–607 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pemovska, T. et al. Individualized systems medicine strategy to tailor treatments for patients with chemorefractory acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov . 3, 1416–1429 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haverty, P. M. et al. Reproducible pharmacogenomic profiling of cancer cell line panels. Nature 533, 333–337 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pozdeyev, N. et al. Integrating heterogeneous drug sensitivity data from cancer pharmacogenomic studies. Oncotarget (2016)

  8. Bouhaddou, M. et al. Drug response consistency in CCLE and CGP. Nature 540, (2016)

  9. Smirnov, P. et al. PharmacoGx: an R package for analysis of large pharmacogenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 1244–1246 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Safikhani, Z. et al. Revisiting inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. F1000Research (2016)

  11. Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J. & Hovig, E. Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003285 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figure 1 and additional references. (PDF 305 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

This file shows drug dose-response curves from the FIMM dataset. When the same drug was tested on the same cell line in CGP and/or CCLE, the curves were also displayed for comparison. (PDF 1564 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safikhani, Z., El-Hachem, N., Smirnov, P. et al. Safikhani et al. reply. Nature 540, E6–E8 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing