Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Activating positive memory engrams suppresses depression-like behaviour

Nature volume 522, pages 335–339 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Stress is considered a potent environmental risk factor for many behavioural abnormalities, including anxiety and mood disorders1,2. Animal models can exhibit limited but quantifiable behavioural impairments resulting from chronic stress, including deficits in motivation, abnormal responses to behavioural challenges, and anhedonia3,4,5. The hippocampus is thought to negatively regulate the stress response and to mediate various cognitive and mnemonic aspects of stress-induced impairments2,3,5, although the neuronal underpinnings sufficient to support behavioural improvements are largely unknown. Here we acutely rescue stress-induced depression-related behaviours in mice by optogenetically reactivating dentate gyrus cells that were previously active during a positive experience. A brain-wide histological investigation, coupled with pharmacological and projection-specific optogenetic blockade experiments, identified glutamatergic activity in the hippocampus–amygdala–nucleus-accumbens pathway as a candidate circuit supporting the acute rescue. Finally, chronically reactivating hippocampal cells associated with a positive memory resulted in the rescue of stress-induced behavioural impairments and neurogenesis at time points beyond the light stimulation. Together, our data suggest that activating positive memories artificially is sufficient to suppress depression-like behaviours and point to dentate gyrus engram cells as potential therapeutic nodes for intervening with maladaptive behavioural states.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Activating positive memory engrams rescues depression-related behaviour.
Figure 2: Positive memory reactivation increases c-Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens shell and the amygdala.
Figure 3: The antidepressant effects of an optically activated positive memory require real-time terminal activity from the BLA to the NAcc.
Figure 4: Chronic activation of a positive memory elicits a long-lasting rescue of depression-related behaviour.

References

  1. Caspi, A. et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 301, 386–389 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pittenger, C. & Duman, R. S. Stress, depression, and neuroplasticity: a convergence of mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 88–109 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hyman, S. E. Revitalizing psychiatric therapeutics. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 220–229 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Covington, H. E., III et al. Antidepressant effect of optogenetic stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 16082–16090 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Russo, S. J. & Nestler, E. J. The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 14, 609–625 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, X. et al. Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature 484, 381–385 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramirez, S. et al. Creating a false memory in the hippocampus. Science 341, 387–391 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Redondo, R. L. et al. Bidirectional switch of the valence associated with a hippocampal contextual memory engram. Nature 513, 426–430 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T. & Parks, A. C. Positive psychotherapy. Am. Psychol. 61, 774–788 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tye, K. M. et al. Dopamine neurons modulate neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour. Nature 493, 537–541 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warden, M. R. et al. A prefrontal cortex-brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge. Nature 492, 428–432 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deisseroth, K. Circuit dynamics of adaptive and maladaptive behaviour. Nature 505, 309–317 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim, B. K., Huang, K. W., Grueter, B. A., Rothwell, P. E. & Malenka, R. C. Anhedonia requires MC4R-mediated synaptic adaptations in nucleus accumbens. Nature 487, 183–189 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Snyder, J. S., Soumier, A., Brewer, M., Pickel, J. & Cameron, H. A. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour. Nature 476, 458–461 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lammel, S. et al. Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 491, 212–217 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dölen, G., Darvishzadeh, A., Huang, K. W. & Malenka, R. C. Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin. Nature 501, 179–184 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlaepfer, T. E. et al. Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 368–377 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiu, J. et al. Visualizing an emotional valence map in the limbic forebrain by TAI-FISH. Nature Neurosci. 17, 1552–1559 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stuber, G. D. et al. Excitatory transmission from the amygdala to nucleus accumbens facilitates reward seeking. Nature 475, 377–380 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DeRubeis, R. J., Siegle, G. J. & Hollon, S. D. Cognitive therapy versis medication. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 788–796 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Han, X. et al. A high-light sensitivity optical neural silencer: development and application to optogenetic control of non-human primate cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5, 18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brody, A. L. et al. Regional brain metabolic changes in patients with major depression treated with either paroxetine or interpersonal therapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 58, 631–640 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Airan, R. D. et al. High-speed imaging reveals neurophysiological links to behavior in an animal model of depression. Science 317, 819–823 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seki, T. & Arai, Y. Highly polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM-H) is expressed by newly generated granule cells in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. J. Neurosci. 13, 2351–2358 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Santarelli, L. et al. Requirement of hippocampal neurogenesis for the behavioral effects of antidepressants. Science 301, 805–809 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S. & Chattarji, S. Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10, 423–433 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Felix-Ortiz, A. C. et al. BLA to vHPC inputs modulate anxiety-related behaviors. Neuron 79, 658–664 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berman, R. M. et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol. Psychiatry 47, 351–354 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedman, A. K. et al. Enhancing depression mechanisms in midbrain dopamine neurons achieves homeostatic resilience. Science 344, 313–319 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsankova, N., Renthal, W., Kumar, A. & Nestler, E. J. Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 355–367 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reijmers, L. G., Perkins, B. L., Matsuo, N. & Mayford, M. Localization of a stable neural correlate of associative memory. Science 317, 1230–1233 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Redondo, R. L. et al. Bidirectional switch of the valence associated with a hippocampal contextual memory engram. Nature 513, 426–430 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramirez, S. et al. Creating a false memory in the hippocampus. Science 341, 387–391 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, X. et al. Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature 484, 381–385 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Han, X. et al. A high-light sensitivity optical neural silencer: development and application to optogenetic control of non-human primate cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5, 18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huff, M. L., Miller, R. L., Deisseroth, K., Moorman, D. E. & LaLumiere, R. T. Posttraining optogenetic manipulations of basolateral amygdala activity modulate consolidation of inhibitory avoidance memory in rats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3597–3602 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Snyder, J. S., Soumier, A., Brewer, M., Pickel, J. & Cameron, H. A. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour. Nature 476, 458–461 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Chen, D. S. Roy, and J. Kim for help with the experiments, T. J. Ryan and T. Kitamura for the TRE–ArchT–eGFP construct, J. Sarinana and E. Hueske for comments and extensive discussions on the manuscript, and all the members of the Tonegawa laboratory for their support. We dedicate this study to the memory of Xu Liu, who made major contributions to memory engram research. This work was supported by RIKEN Brain Science Institute and Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xu Liu: Deceased.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics at the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, Massachusetts, USA

    Steve Ramirez, Christopher J. MacDonald, Anthony Moffa, Joanne Zhou, Roger L. Redondo & Susumu Tonegawa

  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, Massachusetts, USA

    Roger L. Redondo & Susumu Tonegawa

Authors
  1. Steve Ramirez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher J. MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anthony Moffa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joanne Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roger L. Redondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Susumu Tonegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.R., X.L., C.M., A.M., J.Z., R.L.R. and S.T. contributed to the study design. S.R., X.L., A.M., J.Z., C.M. and R.L.R. contributed to the data collection and interpretation. X.L. cloned all constructs. S.R., X.L., C.M., J.Z. and A.M. conducted the surgeries, behaviour experiments, and histological analyses. S.R., X.L. and S.T. wrote the paper. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susumu Tonegawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Male mice spend more time around an object associated with females.

Top, Time spent in the target zone where the object associated with females is introduced in the ON phases. Female-object paired mice (experimental group) spend more time in the target zone during the ON phases than the neutral-object paired mice (control group; two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, ON1 t88 = 2.41; P < 0.05, ON2 t88 = 2.08; P < 0.05). Bottom, Difference score (average of ON phases − baseline (Bsl)) also shows the increased preference for the target zone in the female-object group compared to neutral-object group (t22 = 2.37; *P < 0.05). n = 12 per group. See the Methods section for detailed methods.

Extended Data Figure 2 Positive, neutral, or negative experiences label a similar proportion of dentate gyrus cells with ChR2; stress prevents weight gain over 10 days.

a, The c-Fos mice were bilaterally injected with AAV9-TRE-ChR2-mCherry and implanted with optical fibres targeting the dentate gyrus. b–e, Histological quantifications reveal that, while off Dox, a similar proportion of dentate gyrus cells are labelled by ChR2–mCherry in response to a positive (c), neutral (d), or negative (e) experience. All animals were sacrificed a day after completing the CIS protocol. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, P > 0.05, n.s., not significant. f, Animals were chronically immobilized for 10 days, during which they lost a significant amount of weight compared to an unstressed group (one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, *P < 0.05, n = 9 per group). Data are means ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 3 Reactivation of a positive memory decreases latency to feed in a novelty suppressed feeding paradigm.

a, All groups were food deprived for 24 h and then underwent a novelty-suppressed feeding protocol. While chronic immobilization increased the latency to feed, light-reactivation of a positive memory significantly decreased the latency to feed at levels that matched the unstressed groups. b, Upon completion of the novelty suppressed feeding test, all groups were returned to their home cage and food intake was measured after 5 min (one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, **P < 0.01, n = 16 per group). Data are means ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 4 Activation of a positive memory elicits BLA spiking activity, requires NAcc glutamatergic activity in the tail suspension test, but does not alter locomotor activity in the open field test.

a, Raster plots and peri-stimulus time histograms (PSTH) illustrating a transient excitatory response from a single BLA neuron out of the nine neurons responsive to dentate gyrus positive memory activation during 10 s of blue light stimulation, but not in response to 10 s of red light as a control. Blue bar plots on the right illustrate maximum BLA neural firing rate before (Pre) and after (Post) blue light stimulation in the dentate gyrus (paired t-test, t7 = 6.91, *P = 0.023). Red bar plots show the maximum neural activity for the same neurons after red light stimulation in the dentate gyrus that serves as a control (paired t-test, t7 = 1.62, P = 0.15). b, Brain diagram illustrating target areas manipulated. Within-subjects experiments revealed that glutamatergic antagonists (Glux), but not saline, in the accumbens shell blocked the light-induced effects of a positive memory in stressed subjects. For behavioural data, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test revealed a group-by-light epoch interaction on day 1 (F1,90 = 28.39, P < 0.001; n = 16 per group) and day 2 of testing (F1,90 = 8.28, P < 0.01). Data are means ± s.e.m. c, All groups failed to show significant changes in locomotor activity within a session of open field exploration during either light off or light on epochs, though any trends towards decreases in locomotion are consistent with stress-induced behavioural impairments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Extended Data Figure 5 Activating a positive memory in the dentate gyrus produces an increase in c-Fos expression in the lateral septum and hypothalamus, but not the lateral habenula, ventral hippocampus, or VTA.

a, Diagram of regions analysed. b, c, c-Fos expression significantly increased in the lateral septum (b) and subregions of the hypothalamus including the dorsomedial (DM), ventromedial (VM), and lateral hypothalamus (c) in the positive memory group but not in a group in which a neutral memory was stimulated or in a group expressing mCherry alone. c–e, c-Fos expression did not significantly increase in the lateral habenula (c), various ventral hippocampus subregions (d), or VTA, identified by tyrosine hydroxylase staining (red) stainings in the images expanded on the right (e) (one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n = 5 animals per group, 3–5 slices per animal). TS, tail suspension. Data are means ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 6 Activating a positive memory through the dentate gyrus of unstressed animals increases c-Fos expression in various downstream regions.

a, Diagram of regions analysed. b, In the positive compared to the neutral memory group, c-Fos expression is significantly increased in the lateral septum, NAcc shell, BLA, dorsomedial, ventromedial and lateral hypothalamus, but not in the mPFC, NAcc core, habenula, or ventral hippocampus. Trends were observed in the central amygdala (CeA) and VTA. Each brain region was analysed using an unpaired Student’s t test, n = 5 animals per group, 3–5 slices per animal; #P = 0.17 for central amygdala and P = 0.09 for VTA; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s., not significant. Data are means ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 7 Dopamine receptor antagonists block the light-induced effects of positive memory activation; a single session of activating a positive memory in the dentate gyrus does not produce long-lasting antidepressant-like effects.

a, Administration of a cocktail of dopamine receptor antagonists (DAx) prevented the light-induced increases in struggling during the tail suspension test. When animals were tested again on day 2 and infused with saline, the behavioural effects of optically reactivating a positive memory were observed (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, *P < 0.05, n = 9 per group). b, Animals in which a positive memory was optically activated during the tail suspension test or sucrose preference test showed acute increases in time struggling or preference for sucrose; this change in behaviour did not persist when tested again on day 2 (within subjects ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test), n = 9. n.s., not significant. Data are means ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 8 Chronic activation of a positive memory prevents stress-induced decreases in neurogenesis.

a, The 5-day positive memory stimulation group showed a significant increase of adult newborn cells in the dentate gyrus as measured by doublecortin (DCX)-positive cells (one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, F5,72 = 7.634, P < 0.01) relative to control groups. b–g, Representative images of DCX-positive cells in the dentate gyrus for the 5-day (b), 1-day (c), neutral (d), no stimulation (e), natural (f), and no stress (g) groups. h–m, Representative PSA-NCAM images corresponding to data appearing in Fig. 4d. n = 5 slices per animal, 13 animals per group for data appearing in a. *P < 0.05, n.s., not significant. Data are means ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 9 Behavioural and neuronal correlations.

a, Performance levels in the SPT and the number of adult-born neurons as measured by PSA-NCAM are positively correlated on an animal-by-animal basis. b, Performance levels between the TST and SPT show strong positive correlation trends on an animal-by-animal basis. n = 14 per TST behavioural group, n = 15 per SPT behavioural group.

Related audio

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramirez, S., Liu, X., MacDonald, C. et al. Activating positive memory engrams suppresses depression-like behaviour. Nature 522, 335–339 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14514

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14514

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing