Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Optical attosecond pulses and tracking the nonlinear response of bound electrons

Nature volume 530, pages 66–70 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The time it takes a bound electron to respond to the electromagnetic force of light sets a fundamental speed limit on the dynamic control of matter and electromagnetic signal processing. Time-integrated measurements of the nonlinear refractive index1 of matter indicate that the nonlinear response of bound electrons to optical fields is not instantaneous; however, a complete spectral characterization of the nonlinear susceptibility tensors2—which is essential to deduce the temporal response of a medium to arbitrary driving forces using spectral measurements—has not yet been achieved. With the establishment of attosecond chronoscopy3,4,5, the impulsive response of positive-energy electrons to electromagnetic fields has been explored through ionization of atoms6 and solids7 by an extreme-ultraviolet attosecond pulse8 or by strong near-infrared fields9,10,11. However, none of the attosecond studies carried out so far have provided direct access to the nonlinear response of bound electrons. Here we demonstrate that intense optical attosecond pulses synthesized in the visible and nearby spectral ranges allow sub-femtosecond control and metrology of bound-electron dynamics. Vacuum ultraviolet spectra emanating from krypton atoms, exposed to intense waveform-controlled optical attosecond pulses, reveal a finite nonlinear response time of bound electrons of up to 115 attoseconds, which is sensitive to and controllable by the super-octave optical field. Our study could enable new spectroscopies of bound electrons in atomic, molecular or lattice potentials of solids12, as well as light-based electronics operating on sub-femtosecond timescales and at petahertz rates13,14,15.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Nonlinear response of bound electrons of Kr to an optical attosecond pulse.
Figure 2: Synthesis of an optical attosecond pulse.
Figure 3: Attosecond control of bound electrons in Kr.
Figure 4: Sub-femtosecond, delayed nonlinear response of bound electrons in Kr.

References

  1. Sheik-Bahae, M., Hutchings, D. C., Hagan, D. J. & Van Stryland, E. W. Dispersion of bound electron nonlinear refraction in solids. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 1296–1309 (1991)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics Ch. 1 (Academic Press, 1992)

  3. Hentschel, M. et al. Attosecond metrology. Nature 414, 509–513 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niikura, H. et al. Sub-laser-cycle electron pulses for probing molecular dynamics. Nature 417, 917–922 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Corkum, P. B. & Krausz, F. Attosecond science. Nature Phys . 3, 381–387 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schultze, M. et al. Delay in photoemission. Science 328, 1658–1662 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalieri, A. L. et al. Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter. Nature 449, 1029–1032 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goulielmakis, E. et al. Single-cycle nonlinear optics. Science 320, 1614–1617 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Uiberacker, M. et al. Attosecond real-time observation of electron tunnelling in atoms. Nature 446, 627–632 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckle, P. et al. Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium. Science 322, 1525–1529 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shafir, D. et al. Resolving the time when an electron exits a tunnelling barrier. Nature 485, 343–346 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivanov, M. & Smirnova, O. Opportunities for sub-laser-cycle spectroscopy in condensed phase. Chem. Phys. 414, 3–9 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krüger, M., Schenk, M. & Hommelhoff, P. Attosecond control of electrons emitted from a nanoscale metal tip. Nature 475, 78–81 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schiffrin, A. et al. Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics. Nature 493, 70–74 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schultze, M. et al. Controlling dielectrics with the electric field of light. Nature 493, 75–78 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiner, A. M. Ultrafast Optics Ch. 6 (John Wiley & Sons, 2009)

  17. Zewail, A. H. Femtochemistry: atomic-scale dynamics of the chemical bond. J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 5660–5694 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goulielmakis, E. et al. Real-time observation of valence electron motion. Nature 466, 739–743 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smirnova, O. et al. High harmonic interferometry of multi-electron dynamics in molecules. Nature 460, 972–977 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zewail, A. H. Femtochemistry: Ultrafast Dynamics of the Chemical Bond Vol. 1 (World Scientific, 1994)

  21. Dudovich, N. et al. Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond XUV pulses. Nature Phys . 2, 781–786 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wirth, A. et al. Synthesized light transients. Science 334, 195–200 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hassan, M. Th. et al. Invited Article: attosecond photonics: synthesis and control of light transients. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 111301 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sansone, G., Poletto, L. & Nisoli, M. High-energy attosecond light sources. Nature Photon . 5, 655–663 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vampa, G. et al. Linking high harmonics from gases and solids. Nature 522, 462–464 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hohenleutner, M. et al. Real-time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high-harmonic generation. Nature 523, 572–575 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Corkum, P. B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994–1997 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krausz, F. & Ivanov, M. Attosecond physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163–234 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Muller, H. G. An efficient propagation scheme for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in the velocity gauge. Laser Phys. 9, 138–148 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gauthey, F. I., Garraway, B. M. & Knight, P. L. High harmonic generation and periodic level crossings. Phys. Rev. A 56, 3093–3096 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lundeen, T., Hou, S. Y. & Nibler, J. W. Nonresonant third order susceptibilities for various gases. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 6301–6305 (1983)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shelton, D. P. Nonlinear-optical susceptibilities of gases measured at 1064 and 1319 nm. Phys. Rev. A 42, 2578–2592 (1990)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harris, S. E. & Sokolov, A. V. Subfemtosecond pulse generation by molecular modulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2894–2897 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Baker, S., Walmsley, I. A., Tisch, J. W. G. & Marangos, J. P. Femtosecond to attosecond light pulses from a molecular modulator. Nature Photon . 5, 664–671 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Blow, K. J. & Wood, D. Theoretical description of transient stimulated Raman scattering in optical fibers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25, 2665–2673 (1989)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Coleman, T. F. & Li, Y. Y. An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J. Optim. 6, 418–445 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by European Research Council grant (Attoelectronics-258501), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence: Munich Centre for Advanced Photonics (http://www.munich-photonics.de), the Max Planck Society and the European Research Training Networks ATTOFEL and MEDEA, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (projects numbers 13-02-01465, 13-02-92115 and 13-04-40335) and the Welch Foundation (grant number A-1801).

Author information

Author notes

  1. M. Th. Hassan and T. T. Luu: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Straße 1, Garching, D-85748, Germany

    M. Th. Hassan, T. T. Luu, A. Moulet, M. Garg, N. Karpowicz, F. Krausz & E. Goulielmakis

  2. Department für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching, D-85748, Germany

    O. Raskazovskaya, V. Pervak & F. Krausz

  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, Texas, USA

    P. Zhokhov & A. M. Zheltikov

  4. Physics Department, International Laser Center, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia

    P. Zhokhov & A. M. Zheltikov

Authors
  1. M. Th. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. T. Luu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Moulet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. Raskazovskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Zhokhov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. N. Karpowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. M. Zheltikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. V. Pervak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. F. Krausz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. E. Goulielmakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.Th.H., T.T.L., A.M. and M.G. conducted the experiments; O.R. and V.P. developed the dispersive optics for the experiments; E.G. planned the experiments and supervised the project; M.Th.H., T.T.L., P.Z., A.M. and N.K. conducted the simulations; and M.Th.H., T.T.L., A.M., A.M.Z., F.K. and E.G. interpreted the data and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Goulielmakis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Supercontinuum spectra and experimental set-up.

a, The supercontinuum spectra spans more than two octaves (1.1–4.6 eV), and is shown by the black line; the spectra of the individual channels ChNIR, Chvis, Chvis-UV and ChDUV are shown by the red, orange, blue and violet lines, respectively. b, Schematic illustration of the experiment set-up.

Extended Data Figure 2 Spectral equalization by a metal–dielectric–metal (MDM) coating.

a, The designed reflectivity (red line) and spectral phase (black) of the MDM coating applied on the outer mirror of the double mirror module shown in Extended Data Fig. 1. b, Multi-octave spectrum at the exit of the synthesizer (red line) and upon reflection off the MDM mirror (black line).

Extended Data Figure 3 Global phase and CEP difference in a sub-cycle regime.

a, Half-cycle, cosine-like (blue line) and sine-like (red line) waveforms, compared with the carrier wave (dotted blue and red lines) and envelope (dashed blue lines). b, Limits of CEP decomposition in the time domain. Retrieved CEP (solid lines) versus global-phase offset (dashed lines) as a function of the ratio between the FWHM of the intensity envelope and the period of the carrier wave for ϕG = π/4 rad (blue line), ϕG = π/2 rad (green line) and ϕG = 3π/4 rad (red).

Extended Data Figure 4 Simulated global-phase spectrograms.

a, b, Calculated global-phase (ϕG) spectrograms using the adiabatic model (a) and the TDSE model (b) for experimentally sampled waveforms (optical attosecond pulse) and an intensity of about 4 × 1013 W cm−2. c, Simulated global-phase spectrograms for a sub-cycle pulse (about 2 fs; shown in inset). The polarization response is insensitive to global-phase variation of the waveform; see also experiments in Fig. 3. The colour scale represents the spectral intensity in arbitrary units.

Extended Data Figure 5 Nonlinearity study of the interaction of an optical attosecond pulse with a Kr atom.

a–d, Data points show the spectrally integrated yield of the nonlinear polarization (0–8 eV) as a function of the intensity of the optical attosecond pulse for two global phases ϕG of the driving waveform, ϕG ≈ 0 (a, c) and ϕG ≈ π/2 rad (b, d), evaluated from TDSE simulations (a, b) and our experiments in Fig. 4 (c, d). The error bars represent the standard error of the mean of the input field intensity and the calculated integrated spectral yield of the nonlinear polarization. Δ is the slope of the linear fitting of the log–log plots; the errors shown indicate the standard error of mean, with n = 3. Insets show temporal profiles of the driving electric fields in arbitrary units.

Extended Data Figure 6 Representation of the possible multiphoton transitions on a Kr atom energy level diagram assuming third- and fifth-order nonlinear processes.

Extended Data Figure 7 Synthetic global-phase spectrograms and nonlinear dipole fittings.

a–c, Synthetic global-phase (ϕG) spectrograms determined using the simple model (equation (1) with the same set of parameters (a, b, c) and delays dt = 0 as (a), dt = 20 as (b) and dt = 30 as (c). The colour scale represents spectral intensity in arbitrary units. d, e, Fits (red lines) of the spectrally filtered (d, 5.5–8 eV; e, 0–8 eV) nonlinear dipoles (ρ(t), black lines) with ϕG ≈ 0 (left column) and ϕG ≈ π/2 rad (right column) using equation (1) and 6 × 1013 W cm−2.

Extended Data Figure 8 Reconstruction of the global-phase spectrogram calculated by the TDSE model.

a, Calculated spectrogram at different global-phase settings (ϕG = −1.2π−1.2π rad) of the optical attosecond pulse using the TDSE model. b, Reconstructed spectrogram using the model of equation (1). The colour bar represents spectral intensity in arbitrary units. c, d, Calculated nonlinear dipoles using the TDSE model at ϕG ≈ 0 (c) and ϕG ≈ π/2 rad (d) are plotted in black; the reconstructed nonlinear dipoles and the adiabatic dipoles are shown in red and blue, respectively.

Extended Data Figure 9 Intensity dependence of the nonlinear dipole delay.

a, b, The delay between the adiabatic dipole and the calculated dipole using the TDSE model as a function of the peak intensity according to TDSE simulations (a) and evaluated from the experimental data (b; see Fig. 4).

Extended Data Table 1 Ionization and excitation probabilities calculated using TDSE simulations of Kr for a range of peak intensities of the optical attosecond pulse
Full size table

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, M., Luu, T., Moulet, A. et al. Optical attosecond pulses and tracking the nonlinear response of bound electrons. Nature 530, 66–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16528

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing