Most molecular clouds are filamentary or elongated1,2,3. For those forming low-mass stars (<8 solar masses), the competition between self-gravity and turbulent pressure along the dynamically dominant intercloud magnetic field (10 to 100 parsecs) shapes the clouds to be elongated either perpendicularly4 or parallel5 to the fields. A recent study6 also suggested that on the scales of 0.1 to 0.01 parsecs, such fields are dynamically important within cloud cores forming massive stars (>8 solar masses). But whether the core field morphologies are inherited from the intercloud medium or governed by cloud turbulence is unknown, as is the effect of magnetic fields on cloud fragmentation at scales of 10 to 0.1 parsecs7,8,9. Here we report magnetic-field maps inferred from polarimetric observations of NGC 6334, a region forming massive stars, on the 100 to 0.01 parsec scale. NGC 6334 hosts young star-forming sites10,11,12 where fields are not severely affected by stellar feedback, and their directions do not change much over the entire scale range. This means that the fields are dynamically important. The ordered fields lead to a self-similar gas fragmentation: at all scales, there exist elongated gas structures nearly perpendicular to the fields. Many gas elongations have density peaks near the ends, which symmetrically pinch the fields. The field strength is proportional to the 0.4th power of the density, which is an indication of anisotropic gas contractions along the field. We conclude that magnetic fields have a crucial role in the fragmentation of NGC 6334.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
André, Ph. et al. From filamentary clouds to prestellar cores to the stellar IMF: initial highlights from the Herschel Gould Belt Survey. Astron. Astrophys. 518, L102–L108 (2010).
Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Pillai, T. & Rathborne, J. Fragmentation at the earliest phase of massive star formation. Astrophys. J. 696, 268–273 (2009).
Li, H.-b., Fang, M., Henning, T. & Kainulainen, J. The link between magnetic fields and filamentary clouds: bimodal cloud orientations in the Gould Belt. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 3707–3719 (2013).
Nakamura, F. & Li, Z.-Y. Magnetically regulated star formation in three dimensions: the case of the Taurus Molecular Cloud Complex. Astron. J. 687, 354–375 (2008).
Stone, J., Ostriker, E. & Gammie, C. Dissipation in compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Astrophys. J. 508, L99–L102 (1998).
Zhang, Q. et al. Magnetic fields and massive star formation. Astrophys. J. 792, 116–127 (2014).
Collins, D. et al. The two states of star-forming clouds. Astrophys. J. 750, 13–30 (2012).
Li, H.-b., Dowell, C., Goodman, A., Hildebrand, R. & Novak, G. Anchoring magnetic field in turbulent molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 704, 891–897 (2009).
Myers, A., McKee, C., Cunningham, A., Klein, R. & Krumholz, M. The fragmentation of magnetized, massive star-forming cores with radiative feedback. Astrophys. J. 766, 97–114 (2013).
McCutcheon, W. et al. Star formation in NGC 6334 I and I(N). Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 316, 152–164 (2000).
Beuther, H. et al. Hot ammonia in NGC 6334I & I(N). Astron. Astrophys. 466, 989–998 (2007).
Sandell, G. (Sub)mm continuum mapping of NGC 6334 I & I(N). A cobweb of filaments and protostars. Astron. Astrophys. 358, 242–256 (2000).
Li, H.-b. et al. Results of SPARO 2003: mapping magnetic fields in giant molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 648, 340–354 (2006).
Williams, J., Blitz, L. & McKee, C. in Protostars and Planets IV (eds Mannings, A., Boss, P. & Russell, S. ) 97–111 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2000).
Heiles, C. 9286 stars: an agglomeration of stellar polarization catalogs. Astron. J. 119, 923–927 (2000).
Schleuning, D. Far-infrared and submillimeter polarization of OMC-1: evidence for magnetically regulated star formation. Astrophys. J. 493, 811–825 (1998).
Girart, J., Rao, R. & Marrone, D. Magnetic fields in the formation of Sun-like stars. Science 313, 812–814 (2006).
Dotson, J. L. et al. 350 µm Polarimetry from the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. Astrophys. J. 186 (Suppl.). 406–426 (2010).
Li, H.-b., Houde, M., Lai, S.-p. & Sridharan, T. K. Tracing turbulent ambipolar diffusion in molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 718, 905–912 (2010).
Rodríguez, L. et al. Radio detection of the exciting sources of shell H II regions in NGC 6334. Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofís. 15, 194–196 (2003).
Chandrasekhar, S. & Fermi, E. Magnetic fields in spiral arms. Astrophys. J. 118, 113–115 (1953).
Falceta-Goncąlves, D., Lazarian, A. & Kowal, G. Studies of regular and random magnetic fields in the ISM: statistics of polarization vectors and the Chandrasekhar-Fermi technique. Astrophys. J. 679, 537–551 (2008).
Burkert, A. & Hartmann, L. Collapse and fragmentation in finite sheets. Astrophys. J. 616, 288–300 (2004).
Li, H.-b. et al. in Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R., Dullemond, C. & Henning, Th. ) 101–123 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2014).
Crutcher, R., Wandelt, B., Heiles, C., Falgarone, E. & Troland, T. Magnetic fields in interstellar clouds from Zeeman observations: inference of total field strengths by Bayesian analysis. Astrophys. J. 725, 466–479 (2010).
Matthews, H., McCutcheon, W., Kirk, H., White, G. & Cohen, M. The distribution and properties of cold dust in NGC 6334. Astron. J. 136, 2083–2101 (2008).
Hunter, T. et al. Millimeter multiplicity in NGC 6334 I and I(N). Astrophys. J. 649, 888–893 (2006).
Sarma, A., Troland, T., Roberts, D. & Crutcher, R. VLA OH and H I Zeeman observations of the NGC 6334 complex. Astrophys. J. 533, 271–280 (2000).
McKee, C., Zweibel, E. & Goodman, A. and Heiles, C. Magnetic fields in star-forming regions—theory. In Protostars and Planets III (eds Levy, E. & Lunine, J.). 327–366 (1993).
Vaillancourt, J. Observations of polarized dust emission at far-infrared through millimeter wavelengths. Astron. Soc. Pacif. Conf. Ser. 449, 169–181 (2011).
Chapman, N. et al. Alignment between flattened protostellar infall envelopes and ambient magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 770, 151–165 (2013).
Hull, C. et al. Misalignment of magnetic fields and outflows in protostellar cores. Astrophys. J. 768, 159–163 (2013).
Tomisaka, K. Origin of molecular outflow determined from thermal dust polarization. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 63, 147–158 (2011).
Hayes, J. et al. Simulating radiating and magnetized flows in multiple dimensions with ZEUS-MP. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 165, 188–228 (2006).
Nakano, T. & Nakamura, T. Gravitational instability of magnetized gaseous disks 6. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 30, 671–680 (1978).
Kainulainen, J., Beuther, H., Henning, T. & Plume, R. Probing the evolution of molecular cloud structure. From quiescence to birth. Astron. Astrophys. 508, L35–L38 (2009).
Froebrich, D. & Rowles, J. The structure of molecular clouds—II. Column density and mass distributions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, 1350–1357 (2010).
Elmegreen, B. On the rapid collapse and evolution of molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 668, 1064–1082 (2007).
Bertram, E., Federrath, C., Banerjee, R. & Klessen, R. Statistical analysis of the mass-to-flux ratio in turbulent cores: effects of magnetic field reversals and dynamo amplification. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 420, 3163–3173 (2012).
Lunttila, T., Padoan, P., Juvela, M. & Nordlund, A. The Super-Alfvénic model of molecular clouds: predictions for Zeeman splitting measurements. Astrophys. J. 686, L91–L94 (2008).
Mouschovias, T. & Tassis, K. Testing molecular-cloud fragmentation theories: self-consistent analysis of OH Zeeman observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 15–19 (2009).
Bourke, T., Myers, P., Robinson, G. & Hyland, A. New OH Zeeman measurements of magnetic field strengths in molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 554, 916–932 (2001).
Ostriker, E., Stone, J. & Gammie, C. Density, velocity, and magnetic field structure in turbulent molecular cloud models. Astrophys. J. 546, 980–1005 (2001).
Novak, G., Dotson, J. L. & Li, H. Dispersion of observed position angles of submillimeter polarization in molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 695, 1362–1369 (2009).
Kraemer, K. & Jackson, J. Molecular gas in the NGC 6334 star formation region. Astrophys. J. 124 (Suppl.). 439–463 (1999).
Heyer, M. & Brunt, C. The universality of turbulence in galactic molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 615, 45–48 (2004).
Strittmatter, P. Gravitational collapse in the presence of a magnetic field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 132, 359–378 (1966).
Chibueze, J. et al. Astrometry and spatio-kinematics of H2O masers in the massive star-forming region NGC 6334I(North) with VERA. Astrophys. J. 784, 114–121 (2014).
Reid, M. et al. Trigonometric parallaxes of high mass star forming regions: the structure and kinematics of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 783, 130–143 (2014).
We thank R. Blundell for the SMA Director’s Discretionary Time that allowed the project to take off. We also thank the SPARO team led by G. Novak and the Hertz team led by R. Hildebrand. Discussions with Z.-Y. Li and the proofread by D. Wilmshurst and T.T. Wu improved the manuscript. The experiment was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, project ECS 24300314; by CUHK Direct Grant for Research 2013-2014, project ‘Modelling Star Formation with GPU Computing’; and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft priority programme 1573, project number 46. The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
B is from Extended Data Table 1 and n is approximated by (M1 + M2)/D3. The uncertainties of M, D, d, and R (Extended Data Table 1) are propagated to B and n; the error bars of 1σ are shown. The slopes of the two dashed lines are 0.37 and 0.44. The ‘Curve Fitting’ toolbox of Matlab is used to fit the data. While projection may affect measurements of field strengths (though not much in our case owing to the special LOS), the exponent is less affected, because the effect is the same for all the densities if the field directions are aligned (Fig. 3).
Extended Data Figure 2 Simulated B–n relations and cloud elongation with various magnetic criticality numbers.
Blue lines are the results from the simulations (see text) with various initial uniform field strengths B0. The initial uniform density of the spherical cloud is n0. B and n are the mean values within a cloud (regions with n > n0). The MFRs normalized by the critical value43 (criticality numbers) are shown near the ends of each blue line. The slope should never go beyond 2/3 (the red dashed line), the condition of isotropic contraction. A simulation with the criticality number of 600 was also performed and the slope is exactly 2/3. The observed slope of NGC 6334 with a 95% confidence bound is shown by the shaded zone. The short-to-long axis ratio after ten million years of each simulation is shown within a blue oval shaped with the same axis ratio. For simplicity, the contour of 20% of the peak value is used to define the short and long axes of a cloud. The ratios are measured in the same way for Fig. 2a–d, and their mean and standard deviation are also shown within the green oval.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Yuen, K., Otto, F. et al. Self-similar fragmentation regulated by magnetic fields in a region forming massive stars. Nature 520, 518–521 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14291
Applied Optics (2020)
Magnetic Field Structure in Spheroidal Star-forming Clouds. II. Estimating Field Structure from Observed Maps
The Astrophysical Journal (2020)
Curvature of Magnetic Field Lines in Compressible Magnetized Turbulence: Statistics, Magnetization Predictions, Gradient Curvature, Modes, and Self-gravitating Media
The Astrophysical Journal (2020)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (2020)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (2020)