Letter | Published:

Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas

Nature volume 529, pages 110114 (07 January 2016) | Download Citation


Gain-of-function IDH mutations are initiating events that define major clinical and prognostic classes of gliomas1,2. Mutant IDH protein produces a new onco-metabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate, which interferes with iron-dependent hydroxylases, including the TET family of 5′-methylcytosine hydroxylases3,4,5,6,7. TET enzymes catalyse a key step in the removal of DNA methylation8,9. IDH mutant gliomas thus manifest a CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP)10,11, although the functional importance of this altered epigenetic state remains unclear. Here we show that human IDH mutant gliomas exhibit hypermethylation at cohesin and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)-binding sites, compromising binding of this methylation-sensitive insulator protein. Reduced CTCF binding is associated with loss of insulation between topological domains and aberrant gene activation. We specifically demonstrate that loss of CTCF at a domain boundary permits a constitutive enhancer to interact aberrantly with the receptor tyrosine kinase gene PDGFRA, a prominent glioma oncogene. Treatment of IDH mutant gliomaspheres with a demethylating agent partially restores insulator function and downregulates PDGFRA. Conversely, CRISPR-mediated disruption of the CTCF motif in IDH wild-type gliomaspheres upregulates PDGFRA and increases proliferation. Our study suggests that IDH mutations promote gliomagenesis by disrupting chromosomal topology and allowing aberrant regulatory interactions that induce oncogene expression.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

Data generated for this study are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE70991.


  1. 1.

    et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321, 1807–1812 (2008)

  2. 2.

    The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2481–2498 (2015)

  3. 3.

    et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 462, 739–744 (2009)

  4. 4.

    et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell 18, 553–567 (2010)

  5. 5.

    et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 19, 17–30 (2011)

  6. 6.

    et al. IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature 483, 474–478 (2012)

  7. 7.

    & Oncogenic isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations: mechanisms, models, and clinical opportunities. Cancer Dis. 3, 730–741 (2013)

  8. 8.

    , & TETonic shift: biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 341–356 (2013)

  9. 9.

    & TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature 502, 472–479 (2013)

  10. 10.

    et al. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 17, 510–522 (2010)

  11. 11.

    et al. IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature 483, 479–483 (2012)

  12. 12.

    & Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152, 1270–1284 (2013)

  13. 13.

    et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009)

  14. 14.

    et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012)

  15. 15.

    et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014)

  16. 16.

    et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012)

  17. 17.

    et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015)

  18. 18.

    & Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 405, 482–485 (2000)

  19. 19.

    et al. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature 405, 486–489 (2000)

  20. 20.

    The GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 348, 648–660 (2015)

  21. 21.

    et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 996–1001 (2014)

  22. 22.

    et al. Paediatric and adult glioblastoma: multiform (epi)genomic culprits emerge. Nature Rev. Cancer 14, 92–107 (2014)

  23. 23.

    et al. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155, 462–477 (2013)

  24. 24.

    et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 17, 98–110 (2010)

  25. 25.

    et al. Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation. Genome Res. 22, 1680–1688 (2012)

  26. 26.

    , & Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278 (2014)

  27. 27.

    & CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature Biotechnol. 32, 347–355 (2014)

  28. 28.

    & A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome – biological and translational implications. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 726–734 (2011)

  29. 29.

    , , & Silencing of p16/CDKN2 expression in human gliomas by methylation and chromatin condensation. Cancer Res. 56, 2405–2410 (1996)

  30. 30.

    et al. Transformation by the (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate linked to EGLN activation. Nature 483, 484–488 (2012)

  31. 31.

    et al. Prospective, high-throughput molecular profiling of human gliomas. J. Neurooncol. 110, 89–98 (2012)

  32. 32.

    et al. An aberrant transcription factor network essential for Wnt signaling and stem cell maintenance in glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 3, 1567–1579 (2013)

  33. 33.

    et al. Reconstructing and reprogramming the tumor-propagating potential of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cell 157, 580–594 (2014)

  34. 34.

    et al. Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells. Neuro Oncol. 14, 132–144 (2012)

  35. 35.

    et al. An in vivo patient-derived model of endogenous IDH1-mutant glioma. Neuro Oncol. 14, 184–191 (2012)

  36. 36.

    et al. Genome-wide methylation analyses in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS ONE 9, e89376 (2014)

  37. 37.

    , , & CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 21, 974–984 (2011)

  38. 38.

    et al. ZFHX4 interacts with the NuRD core member CHD4 and regulates the glioblastoma tumor-initiating cell state. Cell Rep. 6, 313–324 (2014)

  39. 39.

    et al. Targeting cancer stem cells through L1CAM suppresses glioma growth. Cancer Res. 68, 6043–6048 (2008)

  40. 40.

    , , , & JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D91–D94 (2004)

  41. 41.

    & 3C-based technologies to study the shape of the genome. Methods 58, 189–191 (2012)

  42. 42.

    et al. Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nature Protocols 2, 1722–1733 (2007)

  43. 43.

    et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013)

  44. 44.

    et al. A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function. J. Neurosci. 28, 264–278 (2008)

Download references


We thank J. Kim, the MGH Neuro Oncology Tissue Repository, and the MGH Pathology Flow Cytometry Core for assistance with clinical samples and analysis, and E. Lander and W. Kaelin for discussions. W.A.F. is supported by a basic research fellowship from the American Brain Tumor Association. B.B.L. is supported by a Jane Coffin Childs fellowship. B.E.B. is an American Cancer Society Research Professor. This research was supported by funds from Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the National Brain Tumor Society and the National Human Genome Research Institute.

Author information

Author notes

    • William A. Flavahan
    •  & Yotam Drier

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Pathology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA

    • William A. Flavahan
    • , Yotam Drier
    • , Brian B. Liau
    • , Shawn M. Gillespie
    • , Andrew S. Venteicher
    • , Anat O. Stemmer-Rachamimov
    • , Mario L. Suvà
    •  & Bradley E. Bernstein
  2. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA

    • William A. Flavahan
    • , Yotam Drier
    • , Brian B. Liau
    • , Shawn M. Gillespie
    • , Andrew S. Venteicher
    • , Mario L. Suvà
    •  & Bradley E. Bernstein
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA

    • William A. Flavahan
    • , Yotam Drier
    • , Brian B. Liau
    • , Shawn M. Gillespie
    •  & Bradley E. Bernstein
  4. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA

    • Andrew S. Venteicher


  1. Search for William A. Flavahan in:

  2. Search for Yotam Drier in:

  3. Search for Brian B. Liau in:

  4. Search for Shawn M. Gillespie in:

  5. Search for Andrew S. Venteicher in:

  6. Search for Anat O. Stemmer-Rachamimov in:

  7. Search for Mario L. Suvà in:

  8. Search for Bradley E. Bernstein in:


Conception and experimental design: W.A.F., Y.D., B.B.L., S.M.G., M.L.S. and B.E.B. Methodology and data acquisition: W.A.F., Y.D., B.B.L., S.M.G., A.S.V., A.O.S.-R., M.L.S. and B.E.B. Analysis and interpretation of data: W.A.F., Y.D. and B.E.B. Manuscript writing: W.A.F., Y.D. and B.E.B. W.A.F. and Y.D. contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley E. Bernstein.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table

    This file contains a list of deregulated boundaries and genes. The table lists domains whose boundaries are predicted to be lost based on cross-boundary gene pairs that gain correlation and intra-domain gene pairs that lose correlation. All supporting gene pairs (FDR < 1%) are listed along with their significance. The overall significance of each domain is also shown. Genes that are up-regulated by at least 2-fold in IDH mutant gliomas, relative to the median of the wild-type, are indicated. For each domain, the coordinates of boundaries predicted to be lost are also listed.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing