Brief Communications Arising | Published:

Questioning evidence of group selection in spiders

Nature volume 524, pages E1E3 (27 August 2015) | Download Citation

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions. Nature 514, 359–362 (2014)

  2. 2.

    & Eight criticisms not to make about group selection. Evolution 65, 1523–1526 (2011)

  3. 3.

    Group selection and kin selection: formally equivalent approaches. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 325–332 (2011)

  4. 4.

    & Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations. Nature 425, 72–74 (2003)

  5. 5.

    , , & Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host-pathogen ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 442, 75–78 (2006)

  6. 6.

    & Animal behaviour: task differentiation by personality in spider groups. Curr. Biol. 24, R749–R751 (2014)

  7. 7.

    , & Reproductive success in a socially polymorphic spider: social individuals experience depressed reproductive success in isolation. Ecol. Entomol. 35, 684–690 (2010)

  8. 8.

    , , & Threshold evolution in exotic populations of a polyphenic beetle. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 587–601 (2002)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Variation in melanism and female preference in proximate but ecologically distinct environments. Ethology 120, 1090–1100 (2014)

  10. 10.

    et al. Genotype × environment interactions, stoichiometric food quality effects, and clonal coexistence in Daphnia pulex. Oecologia 143, 537–547 (2005)

  11. 11.

    , , & Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature 447, 210–212 (2007)

  12. 12.

    Two cooperatively social populations of the theridiid spider Anelosimus studiosus in a temperate region. Anim. Behav. 55, 727–735 (1998)

  13. 13.

    , & Diel and life-history characteristics of personality: consistency versus flexibility in relation to ecological change. Anim. Behav. 101, 43–49 (2015)

  14. 14.

    et al. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471, E1–E4 (2011)

  15. 15.

    , & Social semantics: how useful has group selection been? J. Evol. Biol. 21, 374–385 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK

    • Lena Grinsted
    •  & James D. J. Gilbert
  2. Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 116, building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

    • Trine Bilde
  3. School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK

    • James D. J. Gilbert

Authors

  1. Search for Lena Grinsted in:

  2. Search for Trine Bilde in:

  3. Search for James D. J. Gilbert in:

Contributions

L.G., J.D.J.G. and T.B. authored this paper; L.G. performed statistical analyses.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Grinsted.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14595

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing