Letter | Published:

Vigorous convection as the explanation for Pluto’s polygonal terrain

Nature volume 534, pages 7981 (02 June 2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Pluto’s surface is surprisingly young and geologically active1. One of its youngest terrains is the near-equatorial region informally named Sputnik Planum, which is a topographic basin filled by nitrogen (N2) ice mixed with minor amounts of CH4 and CO ices1. Nearly the entire surface of the region is divided into irregular polygons about 20–30 kilometres in diameter, whose centres rise tens of metres above their sides. The edges of this region exhibit bulk flow features without polygons1. Both thermal contraction and convection have been proposed to explain this terrain1, but polygons formed from thermal contraction (analogous to ice-wedges or mud-crack networks)2,3 of N2 are inconsistent with the observations on Pluto of non-brittle deformation within the N2-ice sheet. Here we report a parameterized convection model to compute the Rayleigh number of the N2 ice and show that it is vigorously convecting, making Rayleigh–Bénard convection the most likely explanation for these polygons. The diameter of Sputnik Planum’s polygons and the dimensions of the ‘floating mountains’ (the hills of of water ice along the edges of the polygons) suggest that its N2 ice is about ten kilometres thick. The estimated convection velocity of 1.5 centimetres a year indicates a surface age of only around a million years.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. The Pluto system: initial results from its exploration by New Horizons. Science 350, (2015)

  2. 2.

    & Ice wedges: growth, thaw transformation, and palaeoenvironmental significance. J. Quat. Sci. 3, 39–55 (1988)

  3. 3.

    Some factors affecting the development of mud-cracks. J. Geol. 25, 135–144 (1917)

  4. 4.

    Mechanics of thermal contraction cracks and ice-wedge polygons in permafrost. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 70, 1–66 (1962)

  5. 5.

    , , & Thermal conductivity of solid nitrogen. Phys. Rev. B 50, 543–546 (1994)

  6. 6.

    & Seasonal nitrogen cycles on Pluto. Icarus 120, 247–265 (1996)

  7. 7.

    & Origin of giant Martian polygons. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 2633–2647 (1992)

  8. 8.

    The origin of polygonal troughs on the Northern Plains of Mars. Icarus 42, 185–210 (1980)

  9. 9.

    et al. On the origin of graben and ridges within and near volcanically buried craters and basins in Mercury's northern plains. J. Geophys. Res. 117, E00L06 (2012)

  10. 10.

    et al. The origin of graben and ridges in Rachmaninoff, Raditladi, and Mozart basins, Mercury. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118, 47–58 (2013)

  11. 11.

    , & Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001)

  12. 12.

    , & On the roles of escape erosion and the viscous relaxation of craters on Pluto. Icarus 250, 287–293 (2015)

  13. 13.

    & A common origin for ridge-and-trough terrain on icy satellites by sluggish lid convection. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 249, 18–27 (2015)

  14. 14.

    & Transitions in thermal convection with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity in a wide box. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 180, 355–367 (2000)

  15. 15.

    , & Experimental study on the rheological properties of polycrystalline solid nitrogen and methane: implications for tectonic processes on Triton. Icarus 207, 972–977 (2010)

  16. 16.

    & Numerical investigation of 2D convection with extremely large viscosity variations. Phys. Fluids 7, 2154–2162 (1995)

  17. 17.

    Nitrogen–carbon monoxide phase diagram. J. Chem. Phys. 44, 417–418 (1966)

  18. 18.

    , & Multiple phase transitions and the style of mantle convection. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 72, 185–210 (1992)

  19. 19.

    & The interaction of a subducting lithospheric slab with a chemical or phase boundary. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 4389–4402 (1984)

  20. 20.

    , & Role of phase transitions in a dynamic mantle. Geophys. J. Int. 42, 705–735 (1975)

  21. 21.

    Solid and liquid nitrogen. Phys. Rep. 27, 89–157 (1976)

  22. 22.

    , , & Turbulent convection at very high Rayleigh numbers. Nature 404, 837–840 (2000)

  23. 23.

    Numerical models of mantle convection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 359–394 (1992)

  24. 24.

    Deformation of Earth Materials: an Introduction to the Rheology of Solid Earth 338–362 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012)

  25. 25.

    & The Structure and Properties of Water 296 (Clarendon Press, 1969)

  26. 26.

    Ice Physics 346 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the New Horizons team members, without whom none of this work would have been possible. We also thank T. Bowling, D. Minton, B. Hogan, J. Kendall, B. Link and C. Milbury for discussions. A.J.T. thanks the Fredrick N. Andrews Fellowship for funding.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

    • A. J. Trowbridge
    • , H. J. Melosh
    •  & A. M. Freed
  2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

    • H. J. Melosh
    •  & J. K. Steckloff

Authors

  1. Search for A. J. Trowbridge in:

  2. Search for H. J. Melosh in:

  3. Search for J. K. Steckloff in:

  4. Search for A. M. Freed in:

Contributions

A.J.T. and H.J.M. conceived this work, developed the parameterized convection model, and conducted Rayleigh number calculations for this paper. J.K.S. developed Maxwell time arguments for ruling out thermal contraction, computed the surface and subsurface temperatures of Pluto, and calculated atmospheric pressures. A.M.F. advised A.J.T., and helped to edit and revise the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Trowbridge.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks G. Schubert and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18016

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.