Site-selective and stereoselective functionalization of unactivated C–H bonds

  • Nature volume 533, pages 230234 (12 May 2016)
  • doi:10.1038/nature17651
  • Download Citation


The laboratory synthesis of complex organic molecules relies heavily on the introduction and manipulation of functional groups, such as carbon–oxygen or carbon–halogen bonds; carbon–hydrogen bonds are far less reactive and harder to functionalize selectively. The idea of C–H functionalization, in which C–H bonds are modified at will instead of the functional groups, represents a paradigm shift in the standard logic of organic synthesis1,2,3. For this approach to be generally useful, effective strategies for site-selective C–H functionalization need to be developed. The most practical solutions to the site-selectivity problem rely on either intramolecular reactions4 or the use of directing groups within the substrate5,6,7,8. A challenging, but potentially more flexible approach, would be to use catalyst control to determine which site in a particular substrate would be functionalized9,10,11. Here we describe the use of dirhodium catalysts to achieve highly site-selective, diastereoselective and enantioselective C–H functionalization of n-alkanes and terminally substituted n-alkyl compounds. The reactions proceed in high yield, and functional groups such as halides, silanes and esters are compatible with this chemistry. These studies demonstrate that high site selectivity is possible in C–H functionalization reactions without the need for a directing or anchoring group present in the molecule.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


Data deposits

The crystal data have been deposited in the The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk) under accession number 1445448.


  1. 1.

    , & C–H bond functionalization: emerging synthetic tools for natural products and pharmaceuticals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 8960–9009 (2012)

  2. 2.

    & C–H functionalization logic in total synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 1976–1991 (2011)

  3. 3.

    Evolution of C–H bond functionalization from methane to methodology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 2–24 (2016)

  4. 4.

    , , & Catalytic carbene insertion into C–H bonds. Chem. Rev. 110, 704–724 (2010)

  5. 5.

    & Arene C–H functionalisation using a removable/modifiable or a traceless directing group strategy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6906–6919 (2014)

  6. 6.

    & Carbon–hydrogen (C–H) bond activation at PdIV: a frontier in C–H functionalization catalysis. Chem. Sci. 6, 70–76 (2015)

  7. 7.

    , , & Weak coordination as a powerful means for developing broadly useful C–H functionalization reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 788–802 (2012)

  8. 8.

    , & Rhodium-catalyzed C–C bond formation via heteroatom-directed C–H bond activation. Chem. Rev. 110, 624–655 (2010)

  9. 9.

    et al. Catalytic functionalization of low reactive C(sp3)-H and C(sp2)-H bonds of alkanes and arenes by carbene transfer from diazo compounds. Dalton Trans. 44, 20295–20307 (2015)

  10. 10.

    , , & Beyond directing groups: transition-metal-catalyzed C–H activation of simple arenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10236–10254 (2012)

  11. 11.

    , , , & C–H activation for the construction of C–B bonds. Chem. Rev. 110, 890–931 (2010)

  12. 12.

    & Role of sterically demanding chiral dirhodium catalysts in site-selective C–H functionalization of activated primary C–H bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9792–9796 (2014)

  13. 13.

    & 2,2,2-Trichloroethyl aryldiazoacetates as robust reagents for the enantioselective C–H functionalization of methyl ethers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17718–17721 (2014)

  14. 14.

    & Guiding principles for site selective and stereoselective intermolecular C–H functionalization by donor/acceptor rhodium carbenes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 1857–1869 (2011)

  15. 15.

    , , & Transition-metal-catalyzed reactions of diazoesters—insertion into C–H bonds of parafins by carbenoids. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 14, 688–689 (1981)

  16. 16.

    , & Catalytic asymmetric C–H activation of alkanes and tetrahydrofuran. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 3063–3070 (2000)

  17. 17.

    et al. Highly selective metal catalysts for intermolecular carbenoid insertion into primary C–H bonds and enantioselective C–C bond formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 9747–9751 (2008)

  18. 18.

    & High symmetry dirhodium(II) paddlewheel complexes as chiral catalysts. Coord. Chem. Rev. 252, 545–555 (2008)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Asymmetric cyclopropanations by rhodium(II) N-(arylsulfonyl)prolinate catalyzed decomposition of vinyldiazomethanes in the presence of alkenes. Practical enantioselective synthesis of the four stereoisomers of 2-phenylcyclopropan-1-amino acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6897–6907 (1996)

  20. 20.

    et al. D2-symmetric dirhodium catalyst derived from a 1,2,2-triarylcyclopropanecarboxylate ligand: design, synthesis and application. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19198–19204 (2011)

  21. 21.

    , , & Chiral crown conformation of Rh2(S-PTTL)4: Enantioselective cyclopropanation with α-alkyl-α-diazoesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7230–7231 (2009)

  22. 22.

    , & Experimental evidence for the all-up reactive conformation of chiral rhodium(II) carboxylate catalysts: enantioselective synthesis of cis-cyclopropane α-amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 16383–16385 (2009)

  23. 23.

    , & Computational study on the selectivity of donor/acceptor-substituted rhodium carbenoids. J. Org. Chem. 74, 6555–6563 (2009)

Download references


Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through the CCI Center for Selective C–H Functionalization (CHE-1205646). We thank Novartis and AbbVie for supporting our research in C–H functionalization. We thank D. Guptill for conducting some preliminary studies on this project. D.G.M. gratefully acknowledges an NSF MRI-R2 grant (CHE-0958205) and the use of the resources of the Cherry Emerson Center for Scientific Computation.

Author information


  1. Department of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

    • Kuangbiao Liao
    • , Solymar Negretti
    • , John Bacsa
    •  & Huw M. L. Davies
  2. Cherry L. Emerson Center for Scientific Computation, Emory University, 1521 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA

    • Djamaladdin G. Musaev


  1. Search for Kuangbiao Liao in:

  2. Search for Solymar Negretti in:

  3. Search for Djamaladdin G. Musaev in:

  4. Search for John Bacsa in:

  5. Search for Huw M. L. Davies in:


K.L. performed and analysed the majority of the synthetic experiments. S.N. prepared the first meta-disubstituted catalyst, D.G.M. conducted the computational studies and J.B. conducted the X-ray crystallographic studies. K.L. and H.M.L.D. designed the synthetic experiments and prepared the manuscript.

Competing interests

H.M.L.D. is a named inventor on a patent entitled “Dirhodium Catalyst Compositions and Synthetic Processes Related Thereto” (US 8,975,428, issued 10 March 2015). The other authors have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huw M. L. Davies.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data – see contents page for details.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.