Understanding the amazingly complex human cerebral cortex requires a map (or parcellation) of its major subdivisions, known as cortical areas. Making an accurate areal map has been a century-old objective in neuroscience. Using multi-modal magnetic resonance images from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and an objective semi-automated neuroanatomical approach, we delineated 180 areas per hemisphere bounded by sharp changes in cortical architecture, function, connectivity, and/or topography in a precisely aligned group average of 210 healthy young adults. We characterized 97 new areas and 83 areas previously reported using post-mortem microscopy or other specialized study-specific approaches. To enable automated delineation and identification of these areas in new HCP subjects and in future studies, we trained a machine-learning classifier to recognize the multi-modal ‘fingerprint’ of each cortical area. This classifier detected the presence of 96.6% of the cortical areas in new subjects, replicated the group parcellation, and could correctly locate areas in individuals with atypical parcellations. The freely available parcellation and classifier will enable substantially improved neuroanatomical precision for studies of the structural and functional organization of human cerebral cortex and its variation across individuals and in development, aging, and disease.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues (J. A. Barth, 1909); Brodmann’s Localization in the Cerebral Cortex (Smith Gordon, 1994) [transl. Garey, L.J.]

  2. 2.

    & Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1, 1–47 (1991)

  3. 3.

    The myeloarchitectonic studies on the human cerebral cortex of the Vogt–Vogt school, and their significance for the interpretation of functional neuroimaging data. Brain Struct. Funct. 218, 303–352 (2013)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. Cereb. Cortex 22, 2241–2262 (2012)

  5. 5.

    et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013)

  6. 6.

    et al. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 144–168 (2013)

  7. 7.

    et al. Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 80–104 (2013)

  8. 8.

    et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Trends and properties of human cerebral cortex: correlations with cortical myelin content. Neuroimage 93, 165–175 (2014)

  10. 10.

    & Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1- and T2-weighted MRI. J. Neurosci. 31, 11597–11616 (2011)

  11. 11.

    et al. Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. Neuroimage 80, 169–189 (2013)

  12. 12.

    , , & Microstructural grey matter parcellation and its relevance for connectome analyses. Neuroimage 80, 18–26 (2013)

  13. 13.

    , , , & Observer-independent method for microstructural parcellation of cerebral cortex: a quantitative approach to cytoarchitectonics. Neuroimage 9, 165–177 (1999)

  14. 14.

    et al. MSM: a new flexible framework for multimodal surface matching. Neuroimage 100, 414–426 (2014)

  15. 15.

    & Centenary of Brodmann’s map—conception and fate. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 139–145 (2010)

  16. 16.

    et al. Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 41, 45–57 (2008)

  17. 17.

    , & The retinotopic organization of the human middle temporal area MT/V5 and its cortical neighbors. J. Neurosci. 30, 9801–9820 (2010)

  18. 18.

    , , & Probabilistic maps of visual topography in human cortex. Cereb. Cortex 25, 3911–3931 (2015)

  19. 19.

    et al. Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb. Cortex 26, 288–303 (2016)

  20. 20.

    , , & Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification. Neuroimage 82, 403–415 (2013)

  21. 21.

    et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011)

  22. 22.

    Uber die Verteilung myeloarchitektonischer Merkmale in der Stirnhirnrinde beim Menschen. J. Hirnforsch. 2, 311–333 (1956)

  23. 23.

    & In vivo architectonics: a cortico-centric perspective. Neuroimage 93, 157–164 (2014)

  24. 24.

    et al. Layer-specific fMRI reflects different neuronal computations at different depths in human V1. PLoS One 7, e32536 (2012)

  25. 25.

    , , & Laminar analysis of 7T BOLD using an imposed spatial activation pattern in human V1. Neuroimage 52, 1334–1346 (2010)

  26. 26.

    , & High-field fMRI unveils orientation columns in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10607–10612 (2008)

  27. 27.

    et al. Mapping the organization of axis of motion selective features in human area MT using high-field fMRI. PLoS One 6, e28716 (2011)

  28. 28.

    et al. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 666–682 (2013

  29. 29.

    et al. Resting state network estimation in individual subjects. Neuroimage 82, 616–633 (2013)

  30. 30.

    et al. Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance. Science 352, 216–220 (2016)

  31. 31.

    et al. The brain analysis library of spatial maps and atlases (BALSA) database. Neuroimage (2016)

  32. 32.

    et al. A surface-based analysis of hemispheric asymmetries and folding of cerebral cortex in term-born human infants. J. Neurosci. 30, 2268–2276 (2010)

  33. 33.

    & Surface-based and probabilistic atlases of primate cerebral cortex. Neuron 56, 209–225 (2007)

  34. 34.

    et al. The Human Connectome Project’s neuroimaging approach. Nat. Neuroscience (in press)

  35. 35.

    et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 11–22 (2004)

  36. 36.

    FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 62, 774–781 (2012)

  37. 37.

    et al. Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-ε4 allele. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7209–7214 (2009)

  38. 38.

    et al. Correspondences between retinotopic areas and myelin maps in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 99, 509–524 (2014)

  39. 39.

    et al. ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging. Neuroimage 95, 232–247 (2014)

  40. 40.

    et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 90, 449–468 (2014)

  41. 41.

    et al. The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space. Brain Struct. Funct. 212, 481–495 (2008)

  42. 42.

    et al. Cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human extrastriate cortex in the region of V5/MT+: a probabilistic, stereotaxic map of area hOc5. Cereb. Cortex 17, 562–574 (2007)

Download references


We thank the members of the WU-Minn-Ox HCP Consortium for invaluable contributions to data acquisition, analysis, and sharing and E. Reid and S. Danker for assistance with preparing the manuscript. Supported by NIH F30 MH097312 (M.F.G.), ROIMH-60974 (D.C.V.E.), NIH F30 MH099877 (C.D.H.), the Human Connectome Project grant (1U54MH091657) from the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, and the Wellcome Trust Strategic Award 098369/Z/12/Z (S.M.S., J.A., C.F.B., M.J.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Timothy S. Coalson
    • , Emma C. Robinson
    •  & Carl D. Hacker

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA

    • Matthew F. Glasser
    • , Timothy S. Coalson
    • , John Harwell
    •  & David C. Van Essen
  2. FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

    • Emma C. Robinson
    • , Jesper Andersson
    • , Mark Jenkinson
    •  & Stephen M. Smith
  3. Department of Computing, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK

    • Emma C. Robinson
  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA

    • Carl D. Hacker
  5. Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

    • Essa Yacoub
    •  & Kamil Ugurbil
  6. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 EN, The Netherlands

    • Christian F. Beckmann
  7. Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands

    • Christian F. Beckmann


  1. Search for Matthew F. Glasser in:

  2. Search for Timothy S. Coalson in:

  3. Search for Emma C. Robinson in:

  4. Search for Carl D. Hacker in:

  5. Search for John Harwell in:

  6. Search for Essa Yacoub in:

  7. Search for Kamil Ugurbil in:

  8. Search for Jesper Andersson in:

  9. Search for Christian F. Beckmann in:

  10. Search for Mark Jenkinson in:

  11. Search for Stephen M. Smith in:

  12. Search for David C. Van Essen in:


M.F.G. and D.C.V.E. designed the study and carried out the analyses. M.F.G., T.S.C., E.C.R., C.D.H., J.H., E.Y., K.U., J.A., C.F.B., M.J., and S.M.S. contributed novel methods. M.F.G., T.S.C., E.C.R., C.D.H., E.Y., J.A., C.F.B., M.J., S.M.S., and D.C.V.E. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthew F. Glasser or David C. Van Essen.

Reviewer Information

Nature thanks R. Poldrack, F. Tong and T. Yeo for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Methods

    This file explains the experimental methods in detail. This information will be of particular interest for methods oriented neuroimaging scientists interested in exactly what was done and why. It contains 11 Supplementary figures.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Results and Discussion

    This file contains 12 supplementary figures and supplementary text expanding on the reproducibility of the data used to generate the parcellation, cross validation of parcellation, an exploration of atypical parcellations in individual subjects, a peek inside the areal classifier, and a discussion.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Neuroanatomical Results

    This file provides a detailed neuroanatomical description of how each border between each pair of cortical areas was delineated and how each area was identified and named. This information will be of particular interest to neuroanatomists. It contains 25 figures and 3 tables.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.