Letter | Published:

Critical insolation–CO2 relation for diagnosing past and future glacial inception

Nature volume 529, pages 200203 (14 January 2016) | Download Citation


The past rapid growth of Northern Hemisphere continental ice sheets, which terminated warm and stable climate periods, is generally attributed to reduced summer insolation in boreal latitudes1,2,3. Yet such summer insolation is near to its minimum at present4, and there are no signs of a new ice age5. This challenges our understanding of the mechanisms driving glacial cycles and our ability to predict the next glacial inception6. Here we propose a critical functional relationship between boreal summer insolation and global carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, which explains the beginning of the past eight glacial cycles and might anticipate future periods of glacial inception. Using an ensemble of simulations generated by an Earth system model of intermediate complexity constrained by palaeoclimatic data, we suggest that glacial inception was narrowly missed before the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The missed inception can be accounted for by the combined effect of relatively high late-Holocene CO2 concentrations and the low orbital eccentricity of the Earth7. Additionally, our analysis suggests that even in the absence of human perturbations no substantial build-up of ice sheets would occur within the next several thousand years and that the current interglacial would probably last for another 50,000 years. However, moderate anthropogenic cumulative CO2 emissions of 1,000 to 1,500 gigatonnes of carbon will postpone the next glacial inception by at least 100,000 years8,9. Our simulations demonstrate that under natural conditions alone the Earth system would be expected to remain in the present delicately balanced interglacial climate state, steering clear of both large-scale glaciation of the Northern Hemisphere and its complete deglaciation, for an unusually long time.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Canon of Insolation and the Ice-Age Problem (Koniglich Serbische Academie, 1941)

  2. 2.

    , & Variations in the Earth’s orbit: pacemaker of the Ice Ages. Science 194, 1121–1132 (1976)

  3. 3.

    The timing of Pleistocene glaciations from a simple multiple-state climate model. Nature 391, 378–381 (1998)

  4. 4.

    & An exceptionally long interglacial ahead? Science 297, 1287–1288 (2002)

  5. 5.

    et al. Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11017–11022 (2011)

  6. 6.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds et al.) 383–464 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013)

  7. 7.

    & Marine Isotope Stage 11 as an analogue for the present interglacial. Global Planet. Change 36, 209–217 (2003)

  8. 8.

    & A movable trigger: fossil fuel CO2 and the onset of the next glaciation. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q05003 (2005)

  9. 9.

    What drives the Ice Age cycle? Science 313, 455–456 (2006)

  10. 10.

    et al. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399, 429–436 (1999)

  11. 11.

    et al. Eight glacial cycles from an Antarctic ice core. Nature 429, 623–628 (2004)

  12. 12.

    et al. in Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability (eds , , & ) 61–121 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010)

  13. 13.

    , , , & Determining the natural length of the current interglacial. Nature Geosci. 5, 138–141 (2012)

  14. 14.

    et al. CLIMBER-2: a climate system model of intermediate complexity. Part I: model description and performance for present climate. Clim. Dyn. 16, 1–17 (2000)

  15. 15.

    A continuum-mechanical formulation for shallow polythermal ice sheets. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 355, 921–974 (1997)

  16. 16.

    & The role of orbital forcing, carbon dioxide and regolith in 100 kyr cycles. Clim. Past 7, 1415–1425 (2011)

  17. 17.

    Milankovitch solar radiation variations and ice age ice sheet sizes. Nature 261, 17–20 (1976)

  18. 18.

    , & Simulation of long-term future climate changes with the green McGill paleoclimate model: the next glacial inception. Clim. Change 79, 381–401 (2006)

  19. 19.

    & Multistability and hysteresis in the climate-cryosphere system under orbital forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L21717 (2005)

  20. 20.

    et al. Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis of ice-sheet volume. Nature 500, 190–193 (2013)

  21. 21.

    The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Clim. Change 61, 261–293 (2003)

  22. 22.

    , & Sensitivity of Holocene atmospheric CO2 and the modern carbon budget to early human land use: analyses with a process-based model. Biogeosciences 8, 69–88 (2011)

  23. 23.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds et al.) 465–570 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013)

  24. 24.

    , , & Glacial CO2 cycle as a succession of key physical and biogeochemical processes. Clim. Past 8, 251–264 (2012)

  25. 25.

    & Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003 (2005)

  26. 26.

    et al. Tuning the climate of a global model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 4, M00A01 (2012)

  27. 27.

    et al. A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 428, 261–285 (2004)

  28. 28.

    & Individual contribution of insolation and CO2 to the interglacial climates of the past 800,000 years. Clim. Dyn. 38, 709–724 (2012)

  29. 29.

    et al. Evolution of ocean temperature and ice volume through the mid-Pleistocene climate transition. Science 337, 704–709 (2012)

  30. 30.

    et al. Sea-level variability over five glacial cycles. Nature Commun. 5, 5076 (2014)

Download references

Author information


  1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14412 Potsdam, Germany

    • A. Ganopolski
    • , R. Winkelmann
    •  & H. J. Schellnhuber
  2. Physics Institute, Potsdam University, 14476 Potsdam, Germany

    • R. Winkelmann
  3. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA

    • H. J. Schellnhuber


  1. Search for A. Ganopolski in:

  2. Search for R. Winkelmann in:

  3. Search for H. J. Schellnhuber in:


A.G. and H.J.S. designed the paper. A.G. developed the methodology and performed the research (with contributions from R.W.). A.G., R.W. and H.J.S. interpreted the results and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ganopolski.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.