Letter | Published:

Small-scale filament eruptions as the driver of X-ray jets in solar coronal holes

Nature volume 523, pages 437440 (23 July 2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

This article has been updated

Abstract

Solar X-ray jets are thought to be made by a burst of reconnection of closed magnetic field at the base of a jet with ambient open field1,2. In the accepted version of the ‘emerging-flux’ model, such a reconnection occurs at a plasma current sheet between the open field and the emerging closed field, and also forms a localized X-ray brightening that is usually observed at the edge of the jet’s base1,3. Here we report high-resolution X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet observations of 20 randomly selected X-ray jets that form in coronal holes at the Sun’s poles. In each jet, contrary to the emerging-flux model, a miniature version of the filament eruptions that initiate coronal mass ejections4,5,6,7 drives the jet-producing reconnection. The X-ray bright point occurs by reconnection of the ‘legs’ of the minifilament-carrying erupting closed field, analogous to the formation of solar flares in larger-scale eruptions. Previous observations have found that some jets are driven by base-field eruptions8,9,10,11, but only one such study, of only one jet, provisionally questioned the emerging-flux model12. Our observations support the view that solar filament eruptions are formed by a fundamental explosive magnetic process that occurs on a vast range of scales, from the biggest mass ejections and flare eruptions down to X-ray jets, and perhaps even down to smaller jets that may power coronal heating10,13,14. A similar scenario has previously been suggested, but was inferred from different observations and based on a different origin of the erupting minifilament15.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 22 July 2015

    The dates in Extended Data Table 1 were updated.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Observations of x-ray jets with the Yohkoh soft x-ray telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 44, 173L–179L (1992)

  2. 2.

    et al. Evidence for Alfvén waves in solar jets. Science 318, 1580–1582 (2007)

  3. 3.

    & Magnetic reconnection as the origin of x-ray jets and Hα surges on the sun. Nature 375, 42–44 (1995)

  4. 4.

    Theoretical model of flares and prominences. Sol. Phys. 34, 323–338 (1974)

  5. 5.

    et al. Hot-plasma ejections associated with compact-loop solar flares. Astrophys. J. 451, L83–L85 (1995)

  6. 6.

    , , & Onset of the magnetic explosion in solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 552, 833–848 (2001)

  7. 7.

    Coronal mass ejections: models and their observational basis. Living Rev. Sol. Phys 8, 1–92 (2011)

  8. 8.

    , , & H-alpha macrospicules—identification with EUV macrospicules and with flares in x-ray bright points. Astrophys. J. 218, 286–290 (1977)

  9. 9.

    et al. Coronal bright points associated with minifilament eruptions. Astrophys. J. 796, 73 (2014)

  10. 10.

    , , & Micro-sigmoids as progenitors of coronal jets: is eruptive activity self-similarly multi-scaled? Astrophys. J. 718, 981–987 (2010)

  11. 11.

    , , & Characteristics of EUV coronal jets observed with STEREO/SECCHI. Sol. Phys. 259, 87–108 (2009)

  12. 12.

    , , & A small-scale eruption leading to a blowout macrospicule jet in an on-disk coronal hole. Astrophys. J. 783, 11 (2014)

  13. 13.

    , , & The cool component and the dichotomy, lateral expansion, and axial rotation of solar x-ray jets. Astrophys. J. 769, 134 (2013)

  14. 14.

    et al. The origins of hot plasma in the solar corona. Science 331, 55–58 (2011)

  15. 15.

    Evidence of magnetic reconnection in solar flares and a unified model of flares. Astrophys. Space Sci. 264, 129–144 (1999)

  16. 16.

    et al. Statistical study of solar x-ray jets observed with the Yohkoh soft x-ray telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 48, 123–136 (1996)

  17. 17.

    et al. A study of polar jet parameters based on Hinode XRT observations. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 59, S771–S778 (2007)

  18. 18.

    et al. Giant chromospheric anemone jet observed with Hinode and comparison with magnetohydrodynamic simulations: evidence of propagating Alfvén waves and magnetic reconnection. Astrophys. J. 683, L83–L86 (2008)

  19. 19.

    & Plasma jets and eruptions in solar coronal holes: a three-dimensional flux emergence experiment. Astrophys. J. 771, 20 (2013)

  20. 20.

    & A numerical model of standard to blowout jets. Astrophys. J. 769, L21 (2013)

  21. 21.

    , & Rotating solar jets in simulations of flux emergence with thermal conduction. Astrophys. J. 789, L19 (2014)

  22. 22.

    et al. The Hinode (solar-B) mission: an overview. Sol. Phys. 243, 3–17 (2007)

  23. 23.

    et al. The atmospheric imaging assembly (AIA) on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys. 275, 17–40 (2012)

  24. 24.

    & Internal and external reconnection in a series of homologous solar flares. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25227–25238 (2001)

  25. 25.

    & Slow-rise and fast-rise phases of an erupting solar filament, and flare emission onset. Astrophys. J. 630, 1148–1159 (2005)

  26. 26.

    , & Advanced automated solar filament detection and characterization code: description, performance, and results. Sol. Phys. 228, 97–117 (2005)

  27. 27.

    et al. Minifilament eruption on the quiet sun. I. Observations at Hα central line. Astrophys. J. 530, 1071–1084 (2000)

  28. 28.

    , , & Does a polar coronal hole’s flux emergence follow a Hale-like law? Astrophys. J. 702, L32–L36 (2009)

  29. 29.

    , , & On a coronal blowout jet: the first observation of a simultaneously produced bubble-like CME and a jet-like CME in a solar event. Astrophys. J. 745, 164 (2012)

  30. 30.

    & Solar dynamics observatory and Hinode observations of a blowout jet in a coronal hole. Sol. Phys. 289, 3313–3329 (2014)

  31. 31.

    , & Reducing heliospheric magnetic flux from coronal mass ejections without disconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1028–1032 (2002)

  32. 32.

    & Data analysis with the SolarSoft system. Sol. Phys. 182, 497–500 (1998)

  33. 33.

    , , & Dichotomy of solar coronal jets: standard jets and blowout jets. Astrophys. J. 720, 757–770 (2010)

  34. 34.

    , & Insights into filament eruption onset from Solar Dynamics Observatory observations. Astrophys. J. 731, L3 (2011)

  35. 35.

    et al. Chromospheric anemone jets as evidence of ubiquitous reconnection. Science 318, 1591–1594 (2007)

  36. 36.

    & Quiet sun explosive events: jets, splashes, and eruptions. Sol. Phys. 282, 453–469 (2013)

  37. 37.

    & Plasmoid-induced-reconnection and fractal reconnection. Earth Planets Space 53, 473–482 (2001)

  38. 38.

    , & Prominence eruptions and coronal mass ejections triggered by newly emerging flux. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25053–25074 (2001)

  39. 39.

    et al. Magnetic field structures triggering solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 760, 31 (2012)

  40. 40.

    , , & The dynamical behaviour of a jet in an on-disk coronal hole observed with AIA/SDO. Astron. Astrophys. 562, A98 (2014)

  41. 41.

    , , & Quiet Sun mini-coronal mass ejections activated by supergranular flows. Astron. Astrophys. 495, 319–323 (2009)

  42. 42.

    Eruptions from solar ephemeral regions as an extension of the size distribution of coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 710, 1480–1485 (2010)

  43. 43.

    , , , , & A standard-to-blowout jet. Astrophys. J. 735, L18 (2011)

  44. 44.

    , , & Coronal hole boundaries at small scales. IV. SOT view. Magnetic field properties of small-scale transient brightenings in coronal holes. Astron. Astrophys. 548, A62–A80 (2012)

  45. 45.

    , & A model for solar polar jets. Astrophys. J. 74, 61–74 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.C.S. and R.L.M. were supported by funding from the Heliophysics Division of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate through the Living With A Star Targeted Research and Technology Program (LWS TR&T), and the Hinode Project. Both benefited from TR&T discussions and from discussions with S. K. Antiochos. We thank D. M. Zarro for assistance with video development. A.C.S. benefited from discussions held at the International Space Science Institute (ISSI; Switzerland) International Team on Solar Coronal Jets (led by N. Raouafi). Hinode is a Japanese mission developed and launched by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), with the National Astronomical Observatory Japan (NAOJ) as a domestic partner, and NASA and the Science and Technology Facilities Council (UK) as international partners. It is operated by these agencies in cooperation with the European Space Agency and Norwegian Space Agency.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA

    • Alphonse C. Sterling
    • , Ronald L. Moore
    • , David A. Falconer
    •  & Mitzi Adams
  2. Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, USA

    • Ronald L. Moore
    •  & David A. Falconer

Authors

  1. Search for Alphonse C. Sterling in:

  2. Search for Ronald L. Moore in:

  3. Search for David A. Falconer in:

  4. Search for Mitzi Adams in:

Contributions

A.C.S. carried out the reduction, analysis, and interpretation of XRT and AIA data, software development, and manuscript preparation. R.L.M. interpreted the results and reviewed the manuscript. D.A.F. developed software, and assimilated and calibrated AIA data. M.A. discovered and analysed the seminal jet event that motivated this broader investigation, and carried out manuscript formatting and review.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alphonse C. Sterling or Ronald L. Moore.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Erupting-Jet Example (Figure 1)

    Jet in soft X-rays from Hinode/XRT (left) and EUV from SDO/AIA 193 Å (right). The videos are synced to approximately concurrent times. See discussion in the text, and Figure 1 and corresponding legend, for details of the jet. This is event 18 of Extended Data Table 1.

  2. 2.

    Jet of 2010 September 9, 22 UT (Extended Data Figure 2)

    XRT (left) and AIA 193 Å (right) video of the jet. The videos are synced to approximately concurrent times. See Extended Data Figure 2 and corresponding legend for details of the jet. This is event 12 of Extended Data Table 1.

  3. 3.

    Jet of 2010 September 9, 23 UT (Extended Data Figure 3)

    XRT (left) and AIA 211 Å (right) videos of the jet. The videos are synced to approximately concurrent times. AIA images are zoomed-in more than are the XRT images. See Extended Data Figure 3 and corresponding legend for details of the jet. This is event 13 of Extended Data Table 1.

  4. 4.

    Jet of 2010 August 28, 13 UT (Extended Data Figure 4)

    XRT (left) and AIA 304 Å (right) video of a “standard” jet. See Extended Data Figure 4 and corresponding legend for details of the jet. This is event 7 of Extended Data Table 1.

  5. 5.

    Jet of 2010 August 28, 11 UT (Extended Data Figure 5)

    XRT (left) and AIA 211 Å (right) video of a “standard” jet. Dark spot north-west of center in XRT images is an artifact. AIA images are zoomed-in more than are the XRT images. See Extended Data Figure 5 and corresponding legend for details of the jet. This is event 6 of Extended Data Table 1.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14556

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.