Letter | Published:

Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions

Nature volume 532, pages 214217 (14 April 2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Liquid-like at rest, dense suspensions of hard particles can undergo striking transformations in behaviour when agitated or sheared1. These phenomena include solidification during rapid impact2,3, as well as strong shear thickening characterized by discontinuous, orders-of-magnitude increases in suspension viscosity4,5,6,7,8. Much of this highly non-Newtonian behaviour has recently been interpreted within the framework of a jamming transition. However, although jamming indeed induces solid-like rigidity9,10,11, even a strongly shear-thickened state still flows and thus cannot be fully jammed12,13. Furthermore, although suspensions are incompressible, the onset of rigidity in the standard jamming scenario requires an increase in particle density9,10,14. Finally, whereas shear thickening occurs in the steady state, impact-induced solidification is transient2,15,16,17. As a result, it has remained unclear how these dense suspension phenomena are related and how they are connected to jamming. Here we resolve this by systematically exploring both the steady-state and transient regimes with the same experimental system. We demonstrate that a fully jammed, solid-like state can be reached without compression and instead purely with shear, as recently proposed for dry granular systems18,19. This state is created by transient shear-jamming fronts, which we track directly. We also show that shear stress, rather than shear rate, is the key control parameter. From these findings we map out a state diagram with particle density and shear stress as variables. We identify discontinuous shear thickening with a marginally jammed regime just below the onset of full, solid-like jamming20. This state diagram provides a unifying framework, compatible with prior experimental and simulation results on dense suspensions, that connects steady-state and transient behaviour in terms of a dynamic shear-jamming process.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Shear-thickening (‘dilatancy’) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. J. Rheol. 33, 329–366 (1999)

  2. 2.

    & Impact-activated solidification of dense suspensions via dynamic jamming fronts. Nature 487, 205–209 (2012)

  3. 3.

    et al. The effect of particle strength on the ballistic resistance of shear thickening fluids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 064103 (2013)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Shear thickening of cornstarch suspensions as a reentrant jamming transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 018301 (2008)

  5. 5.

    & Dynamic jamming point for shear thickening suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 086001 (2009)

  6. 6.

    , , & Discontinuous shear thickening of frictional hard-sphere suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 218301 (2013)

  7. 7.

    & Discontinuous shear thickening without inertia in dense non-brownian suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098302 (2014)

  8. 8.

    et al. Macroscopic discontinuous shear thickening versus local shear jamming in cornstarch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 098301 (2015)

  9. 9.

    , , & Jamming, force chains, and fragile matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1841–1844 (1998)

  10. 10.

    & Jamming is not just cool any more. Nature 396, 21–22 (1998)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles. Nature 411, 772–775 (2001)

  12. 12.

    et al. Generality of shear thickening in dense suspensions. Nature Mater. 9, 220–224 (2010)

  13. 13.

    , , & Shear thickening, frictionless and frictional rheologies in non-Brownian suspensions. J. Rheol. 58, 1693–1724 (2014)

  14. 14.

    , , & Measurement of growing dynamical length scales and prediction of the jamming transition in a granular material. Nature Phys. 3, 260–264 (2007)

  15. 15.

    , & Focused force transmission through an aqueous suspension of granules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 188301 (2010)

  16. 16.

    , , & Nonmonotonic settling of a sphere in a cornstarch suspension. Phys. Rev. E 84, 060401 (2011)

  17. 17.

    & Quasi-2D dynamic jamming in cornstarch suspensions: visualization and force measurements. Soft Matter 10, 6564–6570 (2014)

  18. 18.

    , , & Jamming by shear. Nature 480, 355–358 (2011)

  19. 19.

    & Memory of jamming—multiscale flow in soft and granular matter. Granular Matter (in the press); preprint at (2015)

  20. 20.

    & Marginal matters. Nature 480, 325–326 (2011)

  21. 21.

    & Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions. Phys. Today 62, 27–32 (2009)

  22. 22.

    , , & Imaging the microscopic structure of shear thinning and thickening colloidal suspensions. Science 333, 1276–1279 (2011)

  23. 23.

    et al. Hydrodynamic and contact contributions to continuous shear thickening in colloidal suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 228304 (2015)

  24. 24.

    et al. Microscopic mechanism for shear thickening of non-Brownian suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 108301 (2013)

  25. 25.

    , & Towards a unified description of the rheology of hard-particle suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 088304 (2015)

  26. 26.

    , , & Dynamic jamming fronts. Europhys. Lett. 102, 44001 (2013)

  27. 27.

    & Shear thickening in concentrated suspensions: phenomenology, mechanisms and relations to jamming. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 046602 (2014)

  28. 28.

    & The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions. J. Rheol. 56, 875–923 (2012)

  29. 29.

    & Water sorption by starches. Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 205–208 (1944)

  30. 30.

    & Surface area of starch and its role in water sorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 5186–5188 (1950)

  31. 31.

    Impact-Activated Solidification of Cornstarch and Water Suspensions 51–56 (Springer, 2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Brown, E. Han, N. James, S. Mukhopadhyay and Q. Xu for discussions. This work was supported by the US Army Research Office through grant W911NF-12-1-0182 and the Chicago Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, which is funded by the NSF through grant DMR-1420709. S.M. acknowledges support through a Kadanoff-Rice fellowship.

Author information

Author notes

    • Ivo R. Peters

    Present address: Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.

Affiliations

  1. James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

    • Ivo R. Peters
    • , Sayantan Majumdar
    •  & Heinrich M. Jaeger

Authors

  1. Search for Ivo R. Peters in:

  2. Search for Sayantan Majumdar in:

  3. Search for Heinrich M. Jaeger in:

Contributions

I.R.P., S.M. and H.M.J. conceived the project. I.R.P. and S.M. performed the experiments and the analysis. I.R.P. and H.M.J. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo R. Peters.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Determination of the onset of shear-jamming

    This video shows the determination of the onset of shear-jamming through the impact of spheres on the suspension surface.

  2. 2.

    Difference between a diffusive-like velocity profile and a travelling jamming front at high driving speed

    This video shows the difference between a diffusive-like velocity profile at low driving speed and a traveling jamming front at high driving speed.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17167

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.