To advance quantum information science, physical systems are sought that meet the stringent requirements for creating and preserving quantum entanglement. In atomic physics, robust two-qubit entanglement is typically achieved by strong, long-range interactions in the form of either Coulomb interactions between ions or dipolar interactions between Rydberg atoms1,2,3,4. Although such interactions allow fast quantum gates, the interacting atoms must overcome the associated coupling to the environment and cross-talk among qubits5,6,7,8. Local interactions, such as those requiring substantial wavefunction overlap, can alleviate these detrimental effects; however, such interactions present a new challenge: to distribute entanglement, qubits must be transported, merged for interaction, and then isolated for storage and subsequent operations. Here we show how, using a mobile optical tweezer, it is possible to prepare and locally entangle two ultracold neutral atoms, and then separate them while preserving their entanglement9,10,11. Ground-state neutral atom experiments have measured dynamics consistent with spin entanglement10,12,13, and have detected entanglement with macroscopic observables14,15; we are now able to demonstrate position-resolved two-particle coherence via application of a local gradient and parity measurements1. This new entanglement-verification protocol could be applied to arbitrary spin-entangled states of spatially separated atoms16,17. The local entangling operation is achieved via spin-exchange interactions9,10,11, and quantum tunnelling is used to combine and separate atoms. These techniques provide a framework for dynamically entangling remote qubits via local operations within a large-scale quantum register.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
npj Quantum Information Open Access 15 October 2020
Scientific Reports Open Access 04 February 2019
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Sackett, C. A. et al. Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature 404, 256–259 (2000)
Leibfried, D. et al. Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate. Nature 422, 412–415 (2003)
Wilk, T. et al. Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010502 (2010)
Isenhower, L. et al. Demonstration of a neutral atom controlled-NOT quantum gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010503 (2010)
Monroe, C. et al. Resolved-sideband Raman cooling of a bound atom to the 3D zero-point energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4011–4014 (1995)
Blakestad, R. et al. High-fidelity transport of trapped-ion qubits through an X-junction trap array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 153002 (2009)
Home, J. P. et al. Complete methods set for scalable ion trap quantum information processing. Science 325, 1227–1230 (2009)
Béguin, L., Vernier, A., Chicireanu, R., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. Direct measurement of the van der Waals interaction between two Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013)
Hayes, D., Julienne, P. & Deutsch, I. Quantum logic via the exchange blockade in ultracold collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070501 (2007)
Anderlini, M. et al. Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 448, 452–456 (2007)
Weitenberg, C., Kuhr, S., Mølmer, K. & Sherson, J. Quantum computation architecture using optical tweezers. Phys. Rev. A 84, 032322 (2011)
Mandel, O. et al. Controlled collisions for multi-particle entanglement of optically trapped atoms. Nature 425, 937–940 (2003)
Fukuhara, T. et al. Quantum dynamics of a mobile spin impurity. Nature Phys. 9, 235–241 (2013)
Lücke, B. et al. Twin matter waves for interferometry beyond the classical limit. Science 334, 773–776 (2011)
Strobel, H. et al. Fisher information and entanglement of non-Gaussian spin states. Science 345, 424–427 (2014)
Mazza, L., Rossini, D., Fazio, R. & Endres, M. Detecting two-site spin-entanglement in many-body systems with local particle-number fluctuations. New J. Phys. 17, 013015 (2015)
Fukuhara, T. et al. Spatially resolved detection of a spin-entanglement wave in a Bose-Hubbard chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 035302 (2015)
DiVincenzo, D. P., Bacon, D., Kempe, J., Burkard, G. & Whaley, K. B. Universal quantum computation with the exchange interaction. Nature 408, 339–342 (2000)
Petta, J. R. et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005)
Trotzky, S. et al. Time-resolved observation and control of superexchange interactions with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science 319, 295–299 (2008)
Kotler, S., Akerman, N., Navon, N., Glickman, Y. & Ozeri, R. Measurement of the magnetic interaction between two bound electrons of two separate ions. Nature 510, 376–380 (2014)
Daley, A. J., Pichler, H., Schachenmayer, J. & Zoller, P. Measuring entanglement growth in quench dynamics of bosons in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 020505 (2012)
Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Jotzu, G., Tarruell, L. & Esslinger, T. Short-range quantum magnetism of ultracold fermions in an optical lattice. Science 340, 1307–1310 (2013)
Murmann, S. et al. Two fermions in a double well: exploring a fundamental building block of the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080402 (2015)
Hart, R. A. et al. Observation of antiferromagnetic correlations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms. Nature 519, 211–214 (2015)
Schlosser, N., Reymond, G., Protsenko, I. & Grangier, P. Sub-poissonian loading of single atoms in a microscopic dipole trap. Nature 411, 1024–1027 (2001)
Kaufman, A. M., Lester, B. J. & Regal, C. A. Cooling a single atom in an optical tweezer to its quantum ground state. Phys. Rev. X 2, 041014 (2012)
Kaufman, A. M. et al. Two-particle quantum interference in tunnel-coupled optical tweezers. Science 345, 306–309 (2014)
Kielpinski, D. et al. A decoherence-free quantum memory using trapped ions. Science 291, 1013–1015 (2001)
Wall, M. L., Hazzard, K. R. A. & Rey, A. M. Effective many-body parameters for atoms in nonseparable Gaussian optical potentials. Phys. Rev. A 92, 013610 (2015)
Weitenberg, C. et al. Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 471, 319–324 (2011)
Stewart, G. R. Heavy-fermion systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755–787 (1984)
Peres, A. Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413–1415 (1996)
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P. & Horodecki, R. Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9605038 (1996)
This work was supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the National Science Foundation under grant number 1125844. C.A.R. acknowledges support from the Clare Boothe Luce Foundation. M.L.W. and A.M.R. acknowledge funding from NSF-PIF, ARO, ARO-DARPA-OLE and AFOSR. M.L.W. and M.F.-F. acknowledge support from the NRC postdoctoral fellowship program.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Adiabatic energy eigenstates E as a function of the double-well bias Δ in units of the ground-excited tunnelling Jeg.
At large positive bias, the triplet and singlet eigenstates corresponding to two particles in the same well are split by Jex. The dashed and solid lines denote the energies of the states that asymptotically connect to the states labelled in the figure through the AP process. See Methods for details.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaufman, A., Lester, B., Foss-Feig, M. et al. Entangling two transportable neutral atoms via local spin exchange. Nature 527, 208–211 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16073
Nature Physics (2021)
Frontiers of Physics (2021)
npj Quantum Information (2020)
Nature Physics (2020)