Mitochondrial unfolded protein response controls matrix pre-RNA processing and translation

Published online:


The mitochondrial matrix is unique in that it must integrate the folding and assembly of proteins derived from the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) senses matrix protein misfolding and induces a program of nuclear gene expression, including mitochondrial chaperonins, to promote mitochondrial proteostasis1,2,3. While misfolded mitochondrial-matrix-localized ornithine transcarbamylase induces chaperonin expression4,5,6, our understanding of mammalian UPRmt is rudimentary7, reflecting a lack of acute triggers for UPRmt activation. This limitation has prevented analysis of the cellular responses to matrix protein misfolding and the effects of UPRmt on mitochondrial translation to control protein folding loads. Here we combine pharmacological inhibitors of matrix-localized HSP90/TRAP1 (ref. 8) or LON protease9, which promote chaperonin expression, with global transcriptional and proteomic analysis to reveal an extensive and acute response of human cells to UPRmt. This response encompasses widespread induction of nuclear genes, including matrix-localized proteins involved in folding, pre-RNA processing and translation. Functional studies revealed rapid but reversible translation inhibition in mitochondria occurring concurrently with defects in pre-RNA processing caused by transcriptional repression and LON-dependent turnover of the mitochondrial pre-RNA processing nuclease MRPP3 (ref. 10). This study reveals that acute mitochondrial protein folding stress activates both increased chaperone availability within the matrix and reduced matrix-localized protein synthesis through translational inhibition, and provides a framework for further dissection of mammalian UPRmt.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE75411.


  1. 1.

    , , , & ClpP mediates activation of a mitochondrial unfolded protein response in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 13, 467–480 (2007)

  2. 2.

    , , , & The matrix peptide exporter HAF-1 signals a mitochondrial UPR by activating the transcription factor ZC376.7 in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 37, 529–540 (2010)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Mitochondrial import efficiency of ATFS-1 regulates mitochondrial UPR activation. Science 337, 587–590 (2012)

  4. 4.

    et al. A mitochondrial specific stress response in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 21, 4411–4419 (2002)

  5. 5.

    & The chop gene contains an element for the positive regulation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. PLoS ONE 2, e835 (2007)

  6. 6.

    , & Discovery of genes activated by the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mtUPR) and cognate promoter elements. PLoS ONE 2, e874 (2007)

  7. 7.

    , & Evaluating and responding to mitochondrial dysfunction: the mitochondrial unfolded-protein response and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 311–318 (2013)

  8. 8.

    et al. Combinatorial drug design targeting multiple cancer signaling networks controlled by mitochondrial Hsp90. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 454–464 (2009)

  9. 9.

    et al. The mitochondrial ATP-dependent Lon protease: a novel target in lymphoma death mediated by the synthetic triterpenoid CDDO and its derivatives. Blood 119, 3321–3329 (2012)

  10. 10.

    et al. RNase P without RNA: identification and functional reconstitution of the human mitochondrial tRNA processing enzyme. Cell 135, 462–474 (2008)

  11. 11.

    & The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 334, 1081–1086 (2011)

  12. 12.

    , , , & Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 323–355 (2013)

  13. 13.

    & The unpredictability of prolonged activation of stress response pathways. J. Cell Biol. 209, 781–787 (2015)

  14. 14.

    et al. Exploiting the mitochondrial unfolded protein response for cancer therapy in mice and human cells. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1349–1360 (2011)

  15. 15.

    , & Induction of the mammalian stress response gene GADD153 by oxidative stress: role of AP-1 element. Biochem. J. 314, 547–554 (1996)

  16. 16.

    , , & Molecular signature of response and potential pathways related to resistance to the HSP90 inhibitor, 17AAG, in breast cancer. BMC Med. Genomics 3, 44 (2010)

  17. 17.

    et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7150–7158 (2014)

  18. 18.

    et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011)

  19. 19.

    et al. RNA processing in human mitochondria. Cell Cycle 10, 2904–2916 (2011)

  20. 20.

    et al. Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 548 (2011)

  21. 21.

    , & Structure of the nuclease subunit of human mitochondrial RNase P. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 5664–5672 (2015)

  22. 22.

    et al. Activating transcription factor 3 is integral to the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 kinase stress response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 1365–1377 (2004)

  23. 23.

    , , , & Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 5, e13984 (2010)

  24. 24.

    , & FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017–1018 (2011)

  25. 25.

    , & in Current Protocols in Cell Biology (eds et al.) Ch. 3, Unit 3.27 (Wiley, 2007)

  26. 26.

    et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189 (2010)

  27. 27.

    et al. A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology. Cell 134, 112–123 (2008)

  28. 28.

    , , & Mitochondrial respiratory chain supercomplexes are destabilized in Barth syndrome patients. J. Mol. Biol. 361, 462–469 (2006)

Download references


We thank D. C. Altieri for GTPP, J. Paulo and S. P. Gygi for assistance with mass spectrometry, and L. Pontano and S. H. Sui for assistance with RNA-seq. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R37NS083524 and Biogen, Inc. (J.W.H.), and an EMBO Fellowship (C.M.).

Author information


  1. Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

    • Christian Münch
    •  & J. Wade Harper


  1. Search for Christian Münch in:

  2. Search for J. Wade Harper in:


C.M. and J.W.H. were responsible for project conception, data analysis and manuscript preparation. All experiments were performed by C.M.

Competing interests

J.W.H. is a consultant for Biogen Inc. J.W.H.'s interests were reviewed and are managed by Harvard Medical School in accordance with their conflict of interest policies.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wade Harper.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks G. Shadel and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figure

    This file contains the uncropped scans with size marker indications.

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data

    This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-4.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.