Homo floresiensis, a primitive hominin species discovered in Late Pleistocene sediments at Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia)1,2,3, has generated wide interest and scientific debate. A major reason this taxon is controversial is because the H. floresiensis-bearing deposits, which include associated stone artefacts2,3,4 and remains of other extinct endemic fauna5,6, were dated to between about 95 and 12 thousand calendar years (kyr) ago2,3,7. These ages suggested that H. floresiensis survived until long after modern humans reached Australia by ~50 kyr ago8,9,10. Here we report new stratigraphic and chronological evidence from Liang Bua that does not support the ages inferred previously for the H. floresiensis holotype (LB1), ~18 thousand calibrated radiocarbon years before present (kyr cal. bp), or the time of last appearance of this species (about 17 or 13–11 kyr cal. bp)1,2,3,7,11. Instead, the skeletal remains of H. floresiensis and the deposits containing them are dated to between about 100 and 60 kyr ago, whereas stone artefacts attributable to this species range from about 190 to 50 kyr in age. Whether H. floresiensis survived after 50 kyr ago—potentially encountering modern humans on Flores or other hominins dispersing through southeast Asia, such as Denisovans12,13—is an open question.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431, 1055–1061 (2004)

  2. 2.

    et al. Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431, 1087–1091 (2004)

  3. 3.

    et al. Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 437, 1012–1017 (2005)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Continuities in stone flaking technology at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 503–526 (2009)

  5. 5.

    et al. The Liang Bua faunal remains: a 95 k.yr. sequence from Flores, East Indonesia. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 527–537 (2009)

  6. 6.

    et al. Late Pleistocene–Holocene non-passerine avifauna of Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 33, 877–894 (2013)

  7. 7.

    et al. Geochronology of cave deposits at Liang Bua and of adjacent river terraces in the Wae Racang valley, western Flores, Indonesia: a synthesis of age estimates for the type locality of Homo floresiensis. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 484–502 (2009)

  8. 8.

    et al. Thermoluminescence dating of a 50,000-year-old human occupation site in northern Australia. Nature 345, 153–156 (1990)

  9. 9.

    et al. New ages for human occupation and climatic change at Lake Mungo, Australia. Nature 421, 837–840 (2003)

  10. 10.

    et al. The archaeology, chronology and stratigraphy of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II): a site in northern Australia with early occupation. J. Hum. Evol. 83, 46–64 (2015)

  11. 11.

    et al. Preface: research at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 437–449 (2009)

  12. 12.

    et al. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia. Nature 468, 1053–1060 (2010)

  13. 13.

    et al. Denisova admixture and the first modern human dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 516–528 (2011)

  14. 14.

    et al. The brain of Homo floresiensis. Science 308, 242–245 (2005)

  15. 15.

    et al. Homo floresiensis and the evolution of the hominin shoulder. J. Hum. Evol. 53, 718–731 (2007)

  16. 16.

    et al. The primitive wrist of Homo floresiensis and its implications for hominin evolution. Science 317, 1743–1745 (2007)

  17. 17.

    et al. The foot of Homo floresiensis. Nature 459, 81–84 (2009)

  18. 18.

    & (Eds). Paleoanthropological Research at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 437–648 (2009)

  19. 19.

    et al. Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication. J. Hum. Evol. 61, 644–682 (2011)

  20. 20.

    et al. New wrist bones of Homo floresiensis from Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia). J. Hum. Evol. 64, 109–129 (2013)

  21. 21.

    , , & Review and assessment of the potential of post-IR IRSL dating methods to circumvent the problem of anomalous fading in feldspar luminescence. Geochronometria 41, 178–201 (2014)

  22. 22.

    & A dual-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol (DAP) for thermoluminescence (TL) dating of quartz sediments using the light-sensitive and isothermally stimulated red emissions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 2513–2528 (2006)

  23. 23.

    , , , & Laser ablation U-series analysis of fossil bones and teeth. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 416, 150–167 (2014)

  24. 24.

    , & U-series dating of bone in an open system: the diffusion–adsorption–decay model. Quat. Geochronol. 9, 42–53 (2012)

  25. 25.

    , & Astronomically calibrated 40Ar/39Ar age for the Toba supereruption and global synchronization of late Quaternary records. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18684–18688 (2012)

  26. 26.

    , , & Age intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar sanidine and chemically distinct U/Pb zircon populations from the Alder Creek Rhyolite Quaternary geochronology standard. Chem. Geol. 345, 87–98 (2013)

  27. 27.

    et al. Homo floresiensis and the late Pleistocene environments of eastern Indonesia: defining the nature of the relationship. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 2897–2912 (2009)

  28. 28.

    et al. Establishing the time of initial human occupation of Liang Bua, western Flores, Indonesia. Quat. Geochronol. 2, 337–343 (2007)

  29. 29.

    et al. New evidence for a 67,000-year-old human presence at Callao Cave, Luzon, Philippines. J. Hum. Evol. 59, 123–132 (2010)

  30. 30.

    et al. Earliest hominin occupation of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Nature 529, 208–211 (2016)

  31. 31.

    in Electron Probe Quantitation (eds & ), 9–18 (Plenum, 1991)

  32. 32.

    et al. MPI-DING reference glasses for in situ microanalysis: New reference values for element concentrations and isotope ratios. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, Q02008 (2006)

  33. 33.

    et al. Correspondence between glass-FT and 14C ages of silicic pyroclastic flow deposits sourced from Maninjau Caldera, west-central Sumatra. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 227, 121–133 (2004)

  34. 34.

    & An improved single grain OSL chronology for the sedimentary deposits from Diepkloof Rockshelter, Western Cape, South Africa. J. Archaeol. Sci. 63, 175–192 (2015)

  35. 35.

    & Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term time variations. Radiat. Meas. 23, 497–500 (1994)

  36. 36.

    , & Sources of overdispersion in a K-rich feldspar sample from north-central India: insights from De, K content and IRSL age distributions for individual grains. Radiat. Meas. 47, 696–702 (2012)

  37. 37.

    Luminescence Investigations into the Time of Final Deposition of Toba Volcanic Ash and Artefact-bearing Alluvial Sediments in the Middle Son Valley, Madhya Pradesh, India. PhD thesis, Univ. of Wollongong (2012)

  38. 38.

    & The Rb contents of the K-feldspars being measured in optical dating. Anc. TL 19, 43–46 (2001)

  39. 39.

    An Introduction to Optical Dating (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998)

  40. 40.

    , , & Developments in radiation, stimulation and observation facilities in luminescence measurements. Radiat. Meas. 37, 535–541 (2003)

  41. 41.

    et al. Optical dating in archaeology: thirty years in retrospect and grand challenges for the future. J. Archaeol. Sci. 56, 41–60 (2015)

  42. 42.

    & Luminescence dating of K-feldspar from sediments: a protocol without anomalous fading correction. Quat. Geochronol. 6, 468–479 (2011)

  43. 43.

    et al. Luminescence dating of the Stratzing loess profile (Austria) – testing the potential of an elevated temperature post-IR IRSL protocol. Quat. Int. 234, 23–31 (2011)

  44. 44.

    , & On the dose dependency of the bleachable and non-bleachable components of IRSL from K-feldspar: improved procedures for luminescence dating of Quaternary sediments. Quat. Geochronol. 17, 1–13 (2013)

  45. 45.

    & Ubiquity of anomalous fading in K-feldspars and the measurement and correction for it in optical dating. Can. J. Earth Sci. 38, 1093–1106 (2001)

  46. 46.

    , & Measurement of anomalous fading for feldspar IRSL using SAR. Radiat. Meas. 37, 487–492 (2003)

  47. 47.

    , , , & Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part 1, experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 41, 339–364 (1999)

  48. 48.

    & Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: an overview and some recommendations. Quat. Geochronol. 11, 1–27 (2012)

  49. 49.

    , & Comparison of blue and red TL from quartz. Radiat. Meas. 32, 633–639 (2000)

  50. 50.

    The red, white and blue of quartz luminescence: a comparison of De values derived for sediments from Australia and Indonesia using TL and OSL emissions. Radiat. Meas. 44, 462–466 (2009)

  51. 51.

    et al. Anatomically modern human in Southeast Asia (Laos) by 46 ka. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14375–14380 (2012)

  52. 52.

    et al. In situ U-series dating by laser-ablation multi-collector ICPMS: new prospects for Quaternary geochronology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 2523–2538 (2005)

  53. 53.

    et al. ESR and U-series analyses of teeth from the palaeoanthropological site of Hexian, Anhui Province, China. J. Hum. Evol. 34, 555–564 (1998)

  54. 54.

    & Recent advances and future prospects of the U–Th and U–Pb chronometers applicable to archaeology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 56, 32–40 (2015)

  55. 55.

    , , , & Speleothem-derived Asian summer monsoon variations in Central China, 54–46 ka. J. Quat. Sci. 26, 781–790 (2011)

  56. 56.

    et al. Discerning the timing and cause of historical mortality events in modern Porites from the Great Barrier Reef. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 138, 57–80 (2014)

  57. 57.

    User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.75: a Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel (Berkeley Geochron. Center, 2012)

  58. 58.

    et al. The half-lives of uranium-234 and thorium-230. Chem. Geol. 169, 17–33 (2000)

  59. 59.

    & Feng, Y.-x. High-precision 238U–234U–230Th disequilibrium dating of the recent past: a review. Quat. Geochronol. 4, 423–433 (2009)

  60. 60.

    et al. A redetermination of the isotopic abundances of atmospheric Ar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 4507–4512 (2006)

  61. 61.

    From revolution to convention: the past, present and future of radiocarbon dating. J. Archaeol. Sci. 56, 61–72 (2015)

  62. 62.

    et al. SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1889–1903 (2013)

  63. 63.

    et al. Radiocarbon dating of “old” charcoal using a wet oxidation, stepped-combustion procedure. Radiocarbon 41, 127–140 (1999)

  64. 64.

    , , & Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52, 103–112 (2010)

Download references


The 2007–2014 excavations at Liang Bua were supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project grant to M.J.M. (DP0770234), a Waitt Foundation/National Geographic Society grant to M.W.T. and T.S. (No. 2121-2) and a Smithsonian Scholarly Studies Program award to M.W.T. Additional funding was provided by the Peter Buck Fund for Human Origins Research, the Smithsonian’s Human Origins Program, the University of Wollongong (UOW) and the ARC (DP1093049 to K.E.W.). T.S. is supported by a UOW postgraduate scholarship, M.W.T. by a Canada Research Chair, M.A. and A.B. by ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Awards (DE140100254 and DE130101560, respectively), B.L. by an ARC Future Fellowship (FT14010038), R.G.R. by an ARC Australian Laureate Fellowship (FL130100116) and B.V.A. by a Victoria University of Wellington Science Faculty Research Grant (201255). QUADLAB is funded by the Villum Foundation. Fieldwork was authorised by Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional (Jakarta, Indonesia) and Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Manggarai (Flores, Nusa Tenggara Timur). We also thank I Made Geria, V. N. Sene, R. Potts, P. Goldberg, K. Douka, G. Veatch, V. Rossi, A. Metallo, L. Kinsley, Y. Jafari, T. Lachlan, A. D. Nguyen, D. Yurnaldi, R. Setiawan, I Dewa Kompiang and the entire Liang Bua Team from Teras, Golo Manuk and Bere.

Author information

Author notes

    • Thomas Sutikna
    •  & Matthew W. Tocheri

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Michael J. Morwood
    •  & Rokus Due Awe



  1. Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia

    • Thomas Sutikna
    • , Michael J. Morwood
    • , E. Wahyu Saptomo
    • , Jatmiko
    • , Rokus Due Awe
    • , Bo Li
    • , Brent V. Alloway
    • , Mike W. Morley
    • , Gerrit D. van den Bergh
    •  & Richard G. Roberts
  2. Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, Jakarta 12510, Indonesia

    • Thomas Sutikna
    • , E. Wahyu Saptomo
    • , Jatmiko
    • , Rokus Due Awe
    •  & Sri Wasisto
  3. Department of Anthropology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E1, Canada

    • Matthew W. Tocheri
  4. Human Origins Program, Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013, USA

    • Matthew W. Tocheri
    •  & Hanneke J. M. Meijer
  5. Traps MQ Luminescence Dating Facility, Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia

    • Kira E. Westaway
  6. Research Centre for Human Evolution, Place, Evolution and Rock Art Heritage Unit, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia

    • Maxime Aubert
  7. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia

    • Maxime Aubert
    •  & Adam Brumm
  8. School of Earth Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

    • Jian-xin Zhao
  9. QUADLAB, Section of Earth and Planetary System Science, Natural History Museum of Denmark, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark

    • Michael Storey
  10. School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand

    • Brent V. Alloway
  11. Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway

    • Hanneke J. M. Meijer
  12. Research Centre for Human Evolution, Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia

    • Rainer Grün
    •  & Adam Brumm
  13. Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia

    • Rainer Grün
  14. GeoQuEST Research Centre, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia

    • Anthony Dosseto
  15. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

    • William L. Jungers
  16. Association Vahatra, BP 3972, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar

    • William L. Jungers


  1. Search for Thomas Sutikna in:

  2. Search for Matthew W. Tocheri in:

  3. Search for Michael J. Morwood in:

  4. Search for E. Wahyu Saptomo in:

  5. Search for Jatmiko in:

  6. Search for Rokus Due Awe in:

  7. Search for Sri Wasisto in:

  8. Search for Kira E. Westaway in:

  9. Search for Maxime Aubert in:

  10. Search for Bo Li in:

  11. Search for Jian-xin Zhao in:

  12. Search for Michael Storey in:

  13. Search for Brent V. Alloway in:

  14. Search for Mike W. Morley in:

  15. Search for Hanneke J. M. Meijer in:

  16. Search for Gerrit D. van den Bergh in:

  17. Search for Rainer Grün in:

  18. Search for Anthony Dosseto in:

  19. Search for Adam Brumm in:

  20. Search for William L. Jungers in:

  21. Search for Richard G. Roberts in:


M.J.M., R. P. Soejono and R.G.R. conceived and coordinated the original research program at Liang Bua (2001–2004). The new excavations were planned and directed by T.S., E.W.S. and M.J.M. (2007–2009), and by T.S., M.W.T., E.W.S., J. and M.J.M. (2010–2014). T.S. led the stratigraphic analyses, with major contributions from M.W.T., S.W., M.J.M., K.E.W., R.D.A., E.W.S. and J., and additional input from M.W.M., H.J.M.M., G.D.vdB., B.V.A., A.B., W.L.J. and R.G.R. Dating analyses were conducted by B.L. and R.G.R. (IRSL), K.E.W. (TL), M.A., R.G. and A.D. (234U/230Th, bones), J.-x.Z. (234U/230Th, speleothems), and M.S. (40Ar/39Ar). B.V.A. analysed the volcanic tephra, R.D.A., H.J.M.M., G.D.vdB., M.W.T. and W.L.J. analysed the faunal remains, and J. analysed the stone artefacts. T.S., M.W.T. and R.G.R. wrote the paper, with early contributions from M.J.M. and additional input from all other authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas Sutikna or Matthew W. Tocheri or Richard G. Roberts.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Information sections 1-6 which contain a Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Tables 1-8 – see contents page for details.


  1. 1.

    Animated summary of the stratigraphy and chronology of the Liang Bua depositional sequence.

    Animated summary of the stratigraphy and chronology of the Liang Bua depositional sequence.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.