Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Experimental determination of the electrical resistivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions


Earth continuously generates a dipole magnetic field in its convecting liquid outer core by a self-sustained dynamo action. Metallic iron is a dominant component of the outer core, so its electrical and thermal conductivity controls the dynamics and thermal evolution of Earth’s core1. However, in spite of extensive research, the transport properties of iron under core conditions are still controversial2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Since free electrons are a primary carrier of both electric current and heat, the electron scattering mechanism in iron under high pressure and temperature holds the key to understanding the transport properties of planetary cores. Here we measure the electrical resistivity (the reciprocal of electrical conductivity) of iron at the high temperatures (up to 4,500 kelvin) and pressures (megabars) of Earth’s core in a laser-heated diamond-anvil cell. The value measured for the resistivity of iron is even lower than the value extrapolated from high-pressure, low-temperature data using the Bloch–Grüneisen law, which considers only the electron–phonon scattering. This shows that the iron resistivity is strongly suppressed by the resistivity saturation effect at high temperatures. The low electrical resistivity of iron indicates the high thermal conductivity of Earth’s core, suggesting rapid core cooling and a young inner core less than 0.7 billion years old10. Therefore, an abrupt increase in palaeomagnetic field intensity around 1.3 billion years ago11 may not be related to the birth of the inner core.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Change in electrical resistivity of iron upon phase transitions.
Figure 2: Change in the resistivity of ε iron with increasing temperature.
Figure 3: Iron resistivity at 212 GPa and high temperatures.


  1. Hirose, K., Labrosse, S. & Hernlund, J. Composition and state of the core. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 657–691 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stacey, F. & Anderson, O. Electrical and thermal conductivities of Fe-Ni-Si alloy under core conditions. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 124, 153–162 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stacey, F. & Loper, D. A revised estimate of the conductivity of iron alloy at high pressure and implications for the core energy balance. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 161, 13–18 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sha, X. & Cohen, R. E. First-principles studies of electrical resistivity of iron under pressure. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 075401 (2011)

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Koker, N., Steinle-Neumann, G. & Vlcek, V. Electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of liquid Fe alloys at high P and T, and heat flux in Earth's core. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4070–4073 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pozzo, M., Davies, C., Gubbins, D. & Alfè, D. Thermal and electrical conductivity of iron at Earth's core conditions. Nature 485, 355–358 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomi, H. et al. The high conductivity of iron and thermal evolution of the Earth's core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 224, 88–103 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seagle, C., Cottrell, E., Fei, Y., Hummer, D. & Prakapenka, V. Electrical and thermal transport properties of iron and iron–silicon alloy at high pressure. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5377–5381 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomi, H. & Hirose, K. Electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of hcp Fe–Ni alloys under high pressure: implications for thermal convection in the Earth's core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 247, 2–10 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Labrosse, S. Thermal evolution of the core with a high thermal conductivity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 247, 36–55 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Biggin, A. et al. Palaeomagnetic field intensity variations suggest Mesoproterozoic inner-core nucleation. Nature 526, 245–248 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bridgman, P. W. The resistance of 72 elements, alloys and compounds to 100,000 kg/cm2. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 81, 165–251 (1952)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murr, L., Inal, O. & Morales, A. Vacancies and vacancy clusters in shock-loaded molybdenum: direct observations by transmission electron and field-ion microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 432–434 (1976)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pozzo, M., Davies, C., Gubbins, D. & Alfè, D. Transport properties for liquid silicon–oxygen–iron mixtures at Earth's core conditions. Phys. Rev. B 87, 014110 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pozzo, M., Davies, C., Gubbins, D. & Alfè, D. Thermal and electrical conductivity of solid iron and iron–silicon mixtures at Earth's core conditions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 393, 159–164 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies, C., Pozzo, M., Gubbins, D. & Alfè, D. Constraints from material properties on the dynamics and evolution of Earth's core. Nature Geosci . 8, 678–685 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng, L., Seagle, C., Fei, Y. & Shahar, A. High pressure and temperature electrical resistivity of iron and implications for planetary cores. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 33–37 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Powell, R. W. The electrical resistivity of liquid iron. Phil. Mag. 44, 772–775 (1953)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Zytveld, J. B. Electrical resistivities of liquid transition metals. J. Phys. Colloq . 41 (C8), 503–506 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Secco, R. & Schloessin, H. The electrical resistivity of solid and liquid Fe at pressures up to 7 GPa. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 5887–5894 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dewaele, A. et al. Quasihydrostatic equation of state of iron above 2 Mbar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 215504 (2006)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunnarsson, O., Calandra, M. & Han, J. E. Saturation of electrical resistivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1085–1099 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiesmann, H. et al. Simple model for characterizing the electrical resistivity in A-15 superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 782–785 (1977)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bohnenkamp, U., Sandström, R. & Grimvall, G. Electrical resistivity of steels and face-centered-cubic iron. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4402–4407 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bi, Y., Tan, H. & Jing, F. Electrical conductivity of iron under shock compression up to 200 GPa. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 10849–10854 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sata, N. et al. Compression of FeSi, Fe3C, Fe0.95O, and FeS under the core pressures and implication for light element in the Earth's core. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B09204 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Olson, P., Deguen, R., Hinnov, L. A. & Zhong, S. Controls on geomagnetic reversals and core evolution by mantle convection in the Phanerozoic. Phys. Earth Planet. Sci . 214, 87–103 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tarduno, J. A., Cottrell, R. D., Davis, W. J., Nimmo, F. & Bono, R. K. A Hadean to Paleoarchean geodynamo recorded by single zircon crystals. Science 349, 521–524 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Bars, M., Cébron, D. & Le Gal, P. Flows driven by libration, precession, and tides. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 163–193 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Rourke, J. G. & Stevenson, D. J. Powering Earth's dynamo with magnesium precipitation from the core. Nature 529, 387–389 (2016)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Akahama, Y. & Kawamura, H. Pressure calibration of diamond anvil Raman gauge to 310 GPa. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 043516 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohishi, Y., Hirao, N., Sata, N., Hirose, K. & Takata, M. Highly intense monochromatic X-ray diffraction facility for high-pressure research at SPring-8. High Press. Res. 28, 163–173 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsujino, N. et al. Equation of state of γ-Fe: reference density for planetary cores. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 375, 244–253 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jaccard, D., Holmes, A., Behr, G., Inada, Y. & Onuki, Y. Superconductivity of ε-Fe: complete resistive transition. Phys. Lett. A 299, 282–286 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Touloukian, Y. S. in Thermophysical Properties of Matter: Thermal Conductivity-Nonmetallic Solids Ch. 2 (John Wiley and Sons, 1970)

  36. Braginsky, L., Shklover, V., Hofmann, H. & Bowen, P. High-temperature thermal conductivity of porous Al2O3 nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 70, 134201 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Simpson, A. & Stucks, A. D. Study on thermal conductivity of boron nitride in hexagonal structure in atomistic scale by using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics technique. J. Phys. C 4, 1710–1718 (1971)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ohta, K. et al. Lattice thermal conductivity of MgSiO3 perovskite and post-perovskite at the core–mantle boundary. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 349/350, 109–115 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Imada, S. et al. Measurements of lattice thermal conductivity of MgO to core–mantle boundary pressures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4542–4547 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Matassov, G. The electrical conductivity of iron–silicon alloys at high pressures and the Earth's core. PhD thesis., Lawrence Livermore Lab., Univ. California (1977)

  41. Kiarasi, S. & Secco, R. Pressure–induced electrical resistivity saturation of Fe17Si. Phys. Status Solidi B 252, 2034–2042 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Boehler, R. Temperatures in the Earth's core from melting-point measurements of iron at high static pressures. Nature 363, 534–536 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Anzellini, S., Dewaele, A., Mezouar, M., Loubeyre, P. & Morard, G. Melting of iron at Earth's inner core boundary based on fast X-ray diffraction. Science 340, 464–466 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ohno, H. Antiferromagnetism in hcp iron–ruthenium and hcp iron–osmium alloys. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 31, 92–101 (1971)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank H. Gomi for discussions and assistance with experiments. H. Ichikawa helped with the temperature distribution calculations. High-pressure experiments were conducted at BL10XU, SPring-8 (proposal numbers 2012B1131, 2012B1212, 2013B0080, 2014A0080, and 2014B0080).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



K.O. designed the project. Y.K., K.H., K.S. and Y.O. supported the experiments. The manuscript was written by K.O. and K.H. and reviewed by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Ohta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Images of iron sample and sample configuration for electrical resistance measurements in a DAC.

a, A composite of an iron sample and electrodes shaped by a focused ion beam. b, c, Photomicrographs of a sample chamber viewed through a diamond anvil at 115 GPa and 300 K (b) and 3,700 K (c). The four-probe method was used for electrical resistance measurements. At each set of pressure and temperature conditions, we measured the voltage difference between two potential leads (V+ and V) twice, when electric current passed through the sample from a positive current (I+) lead to a negative current (I) lead and in the opposite direction. These two voltage values were averaged to eliminate thermal voltage, and the resistance is calculated from Ohm’s law.

Extended Data Figure 2 XRD patterns of iron samples at high pressures and temperatures.

a, Data collected at 26 GPa (see Fig. 1a for resistivity measurement), showing the diffraction peaks of ε Fe, γ Fe, and Al2O3 pressure medium (Cor.). Liquid Fe is indicated by a diffuse signal at 2θ = 10° to 14°. b, ε Fe at 140 GPa (Fig. 2e). Part of the SiO2 glass pressure medium crystallized into a CaCl2-type phase (labelled as CS) when thermal annealing occurred at 80 GPa.

Extended Data Figure 3 Pressure and temperature conditions of electrical resistivity measurements of iron.

Circles show the conditions of laser-heated DAC experiments (Figs 1 and 2b–f), and squares indicate those for measurements in a muffle furnace up to 450 K (Fig. 2a). Phase boundaries are from the literature42,43. The symbol colours in this figure correspond to those in Figs 1 and 2. Error bars, 1σ.

Extended Data Figure 4 Electrical resistivity of ε iron at high pressure and 300 K.

Bold black and blue curves show the results of previous DAC experiments by Gomi et al.7 and Seagle et al.8, respectively, with uncertainties shown by bands. The red curve connecting crosses is from theoretical calculations4. All these results are consistent with each other above ~80 GPa. For comparison, the resistivity of ε iron at 1 bar deduced from the measurements of hexagonal close-packed (hcp) Fe–Os alloy44 and at low pressures in a DAC34 are also shown.

Extended Data Figure 5 Temperature maps of the iron sample and electrodes in a laser-heated DAC at 115 GPa and 4,500 K.

Al2O3 is the pressure medium. The top panel shows the temperature map viewed along the compression axis. The bottom panel shows the temperature map of the cross-section of a sample chamber and a gasket. The maximum temperature difference in the area for resistance measurement is 200 K, smaller than the uncertainty in the temperature determination.

Extended Data Table 1 Saturation resistivity ρsat of ε iron at high pressures

Related audio

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohta, K., Kuwayama, Y., Hirose, K. et al. Experimental determination of the electrical resistivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Nature 534, 95–98 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing