Letter | Published:

Metastable high-entropy dual-phase alloys overcome the strength–ductility trade-off

Nature volume 534, pages 227230 (09 June 2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Metals have been mankind’s most essential materials for thousands of years; however, their use is affected by ecological and economical concerns. Alloys with higher strength and ductility could alleviate some of these concerns by reducing weight and improving energy efficiency. However, most metallurgical mechanisms for increasing strength lead to ductility loss, an effect referred to as the strength–ductility trade-off1,2. Here we present a metastability-engineering strategy in which we design nanostructured, bulk high-entropy alloys with multiple compositionally equivalent high-entropy phases. High-entropy alloys were originally proposed to benefit from phase stabilization through entropy maximization3,4,5,6. Yet here, motivated by recent work that relaxes the strict restrictions on high-entropy alloy compositions by demonstrating the weakness of this connection7,8,9,10,11, the concept is overturned. We decrease phase stability to achieve two key benefits: interface hardening due to a dual-phase microstructure (resulting from reduced thermal stability of the high-temperature phase12); and transformation-induced hardening (resulting from the reduced mechanical stability of the room-temperature phase13). This combines the best of two worlds: extensive hardening due to the decreased phase stability known from advanced steels14,15 and massive solid-solution strengthening of high-entropy alloys3. In our transformation-induced plasticity-assisted, dual-phase high-entropy alloy (TRIP-DP-HEA), these two contributions lead respectively to enhanced trans-grain and inter-grain slip resistance, and hence, increased strength. Moreover, the increased strain hardening capacity that is enabled by dislocation hardening of the stable phase and transformation-induced hardening of the metastable phase produces increased ductility. This combined increase in strength and ductility distinguishes the TRIP-DP-HEA alloy from other recently developed structural materials16,17. This metastability-engineering strategy should thus usefully guide design in the near-infinite compositional space of high-entropy alloys.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nature Mater. 10, 817–822 (2011)

  2. 2.

    et al. Evading the strength–ductility trade-off dilemma in steel through gradient hierarchical nanotwins. Nature Commun. 5, 3580 (2014)

  3. 3.

    et al. Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 6, 299–303 (2004)

  4. 4.

    et al. Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 61, 1–93 (2014)

  5. 5.

    et al. Exceptional damage-tolerance of a medium-entropy alloy CrCoNi at cryogenic temperatures. Nature Commun. 7, 10602 (2016)

  6. 6.

    et al. A fracture-resistant high-entropy alloy for cryogenic applications. Science 345, 1153–1158 (2014)

  7. 7.

    , , & A novel, single phase, non-equiatomic FeMnNiCoCr high-entropy alloy with exceptional phase stability and tensile ductility. Scr. Mater. 72–73, 5–8 (2014)

  8. 8.

    et al. Composition dependence of phase stability, deformation mechanisms, and mechanical properties of the CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy system. JOM 66, 1993–2001 (2014)

  9. 9.

    et al. Non-equiatomic high entropy alloys: approach towards rapid alloy screening and property-oriented design. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 648, 183–192 (2015)

  10. 10.

    et al. Design of a twinning-induced plasticity high entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 94, 124–133 (2015)

  11. 11.

    , & Solid solution or intermetallics in a high-entropy alloy. Adv. Eng. Mater. 11, 641–644 (2009)

  12. 12.

    et al. An overview of dual-phase steels: advances in microstructure-oriented processing and micromechanically guided design. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 45, 391–431 (2015)

  13. 13.

    , & Design of a novel Mn-based 1 GPa duplex stainless TRIP steel with 60% ductility by a reduction of austenite stability. Acta Mater. 59, 4653–4664 (2011)

  14. 14.

    Hadfield’s manganese steel. Science 12, 284–286 (1888)

  15. 15.

    , , & High strength Fe–Mn–(Al, Si) TRIP/TWIP steels development–properties–application. Int. J. Plast. 16, 1391–1409 (2000)

  16. 16.

    et al. Heterogeneous lamella structure unites ultrafine-grain strength with coarse-grain ductility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14501–14505 (2015)

  17. 17.

    , & Brittle intermetallic compound makes ultrastrong low-density steel with large ductility. Nature 518, 77–79 (2015)

  18. 18.

    et al. The influence of manganese content on the stacking fault and austenite/ε-martensite interfacial energies in Fe–Mn–(Al–Si) steels investigated by experiment and theory. Acta Mater. 68, 238–253 (2014)

  19. 19.

    , , & A novel approach to measure grain boundary segregation in bulk polycrystalline materials in dependence of the boundaries’ five rotational degrees of freedom. Scr. Mater. 81, 16–19 (2014)

  20. 20.

    et al. Chemical gradients across phase boundaries between martensite and austenite in steel studied by atom probe tomography and simulation. Acta Mater. 59, 364–374 (2011)

  21. 21.

    et al. Segregation engineering enables nanoscale martensite to austenite phase transformation at grain boundaries: a pathway to ductile martensite. Acta Mater. 61, 6132–6152 (2013)

  22. 22.

    et al. The influences of temperature and microstructure on the tensile properties of a CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 61, 5743–5755 (2013)

  23. 23.

    , & Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000)

  24. 24.

    et al. Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility. Nature 451, 1085–1089 (2008)

  25. 25.

    & Theory and application of electron channelling contrast imaging under controlled diffraction conditions. Acta Mater. 75, 20–50 (2014)

  26. 26.

    , & Effect of nitrogen on stacking fault energy of f.c.c. iron-based alloys. Acta Mater. 47, 1271–1279 (1999)

  27. 27.

    , & Direct observations of martensite nuclei in stainless steel. Acta Metall. 27, 1839–1847 (1979)

  28. 28.

    , , & Realization of high tensile ductility in a bulk metallic glass composite by the utilization of deformation-induced martensitic transformation. Scr. Mater. 65, 304–307 (2011)

  29. 29.

    , & Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale. Science 324, 349–352 (2009)

  30. 30.

    , , , & Nanolaminate transformation-induced plasticity–twinning-induced plasticity steel with dynamic strain partitioning and enhanced damage resistance. Acta Mater. 85, 216–228 (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by the European Research Council under the EU’s 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement 290998. The contributions of H. Springer, S. Zaefferer, M. Nellessen, M. Adamek and F. Schlüter are also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 40237 Düsseldorf, Germany

    • Zhiming Li
    • , Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep
    • , Yun Deng
    • , Dierk Raabe
    •  & Cemal Cem Tasan
  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USA

    • Cemal Cem Tasan

Authors

  1. Search for Zhiming Li in:

  2. Search for Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep in:

  3. Search for Yun Deng in:

  4. Search for Dierk Raabe in:

  5. Search for Cemal Cem Tasan in:

Contributions

C.C.T. and D.R. designed the research; Z.L. was the lead experimental scientist of the study; K.G.P. and Y.D. performed some of the alloy design experiments; and Z.L. and C.C.T. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiming Li or Dierk Raabe or Cemal Cem Tasan.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17981

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.