Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models

Abstract

Spin models are the prime example of simplified many-body Hamiltonians used to model complex, strongly correlated real-world materials1. However, despite the simplified character of such models, their dynamics often cannot be simulated exactly on classical computers when the number of particles exceeds a few tens. For this reason, quantum simulation2 of spin Hamiltonians using the tools of atomic and molecular physics has become a very active field over the past years, using ultracold atoms3 or molecules4 in optical lattices, or trapped ions5. All of these approaches have their own strengths and limitations. Here we report an alternative platform for the study of spin systems, using individual atoms trapped in tunable two-dimensional arrays of optical microtraps with arbitrary geometries, where filling fractions range from 60 to 100 per cent. When excited to high-energy Rydberg D states, the atoms undergo strong interactions whose anisotropic character opens the way to simulating exotic matter6. We illustrate the versatility of our system by studying the dynamics of a quantum Ising-like spin-1/2 system in a transverse field with up to 30 spins, for a variety of geometries in one and two dimensions, and for a wide range of interaction strengths. For geometries where the anisotropy is expected to have small effects on the dynamics, we find excellent agreement with ab initio simulations of the spin-1/2 system, while for strongly anisotropic situations the multilevel structure of the D states has a measurable influence7,8. Our findings establish arrays of single Rydberg atoms as a versatile platform for the study of quantum magnetism.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Many-body dynamics of Rydberg atoms and experimental platform.
Figure 2: Collective oscillations in the full Rydberg blockade regime.
Figure 3: Tuning interactions in an eight-spin chain with PBC.
Figure 4: Ising dynamics in large spin ensembles.

References

  1. 1

    Auerbach, A. Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer, New York, 1994)

  2. 2

    Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Nascimbène, S. Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases. Nature Phys. 8, 267–276 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Yan, B. et al. Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules. Nature 501, 521–525 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Blatt, R. & Roos, C. F. Quantum simulations with trapped ions. Nature Phys. 8, 277–284 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Glaetzle, A. W. et al. Quantum spin-ice and dimer models with Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041037 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Vermersch, B., Glaetzle, A. W. & Zoller, P. Magic distances in the blockade mechanism of Rydberg P and D states. Phys. Rev. A 91, 023411 (2015)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Tresp, C. et al. Dipolar dephasing of Rydberg D-state polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 083602 (2015)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Saffman, S., Walker, T. G. & Mølmer, K. Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Weimer, H., Müller, M., Lesanovsky, I., Zoller, P. & Büchler, H. P. A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nature Phys. 6, 382–388 (2010)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Barredo, D. et al. Demonstration of a strong Rydberg blockade in three-atom systems with anisotropic interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 183002 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Béguin, L., Vernier, A., Chicireanu, R., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. Direct measurement of the van der Waals interaction between two Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Nogrette, F. et al. Single-atom trapping in holographic 2D arrays of microtraps with arbitrary geometries. Phys. Rev. X 4, 021034 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Dudin, Y. O., Li, L., Bariani, F. & Kuzmich, A. Observation of coherent many-body Rabi oscillations. Nature Phys. 8, 790–794 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Ebert, M. et al. Atomic Fock state preparation using Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043602 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Ebert, M., Kwon, M., Walker, T. G. & Saffman, M. Coherence and Rydberg blockade of atomic ensemble qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 093601 (2015)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Zeiher, J. et al. Microscopic characterization of scalable coherent Rydberg superatoms. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Ates, C. & Lesanovsky, I. Entropic enhancement of spatial correlations in a laser-driven Rydberg gas. Phys. Rev. A 86, 013408 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Petrosyan, D., Höning, M. & Fleischhauer, M. Spatial correlations of Rydberg excitations in optically driven atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. A 87, 053414 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Schauß, P. et al. Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two-dimensional Rydberg gas. Nature 491, 87–91 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Löw, R. et al. Universal scaling in a strongly interacting Rydberg gas. Phys. Rev. A 80, 033422 (2009)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lester, B. J., Luick, N., Kaufman, A. M., Reynolds, C. M. & Regal, C. A. Rapid production of uniformly-filled arrays of neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 073003 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Fung, Y. H. & Andersen, M. F. Efficient collisional blockade loading of single atom into a tight microtrap. New J. Phys. 17, 073011 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Gaj, A. et al. From molecular spectra to a density shift in dense Rydberg gases. Nature Commun. 5, 4546 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Ates, C., Garrahan, J. P. & Lesanovsky, I. Thermalization of a strongly interacting closed spin system: from coherent many-body dynamics to a Fokker-Planck equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 110603 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Hazzard, K. R. A. et al. Quantum correlations and entanglement in far-from-equilibrium spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 90, 063622 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Barredo, D. et al. Coherent excitation transfer in a spin chain of three Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 113002 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Hauke, P. et al. Complete devil’s staircase and crystal-superfluid transitions in a dipolar XXZ spin chain: a trapped ion quantum simulation. New J. Phys. 12, 113037 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Senko, C. et al. Realization of a quantum integer-spin chain with controllable interactions. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021026 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Peter, D. et al. Topological bands with a Chern number C = 2 by dipolar exchange interactions. Phys. Rev. A 91, 053617 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Shen, C. & Duan, L.-M. Correcting detection errors in quantum state engineering through data processing. New J. Phys. 14, 053053 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Zeiher, J. et al. Many-body interferometry of a Rydberg-dressed spin lattice. http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1602.06313 (2016)

  33. 33

    Schauß, P. et al. Crystallization in Ising quantum magnets. Science 347, 1455–1458 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Derevianko, A., Komar, P., Topcu, T., Kroeze, R. M. & Lukin, M. D. Effects of molecular resonances on Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. A 92, 063419 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Busche for contributions in the early stages of the experiment, I. Lesanovsky, H. P. Büchler and T. Pohl for discussions, and Y. Sortais for a reading of the manuscript. This work benefited from financial support by the EU (FET-Open Xtrack Project HAIRS, H2020 FET-PROACT Project RySQ, and EU Marie-Curie Program ITN COHERENCE FP7-PEOPLE-2010-ITN-265031 (H.L.)), by the ‘PALM’ Labex (project QUANTICA) and by the Région Île-de-France in the framework of DIM Nano-K.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made critical contributions to the work, discussed the results, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Lahaye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks C. F. Roos and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Full and partial loading of arrays.

a, Sketch of the experimental sequences. During loading, the camera images are analysed continuously to extract the number of loaded traps. As soon as a triggering criterion is met, the loading is stopped and an image of the initial configuration is acquired. After Rydberg excitation, a final image is acquired, revealing the atoms excited to Rydberg states (green disks at bottom right). b, Average triggering time TN when the triggering criterion is set to N = Nt: achieving full loading requires an exponentially long time, limiting the method in practice to Nt ≤ 9. The triggering times can vary substantially depending on the density of the magneto-optical trap used to load the array, and the data points shown here correspond to typical conditions used for the data of the main text. Error bars, s.e.m. c, Probability pN of having a number N of loaded traps in the partially loaded regime for the 30-trap ‘racetrack’ (left) and the 49-trap square array (right; blue dots). The shaded distributions correspond to what would be observed with random triggering. For this partial loading regime, the triggering rate of the experiment is about 1 s−1.

Extended Data Figure 2 Effect of detection errors.

a, Experimental determination of ε. From the data of the full blockade experiments (Fig. 2 of main text), we plot the probability P0 of recapturing all N atoms for τ = 0. The solid line is a fit to the expected dependence (1 − ε)N, giving ε = 3% (the shaded area corresponds to 2% < ε < 4%). Error bars, s.e.m. b, Calculated probabilities of observing 0,1 or 2 excitations (columns 1–3) as a function of the excitation pulse area Ωt, assuming a perfect blockade and ε = 3%, for atom numbers N = 3, 9, 15 (rows 1–3).

Extended Data Figure 3 Full data set for the Rydberg blockade data.

a, Fully loaded arrays of 1 to 9 traps (n = 82). b, Partially loaded array of Nt = 19 traps, containing from N = 10 to N = 15 atoms (n = 100). The column on the left shows the probability P0 of recapturing all atoms, the centre column the probability P1 of losing just one atom out of N, and the column on the right the probability P2 of losing two atoms out of N. The solid lines are fits by equation (5). Error bars, s.e.m. c, Damping rate γ extracted from the P0 data as a function of the number of atoms in the array. Error bars, s.d.

Extended Data Figure 4 Homogeneous excitation in the eight-atom ring.

a, For Ωτ = 3.1, we observe strongly contrasted oscillations in the pair correlation function g2(k). b, The average density of Rydberg excitations, however, is approximately the same on every site. The horizontal dashed line indicates the mean over all sites. Error bars, s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 5 Full time evolution of the correlation functions for the 30-trap, racetrack-shaped chain.

a, Same as for Fig. 3a–c. The right panel is the time evolution of the pair correlation function, clearly showing that, for times longer than a few Ω−1, the pair correlation function does not evolve significantly. The vertical dashed line indicates the value of the blockade radius. b, The principal quantum number is now n = 57, and the Rabi frequency Ω = 2π × 1.7 MHz, such that Rb = 2.4a. The central panel shows the time evolution of the Rydberg fraction, and the right panel the time evolution of the pair correlation function. For both a and b, fR approaches, at long times, the close-packing limit a/Rb of hard rods of length Rb (dashed horizontal lines).

Extended Data Figure 6 Full time evolution of the experimental correlation function for the 7 × 7 square array.

One observes the blockaded region around (k, l) = (0, 0), with a slight flattening reflecting the anisotropy of the interaction. After a few Ω−1, the correlation function g(2)(k, l) does not evolve any more.

Extended Data Figure 7 Full versus partial loading for the dynamics and correlations in the case of Fig. 4a–c.

a, Rydberg fraction as a function of time for the partially loaded (solid line) or fully loaded (thin dashed line) 30-trap array. b, Pair correlation function g(2)(k) for Ωτ ≈ 2.0, for the partially loaded (solid line) or fully loaded (thin dashed line) 30-trap array. In both cases, the effect of detection errors (ε = 3%) is included.

Extended Data Figure 8 Assessing the validity of the approximation of translational invariance in the eight-atom ring.

Calculated pair correlation function g(2)(k) as a function of the excitation time for the eight-atom ring. a, Simulation using the experimentally relevant anisotropic interaction, which breaks translational invariance. b, Simulation with the same parameters as in a, except that the angular dependence is neglected (we replace equation (8) by its value for θ = 0), thus re-establishing translational invariance. We observe that the contrast in a is reduced, as expected, but only in a marginal way.

Extended Data Figure 9 Effect of the Zeeman structure of the Rydberg states on the dynamics of the Rydberg fraction fR.

We use the toy model of nP1/2 Rydberg states discussed in Methods, with n = 30 and B = 0.2 G. a, The atoms are aligned along the quantization axis z, and spaced by a = 1.6 μm (inset). In this case, the full solution including the Zeeman structure (red solid line) agrees perfectly with the solution of the effective spin-1/2 model with an anisotropic effective potential (as used in all the rest of the paper, black dotted line). b, The atoms are aligned perpendicularly to z, with a = 2 μm (inset; thus keeping the same effective potential interaction between adjacent atoms as in a). The full (red solid line) and approximate (black dotted line) solutions agree at short times, but for longer times some population builds up in the other Zeeman sublevel that is not directly coupled to |g〉 by the laser (blue dashed line), resulting in a slowly increasing excess of Rydberg fraction similar to what is observed experimentally for some configurations.

Extended Data Table 1 Experimental parameters used for the data presented in the main text

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labuhn, H., Barredo, D., Ravets, S. et al. Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models. Nature 534, 667–670 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18274

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing