Letter | Published:

Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production

Nature volume 527, pages 235239 (12 November 2015) | Download Citation


Growing evidence demonstrates that climatic conditions can have a profound impact on the functioning of modern human societies1,2, but effects on economic activity appear inconsistent. Fundamental productive elements of modern economies, such as workers and crops, exhibit highly non-linear responses to local temperature even in wealthy countries3,4. In contrast, aggregate macroeconomic productivity of entire wealthy countries is reported not to respond to temperature5, while poor countries respond only linearly5,6. Resolving this conflict between micro and macro observations is critical to understanding the role of wealth in coupled human–natural systems7,8 and to anticipating the global impact of climate change9,10. Here we unify these seemingly contradictory results by accounting for non-linearity at the macro scale. We show that overall economic productivity is non-linear in temperature for all countries, with productivity peaking at an annual average temperature of 13 °C and declining strongly at higher temperatures. The relationship is globally generalizable, unchanged since 1960, and apparent for agricultural and non-agricultural activity in both rich and poor countries. These results provide the first evidence that economic activity in all regions is coupled to the global climate and establish a new empirical foundation for modelling economic loss in response to climate change11,12, with important implications. If future adaptation mimics past adaptation, unmitigated warming is expected to reshape the global economy by reducing average global incomes roughly 23% by 2100 and widening global income inequality, relative to scenarios without climate change. In contrast to prior estimates, expected global losses are approximately linear in global mean temperature, with median losses many times larger than leading models indicate.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , & What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. J. Econ. Lit. 52, 740–798 (2014)

  2. 2.

    , & Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict. Science 341, 1235367 (2013)

  3. 3.

    & Non-linear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15594–15598 (2009)

  4. 4.

    & Temperature and the allocation of time: Implications for climate change. J. Labor Econ. 13, 1–26 (2014)

  5. 5.

    , & Climate change and economic growth: evidence from the last half century. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 4, 66–95 (2012)

  6. 6.

    Temperatures and cyclones strongly associated with economic production in the Caribbean and Central America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15367–15372 (2010)

  7. 7.

    in Economics of the Environment (ed. ) (W. W. Norton & Company, 2012)

  8. 8.

    & Does the environment still matter? Daily temperature and income in the United States. NBER Working Paper 20750. (2014)

  9. 9.

    The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 23, 29–51 (2009)

  10. 10.

    A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies (Yale Univ. Press, 2008)

  11. 11.

    Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J. Econ. Lit. 51, 860–872 (2013)

  12. 12.

    et al. Global warming: improve economic models of climate change. Nature 508, 173–175 (2014)

  13. 13.

    Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3510–3517 (2006)

  14. 14.

    , & Temperature and income: reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 198–204 (2009)

  15. 15.

    & The causal effect of environmental catastrophe on long run economic growth. NBER Working Paper 20352. (2014)

  16. 16.

    & Feeling the heat: temperature, physiology & the wealth of nations. NBER Working Paper 19725. (2013)

  17. 17.

    World Bank Group. World Development Indicators 2012 (World Bank Publications, 2012)

  18. 18.

    & Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: monthly and annual time series (1900–2010) v. 3.01. (2012)

  19. 19.

    , & Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate. Nature 476, 438–441 (2011)

  20. 20.

    & The Penn World Table (Mark 5): an expanded set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Q. J. Econ. 106, 327–368 (1991)

  21. 21.

    & Adaptation to climate change: evidence from US agriculture. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Pol (in the press)

  22. 22.

    et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387–400 (2014)

  23. 23.

    et al. Economic Risks of Climate Change: An American Prospectus (Columbia Univ. Press, 2015)

  24. 24.

    & Adapting North American wheat production to climatic challenges, 1839–2009. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 480–485 (2011)

  25. 25.

    , , , & Adapting to climate change: the remarkable decline in the US temperature-mortality relationship over the 20th century. J. Polit. Econ (in the press)

  26. 26.

    , & Evolving comparative advantage and the impact of climate change in agricultural markets: evidence from a 9 million-field partition of the earth. J. Polit. Econ (in the press)

  27. 27.

    Visually-weighted regression. SSRN Working Paper 2265501. (2012)

Download references


We thank D. Anthoff, M. Auffhammer, V. Bosetti, M. P. Burke, T. Carleton, M. Dell, L. Goulder, S. Heft-Neal, B. Jones, R. Kopp, D. Lobell, F. Moore, J. Rising, M. Tavoni, and seminar participants at Berkeley, Harvard, Princeton, Stanford universities, Institute for the Study of Labor, and the World Bank for useful comments.

Author information

Author notes

    • Marshall Burke
    •  & Solomon M. Hsiang

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, California 94305, USA

    • Marshall Burke
  2. Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, California 94305, USA

    • Marshall Burke
  3. Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Solomon M. Hsiang
  4. National Bureau of Economic Research

    • Solomon M. Hsiang
    •  & Edward Miguel
  5. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA

    • Edward Miguel


  1. Search for Marshall Burke in:

  2. Search for Solomon M. Hsiang in:

  3. Search for Edward Miguel in:


M.B. and S.M.H. conceived of and designed the study; M.B. and S.M.H. collected and analysed the data; M.B., S.M.H. and E.M. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marshall Burke.

Replication data have been deposited at the Stanford Digital Repository (http://purl.stanford.edu/wb587wt4560).

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Text and Data, Supplementary Tables 1-3 and additional references (see Page 1 for more details).

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.