Avoidance of apoptosis is critical for the development and sustained growth of tumours. The pro-survival protein myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) is overexpressed in many cancers, but the development of small molecules targeting this protein that are amenable for clinical testing has been challenging. Here we describe S63845, a small molecule that specifically binds with high affinity to the BH3-binding groove of MCL1. Our mechanistic studies demonstrate that S63845 potently kills MCL1-dependent cancer cells, including multiple myeloma, leukaemia and lymphoma cells, by activating the BAX/BAK-dependent mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. In vivo, S63845 shows potent anti-tumour activity with an acceptable safety margin as a single agent in several cancers. Moreover, MCL1 inhibition, either alone or in combination with other anti-cancer drugs, proved effective against several solid cancer-derived cell lines. These results point towards MCL1 as a target for the treatment of a wide range of tumours.
Apoptosis is an evolutionarily conserved process of programmed cell death that is essential for the elimination of unwanted or potentially dangerous cells1. Avoidance of apoptosis is critical for the development and sustained expansion of tumours and underpins resistance to diverse anti-cancer treatments2. BCL-2 family proteins are key regulators of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and are characterized by the presence of at least one of four BCL-2 homology (BH) domains. They comprise a pro-survival group (BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, MCL1 and BFL1, also known as BCL2A1) and two pro-apoptotic subgroups: the multi-BH domain cell death effectors (BAX, BAK and BOK) and the BH3-only apoptosis initiators (for example, BIM and BAD)3. Interactions among these subgroups, involving binding of the BH3 domain of the pro-apoptotic members to a groove on the surface of the pro-survival proteins, controls commitment to apoptosis4. In many cancers, the balance between the pro- and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members is tipped towards survival as a consequence of genetic or epigenetic changes5.
The promising clinical activity of small molecule inhibitors targeting BCL-2, BCL-XL and BCL-W (navitoclax, ABT-263)6,7 or BCL-2 alone (venetoclax, ABT-199)8 has validated the use of BH3-mimetic drugs to directly activate apoptosis in cancers9. MCL1 gene amplifications are frequently found in human cancers10 and several key oncogenic pathways lead to increased MCL1 protein expression through transcriptional or post-transcriptional mechanisms11. Studies using inducible gene deletion, RNA interference or inducible expression of ligands that inhibit distinct pro-survival BCL-2 family members have shown that MCL1 is essential for the growth of diverse tumours, including acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)12, MYC-13 or BCR–ABL-driven pre-B or B lymphomas14, T cell lymphomas15,16, multiple myeloma17, certain breast cancers and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines carrying MCL1 gene amplifications10. Certain compounds that broadly inhibit gene transcription (for example, anthracyclines and CDK9 inhibitors) or protein translation (for example, puromycin and emetine) are thought to exert their cytotoxic effects in tumour cells, at least in part, by downregulating MCL1 (ref. 18).
No drug-like MCL1 inhibitors have been published yet; the only compounds showing on-target activity are of weak cellular potency and therefore useful only as in vitro chemical tools19,20,21. Moreover, conditional gene knockout studies have shown that MCL1 is essential for the survival of haematopoietic stem cells22, cardiomyocytes23,24 and several other critical cell types3, raising the issue of tolerability when targeting MCL1.
In this paper, we describe the development and mechanism of action of S63845, a potent, selective MCL1 inhibitor. S63845 exhibited low nanomolar cytotoxic activity in multiple cancer-derived cell lines in vitro and potent efficacy in vivo in preclinical mouse models of diverse haematological malignancies. The ability of normal tissues in mice to tolerate doses of S63845 that efficiently kill tumour cells indicates that a suitable therapeutic window may be achievable for MCL1-specific BH3 mimetics.
Highly selective and potent binding of S63845 to MCL1
An NMR-based fragment screen and subsequent structure-guided drug discovery yielded S63845 (Fig. 1a), a selective and potent MCL1 inhibitor. S63845 binds human MCL1 with a Kd of 0.19 nM (surface plasmon resonance) and mouse MCL1 with an around 6-fold lower affinity, with no appreciable binding to BCL-2 or BCL-XL (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Fig. 1a). For comparison, A-1210477, a previously published MCL1 inhibitor19, has an approximately 20-fold lower affinity for human MCL1 (Extended Data Fig. 1b, c).
The BH3-binding grooves on the surfaces of pro-survival BCL-2 family members have common features, most notably the presence of four hydrophobic pockets (P1–P4), which interact with four conserved hydrophobic residues on the BH3 α-helix of the pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family members25. The co-crystal structure of S63845 bound to MCL1 revealed that this inhibitor binds to the BH3-binding groove of MCL1 in a site similar to that at which previously published BH3 mimetics were shown to bind20,26 (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Table 1). The carboxylate moiety forms a strong interaction with Arg263, an anchor point typical for inhibitors of pro-survival BCL-2 family members3. The aromatic scaffold is embedded into the hydrophobic pocket P2 while the terminal trifluoromethyl moiety stretches across into P4, sitting in a small hydrophobic pocket.
S63845 kills tumour cells by BAX/BAK-mediated apoptosis
S63845 was tested alongside other BH3 mimetics (ABT-263 and ABT-199) for its ability to induce apoptosis in three cancer-derived cell lines with known dependency on distinct pro-survival BCL-2 family members. S63845 potently killed MCL1-dependent H929 multiple myeloma cells27, whereas ABT-263 and ABT-199 had only minimal impact (Fig. 1c). S63845 was approximately 1,000-fold more potent in killing H929 cells than the previously described MCL1 inhibitor A-1210477 (Fig. 1c). This difference in potency is probably because of the weaker affinity of A-1210477 for MCL1 (Extended Data Fig. 1b), as well as because of binding of A-1210477 to serum proteins, which reduces its bioavailability. Conversely, the activity of S63845 was not affected by serum concentration (Extended Data Fig. 1d). S63845 had little impact on the viability of BCL-2- and BCL-XL-dependent H146 small-cell lung carcinoma cells28 (Fig. 1c). The sensitivity of RS4;11 leukaemic cells to S63845 and ABT-199 (Fig. 1c) indicates that this cell line depends on both BCL-2 (ref. 29) and MCL1. The MCL1 dependence of H929 cells for their survival was confirmed by using an inducible CRISPR/Cas9 knockout system30 to target each of the pro-survival BCL-2 proteins (Extended Data Fig. 2).
Selective targeting of MCL1 by S63845 was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, which showed that S63845 disrupted binding of BAK and BAX to MCL1 in HeLa cells, whereas it had no impact on the interaction of these pro-apoptotic proteins with BCL-XL or BCL-2 (Extended Data Fig. 3a). Treatment with S63845 increased MCL1 protein levels in the HCT-116 colon carcinoma cell line more potently than treatment with A-1210477 (Fig. 1d; see also ref. 19). The increased MCL1 protein levels were not accompanied by an increase in MCL1 mRNA levels, but correlated with protein half-life extension (Extended Data Fig. 3b–e).
S63845 rapidly induced caspase-dependent phosphatidyl-serine exposure (Fig. 1e), poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cleavage (Extended Data Fig. 4a), and cytochrome c release from mitochondria (Extended Data Fig. 4b), which are all hallmarks of apoptosis, in H929 cells and other cell lines (Extended Data Fig. 4c). BAX- and BAK-deficient H929 cells were resistant to S63845 (Fig. 1f), demonstrating that S63845 kills cancer cells through on-target activity, that is, activation of the BAX/BAK-dependent mitochondrial apoptotic pathway by direct inhibition of MCL1.
Activity of S63845 in haematological malignancies
Many multiple myeloma cell lines express high levels of MCL1 and some have been reported to be dependent on MCL1 for survival31,32. We found that 17 out of 25 multiple myeloma cell lines tested were highly sensitive to S63845 (IC50 < 0.1 μM), six lines were moderately sensitive (0.1 μM < IC50 < 1 μM) and two lines were insensitive (IC50 > 1 μM) (Fig. 2a). The killing activity of S63845 in these cells correlated with the impact of the BIM2A peptide, which specifically inhibits MCL1 (ref. 33), or genetic deletion of MCL1 (ref. 17) but did not correlate with the impact of the BIM–BAD peptide, which inhibits BCL-2, BCL-XL and BCL-W (ref. 34) (Extended Data Fig. 5a, b). The dependence of the killing activity of S63845 on BAX and BAK was confirmed by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in two highly sensitive multiple myeloma cell lines (Extended Data Fig. 5c). All multiple myeloma cell lines tested expressed readily detectable levels of MCL1 but the most sensitive ones had barely detectable levels of BCL-XL (Extended Data Fig. 5d). In contrast to the BCL-2 inhibitor, multiple myeloma cell lines sensitive to S63845 were not restricted to those carrying a t(11;14) chromosomal translocation35, but also included ones carrying chromosomal translocations associated with poor prognosis, such as t(4;14) (ref. 36), or TP53 mutations (Fig. 2a). This suggests that MCL1 inhibitors may be effective in cases refractory to standard-of-care agents.
Intravenously injected (i.v.) S63845 exerted dose-dependent anti-tumour activity in human multiple myeloma (H929 and AMO1) xenografts in immunocompromised mice (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 6a), with maximal tumour growth inhibition (TGImax) of 114% in the AMO1 model and 103% in the H929 model. At 25 mg kg−1, S63845 induced complete regression in 7 out of 8 of the mice at 100 days after treatment in the AMO1 model (Extended Data Fig. 6b). Notably, even at the highest tested efficacious dose (independent of the number of administrations), S63845 was well tolerated by the mice with no significant weight loss observed (Extended Data Fig. 6c, d).
S63845 was next tested in a panel of 11 cell lines representative of human lymphomas and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML; Fig. 2c): five lines were highly sensitive (IC50 < 0.1 μM), three were moderately sensitive (0.1 μM < IC50 < 1 μM) and three were insensitive to S63845 (IC50 > 1 μM). S63845 also showed potent cytotoxic activity against seven out of seven c-MYC-driven human Burkitt lymphoma cell lines (Extended Data Fig. 6e). These findings are consistent with the MCL1 dependence of c-MYC- or BCR–ABL-driven human and mouse malignant cells revealed by inducible MCL1 gene deletion or MCL1 blockade by BIM2A (refs 13, 14).
The in vivo activity of S63845 was tested in the c-MYC-driven mouse lymphoma (lymphomas from Eμ-Myc transgenic mice) model, in which both the tumour cells and the normal tissues express mouse MCL1 protein and thus have the same affinity for the drug. All Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell lines tested were sensitive to S63845 in vitro with IC50 ranging from 161 nM to 282 nM (Fig. 2d). Treatment with 25 mg kg−1 S63845 (i.v.) for five consecutive days was able to cure 70% of immuno-competent C57BL/6 mice bearing Eμ-Myc mouse lymphomas (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 6f, g), with no side-effects evident in normal tissues.
The activity of S63845 was next evaluated in a panel of eight AML cell lines: all lines were sensitive to S63845 (IC50 4–233 nM, Fig. 3a), consistent with results obtained in animal models of AML (ref. 12). No correlation between the potency of S63845 and MCL1 mRNA expression was observed in the combined panel of haematological cancer cell lines (data not shown). However, after investigating the expression of additional BCL-2 family members or even in an unbiased analysis, we found an inverse correlation between sensitivity to S63845 and BCL-XL mRNA expression levels (Fig. 3b and Extended Data Fig. 7a). Accordingly, the five CML cell lines, which expressed comparatively high levels of BCL-XL mRNA, were relatively insensitive to S63845 (IC50 > 1 μM). In vivo, S63845 showed potent activity in the MV4-11 human AML xenograft model, with a TGImax of 86% at 12.5 mg per kg body weight (Fig. 3c). At 25 mg kg−1, complete remission was observed in 6 out of 8 mice after 80 days.
To investigate the potential for MCL1 targeting in primary AML, 25 freshly derived patient AML samples were treated with S63845 alongside ABT-199, and the standard-of-care drugs, idarubicin and ara-C (Extended Data Fig. 7b). LC50 values for S63845 were in the low-nanomolar range in 5 out of 25 cases (20%). Although some S63845-sensitive AML samples were also sensitive to ABT-199, others were selectively sensitive only to S63845 or ABT-199 (Extended Data Fig. 7b). The LC50 for S63845 was below 1 μM for 3 out of 5 AML cases with adverse cytogenetic karyotypes. The AML samples displayed a wide range of responses to the MCL1 inhibitor, with the most sensitive cases requiring 100- to 1,000-fold less S63845 for effective killing than the resistant ones or normal CD34+ progenitor cells (Fig. 3d). In clonogenic assays, a subset of primary AML samples were sensitive to 100 nM S63845, whereas normal human CD34+ progenitor cells were resistant to this dose (Extended Data Fig. 7c). By contrast, the standard-of-care chemotherapeutic drugs were toxic to clonogenic growth of both leukaemic and normal progenitor cells (Extended Data Fig. 7c).
Activity of S63845 in solid tumours
S63845 cytotoxic activity was also tested in a panel of solid-tumour-derived cell lines. Although the majority were relatively resistant to S63845 when used as a single agent (IC50 > 1 μM), a few cell lines were moderately sensitive with IC50 < 1 μM in 3 out of 20 NSCLCs, 3 out of 9 breast cancers and 3 out of 12 melanomas (Extended Data Fig. 8a). While there was no clear correlation with the mutational status of these cell lines, investigation of the expression of BCL-2 family members and of an unbiased analysis revealed that sensitivity to the MCL1 inhibitor was inversely correlated with BCL-XL mRNA expression levels (Extended Data Fig. 8b, c). This is consistent with previously published work using MCL1 knockdown10,37,38.
We next investigated whether solid-cancer-derived cell lines could be sensitized to S63845 by co-treatment with drugs that target oncogenic kinases39. S63845 was tested in combination with lapatinib (HER2 inhibitor) in the HER2-amplified BT-474 breast-cancer cell line, tarceva (EGFR inhibitor) in the PC9 (EGFR-mutated) NSCLC cell line, trametinib (MEK inhibitor) in SK-MEL-28 (B-RAF-mutated) and SK-MEL-2 (N-RAS-mutated) melanoma cell lines or vemurafenib (RAF inhibitor) in the B-RAF mutated A2058 melanoma cell line. Even though these inhibitors of oncogenic kinases increased the levels of BIM (Extended Data Fig. 8d), they elicited a predominantly cytostatic effect in the cancer cell lines tested (Fig. 4 and Extended Data Fig. 8e). Notably, the combination of these kinase inhibitors with the MCL1 inhibitor S63845 induced a potent cytotoxic response (Fig. 4 and Extended Data Fig. 8e). These results are consistent with previous reports showing that inhibitors of oncogenic kinases can potently sensitize tumour cells to BH3-mimetic drugs targeting BCL-2 and/or BCL-XL (refs 40,41).
S63845 is tolerated in mice at efficacious doses
Finally, we investigated the impact of S63845 treatment on key organs and as multiple blood-cell subsets at the dose of 25 mg kg−1, which is highly efficacious against mouse tumours (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 6f, g). This dose caused only a minor reduction in certain leukocyte subsets and no histomorphological changes were observed in the liver, heart, kidney, skeletal muscle and other organs of mice (Fig. 5 and Extended Data Fig. 9a, b). C57BL/6 mice could even tolerate a 40 mg per kg body weight dose (Extended Data Fig. 9c). At the dose-limiting level of 60 mg kg−1, S63845 caused a marked reduction in erythrocytes (Extended Data Fig. 9d) and the mice presented with apathy, weight loss and signs of haemolysis. The fact that S63845 is well tolerated at therapeutically efficacious doses in mouse cancer models contrasts with previous work showing that conditional MCL1 gene targeting has a severe detrimental impact on multiple cell types, often having a fatal outcome22,23,24. The most likely explanation is that irreversible loss of MCL1, resulting from gene knockout, is not equivalent to intermittent periods of pharmacological MCL1 inhibition. It is also possible that additional roles of MCL1, independent of its anti-apoptotic function42, may only be revealed by gene knockout but not by a pharmacological inhibitor.
Here we describe a highly potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the pro-survival protein MCL1 that has noteworthy single agent in vitro and in vivo anti-tumour activity in cancer-derived cell lines known to be MCL1 dependent, while sparing normal tissues at efficacious doses. We confirmed the broad therapeutic applicability of MCL1 inhibition across panels of multiple myeloma, lymphomas, leukaemias and primary AML cells. We show that the therapeutic potential of MCL1 inhibitors extends to several solid tumour models, some of which showed sensitivity to S63845 monotherapy, while many others were only killed when treated with a combination of S63845 and inhibitors of oncogenic kinases. Mechanism-of-action studies confirmed that this MCL1 inhibitor induces hallmarks of apoptosis and kills cancer cells in a manner dependent on pro-apoptotic BAX and/or BAK.
This study presents preclinical evidence that MCL1 is a druggable target and that direct pharmacological inhibition of MCL1 with a BH3-mimetic drug can be tolerated and efficacious against several cancer types. Despite previous work showing that genetic loss of MCL1 causes severe defects in mice, our results suggest that a robust anti-tumour effect and a suitable therapeutic window are achievable with a BH3-mimetic drug that targets MCL1.
Lapatinib, PLX-4032, trametenib, tarceva, ABT-199 and ABT-263 were purchased from Selleck-chem; QVD-OPh from Sigma; MG132 from Calbiochem; idarubicin and araC from Pharmacia and Upjohn. A-1210477 was made according to published methods26. Synthesis and characterization of S63845 is provided in the Supplementary Methods. Owing to light sensitivity, S63845 was stored in the dark.
MCL1 protein expression and purification
Following the previously published structure of MCL1 (PDB ID4WGI)43, a construct was designed with residues 173–321 of human MCL1 as a C-terminal fusion with maltose binding protein (MBP). In addition to the surface entropy-reducing (SER) mutations in MCL1 (K194A, K197A and R201A (ref. 43)), we also introduced E198A, E199A and K265A mutations into MBP (ref. 44).
The plasmid encoding the MBP–MCL1 fusion protein was transformed into BL21(DE3)pLysS bacteria. A single colony was used to inoculate 5 ml terrific broth (Fisher BioReagents, (BP2468-2)) containing kanamycin and chloramphenicol at 100 μg ml−1 and 34 μg ml−1, respectively. After 3 h growth at 37 °C, the 5 ml culture was used to inoculate 2 l terrific broth containing the same antibiotics. At an OD600 of 0.7, the temperature was reduced to 18 °C before induction of MBP–MCL1 protein expression by addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM. Cells were harvested by centrifugation.
Harvested cells were resuspended in 3 volumes of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and lysed by passing three times through an emulsiflex-C5 (Avestin). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 40,000 g, at 4 °C, for 60 min and applied to a 5-ml MBPTrap column (GE Healthcare). The MBP–MCL1 fusion protein was eluted in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM maltose and further purified by size exclusion chromatography in 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT. Protein eluted as a monomer was concentrated and used in crystallization studies.
Apo crystals were grown at a concentration of 34 mg ml−1 (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and 2 mM DTT) by the sitting drop vapour diffusion. 2 μl of the protein solution was mixed with 2 μl of the crystallization reservoir (25% PEG 3350, 0.2 M magnesium formate, 1 mM maltose) in a sitting drop plate. The plate was incubated at 284 K and suitable rod-like crystals appeared overnight. Individual crystals were harvested from the crystallization drops and transferred to a drop containing 4.5 μl of the crystallization reservoir solution plus 0.5 μl of S63845 (20 mM in DMSO). The mixture was incubated for 72 h at 284 K. Crystals were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen after cryoprotection using crystallization reservoir plus 20% ethylene glycol.
Diffraction data were collected at the Soleil Synchrotron (France) on a beamline Proxima1 and were processed and scaled using XDS (ref. 45). The structure was solved by molecular replacement using MOLREP (ref. 46), using another crystal structure of an MBP–MCL1 fusion protein43. The data were subsequently refined using REFMAC5 (ref. 47). Interactive graphical model building was carried out with COOT. The ligand was clearly defined by the initial electron density maps. The progress of the refinement was assessed using Rfree and the conventional R factor. Once refinement was completed, the structures were validated using various programs from the CCP4i package, CCP4. Statistic parameters are detailed in Extended Table 1.
Fluorescence polarization assays were carried out in black-walled, flat-bottomed, low-binding, 384-well plates (Corning) in buffer A (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 pH 7.4 and 5% DMSO) in the presence of 10 nM fluorescein-PUMA (3-(((3′,6′-dihydroxy-3-oxo-3H-spiro(2-benzofuran-1,9′-xanthene)-5-yl)carbamothioyl)amino)-N-(6-oxohexyl)propanamide-AREIGAQLRRMADDLNAQY, from the polypeptide group, France). Final concentrations of MCL1, BCL-2 and BCL-XL proteins were 10, 10 and 20 nM, respectively. The assay plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature and the fluorescence polarization was measured on a Synergy 2 reader (exitation, 528 nm; emission, 640 nm; cut-off, 510 nm). The binding of increasing doses of the compound was expressed as a percentage reduction in mP compared to the window established between the ‘DMSO only’ and ‘total inhibition’ control (30 μM PUMA). The inhibitory concentrations of the drugs that gave a 50% reduction in mP (IC50) were determined, from 11-point dose response curves, in XL-Fit using a 4-parameter logistic model (Sigmoidal dose–response model). The Ki was subsequently calculated as described in ref. 48.
Surface plasmon resonance
All SPR measurements were performed on a BIAcore T200 instrument (BIAcore GE Healthcare).
Direct binding assay
Direct binding experiments were performed at 20 °C on Series S NTA chips. 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 175 mM NaCl, 25 μM EDTA, 1 mM TCEP, 0.01% P20 and 1% DMSO was used as a running buffer (buffer B). The ligand surface was generated using double His-tagged proteins essentially as described in refs 49, 50. Serial dilutions of the compound in buffer B were injected over the protein surface. All sample measurements were performed at a flow rate of 30 μlper min (injection time 120 s, dissociation time 360 s). The sensor surface was regenerated by consecutive injections of 0.35 M EDTA pH 8.0 with 0.1 mg/ml−1 trypsin, 0.5 M imidazole and 45% DMSO (60 s, 15 μl per min). Data processing was performed using BIAevaluation 2.1 (BIAcore GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp) software. Sensorgrams were double referenced before global fitting of the concentration series to a 1:1 binding model.
Affinity determination by competition in solution
Affinity determination by competition in solution experiments were performed at 30 °C in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 1 mM TCEP, 2% glycerol, 0.05% P20 and 1% DMSO (buffer C). An MCL1-specific compound was immobilized on Series S CM5 chips by amine coupling as advised in the BIAcore GE Healthcare protocol. Serial dilutions of compounds in buffer B supplemented with fixed concentrations of protein were injected over the generated surface at a flow rate of 15 μl per min for 90 s. Calibration curves were generated using the same procedure by injecting different concentrations of protein over the same sensor chip. Affinity evaluations were performed using the affinity in solution model of BIA evaluation 2.1 (BIAcore GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp) software.
Animals and treatment groups
Mice were kept in either the Servier Research Institute or the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) specified pathogen-free animal areas for mouse experimental purpose (for Servier, facility license number B78-100-2). The care and use of animals was in accordance with European and national regulations for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (directives 86/609 and 2003/65) and the requirements of the Servier Research Institute and WEHI Animal Ethics Committees. Sample sizes were chosen to reach statistical significance, and tumour measurements and all data analysis were performed in a blinded fashion. The Eμ-Myc transgenic mice are kept on a C57BL/6–Ly5.2+ background and have been described previously51.
8–10 week old female SCID mice (for transplantation with human AMO1 and H929 tumour cells) or Swiss Nude mice (Crl:NU(Ico)-Foxn1nu) (for transplantation with human MV4-11 tumour cells) were inoculated with 0.1 ml containing 5 × 106 of the indicated tumour cells subcutaneously into the right flank. The H929 and MV4-11 cells were resuspended in 100% matrigel (BD Biosciences) and the AMO1 cells in a 50:50 mixture of growth medium and matrigel. The width and length of the tumours were measured 2–3 times a week using an electronic caliper. Tumour volume was calculated using the formula: (length × width2)/2. When the tumour volume reached approximately 200 mm3, mice were randomized into different groups; that is, treatment with drug (different concentrations) or vehicle (n = 8 for each group). S63845 was formulated extemporaneously in 25 mM HCl, 20% 2-hydroxy propyl β-cyclo dextrin 20% (Fisher Scientifics) and administrated at the doses and schedules described in the figure legends. Tumour growth inhibition (TGImax) was calculated at the greatest response using the following equation:
where day x is the day maximum where the number of animals per group in the control group is sufficient to calculate the TGI (%). For the statistical analysis of differences in tumour volume between treatment groups, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures on day factor was performed on log-transformed data followed by Dunnett adjustment in order to compare each dose of drug to the control group. A complete tumour regression response was considered for the population with tumours 25 mm3 for at least three consecutive measurements. For ethical reasons, mice carrying tumours exceeding 2,000 mm3 were euthanized. Data are represented as mean of tumour volume ± s.e.m. over time (days) until at least one mouse per cohort had to be killed.
Single-cell suspensions of 106 Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell lines (AH15A, AF47A, BRE966, 2253, MRE 721, 560), resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), were injected into the tail vein of 8–9 week old female C57BL/6–Ly5.1+ mice. Mice were treated with either vehicle (25 mM HCl, 20% 2-hydroxy propyl β-cyclo dextrin) or 25 mg kg−1 S63845 (reconstituted in vehicle) on days 5–9 after transplant, administered by tail vein injection or, in some incidences when the tails became damaged, by retro-orbital injection. To generate the survival curves of the mice bearing the Eμ-Myc lymphoma cells, mice were killed when deemed unwell by experienced animal technicians. For the toxicity experiments, female C57BL/6–Ly5.1+ mice bearing Eμ-Myc lymphomas or non-tumour bearing C57BL/6–Ly5.1+ mice were killed 4 days after the 5-day drug treatment regimen had been completed (this equated to 13 days after transplantation of the tumour cells in the mice bearing the Eμ-Myc lymphoma cells). For the three mice injected with the AH15A Eμ-Myc lymphoma cells, those treated with vehicle were analysed after only 4 days of treatment because they were deemed too unhealty from the lymphoma to complete their prescribed regimen. For the maximal tolerated dose experiments, 7–8 week old C57BL/6 mice (3 male and 3 female mice in each arm) were treated with a dose of vehicle or S63845 (25 mg per kg, 40 mg per kg, 50 mg per kg or 60 mg per kg body weight) for 5 consecutive days by i.v. tail vein injection or by retro-orbital injection if the tails became damaged. The mice were analysed as they were killed, or for the mice surviving the entire course of treatment, 3 days after the 5-day treatment had been completed. For the initial toxicity studies, sections of spleen, lymph nodes, thymus, ovaries, uterus, kidneys, liver, pancreas, intestines, colon, heart, lung, sternum, backbone and muscle were fixed in 10% formalin and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The weights of the spleen, thymus, (axillary, brachial and inguinal) lymph nodes, liver and kidneys were recorded. Cells were flushed from the bone marrow (two femurs and one tibia) and single cell suspensions of the spleen, thymus and lymph nodes were generated. The red blood cells were lysed by treatment with 0.168 M ammonium chloride and the white blood cell count was determined using a CASY cell counter (Scharfe System GmbH).
Primary AML patient samples
All bone marrow or peripheral blood samples from patients with AML were collected after informed consent in accordance with guidelines approved by the Alfred and Royal Melbourne Hospital human research ethics committees. Mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare) density-gradient centrifugation, followed by red cell depletion in ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) lysis buffer at 37 °C for 10 min. Cells were then resuspended in PBS containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma). Mononuclear cells were suspended in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) medium containing penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco) and 15% heat-inactivated FBS (Sigma). Normal CD34+ progenitor cells from healthy donors were collected from granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized blood harvests and purified after Ficoll separation by CD34 positive selection using Miltenyi Biotec micobeads (Miltenyi Biotec. Cat. No. 130-046-703).
Human research ethics approval
The research with primary human cells was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of Alfred Health. AML cells from patients and cells from normal donors were obtained following informed consent processes approved by the HRECs of Alfred Health and Melbourne Health.
Agar colony formation assays
Colony-forming assays were performed on freshly purified and frozen mononuclear fractions from AML patients or normal cells from G-CSF mobilized normal, healthy donors. Primary cells were cultured in duplicate in 35-mm dishes (Griener-bio) at 104 to 105 cells. Cells were plated in 0.6% agar (Difco): AIMDM 2× (IMDM powder, Invitrogen), supplemented with NaHCO3, dextran, penicillin and streptomycin, β-mercaptoethanol and asparagine, FBS (Sigma) at a 2:1:1 ratio of agar:AIMDM:FBS. For optimal growth conditions, all plates contained granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (100 ng per plate, genzyme), IL-3 (100 ng per plate, R&D Systems), stem cell factor (100 ng per plate, R&D Systems) and erythropoietin (4U per plate, Roche). Cells were cultured for 2–3 weeks in the presence or absence of drugs at 37 °C at 5% CO2 in a high humidity incubator. After incubation, plates were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in saline and scored using GelCount (Oxford Optronix).
NCI-H929, RS4;11, MV4-11, HCT-116, BT-474, SK-Mel-2, PC-9 and H146 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium, A2058 cells were cultured in DMEM medium and SK-MEL-28 cells were cultured in EMEM medium. All media were supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, and 10 mM HEPES pH = 7.4, at 37 °C, in 5% CO2. For RS4;11 cells the medium was additionally supplemented with 4.5 g l−1 glucose. AMO1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, and 10mM HEPES pH = 7.4. HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM medium (containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin). Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. All of the cell lines were purchased from the ATCC or DSMZ.
Human Burkitt lymphoma (BL)-derived cell lines (Rael-BL, Kem-BL, BL2, BL30, BL31, BL41, and Ramos-BL, a gift from A.B. Rickinson and M. Rowe, University of Birmingham, UK) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 1 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μM α-thiogycerol (Sigma), and 20 nM bathocuproine disulfonic acid (Sigma) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The mouse Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell lines (AH15A, AF47A, 2253, BRE966, MRE 721 and 560) were cultured in high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 100 μM asparagine (Sigma), 100 U ml−1 penicillin and 100 mg ml−1 streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37 °C, 10% CO2.
The myeloma-derived cell lines were purchased from the ATCC, DSMZ or JCRB or provided by the laboratory of A. Spencer (XG1, KMS-26, ANBL6, WL-2 and OCI-MY1) and cultured as recommended by the suppliers at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. Bax−/−,Bak−/− H929, KMS-12-PE and AMO1 cells were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing as described below. HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS at 37 °C in the presence of 10% CO2. Media and supplements were purchased from Life Technologies unless specified otherwise.
To test the sensitivity of 152 cell lines derived from several types of solid tumours or haematological malignancies (AML, lymphoma, bladder, central nervous system, colorectal, gastric, head and neck, liver, lung, breast, melanoma, ovarian, pancreas, prostate, renal, sarcoma and uterine) to S63845, cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium (25 mM HEPES, with l-glutamine, Biochrom) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Sigma) and 0.1 mg ml−1 gentamicin (Life Technologies). Different culture media were used for VCap (DMEM, 10% FCS, 1% gentamycin), CALU1 (McCoy, 10% FCS 1% gentamycin) and U87MG (EMEM, 10% FCS 1% gentamycin). These cell lines were provided by the Children’s Hospital Cologne, the University Hospital Freiburg or the NCI or were purchased from ATCC, DSMZ, JCRB, ECACC or KCBL.
Two cell lines used in this study were present in the list of commonly misidentified cell lines maintained by the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC): NCI-H929 and U-937. For our study, H929 cells were obtained from authentic stocks (ATCC CRL-9068 and DSMZ ACC-163) and U937 cells were authenticated by STR analysis. All cell lines used in this study were verified to be mycoplasma negative before undertaking any experiments with them.
MTT cell viability assay
Cell viability was measured using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) colourimetric assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well microplates at a density to maintain control (untreated) cells in an exponential phase of growth during the entire experiment. Cells were incubated with compounds for 48 h followed by incubation with 1 mg ml−1 MTT for 4 h at 37 °C. Lysis buffer (20% SDS) was added and absorbance was measured at 540 nm 18 h later. All experiments were repeated at least three times. The percentage of viable cells was calculated and averaged for each well: per cent growth = (OD treated cells/OD control cells) × 100, and the IC50, the concentration where the optical density was reduced by 50%, was calculated by a linear regression performed on the linear zone of the dose–response curve.
CellTiterBlue cell viability assay
Cells were harvested from exponential phase cultures, counted and plated in 96-well flat-bottom microtitre plates at a cell density depending on the cell line’s growth rate (4,000 to 30,000 cells for solid-tumour-derived cell lines, 10,000 to 60,000 for haematological cancer-derived cell lines). After a 24-h recovery period to allow the cells to resume exponential growth, 10 μl of culture medium (four control wells per plate) or of culture medium with the test compound were added by a liquid-handling robotic system and treated or untreated cells were cultured for a further 3 days. Compounds were applied in half-log increments at 10 concentrations in duplicate. After treatment of cells, 20 μl per well CellTiter-Blue reagent (Promega) was added. After incubation for up to 4 h, fluorescence was measured by using the Enspire Multimode Reader (Perkin Elmer, excitation λ = 531 nm, emission λ = 615 nm). IC50 values were calculated by 4-parameter, nonlinear curve fit using Oncotest Warehouse Software.
CellTiter-Glo luminescent cell viability assay
To test the activity of S63845 in combination with the kinase inhibitors trametenib, tarceva, PLX-4032 and lapatinib, SK-MEL-28, BT-474, A2058, SK-Mel-2 and PC-9 cells were seeded into 96-well plates. After 24 h, cells were treated with the indicated compounds for 72 h and assayed for viability using the CellTiter-Glo reagent (Promega). Luminescence was measured at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h on independent plates seeded and treated at the same time. Results were normalized to the samples without treatment at time 0 h.
To test the sensitivity of the multiple myeloma cell lines to S63845 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 5,000 cells per well and treated at 5-point 1:8 serial dilutions of compounds starting from 10 μM. Cell viability was assessed at 48 h using the CellTiter-Glo Assay (Promega) following the manufacturer’s instructions and the plates were read using an Envision luminescence plate reader (Perkin Elmer). Results were normalized to the viability of cells that had been treated with 0.1% DMSO (vehicle) in medium for 48 h. The IC50 values were calculated using nonlinear regression algorithms in Prism software (GraphPad).
To test the dependence of H929 cells on BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, MCL1 or A1/BFL1 for their sustained survival, pools of cells stably expressing Cas9 (mCherry+) and inducibly expressing the relevant single guide RNA (sgRNA) (GFP+) were purified by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences) and seeded into 96-well plates (5,000 cells per well) in triplicates and their viability was determined by using the CellTiter-Glo assay 72 h after the addition of doxocycline (1 μg ml−1) to induce expression of the sgRNA targeting the corresponding genes. The data were normalized to the viability of cells infected with the empty vector. In some experiments, the viability (determined by propidium iodide exclusion) of the cells with or without co-treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor QVD-OPh (25 μM; MP Biomedicals) for 12 h was also determined.
Cell viability analysis of primary AML patient samples
Freshly purified mononuclear cells from AML patient samples were adjusted to a concentration of 2.5 × 105 per ml1 and 100 μl of cell suspensions were aliquoted per well into 96-well plates (Sigma). Cells were then treated with S63845, cytarabine (Pfizer), ABT-199 (Active Biochem) or idarubicin (Sigma) over a 6 log concentration range from 1 nM to 10 μM for 48 h and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were then stained with the Sytox blue nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen) and fluorescence measured by flow cytometric analysis using a LSR-II Fortessa machine (Becton Dickinson). FACSDiva software was used for data collection, and FlowJo software for data analysis. Blast cells were gated using forward and side light scatter properties. Viable cells excluding Sytox blue were determined at six concentrations for each drug and the 50% lethal concentration (LC50, in μM) was calculated using nonlinear regression algorithms in Prism software (GraphPad).
Cell viability analysis by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining
NCI-H929 cells were treated with the indicated compounds for 4 h, centrifuged and washed with binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2). Cells were incubated with 200 μl of binding buffer containing Annexin V–Alexa fluor 488 (Invitrogen) and propidium iodide (Sigma) for 15 min at 20 °C in the dark. 400 μl of binding buffer was added and samples were kept at 4 °C before flow cytometry analysis. For each sample, 104 cells were analysed by flow cytometry in an Epics XL/MCL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Fluorescence was collected at 520 nm (Alexa fluor 488) and 630 nm ( propidium iodide).
Human Burkitt lymphoma-derived cell lines and mouse Eμ-Myc lymphoma cell lines were plated at a density of 4 × 104 cells per well in flat-bottomed 96-well plates. These cells were treated with increasing doses of S63845 (typically 0.008, 0.025, 0.04, 0.2, 1, 5 μM) for 24 h. Cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide, analysed on a FACS Calibur and live cells (Annexin V negative/propidium iodide negative) were recorded. Data are presented as per cent cell death induction relative to cells cultured in medium alone.
Immunodetection of cleaved PARP by MesoScale discovery assay
Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were treated with the indicated compounds for 6 h and harvested in lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 142.5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktails (Calbiochem)). Cleared lysates (5 μg protein) were prepared for immunodetection of cleaved PARP (a marker of apoptosis) by using the MSD apoptosis panel whole cell lysate kit (MSD) in 96-well plates according to manufacturer’s instructions, and were analysed on the Sector Image 2400.
Cytochrome c release assay
NCI-H929 cells were treated with S63845 for 4 h, washed with PBS and harvested in lysis buffer delivered with the cytochrome c release apoptosis assay kit (Qiagen). Cells were then homogenized using an ice-cold tissue grinder (40 passes). Homogenates were centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes and centrifuged at 10 000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected as cytosolic fractions. Cytochrome c release was determined by western blotting using the cytochrome c antibody provided in the kit. Lysates were also analysed by immunoblotting using an anti-LDH antibody (Rockland 200-1173; used as protein loading control).
Total protein extracts of myeloma cells were generated in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 135 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol) containing 1% Triton X-100 and complete protease inhibitors (Roche). Protein extracts of the other cell lines were generated in lysis buffer containing 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 142.5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktails (Calbiochem). Lysates were stored at −80 °C. Protein content was quantified using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Lysates were diluted with LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen) at a 3:1 ratio and denatured at 95 °C for 7–10 min. 20–40 μg of protein extracts were separated by SDS–PAGE (NuPAGE 10% Bis Tris gels) and proteins transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% skimmed milk in PBS and 0.1% Tween20 (blocking buffer) before incubation with antibodies. Rat monoclonal antibodies to BAX (21C10; WEHI) or BAK (7D10; WEHI) and mouse monoclonal antibody against HSP70 (N6; used as a loading control) were used. All antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer. Commercially available antibodies were also used: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against MCL1 (Santa Cruz, S-19, sc-819), PARP (Cell Signaling, 9542), BIM (Cell Signaling, C34C5 2933), Phospho-ERK (Cell Signaling, 9101), total ERK (Cell Signaling, 9102), BAK (BD 556396), BAX (Santa Cruz, sc-493) BCL-XL (Transduction Laboratory, 610212) and mouse monoclonal antibodies against actin (Millipore, MAB1501R; used as a loading control), NOXA (Calbiochem, OP180), Flag-M2 (Sigma) and p53 (Santa Cruz, sc-126).
HeLa cells were transiently transfected, using the Effecten reagent (Qiagen), with expression vectors encoding 3× Flag-tagged MCL1, BCL-XL or BCL-2 (p3×Flag–CMV10, Sigma). After 24 h, cells were treated for 4 h with S63845 and then harvested in lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.4% Triton X100, protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktails (Calbiochem)). The cleared lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma). The immunoprecipitates and inputs were analysed by immunoblotting using the antibodies listed above.
Analysis of MCL1 gene expression by qPCR
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy mini kit with DNase I treatment (Qiagen) and reverse transcripted using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit with RNAse inhibitor (Life Technologies). Conventional real-time PCR was performed on an ABI 7900HT system in 50 μl reaction volumes containing 2× TaqMan universal PCR master mix, 2.5 μl of 20× target/control assay mix and 5 μl of respective cDNA in an optical 96-well plate. NTCs (no template controls) using RNase-free water were included in the plate. Cycling conditions were 95 °C (10 min), followed by 40 PCR cycles at 95 °C (15 s) and 60 °C (1 min). TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Life Technologies) for MCL1 evaluated the anti-apoptotic long (L) isoform NM_021960 (reference assay Hs01050896_m1). Two out of five reference genes including GAPDH, PPIA, 18S, UBC and SDHA, were selected on geNorm software as the optimal number of reference target genes (geNorm pairwise variation cut off V < 0.15). As such, the optimal normalization factor was calculated as the geometric mean (GM) of reference targets SDHA and PPIA (ref genes) and calculation of −ΔCt was achieved as follows: Data are presented as fold change of relative quantification calculated as 2–ΔΔCt, with . Pair-wise comparisons were evaluated with a t-test.
Antibodies for flow cytometry
Aliquots of cells were stained in 24G2 (anti-FcγR, (Fcγ gamma receptor)) antibody containing hybridoma supernatant, containing fluorescently (FITC, R-PE or APC) labelled monoclonal antibodies against cell surface markers, and analysed on an LSR11C (Becton Dickinson) excluding propidium iodide + (dead) cells. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD25 (clone PC61), anti-CD4 (clones GK1.5 (Biolegend) and H129), anti-CD8 (clones 53-6.7 (Biolegend) and YTS 169), CD44 (clone IM7), anti-B220 (220 kDa form of CD45 expressed on B cells, clones RA3-6B2 (Biolegend)), anti-GR1 (granulocyte antigen 1, clone RB6-8C5), anti-MAC1 macrophage antigen 1, clone M1/70), anti-SCA1 (stem cell antigen 1, clone E13-161.7), anti-c-KIT (clone 2B8 (Biolegend)), anti-TCR (T cell receptor, Biolegend), anti-TER119 (clone TER-119), anti-IgM (clone 5.1), anti-IgD (clone 11-26C), anti-Ly5.1 (clone A20.1) and anti-Ly5.2 (clone S.450-15.2). Data were processed using FlowJo Version 9.9 (TreeStar).
Blood cell counts and cell subset composition were determined using an ADVIA 2120 haematology analyser (Siemens).
Plasmids, lentivirus production and infection
The vectors for the constitutive expression of Cas9 and the inducible expression of the sgRNAs have been previously described30. To target the BCL-2 family members, sgRNAs were designed ( http://crispr.mit.edu) and cloned into pFH1tUTG (ref. 30) with the exception of sgRNAs for MCL1, which have been previously described30. The sequences of the sgRNAs used in this study as well as the primers for amplifying the targeted regions for DNA sequence analysis are detailed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The vectors to express the BIM variants have been previously described12,13. To produce lentiviruses, the constructs of interest were co-transfected into HEK293T cells with the packaging viruses pMDLg/pRRE, pRSV RRE and pCMV VSV-G (all from Addgene) using the Effectene transfection reagent (Qiagen). The lentiviruses were harvested, filtered and used to infect target cells as previously described13,30.
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing
Multiple-myeloma-derived cell lines were serially infected with lentiviruses that stably co-express Cas9 and the fluorescent marker, mCherry, and inducibly express the indicated sgRNAs plus stably express GFP. Double positive cells (mCherry+ GFP+) were purified using a BD FACSAria Fusion Sorter (BD Biosciences). Expression of the sgRNA was induced by the addition of doxycycline (1 μg ml−1; Sigma). The experiments targeting BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, MCL1 and BFL1 were undertaken with pools of infected cells. To generate the BAX−/−,BAK−/− H929 clone, a BAX-deficient H929 clone was infected with a lentivirus expressing a sgRNA to target BAK, re-cloned and verified by DNA sequencing and western blotting (Fig. 2c). Sequences of sgRNAs and primers for targeted PCR used in this study are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
DNA sequence verification was carried out as previously described30. Briefly, genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen) and mutation of targeted DNA confirmed by the Illumina MiSeq30. The unique PCR primers with overhang sequences for each sgRNA are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Graphpad Prism software was used for generating Kaplan–Meier animal survival plots of vehicle and S63845 treated mice and performing statistical analysis (using a log-rank test (Mantel–Cox)). Graphpad Prism was also used to perform multiple unpaired two-tailed t-tests of vehicle-treated and S63845-treated mice to look for significant changes in the data generated from the ADVIA analysis of the blood and from the FACS analysis of the number of different cells present in the spleen, thymus, lymph nodes and bone marrow. Graphpad Prism was used to generate IC50 curves for cell lines treated with S63845 in vitro. GraphPad Software was used for statistical analysis. All data are expressed as mean ± s.d. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
The PDB deposition code for the X-ray structure of the MBP-MCL1 complex with S63845 is 5LOF.
We thank S. Courtade-Gaiani and D. Valour for bioinformatics support, E. Borges for assistance on manuscript formatting, E. Schneider and C. Wagner-Legrand, H. Johnson, G. Siciliano and K. Hughes for technical help for in vivo studies, N. Whitehead for protein production support, P. Bouillet and L. A. O’Reilly for assistance with histology, M. Fallowfield, J. D’Alessandro, L. Terry, V. Lemesre, J.-P. Galizzi and C. de la Moureyre for in vitro assay support, H. Simmonite for analytical support and L. Andrieu, L. Montane and A. Schmutz for biostatistical support. Research at WEHI is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (NHMRC, GNT1016647, GNT1016701, GNT1020363, GNT1086291, GNT1049720, GNT1057742, GNT1079560), the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (SCOR grant 7001-03), The Cancer Council (1086157 GLK, grant in aid to A.W.R. and D.C.S.H.), The Kay Kendall Leukemia Fund Intermediate Fellowship (KKL331 to G.L.K.), the Victoria Cancer Agency, the Australian Cancer Research Foundation, a Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) grant and the estate of Anthony (Toni) Redstone OAM.
Extended data figures
Extended data tables
This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-2, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Supplementary Methods.
About this article