Letter | Published:

Heating of Jupiter’s upper atmosphere above the Great Red Spot

Nature volume 536, pages 190192 (11 August 2016) | Download Citation


The temperatures of giant-planet upper atmospheres at mid- to low latitudes are measured to be hundreds of degrees warmer than simulations based on solar heating alone can explain1,2,3,4. Modelling studies that focus on additional sources of heating have been unable to resolve this major discrepancy. Equatorward transport of energy from the hot auroral regions was expected to heat the low latitudes, but models have demonstrated that auroral energy is trapped at high latitudes, a consequence of the strong Coriolis forces on rapidly rotating planets3,4,5. Wave heating, driven from below, represents another potential source of upper-atmospheric heating, though initial calculations have proven inconclusive for Jupiter, largely owing to a lack of observational constraints on wave parameters6,7. Here we report that the upper atmosphere above Jupiter’s Great Red Spot—the largest storm in the Solar System—is hundreds of degrees hotter than anywhere else on the planet. This hotspot, by process of elimination, must be heated from below, and this detection is therefore strong evidence for coupling between Jupiter’s lower and upper atmospheres, probably the result of upwardly propagating acoustic or gravity waves.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & On the temperature of the Jovian thermosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 30, 718–725 (1973)

  2. 2.

    , & in The Outer Planets and their Moons Vol. 19 of Space Sciences Series of ISSI 116, 319–343 (2005)

  3. 3.

    , , , & An unexpected cooling effect in Saturn’s upper atmosphere. Nature 445, 399–401 (2007)

  4. 4.

    , & Response of the Jovian thermosphere to a transient pulse in solar wind pressure. Planet. Space Sci. 91, 27–44 (2014)

  5. 5.

    & Coupled rotational dynamics of Jupiter’s thermosphere and magnetosphere. Ann. Geophys. 27, 199–230 (2009)

  6. 6.

    , & Gravity wave heating and cooling in Jupiter’s thermosphere. Icarus 148, 266–281 (2000)

  7. 7.

    & Heating of Jupiter’s thermosphere by dissipation of gravity waves due to molecular viscosity and heat conduction. Icarus 140, 328–340 (1999)

  8. 8.

    et al. SpeX: a medium-resolution 0.8–5.5 micron spectrograph and imager for the NASA infrared telescope facility. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 115, 362–382 (2003)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Probing the depth of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot with the Juno gravity experiment. Icarus 267, 232–242 (2016)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Estimated energy balance in the Jovian upper atmosphere during an auroral heating event. Icarus 181, 256–265 (2006)

  11. 11.

    et al. Conjugate observations of Saturn’s northern and southern H3+ aurorae. Icarus 229, 214–220 (2014)

  12. 12.

    et al. Vertical emissivity profiles of Jupiter’s northern H3+ and H2 infrared auroras observed by Subaru/IRCS. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 10,219–10,241 (2014)

  13. 13.

    et al. H3+: the driver of giant planet atmospheres. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 364, 3121–3137 (2006)

  14. 14.

    , , , & First vertical ion density profile in Jupiter’s auroral atmosphere: direct observations using the Keck II telescope. Astrophys. J. 677, 790–797 (2008)

  15. 15.

    & in Jupiter’s Thermosphere and Ionosphere 185–218 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)

  16. 16.

    et al. A simple axisymmetric model of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling currents in Jupiter’s polar ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 110, 11209 (2005)

  17. 17.

    et al. A baseline spectroscopic study of the infrared auroras of Jupiter. Icarus 127, 379–393 (1997)

  18. 18.

    et al. Magnetosphere–atmosphere coupling at Saturn: 1—Response of thermosphere and ionosphere to steady state polar forcing. Icarus 221, 481–494 (2012)

  19. 19.

    & The vertical structure of Jupiter’s equatorial zonal wind above the cloud deck, derived using mesoscale gravity waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 472–476 (2013)

  20. 20.

    , & Acoustic wave heating of the thermosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 21543–21548 (2001)

  21. 21.

    , & Acoustic waves in the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere generated by deep tropical convection. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1392 (2003)

  22. 22.

    , & Heating of Jupiter’s thermosphere by the dissipation of upward propagating acoustic waves. Icarus 163, 398–413 (2003)

  23. 23.

    et al. Thermal structure and dynamics of the Jovian atmosphere. I. The Great Red Spot. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 8759–8767 (1981)

  24. 24.

    et al. Thermal structure and composition of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot from high-resolution thermal imaging. Icarus 208, 306–328 (2010)

  25. 25.

    , & Spectroscopic properties of the H3+ molecule: a new calculated line list. Astrophys. J. 464, 516–520 (1996)

  26. 26.

    , , & H3+ cooling in planetary atmospheres. Faraday Discuss. 147, 283–291 (2010)

  27. 27.

    et al. On the anticorrelation between H3+ temperature and density in giant planet ionospheres. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 1611–1617 (2014)

  28. 28.

    et al. Temperature changes and energy inputs in giant planet atmospheres: what we are learning from H3+. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 370, 5213–5224 (2012)

Download references


We thank the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under contract NNH14CK55B with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). We are grateful to the observing staff at the Infrared Telescope Facility and Mauna Kea Observatory. This work was funded by NASA under grant number 9500303356 issued through the Planetary Astronomy Program (to L.M. and J.O’D). The UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) supported this work through the Studentship Enhancement Programme (STEP) for J.O’D., and consolidated grant support for T.S.S. and H.M. (ST/N000749/1). The Royal Astronomical Society partially funded travel to take the observations. We are grateful for the planetary ephemerides that were provided by the Planetary Data System.

Author information


  1. Center for Space Physics, Boston University, Boston 02215, USA

    • J. O’Donoghue
    •  & L. Moore
  2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK

    • T. S. Stallard
    •  & H. Melin


  1. Search for J. O’Donoghue in:

  2. Search for L. Moore in:

  3. Search for T. S. Stallard in:

  4. Search for H. Melin in:


J.O’D. collected, analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the paper. L.M. greatly assisted in the data reduction, analysis, interpretation and writing of the paper. T.S.S. helped with the analysis and interpretation of the data. H.M. assisted in the collection and reduction of data, and provided computer code necessary for the analysis of data. All authors provided comments on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. O’Donoghue.

Reviewer Information

Nature thanks J. Cho, M. Flasar and J. Sinclair for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.