Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structural insight into the role of the Ton complex in energy transduction

This article has been updated


In Gram-negative bacteria, outer membrane transporters import nutrients by coupling to an inner membrane protein complex called the Ton complex. The Ton complex consists of TonB, ExbB, and ExbD, and uses the proton motive force at the inner membrane to transduce energy to the outer membrane via TonB. Here, we structurally characterize the Ton complex from Escherichia coli using X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy, double electron–electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy, and crosslinking. Our results reveal a stoichiometry consisting of a pentamer of ExbB, a dimer of ExbD, and at least one TonB. Electrophysiology studies show that the Ton subcomplex forms pH-sensitive cation-selective channels and provide insight into the mechanism by which it may harness the proton motive force to produce energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The structure of the ExbB oligomer.
Figure 2: The structure of the ExbB–ExbDΔperi complex.
Figure 3: The oligomeric state of ExbB within the Ton complex.
Figure 4: The oligomeric state of ExbD within the Ton complex.
Figure 5: Channel properties of the Ton subcomplex.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

Coordinates and structure factors for the ExbB/ExbD complexes have been deposited into the Protein Data Bank (PDB accession codes 5SV0 and 5SV1).

Change history

  • 05 October 2016

    A minor change was made to the reported labelling at residue 113 distance, and to the DEER Spectroscopy section in the Methods.


  1. Krewulak, K. D. & Vogel, H. J. TonB or not TonB: is that the question? Biochem. Cell Biol. 89, 87–97 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Noinaj, N., Guillier, M., Barnard, T. J. & Buchanan, S. K. TonB-dependent transporters: regulation, structure, and function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 43–60 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassford, P. J., Jr, Bradbeer, C., Kadner, R. J. & Schnaitman, C. A. Transport of vitamin B12 in tonB mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 128, 242–247 (1976)

  4. Lohmiller, S., Hantke, K., Patzer, S. I. & Braun, V. TonB-dependent maltose transport by Caulobacter crescentus. Microbiology 154, 1748–1754 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schauer, K., Rodionov, D. A. & de Reuse, H. New substrates for TonB-dependent transport: do we only see the ‘tip of the iceberg’? Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 330–338 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cascales, E. et al. Colicin biology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 158–229 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Postle, K. & Kadner, R. J. Touch and go: tying TonB to transport. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 869–882 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clément, E., Mesini, P. J., Pattus, F. & Schalk, I. J. The binding mechanism of pyoverdin with the outer membrane receptor FpvA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on its iron-loaded status. Biochemistry 43, 7954–7965 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cadieux, N., Barekzi, N. & Bradbeer, C. Observations on the calcium dependence and reversibility of cobalamin transport across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34921–34928 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schramm, E., Mende, J., Braun, V. & Kamp, R. M. Nucleotide sequence of the colicin B activity gene cba: consensus pentapeptide among TonB-dependent colicins and receptors. J. Bacteriol. 169, 3350–3357 (1987)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brewer, S. et al. Structure and function of X-Pro dipeptide repeats in the TonB proteins of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 216, 883–895 (1990)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, C., Mooser, A., Plückthun, A. & Wlodawer, A. Crystal structure of the dimeric C-terminal domain of TonB reveals a novel fold. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27535–27540 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Witty, M. et al. Structure of the periplasmic domain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa TolA: evidence for an evolutionary relationship with the TonB transporter protein. EMBO J. 21, 4207–4218 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ködding, J. et al. Crystal structure of a 92-residue C-terminal fragment of TonB from Escherichia coli reveals significant conformational changes compared to structures of smaller TonB fragments. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 3022–3028 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Herrero, A., Peacock, R. S., Howard, S. P. & Vogel, H. J. The solution structure of the periplasmic domain of the TonB system ExbD protein reveals an unexpected structural homology with siderophore-binding proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 66, 872–889 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgs, P. I., Larsen, R. A. & Postle, K. Quantification of known components of the Escherichia coli TonB energy transduction system: TonB, ExbB, ExbD and FepA. Mol. Microbiol. 44, 271–281 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sverzhinsky, A. et al. Membrane protein complex ExbB4-ExbD1-TonB1 from Escherichia coli demonstrates conformational plasticity. J. Bacteriol. 197, 1873–1885 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sverzhinsky, A. et al. Coordinated rearrangements between cytoplasmic and periplasmic domains of the membrane protein complex ExbB-ExbD of Escherichia coli. Structure 22, 791–797 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pramanik, A. et al. Oligomeric structure of ExbB and ExbB-ExbD isolated from Escherichia coli as revealed by LILBID mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 50, 8950–8956 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jordan, L. D. et al. Energy-dependent motion of TonB in the Gram-negative bacterial inner membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11553–11558 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun, V. The structurally related exbB and tolQ genes are interchangeable in conferring tonB-dependent colicin, bacteriophage, and albomycin sensitivity. J. Bacteriol. 171, 6387–6390 (1989)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cascales, E., Lloubès, R. & Sturgis, J. N. The TolQ-TolR proteins energize TolA and share homologies with the flagellar motor proteins MotA-MotB. Mol. Microbiol. 42, 795–807 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lloubès, R. et al. The Tol-Pal proteins of the Escherichia coli cell envelope: an energized system required for outer membrane integrity? Res. Microbiol. 152, 523–529 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeh, Y. C., Comolli, L. R., Downing, K. H., Shapiro, L. & McAdams, H. H. The caulobacter Tol-Pal complex is essential for outer membrane integrity and the positioning of a polar localization factor. J. Bacteriol. 192, 4847–4858 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gray, A. N. et al. Coordination of peptidoglycan synthesis and outer membrane constriction during Escherichia coli cell division. eLife 4, 07118 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Germon, P., Ray, M. C., Vianney, A. & Lazzaroni, J. C. Energy-dependent conformational change in the TolA protein of Escherichia coli involves its N-terminal domain, TolQ, and TolR. J. Bacteriol. 183, 4110–4114 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Larsen, R. A., Thomas, M. G. & Postle, K. Protonmotive force, ExbB and ligand-bound FepA drive conformational changes in TonB. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 1809–1824 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhai, Y. F., Heijne, W. & Saier, M. H., Jr. Molecular modeling of the bacterial outer membrane receptor energizer, ExbBD/TonB, based on homology with the flagellar motor, MotAB. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1614, 201–210 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kojima, S. & Blair, D. F. Conformational change in the stator of the bacterial flagellar motor. Biochemistry 40, 13041–13050 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saier, M. H., Jr. Tracing pathways of transport protein evolution. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 1145–1156 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ollis, A. A., Manning, M., Held, K. G. & Postle, K. Cytoplasmic membrane protonmotive force energizes periplasmic interactions between ExbD and TonB. Mol. Microbiol. 73, 466–481 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Parsons, L. M., Grishaev, A. & Bax, A. The periplasmic domain of TolR from Haemophilus influenzae forms a dimer with a large hydrophobic groove: NMR solution structure and comparison to SAXS data. Biochemistry 47, 3131–3142 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Larsen, R. A. & Postle, K. Conserved residues Ser(16) and His(20) and their relative positioning are essential for TonB activity, cross-linking of TonB with ExbB, and the ability of TonB to respond to proton motive force. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 8111–8117 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Labarca, P. & Latorre, R. Insertion of ion channels into planar lipid bilayers by vesicle fusion. Methods Enzymol. 207, 447–463 (1992)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ollis, A. A., Kumar, A. & Postle, K. The ExbD periplasmic domain contains distinct functional regions for two stages in TonB energization. J. Bacteriol. 194, 3069–3077 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ollis, A. A. & Postle, K. ExbD mutants define initial stages in TonB energization. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 237–247 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Braun, V. et al. Energy-coupled transport across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli: ExbB binds ExbD and TonB in vitro, and leucine 132 in the periplasmic region and aspartate 25 in the transmembrane region are important for ExbD activity. J. Bacteriol. 178, 2836–2845 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Braun, V. & Herrmann, C. Point mutations in transmembrane helices 2 and 3 of ExbB and TolQ affect their activities in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 186, 4402–4406 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sehnal, D. et al. MOLE 2.0: advanced approach for analysis of biomacromolecular channels. J. Cheminform. 5, 39 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Smart, O. S., Neduvelil, J. G., Wang, X., Wallace, B. A. & Sansom, M. S. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 354–360, 376 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitmore, L. & Wallace, B. A. Protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopy: methods and reference databases. Biopolymers 89, 392–400 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Minor, Z. O. W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Winter, G. xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 186–190 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schneider, T. P. T. R. HKL2MAP: a graphical user interface for phasing with SHELX programs. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 37, 843–844 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schenk, A. D., Philippsen, A., Engel, A. & Walz, T. A pipeline for comprehensive and automated processing of electron diffraction data in IPLT. J. Struct. Biol. 182, 173–185 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Polyhach, Y. et al. High sensitivity and versatility of the DEER experiment on nitroxide radical pairs at Q-band frequencies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 10762–10773 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jeschke, G. et al. DeerAnalysis2006—a comprehensive software package for analyzing pulsed ELDOR data. Appl. Magn. Reson. 30, 473–498 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. von Hagens, T., Polyhach, Y., Sajid, M., Godt, A. & Jeschke, G. Suppression of ghost distances in multiple-spin double electron-electron resonance. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 5854–5866 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Polyhach, Y., Bordignon, E. & Jeschke, G. Rotamer libraries of spin labelled cysteines for protein studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 2356–2366 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mueller, P., Rudin, D. O., Tien, H. T. & Wescott, W. C. Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system. Nature 194, 979–980 (1962)

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hille, B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes 3rd edn (Sinauer, 2001)

Download references


We thank the staff at the SER-CAT and GM/CA-CAT beamlines at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (use of the APS is supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. W-31-109-Eng-38, and by the US DOE, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, under contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357); the staff at beamlines 5.0.1 and 8.2.1, Advance Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for their assistance during crystal screening (the Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231); G. Jeschke (ETH Zurich) for providing the Q-band resonator; T. Assafa for the reproducibility measurements; the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for funding the AWG E580 Q-band spectrometer (INST 130/972-1 FUGG); Y. Li at the NINDS/NIH Protein/Peptide Sequencing Facility for performing mass spectrometry analysis; and members of the Lloubes team, E. Cascales, J. Sturgis and J. P. Duneau for discussions. N.N. is supported by the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1K22AI113078-01). E.B. is supported by the Cluster of Excellence RESOLV (EXC 1069) funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. W.A.C. is supported by the NIH (NIH GM 038323) and the Henry Koffler Professorship at Purdue University. H.C. and R.L. are funded by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, the Aix-Marseille Université and grants from the Agence National de la Recherche (BACMOLMOT [ANR-14-CE09-0023]) and from Projets internationaux de coopération scientifique (PICS05853). H.C., T.J.B., I.B. and S.K.B. are supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIDDK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.S. prepared the ExbB wild-type construct. H.C., N.N., T.J.B., and R.L. prepared ExbD constructs and mutants of ExbB and ExbD. T.J.B. prepared the TonB constructs. H.C. performed all expression and purification for assays, electron microscopy, DEER spectroscopy, electrophysiology, and crystallization. H.C. and N.N. performed crystallization and H.C., N.N., and I.B. did screening and data collection. N.N. solved the initial crystal structure using crystals grown by H.C. H.C. performed the electron microscopy experiments. E.B. performed the DEER spectroscopy experiments. S.D.Z. and W.A.C. performed the electrophysiology experiments. All authors analysed and discussed the data. R.L., W.A.C., and S.K.B. conceived the original projects. H.C., N.N., S.D.Z., W.A.C., R.L. and S.K.B. contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicholas Noinaj, Roland Lloubes or Susan K. Buchanan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information

Nature thanks H. Mchaourab, T. Walz and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Structure determination for the Ton subcomplex (ExbB–ExbDΔperi) using Se-SAD at 5.2 Å resolution.

a, The initial structure of the Ton subcomplex was solved by Se-SAD using anisotropic data extending to 5.2 Å resolution. The data from two crystals were processed with Xia2 and the initial sites found using HKL2MAP v0.3, which found a single solution every ~10,000 tries; resolution limits were also important for finding a solution. b, The sites were then input into AUTOSOL/PHENIX for site refinement and density modification, producing density maps (blue mesh) which clearly showed five-fold symmetry and allowed an initial model of a monomer to be built, consisting almost entirely of α-helices. This model was then used as a search model for molecular replacement to solve the 2.6 Å native structure (data obtained from a single crystal). c, Anomalous different map (orange mesh) showing density for the selenium sites in the 5.2 Å Se-incorporated structure.

Extended Data Figure 2 Representative electron density for the native Ton subcomplex (ExbB–ExbDΔperi) solved to 2.6 Å resolution.

a, Representative electron density map (2FoFc contoured at 1.0σ, grey mesh; 2FoFc omit map (omitting residues 113–124) contoured at 1.0σ, magenta mesh) along residues 113–124 within helix α5. b, Cutaway view of the transmembrane pore of ExbB (grey ribbon) from the native structure at pH 7.0 showing ring-like difference density (green isosurface, FoFc map contoured at 2.5σ) along the conserved residues T148 and T181 (grey and red spheres). c, d, Tilted view (c) and an orthogonal view (d) (relative to a) of the ring-like density. Structures were determined using data obtained from a single crystal in each case.

Extended Data Figure 3 Helical shifts and overall flexibility in the ExbB pentamer.

a, Two pentamers were observed per asymmetric unit within the crystal structure. Shown here is pentamer 1 (green) aligned with pentamer 2 (magenta), illustrating slight shifts in a number of the helices (cylinders) between the two pentamers, with the largest shifts indicated by black arrows. The loops connecting α6 and α7 also show variability between monomers and pentamers. b, The TonB subcomplex (ExbB–ExbDΔperi) showing a B-factor putty representation with values ranging from the most ordered in blue to the most disordered in red.

Extended Data Figure 4 Electron density for the transmembrane helix of ExbD.

a, Omit map (2FoFc, contoured at 1.0σ) along the transmembrane pore of ExbB. The density corresponding to the ExbB pentamer is shown in blue mesh, while the density corresponding to the transmembrane helix of ExbD is shown in green mesh. b, Stereoimage showing the density (2FoFc, contoured at 0.8σ, grey mesh; 2FoFc omit map (omitting the transmembrane helix of ExbD), contoured at 0.8σ, green mesh) for the transmembrane helix of ExbD after building and refinement.

Extended Data Figure 5 Comparison of observed density for crystal structures of ExbB–ExbDΔperi solved at pH 7.0 versus pH 4.5.

The presence of electron density for the transmembrane helix of ExbD (magenta ribbon) was dependent on the pH at which the crystals were grown. At pH 7.0, we observed little density (orange mesh) inside the transmembrane pore of the ExbB (grey ribbon) pentamer (see also Extended Data Fig. 3). However, for the structures solved at pH 4.5, we observed clear density (blue mesh) for the transmembrane helix of ExbD, albeit to varying degrees. Density maps (2FoFc) are contoured at 1.0σ.

Extended Data Figure 6 Packing similarities of the 2D and 3D crystals used for electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography.

a, Averaged projection map from the electron microscopy analysis on 2D crystals. Five images were analysed, and a representative averaged projection map was calculated from 900 sub-images. The averaged map shows two different populations of the pentamer that are similar in size but differ in level intensity owing to opposite orientations of the complex within the crystal; a similar packing arrangement was also observed in our crystal structures. ExbD was not detected in our electron microscopy studies, probably owing to disorder of the globular domain, which is anchored to the membrane by a long unstructured linker15. b, Packing of the complex in the X-ray crystal structure from 3D crystals. The right side indicates an orthogonal view highlighting a single row of molecules from the lattice (black dashed box). c, Fitting the row of molecules from the 3D lattice (X-ray) from b onto the averaged projection map from the 2D crystals (electron microscopy) to highlight the consistency observed in packing.

Extended Data Figure 7 DEER traces and analysis.

Ton subcomplex (ExbBC25–ExbD, ExbBC25S–ExbDN78C, and ExbBC25S–ExbDE113C) in 0.08% C10E5 (a) and in 0.03% DDM (b), and the fully assembled Ton complex (TonBC18A–ExbBC25–ExbD and TonBC18A–ExbBC25S–ExbDN78C) in 0.05% DDM (c). Upper panels, experimental Q-band DEER primary data V(t)/V(0) (coloured lines, cyan ExbD113MTSL; violet ExbD78MTSL; red and orange, ExbB25MTSL) and simulated background functions (dotted line). Middle panels, DEER traces after background correction (coloured lines) and fit with DeerAnalysis2015 (dotted lines) with Tikhonov regularization parameters from 10 to 100 adjusted via L-curve analysis and data validation. Lower panels, obtained distance distributions. For the pentameric ExbB sample (50% labelling efficiency), a modulation depth >0.45 was obtained, indicating the presence of a multi-spin system. For the sample solubilized in DDM, longer DEER traces were obtained (4 μs) to better characterize the long distance peak of 5–6 nm in ExbB25MTSL. Additionally, for all panels, another DEER trace was measured after decreasing the microwave power of the 12-ns pump pulse to 25% (orange line) to suppress ghost peaks arising from the presence of more than two spins in the system. The resulting distance distribution (orange) was found to be very similar to that obtained with 100% microwave power (red), showing that no ghost peak artefacts were present. The lower modulation depth observed for the ExbD samples labelled at position 113 with respect to those labelled at position 78 (both labelling efficiency >80%) may be due to the presence of distances <1.5 nm (predicted by the simulations), which are outside of the sensitivity range of the technique, or to destabilization of the ExbD dimer induced by the label. The bottom of c shows a comparison of the Ton subcomplex in DDM (dashed lines from b) to the fully assembled Ton complex (solid lines). All panels show data from single experiments.

Extended Data Figure 8 Densitometry of the purified fully assembled Ton complex.

a, SDS–PAGE gel of the Ton complex (+TonB) and the Ton subcomplex (−TonB) at increasing concentrations. b, Bar graph showing the comparison of the ExbB–ExbD ratio within the Ton complex (+TonB) and the Ton subcomplex (−TonB) indicating that association of TonB with the Ton subcomplex does not change the stoichiometric ratio of the components. While we see a slight difference in the ExbB–ExbD ratio values in the presence or absence of TonB, the observed difference is too small to suggest an altered stoichiometry between ExbB and ExbD. Three representative lanes for each sample are shown in a; however, five lanes were used for all calculations. Densitometry analysis was performed with ImageJ and mean values and standard errors calculated using Microsoft Excel. For purifications of the Ton complex (+TonB), five purification experiments were performed and one representative is shown. For purifications of the Ton subcomplex (−TonB), ~50 purifications were performed and one representative is shown.

Extended Data Figure 9 Circular dichroism analysis of secondary structure and thermal stability of the Ton subcomplex.

Far-UV circular dichroism spectrum (185–260 nm) of the Ton subcomplex (ExbB–ExbD) with the calculated percentage of secondary structure shown. Contents of regular and distorted α-helical structures, 47 and 21%, respectively, were combined during the calculation of secondary structure contributions. Inset, comparison of the thermal stability of the Ton subcomplex (blue) versus ExbB alone (red) measured through the temperature dependence of the circular dichroism signal amplitude at 222 nm. Both panels show data from a single experiment.

Extended Data Figure 10 Sequence conservation of ExbB orthologues mapped onto the crystal structure.

a, Clustal W alignment of ExbB sequences from: E.coli K12 (P0ABU7), Neisseria meningitidis (P64100), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Q5F711), Haemophilus ducreyi (O51808), Vibrio harveyi (D0XEN5), Yersinia pestis (D1TTA4), Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (O27101), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (G3XCW0), ExbB1 of Vibrio cholerae (O52043) and ExbB2 of Vibrio cholerae (AAC69454). b, Conservation mapped onto the ExbB structure with Chimera. The most conserved residues are in blue and found in α6 (TM2) and α7 (TM3) of the ExbB structure. An extensive alignment that also includes sequences from the Tol and Mot systems shows similar results22. c, Cutaway molecular surface of ExbB pentamer with the most conserved residues mapped onto the surface.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-2. Table 1 contains a summary of data collection and refinement statistics for the Ton subcomplex crystal structures; Table 2 shows how zero-current potential (Vrev) was determined from volt-ampere characteristics measured in asymmetric salt conditions. Relative cation/anion permeability was calculated using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation. (XLSX 12 kb)

Overall structure of the Ton subcomplex

This video gives a structural insight into the role of the Ton complex in energy transduction. (MOV 29929 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celia, H., Noinaj, N., Zakharov, S. et al. Structural insight into the role of the Ton complex in energy transduction. Nature 538, 60–65 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing