Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Charge-density analysis of an iron–sulfur protein at an ultra-high resolution of 0.48 Å


The fine structures of proteins, such as the positions of hydrogen atoms, distributions of valence electrons and orientations of bound waters, are critical factors for determining the dynamic and chemical properties of proteins. Such information cannot be obtained by conventional protein X-ray analyses at 3.0–1.5 Å resolution, in which amino acids are fitted into atomically unresolved electron-density maps and refinement calculations are performed under strong restraints1,2. Therefore, we usually supplement the information on hydrogen atoms and valence electrons in proteins with pre-existing common knowledge obtained by chemistry in small molecules. However, even now, computational calculation of such information with quantum chemistry also tends to be difficult, especially for polynuclear metalloproteins3. Here we report a charge-density analysis of the high-potential iron–sulfur protein from the thermophilic purple bacterium Thermochromatium tepidum using X-ray data at an ultra-high resolution of 0.48 Å. Residual electron densities in the conventional refinement are assigned as valence electrons in the multipolar refinement. Iron 3d and sulfur 3p electron densities of the Fe4S4 cluster are visualized around the atoms. Such information provides the most detailed view of the valence electrons of the metal complex in the protein. The asymmetry of the iron–sulfur cluster and the protein environment suggests the structural basis of charge storing on electron transfer. Our charge-density analysis reveals many fine features around the metal complex for the first time, and will enable further theoretical and experimental studies of metalloproteins.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Crystal structure of HiPIP at 0.48 Å resolution.
Figure 2: The Fe4S4 cluster.
Figure 3: Topological analysis of charge density in the Fe4S4 cluster.
Figure 4: Interaction network around the Fe4S4 cluster.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

The coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession number 5D8V.


  1. 1

    Hendrickson, W. A. Stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecular structures. Methods Enzymol. 115, 252–270 (1985)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Wlodawer, A., Minor, W., Dauter, Z. & Jaskolski, M. Protein crystallography for aspiring crystallographers or how to avoid pitfalls and traps in macromolecular structure determination. FEBS J. 280, 5705–5736 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Rokob, T. A., Srnec, M. & Rulíšek, L. Theoretical calculations of physico-chemical and spectroscopic properties of bioinorganic systems: current limits and perspectives. Dalton Trans. 41, 5754–5768 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Nogi, T., Fathir, I., Kobayashi, M., Nozawa, T. & Miki, K. Crystal structures of photosynthetic reaction center and high-potential iron-sulfur protein from Thermochromatium tepidum: thermostability and electron transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13561–13566 (2000)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Liu, L., Nogi, T., Kobayashi, M., Nozawa, T. & Miki, K. Ultrahigh-resolution structure of high-potential iron-sulfur protein from Thermochromatium tepidum. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1085–1091 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Niwa, S. et al. Structure of the LH1-RC complex from Thermochromatium tepidum at 3.0 Å. Nature 508, 228–232 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Takeda, K., Kusumoto, K., Hirano, Y. & Miki, K. Detailed assessment of X-ray induced structural perturbation in a crystalline state protein. J. Struct. Biol. 169, 135–144 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Niu, S. & Ichiye, T. Insight into environmental effects on bonding and redox properties of [4Fe-4S] clusters in proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 5724–5725 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Glaser, T. et al. Protein effects on the electronic structure of the [Fe4S4]2+ cluster in ferredoxin and HiPIP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4859–4860 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Dey, A. et al. Solvent tuning of electrochemical potentials in the active sites of HiPIP versus ferredoxin. Science 318, 1464–1468 (2007)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Jelsch, C. et al. Accurate protein crystallography at ultra-high resolution: valence electron distribution in crambin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3171–3176 (2000)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Schmidt, A., Jelsch, C., Ostergaard, P., Rypniewski, W. & Lamzin, V. S. Trypsin revisited: crystallography at (sub) atomic resolution and quantum chemistry revealing details of catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43357–43362 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Fournier, B. et al. Charge density and electrostatic interactions of fidarestat, an inhibitor of human aldose reductase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10929–10941 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zarychta, B. et al. Cholesterol oxidase: ultrahigh-resolution crystal structure and multipolar atom model-based analysis. Acta Crystallogr. D 71, 954–968 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hansen, N. K. & Coppens, P. Testing aspherical atom refinements on small-molecule data sets. Acta Crystallogr. A 34, 909–921 (1978)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Berkholz, D. S., Driggers, C. M., Shapovalov, M. V., Dunbrack, R. L., Jr & Karplus, P. A. Nonplanar peptide bonds in proteins are common and conserved but not biased toward active sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 449–453 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Engh, R. A. & Huber, R. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 392–400 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Murray-Rust, P. & Glusker, J. P. Directional hydrogen bonding to sp2- and sp3- hybridized oxygen atoms and its relevance to ligand-macromolecule interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 1018–1025 (1984)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bertini, I., Donaire, A., Felli, I. C., Luchinat, C. & Rosato, A. 1H and 13C NMR studies of an oxidized HiPIP. Inorg. Chem. 36, 4798–4803 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Improta, R., Vitagliano, L. & Esposito, L. Peptide bond distortions from planarity: new insights from quantum mechanical calculations and peptide/protein crystal structures. PLoS ONE 6, e24533 (2011)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wang, Y.-F., Yu, Z.-Y., Wu, J. & Liu, C.-B. Electron delocalization and charge transfer in polypeptide chains. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 10521–10526 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Smith, G. T. et al. Experimental determination of the electron density topology in a non-centrosymmetric transition metal complex: [Ni(H3L)][NO3][PF6] [H3L = N,N′,N′′-tris(2-hydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane]. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 5028–5034 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Bader, R. F. W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory (Oxford Univ. Press, 1990)

  24. 24

    Koritsanszky, T. S. & Coppens, P. Chemical applications of X-ray charge-density analysis. Chem. Rev. 101, 1583–1628 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Gibbs, G. V. et al. Theoretical electron density distributions for Fe- and Cu-sulfide earth materials: a connection between bond length, bond critical point properties, local energy densities, and bonded interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 1923–1931 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Harris, T. V. & Szilagyi, R. K. Iron-sulfur bond covalency from electronic structure calculations for classical iron-sulfur clusters. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 540–552 (2014)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Dey, A. et al. Sulfur K-edge XAS and DFT calculations on [Fe4S4]2+ clusters: effects of H-bonding and structural distortion on covalency and spin topology. Inorg. Chem. 44, 8349–8354 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Mouesca, J. M., Noodleman, L., Case, D. A. & Lamotte, B. Spin densities and spin coupling in iron-sulfur clusters: a new analysis of hyperfine coupling constants. Inorg. Chem. 34, 4347–4359 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Flot, D. et al. The ID23-2 structural biology microfocus beamline at the ESRF. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 17, 107–118 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Paithankar, K. S., Owen, R. L. & Garman, E. F. Absorbed dose calculations for macromolecular crystals: improvements to RADDOSE. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 152–162 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122 (2008)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Guillot, B., Viry, L., Guillot, R. & Lecomte, C. Refinement of proteins at subatomic resolution with MOPRO. J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 214–223 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Guillot, B., Jelsch, C., Podjarny, A. & Lecomte, C. Charge-density analysis of a protein structure at subatomic resolution: the human aldose reductase case. Acta Crystallogr. D 64, 567–588 (2008)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Allen, F. H. A systematic pairwise comparison of geometric parameters obtained by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Acta Crystallogr. B 42, 515–522 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Wu, G., Rodrigues, B. L. & Coppens, P. The correction of reflection intensities for incomplete absorption of high-energy X-rays in the CCD phosphor. J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 356–359 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Zarychta, B., Pichon-Pesme, V., Guillot, B., Lecomte, C. & Jelsch, C. On the application of an experimental multipolar pseudo-atom library for accurate refinement of small-molecule and protein crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. A 63, 108–125 (2007)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Holladay, A., Leung, P. & Coppens, P. Generalized relations between d-orbital occupancies of transition-metal atoms and electron-density multipole population parameters from X-ray diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr. A 39, 377–387 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Sabino, J. R. & Coppens, P. On the choice of d-orbital coordinate system in charge-density studies of low-symmetry transition-metal complexes. Acta Crystallogr. A 59, 127–131 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    DeLano, W. L. The PyMol Molecular Graphics System (DeLano Scientific, 2002)

  41. 41

    Yu, M. & Trinkle, D. R. Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 064111 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank K. Kusumoto and H. Ohno for their contributions in the initial steps of the work, and T. Tsujinaka and S. Niwa for their contributions in the preparation of the manuscript. We also thank the BL41XU beamline staff of SPring-8 for their help in data collection. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (number 23657073 to K.T.) and the Photon and Quantum Basic Research Coordinated Development Program (to K.M.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Author information




K.M. initiated and supervised the project. K.T. designed the experiments. Y.H. prepared crystals. Y.H. and K.T. performed data collection and the crystallographic analysis. Y.H., K.T. and K.M. discussed the results. Y.H. wrote the initial draft, and K.T. and K.M. revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunio Miki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Quality of the diffraction data at 0.48 Å resolution.

a, The diffraction image. Right, zoom view of the boxed region at left. The resolution for each circle is indicated. b, Rsym (blue) and <I>/<σ(I)> (pink) values are plotted for 30 resolution bins. c, Changes of Rsym at the highest-resolution shell (0.50–0.48 Å) and relative B factor in the course of the data collection. The Rsym (blue) and relative B factor (red) are plotted as functions of frame number.

Extended Data Figure 2 Residual electron density for each refinement step.

The left panels show the residual density after the ISAM refinement; the right panels show the residual density after the MAM refinement. a, The plane of the peptide bond between Asn45 and Cys46. Maximum and minimum peaks are 0.33 and −0.22 electrons per cubic ångström for the ISAM analysis, and 0.18 and −0.20 electrons per cubic ångström for the MAM analysis. b, The plane of the aromatic ring of Trp74. Maximum and minimum peaks are 0.34 and −0.29 electrons per cubic ångström for the ISAM analysis, and 0.23 and −0.23 electrons per cubic ångström for the MAM analysis. c, The Fe4S4 cluster. The plane consists of FE1, S3 and Cys43-Sγ atoms. Maximum and minimum peaks are 0.60 and −0.35 electrons per cubic ångström for the ISAM analysis, and 0.35 and −0.29 electrons per cubic ångström for the MAM analysis. The contour interval is 0.05 electrons per cubic ångström for all figures. Blue solid, red dashed and yellow dashed lines denote positive, negative and zero contours, respectively.

Extended Data Figure 3 Interaction network around the Fe4S4 cluster.

a, Deformation electron density around the Cys43-Sγ atom. The main-chain oxygen atom of Asn70, the main-chain carboxyl carbon atom of Gly73 and the H atom of Ile69-Cδ1 are located close to Cys43-Sγ. The static deformation maps are shown as grey and cyan surfaces contoured at the levels of +0.1 and +0.3 electrons per cubic ångström, respectively. The omit map of hydrogen atoms is shown as a pink mesh contoured at the 3.0σ level. The dashed lines indicate interactions between valence densities of sulfur atoms and hydrogen atoms. b, Deformation electron density around Cys61-Sγ. The main-chain amide of Leu63 and the H atom of Phe64-Cδ2 are located close to Cys61-Sγ. c, Deformation electron density around Cys75-Sγ. The main-chain amide of Ser77 is located close to Cys75-Sγ. d, Deformation electron density around S1 of the Fe4S4 cluster. The H atom of Phe48-Cδ2 and the Cδ1 atom of Leu63 are located close to S1. e, Deformation electron density around S2 of the Fe4S4 cluster. The H atoms of Tyr19-Cδ1, Phe64-Cε2 and Ile69-Cγ2 are located close to S2. f, Deformation electron density around S4 of the Fe4S4 cluster. The H atom of Cys43-Cβ, the H atom of Cys46-Cβ and the amide nitrogen atom of Met49 are located close to S4.

Extended Data Figure 4 The local axes for Fe atoms of Fe4S4(Cys-Sγ)4.

a, Whole view of the local axes of the four Fe atoms. b, Close-up views of the local axes of each Fe atom (FE1−FE4). The static deformation maps of Fe4S4(Cys-Sγ)4 are represented as grey isosurfaces contoured at the level of +0.2 electrons per cubic ångström.

Extended Data Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics
Extended Data Table 2 Dihedral and improper angles
Extended Data Table 3 Geometrical parameters in Fe4S4(Cys-Sγ)4
Extended Data Table 4 Atomic properties of Fe4S4(Cys-Sγ)4
Extended Data Table 5 Topological parameters at BCPs of Fe–S bonds
Extended Data Table 6 The d-orbital populations of iron atoms

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirano, Y., Takeda, K. & Miki, K. Charge-density analysis of an iron–sulfur protein at an ultra-high resolution of 0.48 Å. Nature 534, 281–284 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing