For centuries, practitioners of origami (‘ori’, fold; ‘kami’, paper) and kirigami (‘kiru’, cut) have fashioned sheets of paper into beautiful and complex three-dimensional structures. Both techniques are scalable, and scientists and engineers are adapting them to different two-dimensional starting materials to create structures from the macro- to the microscale1,2. Here we show that graphene3,4,5,6 is well suited for kirigami, allowing us to build robust microscale structures with tunable mechanical properties. The material parameter crucial for kirigami is the Föppl–von Kármán number7,8 γ: an indication of the ratio between in-plane stiffness and out-of-plane bending stiffness, with high numbers corresponding to membranes that more easily bend and crumple than they stretch and shear. To determine γ, we measure the bending stiffness of graphene monolayers that are 10–100 micrometres in size and obtain a value that is thousands of times higher than the predicted atomic-scale bending stiffness. Interferometric imaging attributes this finding to ripples in the membrane9,10,11,12,13 that stiffen the graphene sheets considerably, to the extent that γ is comparable to that of a standard piece of paper. We may therefore apply ideas from kirigami to graphene sheets to build mechanical metamaterials such as stretchable electrodes, springs, and hinges. These results establish graphene kirigami as a simple yet powerful and customizable approach for fashioning one-atom-thick graphene sheets into resilient and movable parts with microscale dimensions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , & (eds) Origami 5: Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education (CRC Press, 2011)

  2. 2.

    et al. Programmable matter by folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12441–12445 (2010)

  3. 3.

    , , & Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008)

  4. 4.

    et al. Macroscopic graphene membranes and their extraordinary stiffness. Nano Lett. 8, 2442–2446 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature 446, 60–63 (2007)

  6. 6.

    et al. Electromechanical resonators from graphene sheets. Science 315, 490–493 (2007)

  7. 7.

    Vorlesungen über technische Mechanik (, 1905)

  8. 8.

    Festigkeitsproblem im Maschinenbau. Vol. 4 (Encyklopädie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 1910)

  9. 9.

    & Mechanical properties of warped membranes. Phys. Rev. E 88, 012136 (2013)

  10. 10.

    & Fluctuations in membranes with crystalline and hexatic order. J. Phys. 48, 1085–1092 (1987)

  11. 11.

    & Fluctuations of solid membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2634–2637 (1988)

  12. 12.

    & Self-consistent theory of polymerized membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1209–1212 (1992)

  13. 13.

    , , , & Scaling properties of flexible membranes from atomistic simulations: application to graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 121405 (2009)

  14. 14.

    et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009)

  15. 15.

    On the Brownian motion of a harmonically bound particle and the theory of a Wiener process. Eur. J. Phys. 6, 259–265 (1985)

  16. 16.

    , , & Quantitative guidelines for force calibration through spectral analysis of magnetic tweezers data. Biophys. J. 99, 1292–1302 (2010)

  17. 17.

    , & Intrinsic ripples in graphene. Nature Mater. 6, 858–861 (2007)

  18. 18.

    , & Lattice dynamics of pyrolytic graphite. Phys. Rev. B 5, 4951–4962 (1972)

  19. 19.

    , , & Suppression of anharmonicities in crystalline membranes by external strain. Phys. Rev. B 83, 174104 (2011)

  20. 20.

    & Thermal fluctuations of free-standing graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82, 035407 (2010)

  21. 21.

    et al. Graphene bubbles with controllable curvature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 093103 (2011)

  22. 22.

    et al. Direct imaging of atomic-scale ripples in few-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 12, 2278–2282 (2012)

  23. 23.

    & Thermal excitations of warped membranes. Phys. Rev. E 89, 022126 (2014)

  24. 24.

    , & Graphene-based materials in electrochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 3157–3180 (2010)

  25. 25.

    , & Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327, 1603–1607 (2010)

  26. 26.

    et al. Graphene-based bimorph microactuators. Nano Lett. 11, 977–981 (2011)

  27. 27.

    et al. Graphene veils and sandwiches. Nano Lett. 11, 3290–3294 (2011)

Download references


We thank D. Nelson, M. Bowick, A. Kosmrlj, J. Alden, A. van der Zande, and R. Martin-Wells for discussions. We thank E. Minot for assistance with electrolyte gating. We thank R. Hovden for discussions on three-dimensional reconstruction theory and techniques, and R. Hovden, M. Hanwell, and U. Ayachit for developing and supporting the TomViz three-dimensional visualization software. We thank J. Wardini, P. Ong, A. Zaretski, and S. P. Wang for additional graphene samples, and F. Parish with Cornell’s College of Architecture, Art, and Planning for assistance with the paper models. We also acknowledge the Origami Resource Center (http://www.origami-resource-center.com/) for kirigami design ideas. This work was supported by the Cornell Center for Materials Research (National Science Foundation, NSF, grant DMR-1120296), the Office of Naval Research (N00014-13-1-0749), and the Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science. Devices were fabricated at the Cornell Nanoscale Science and Technology Facility, a member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network, which is supported by the NSF (ECCS-0335765). K.L.M. and P.Y.H. acknowledge support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-1144153 and DGE-0707428). Tomography visualization software development was supported by a SBIR grant (DE-SC0011385).

Author information


  1. Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

    • Melina K. Blees
    • , Peter A. Rose
    • , Samantha P. Roberts
    • , Kathryn L. McGill
    • , Joshua W. Kevek
    • , Bryce Kobrin
    •  & Paul L. McEuen
  2. School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

    • Arthur W. Barnard
    • , Pinshane Y. Huang
    •  & David A. Muller
  3. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

    • Alexander R. Ruyack
  4. Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

    • David A. Muller
    •  & Paul L. McEuen


  1. Search for Melina K. Blees in:

  2. Search for Arthur W. Barnard in:

  3. Search for Peter A. Rose in:

  4. Search for Samantha P. Roberts in:

  5. Search for Kathryn L. McGill in:

  6. Search for Pinshane Y. Huang in:

  7. Search for Alexander R. Ruyack in:

  8. Search for Joshua W. Kevek in:

  9. Search for Bryce Kobrin in:

  10. Search for David A. Muller in:

  11. Search for Paul L. McEuen in:


Device design and actuation techniques were developed by M.K.B., A.W.B., P.A.R., S.P.R., and K.L.M. under the supervision of P.L.M. Fabrication and characterization was performed by the above authors with additional support from A.R.R., J.W.K., and B.K. Bending stiffness measurements were designed by A.W.B. and P.L.M. and carried out by M.K.B., P.A.R., and K.L.M. with data analysis by S.P.R., A.W.B., M.K.B., K.L.M., and P.A.R. under the supervision of P.L.M. Electrical measurements were performed by K.L.M. and M.K.B. under the supervision of P.L.M. Three-dimensional reconstructions were performed by P.Y.H. under the supervision of D.A.M. The paper was written by M.K.B. and P.L.M., with assistance from P.A.R., A.W.B., K.L.M., and P.Y.H. and in consultation with all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul L. McEuen.

Extended data

Supplementary information


  1. 1.

    Manipulating a large sheet of graphene (1x speed)

    Once the graphene has been released from the surface, it can crumple dramatically, similar to a large sheet of paper. Surfactants in the solution allow the graphene to return to its original shape.  Lifting a graphene device (2x speed). Driving the micromanipulator into an attached gold pad lets us fully release the device and lift it up off of the surface

  2. 2.

    Stiff graphene kirigami spring extends by ~70% (2x speed)

    Using a micromanipulator driven into one gold pad, we can repeatedly stretch and relax a kirigami spring. Soft graphene kirigami spring extends by ~240% (2x speed). A different kirigami pattern results in a softer spring that stretches dramatically. Z-scan used in 3D reconstruction (background subtracted). The left side of this spring is being held up by the probe tip, while the right side is still stuck to the substrate.

  3. 3.

    Infrared laser focused on a kirigami pyramid’s central pad and Kirigami pyramid actuation, laser filtered out of the video (1x speed).

    The laser is fired from below the pyramid and pushes upwards on the pad, causing it to go out of focus. Twisting graphene with an iron pad and rotating magnetic field (2x speed). Surfactant in the solution allows the graphene to unfold again. A graphene hinge, actuated by a long graphene arm. Large field of view shows the mechanism. A graphene hinge after 1000 cycles (1x speed). This device survived through 10,000 cycles.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.