The locations of recent supernovae near the Sun from modelling 60Fe transport


The signature of 60Fe in deep-sea crusts indicates that one or more supernovae exploded in the solar neighbourhood about 2.2 million years ago1,2,3,4. Recent isotopic analysis is consistent with a core-collapse or electron-capture supernova that occurred 60 to 130 parsecs from the Sun5. Moreover, peculiarities in the cosmic ray spectrum point to a nearby supernova about two million years ago6. The Local Bubble of hot, diffuse plasma, in which the Solar System is embedded, originated from 14 to 20 supernovae within a moving group, whose surviving members are now in the Scorpius–Centaurus stellar association7,8. Here we report calculations of the most probable trajectories and masses of the supernova progenitors, and hence their explosion times and sites. The 60Fe signal arises from two supernovae at distances between 90 and 100 parsecs. The closest occurred 2.3 million years ago at present-day galactic coordinates l = 327°, b = 11°, and the second-closest exploded about 1.5 million years ago at l = 343°, b = 25°, with masses of 9.2 and 8.8 times the solar mass, respectively. The remaining supernovae, which formed the Local Bubble, contribute to a smaller extent because they happened at larger distances and longer ago (60Fe has a half-life of 2.6 million years9,10). There are uncertainties relating to the nucleosynthesis yields and the loss of 60Fe during transport, but they do not influence the relative distribution of 60Fe in the crust layers, and therefore our model reproduces the measured relative abundances very well.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Probability clouds of the two most recent supernovae.
Figure 2: Analytical model of 60Fe-carrying shells at 1.4 Myr and 2.2 Myr before present.
Figure 3: Numerical simulations for 60Fe distribution associated with the Local and Loop I superbubbles.
Figure 4: Deposition of 60Fe on Earth.


  1. 1

    Knie, K. et al. Indication for supernova produced 60Fe activity on Earth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 18–21 (1999)

  2. 2

    Knie, K. et al. 60Fe anomaly in a deep-sea manganese crust and implications for a nearby supernova source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171103 (2004)

  3. 3

    Fitoussi, C. et al. Search for supernova-produced 60Fe in a marine sediment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 121101 (2008)

  4. 4

    Bishop, S. et al. Search for supernova 60Fe in the Earth’s fossil record. In American Physical Society April Meeting 2013 58, abstr. X8.00002, (2013)

  5. 5

    Fry, B. J., Fields, B. D. & Ellis, J. R. Astrophysical shrapnel: discriminating among near-Earth stellar explosion sources of live radioactive isotopes. Astrophys. J. 800, 71 (2015)

  6. 6

    Kachelrieß, M., Neronov, A. & Semikoz, D. V. Signatures of a two million year old supernova in the spectra of cosmic ray protons, antiprotons, and positrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181103 (2015)

  7. 7

    Fuchs, B., Breitschwerdt, D., de Avillez, M. A., Dettbarn, C. & Flynn, C. The search for the origin of the Local Bubble redivivus. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 373, 993–1003 (2006)

  8. 8

    Benítez, N., Maíz-Apellániz, J. & Canelles, M. Evidence for nearby supernova explosions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 081101 (2002)

  9. 9

    Rugel, G. et al. New measurement of the 60Fe half-life. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 072502 (2009)

  10. 10

    Wallner, A. et al. Settling the half-life of 60Fe: fundamental for a versatile astrophysical chronometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 041101 (2015)

  11. 11

    Berghöfer, T. W. & Breitschwerdt, D. The origin of the young stellar population in the solar neighborhood—a link to the formation of the Local Bubble? Astron. Astrophys. 390, 299–306 (2002)

  12. 12

    Breitschwerdt, D. & de Avillez, M. A. The history and future of the Local and Loop I bubbles. Astron. Astrophys. 452, L1–L5 (2006)

  13. 13

    de Avillez, M. A. & Breitschwerdt, D. The distribution of Li-like ions in the Local Bubble. Astrophys. J. 697, L158–L161 (2009)

  14. 14

    de Avillez, M. A. & Breitschwerdt, D. Non-equilibrium ionization modeling of the Local Bubble. I. Tracing C iv, N v, and O vi ions. Astron. Astrophys. 539, L1 (2012)

  15. 15

    Savage, B. D. & Lehner, N. Properties of O vi absorption in the local interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 162 (Suppl.), 134–160 (2006)

  16. 16

    Maíz Apellániz, J. & Úbeda, L. Numerical biases on initial mass function determinations created by binning. Astrophys. J. 629, 873–880 (2005)

  17. 17

    Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. New grids of stellar models from 0.8 to 120 M at Z = 0.020 and Z = 0.001. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser . 96, 269–331 (1992)

  18. 18

    European Space Agency. The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO Catalogues. Astrometric and Photometric Star Catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission. ESA Special Publication SP-1200, (ESA, 1997)

  19. 19

    Egger, R. J. & Aschenbach, B. Interaction of the Loop I supershell with the Local Hot Bubble. Astron. Astrophys. 294, L25–L28 (1995)

  20. 20

    Massey, P., Johnson, K. E. & DeGioia-Eastwood, K. The initial mass function and massive star evolution in the OB associations of the northern Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 454, 151–171 (1995)

  21. 21

    Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P. & Moore, R. Interstellar bubbles. II—structure and evolution. Astrophys. J. 218, 377–395 (1977)

  22. 22

    McCray, R. & Kafatos, M. Supershells and propagating star formation. Astrophys. J. 317, 190–196 (1987)

  23. 23

    Kahn, F. D. in IAU Colloq. 166: The Local Bubble and Beyond (eds Breitschwerdt, D., Freyberg, M. J. & Truemper, J. ) Vol. 506 of Lecture Notes in Physics 483–494 (Springer, 1998)

  24. 24

    Sedov, L. I. Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics 10th edn, 242–251 (CRC Press, 1993)

  25. 25

    Taylor, G. The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. II. The atomic explosion of 1945. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 201, 175–186 (1950)

  26. 26

    Wanajo, S., Janka, H.-T. & Müller, B. Electron-capture supernovae as sources of 60Fe. Astrophys. J. 774, L6 (2013)

  27. 27

    Athanassiadou, T. & Fields, B. D. Penetration of nearby supernova dust in the inner solar system. New Astron. 16, 229–241 (2011)

  28. 28

    Firestone, R. B. Observation of 23 supernovae that exploded <300 pc from Earth during the past 300 kyr. Astrophys. J . 789, 29 (2014)

  29. 29

    Erlykin, A. D. & Wolfendale, A. W. Cosmic ray antiprotons and the single source model. J. Phys. G 42, 115202 (2015)

  30. 30

    Melott, A. L., Usoskin, I. G., Kovaltsov, G. A. & Laird, C. M. Has the Earth been exposed to numerous supernovae within the last 300 kyr? Int. J. Astrobiol. 14, 375–378 (2015)

  31. 31

    Melott, A. L. A possible role for stochastic radiation events in the systematic disparity between molecular and fossil dates. Preprint at (2015)

  32. 32

    Lindblad, B. Galactic dynamics. Handb. Phys. 11/53, 21–99 (1959)

  33. 33

    Wielen, R. in Landolt–Börnstein: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology (eds Schaifers, K. & Voigt, H. H. ) Group VI, Vol. 2, 225–227 (Springer, 1982)

  34. 34

    Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. The evolution and explosion of massive stars. II. Explosive hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 101 (Suppl.), 181 (1995)

  35. 35

    Rauscher, T., Heger, A., Hoffman, R. D. & Woosley, S. E. Nucleosynthesis in massive stars with improved nuclear and stellar physics. Astrophys. J. 576, 323–348 (2002)

  36. 36

    Limongi, M. & Chieffi, A. The nucleosynthesis of 26Al and 60Fe in solar metallicity stars extending in mass from 11 to 120 M: the hydrostatic and explosive contributions. Astrophys. J. 647, 483–500 (2006)

  37. 37

    Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. Nucleosynthesis and remnants in massive stars of solar metallicity. Phys. Rep. 442, 269–283 (2007)

  38. 38

    Fields, B. D., Hochmuth, K. A. & Ellis, J. Deep-ocean crusts as telescopes: using live radioisotopes to probe supernova nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 621, 902–907 (2005)

  39. 39

    Poutivtsev, M. Extraterrestrisches53Mn in hydrogenetischen Mangankrusten. PhD thesis, Technische Univ. München, (2007)

  40. 40

    Feige, J. et al. AMS measurements of cosmogenic and supernova-ejected radionuclides in deep-sea sediment cores. In Eur. Phys. J. Web Conf. 63, 03003, (2013)

  41. 41

    Teyssier, R. Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. Astron. Astrophys. 385, 337–364 (2002)

  42. 42

    Ferrière, K. Global model of the interstellar medium in our galaxy with new constraints on the hot gas component. Astrophys. J. 497, 759–776 (1998)

  43. 43

    de Avillez, M. A. & Breitschwerdt, D. Volume filling factors of the ISM phases in star forming galaxies. I. The role of the disk-halo interaction. Astron. Astrophys. 425, 899–911 (2004)

  44. 44

    Kuijken, K. & Gilmore, G. The mass distribution in the Galactic Disc. I—A technique to determine the integral surface mass density of the disc near the sun. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 239, 571–603 (1989)

  45. 45

    Kuijken, K. & Gilmore, G. The mass distribution in the Galactic Disc. II—Determination of the surface mass density of the Galactic Disc near the Sun. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 239, 605–649 (1989)

  46. 46

    Ferland, G. J. et al. CLOUDY 90: numerical simulation of plasmas and their spectra. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 110, 761–778 (1998)

  47. 47

    Robitaille, T. P. & Whitney, B. A. The present-day star formation rate of the Milky Way determined from Spitzer-detected young stellar objects. Astrophys. J. 710, L11–L15 (2010)

  48. 48

    Salpeter, E. E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955)

  49. 49

    Blaauw, A. The O associations in the solar neighborhood. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2, 213–246 (1964)

  50. 50

    Fleck, R. C. Scaling relations for the turbulent, non–self-gravitating, neutral component of the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 458, 739 (1996)

  51. 51

    de Avillez, M. A. & Breitschwerdt, D. The generation and dissipation of interstellar turbulence: results from large-scale high-resolution simulations. Astrophys. J. 665, L35–L38 (2007)

  52. 52

    Boldyrev, S. Kolmogorov-Burgers model for star-forming turbulence. Astrophys. J. 569, 841–845 (2002)

  53. 53

    Davidson, P. A. Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers 1st edn, 234–235 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004)

  54. 54

    de Avillez, M. A. & Mac Low, M.-M. Mixing timescales in a supernova-driven interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 581, 1047–1060 (2002)

  55. 55

    Wasserburg, G. J., Gallino, R. & Busso, M. A test of the supernova trigger hypothesis with 60Fe and 26Al. Astrophys. J. 500, L189–L193 (1998)

  56. 56

    Wang, L., Ku, T. L., Luo, S., Southon, J. R. & Kusakabe, M. 26Al-10Be systematics in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 109–119 (1996)

  57. 57

    Sharma, P., Klein, J., Middleton, R. & Church, T. M. 26Al and 10Be in authigenic marine minerals. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 29, 335–340 (1987)

  58. 58

    Feige, J. Supernova-produced Radionuclides in Deep-sea Sediments Measured with AMS. PhD thesis, Univ. Vienna, (2014)

Download references


D.B., and M.M.S. acknowledge funding by the DFG priority program 1573 “Physics of the Interstellar Medium”. We thank U. Bolick for help during the preparation of the manuscript and R. Teyssier for discussions on details of the RAMSES code.

Author information




D.B. worked out the model, and led the research and the paper writing. J.F. carried out analytic calculations, interpreted the crust data, calculated the IMF and produced Figs. 1 and 2 and the lower part of Fig. 4 and Extended Data Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. M.M.S. performed extensive numerical simulations on the background interstellar medium, the evolution of the Local Bubble and Loop I bubbles and the 60Fe transport and produced Fig. 3 and the upper part of Fig. 4. was involved in the interpretation of the data and the numerical simulations. C.D. carried out the analysis of the moving group stars, calculated the trajectories of both Local Bubble and Loop I progenitor stars and wrote a program to determine the probability distributions. B.F. worked analytically on the epicyclic equations and carried out the cumulative distribution function calculations for the most probable trajectories.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Breitschwerdt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 60Fe yields from various nucleosynthesis models 34,35,36,37.

Given that the yields are mass-dependent, an average between the highest37 and lowest36 was calculated and extrapolated towards the lower mass range. Superscripts in the legend refer to reference numbers.

Extended Data Figure 2 26Al yields from various nucleosynthesis models 34,35,36,37.

To be conservative, the highest yields36 were fitted and extrapolated towards the lower mass range.

Extended Data Figure 3 53Mn yields from various nucleosynthesis models 34,35,37.

Again, to be conservative, the highest yields35 were fitted and extrapolated towards the lower mass range.

Extended Data Figure 4 26Al in the ferromanganese crust.

The largest fraction arises from atmospheric production, hiding a possible supernova signal. The arrival times of the supernova shells (analytical model with input parameters identical to the 60Fe model) are indicated by a blue square (UCL) and a green dot (LB, Local Bubble shell), whereas the blue and green shaded histograms represent the amount of 26Al deposited onto the crust, normalized to 27Al. The resulting supernova signal (SN) is added to the atmospheric background (black dashed line). The measured 60Fe concentration2 in the layer showing the largest peak (red (blue) dashed lines) was used to scale towards the 26Al content using supernova 60Fe/26Al ratios55 of 0.6 (23). Here, the atmospheric background has been added to the signal. Source data

Extended Data Figure 5 53Mn in the ferromanganese crust.

The largest fraction is produced from extraterrestrial dust and micrometeorite influx, hiding a possible supernova signal. Again, the analytical model with input parameters identical to the 60Fe model was used. The notation is the same as in Fig. 4. Source data

Extended Data Table 1 Supernova explosions that created the Local Bubble

Related audio

Lizzie Gibney investigates the clues from a nearby supernova discovered under our oceans

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breitschwerdt, D., Feige, J., Schulreich, M. et al. The locations of recent supernovae near the Sun from modelling 60Fe transport. Nature 532, 73–76 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.