Ongoing hydrothermal activities within Enceladus

Subjects

Abstract

Detection of sodium-salt-rich ice grains emitted from the plume of the Saturnian moon Enceladus suggests that the grains formed as frozen droplets from a liquid water reservoir that is, or has been, in contact with rock1,2. Gravitational field measurements suggest a regional south polar subsurface ocean of about 10 kilometres thickness located beneath an ice crust 30 to 40 kilometres thick3. These findings imply rock–water interactions in regions surrounding the core of Enceladus. The resulting chemical ‘footprints’ are expected to be preserved in the liquid and subsequently transported upwards to the near-surface plume sources, where they eventually would be ejected and could be measured by a spacecraft4. Here we report an analysis of silicon-rich, nanometre-sized dust particles5,6,7,8 (so-called stream particles) that stand out from the water-ice-dominated objects characteristic of Saturn. We interpret these grains as nanometre-sized SiO2 (silica) particles, initially embedded in icy grains emitted from Enceladus’ subsurface waters and released by sputter erosion in Saturn’s E ring. The composition and the limited size range (2 to 8 nanometres in radius) of stream particles indicate ongoing high-temperature (>90 °C) hydrothermal reactions associated with global-scale geothermal activity that quickly transports hydrothermal products from the ocean floor at a depth of at least 40 kilometres up to the plume of Enceladus.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Identifying particle constituents.
Figure 2: Minimum temperatures for formation of silica nanoparticles.
Figure 3: A schematic of Enceladus’ interior.
Figure 4: Concentration of silica nanoparticles in E-ring grains.

References

  1. 1

    Postberg, F. et al. Sodium salts in E-ring ice grains from an ocean below the surface of Enceladus. Nature 459, 1098–1101 (2009)

  2. 2

    Postberg, F., Schmidt, J., Hillier, J., Kempf, S. & Srama, R. A salt-water reservoir as the source of a compositionally stratified plume on Enceladus. Nature 474, 620–622 (2011)

  3. 3

    Iess, L. et al. The gravity field and interior structure of Enceladus. Science 344, 78–80 (2014)

  4. 4

    Hillier, J. K. et al. The composition of Saturn’s E ring. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 377, 1588–1596 (2007)

  5. 5

    Kempf, S. et al. High-velocity streams of dust originating from Saturn. Nature 433, 289–291 (2005)

  6. 6

    Kempf, S. et al. Composition of Saturnian stream particles. Science 307, 1274–1276 (2005)

  7. 7

    Hsu, H.-W. et al. Stream particles as the probe of the dust-plasma-magnetosphere interaction at Saturn. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A09215 (2011)

  8. 8

    Hsu, H.-W., Krüger, H. & Postberg, F. in Nanodust in the Solar System: Discoveries and Interpretations (eds Mann, I., Meyer-Vernet, N. & Czechowski, A. ) 77–117 (Springer Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 385, 2012)

  9. 9

    Srama, R. et al. The Cassini cosmic dust analyzer. Space Sci. Rev. 114, 465–518 (2004)

  10. 10

    Postberg, F. et al. Discriminating contamination from particle components in spectra of Cassini’s dust detector CDA. Planet. Space Sci. 57, 1359–1374 (2009)

  11. 11

    Ming, T. et al. Meteoritic silicon carbide and its stellar sources — implications for galactic chemical evolution. Nature 339, 351–354 (1989)

  12. 12

    Iler, R. K. The Chemistry of Silica (Wiley & Sons, 1979)

  13. 13

    Allen, L. H. & Matijević, E. Stability of colloidal silica, I. Effect of simple electrolytes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 31, 287–296 (1969)

  14. 14

    Icopini, G. A., Brantley, S. L. & Heaney, P. J. Kinetics of silica oligomerization and nanocolloid formation as a function of pH and ionic strength at 25°C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 293–303 (2005)

  15. 15

    Conrad, C. F. et al. Modeling the kinetics of silica nanocolloid formation and precipitation in geologically relevant aqueous solutions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 531–542 (2007)

  16. 16

    Tobler, D. J., Shaw, S. & Benning, L. G. Quantification of initial steps of nucleation and growth of silica nanoparticles: an in-situ SAXS and DLS study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 5377–5393 (2009)

  17. 17

    Tobler, D. J. & Benning, L. G. In situ and time resolved nucleation and growth of silica nanoparticles forming under simulated geothermal conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 114, 156–168 (2013)

  18. 18

    Herzig, P. M. et al. Hydrothermal silica chimney fields in the Galapagos Spreading Center at 86° W. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 89, 261–272 (1988)

  19. 19

    Channing, A. & Butler, I. B. Cryogenic opal-A deposition from Yellowstone hot springs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 257, 121–131 (2007)

  20. 20

    Zolotov, M. Y. Aqueous fluid composition in CI chondritic materials: chemical equilibrium assessments in closed systems. Icarus 220, 713–729 (2012)

  21. 21

    Sirono, S. Differentiation of silicates from H2O ice in an icy body induced by ripening. Earth Planets Space 65, 1563–1568 (2013)

  22. 22

    Matson, D. L., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., Davies, A. G. & Johnson, T. V. Enceladus: a hypothesis for bringing both heat and chemicals to the surface. Icarus 221, 53–62 (2012)

  23. 23

    Schmidt, J., Brilliantov, N., Spahn, F. & Kempf, S. Slow dust in Enceladus’ plume from condensation and wall collisions in tiger stripe fractures. Nature 451, 685–688 (2008)

  24. 24

    Kempf, S. et al. The E ring in the vicinity of Enceladus. I. Spatial distribution and properties of the ring particles. Icarus 193, 420–437 (2008)

  25. 25

    Malamud, U. & Prialnik, D. Modeling serpentinization: applied to the early evolution of Enceladus and Mimas. Icarus 225, 763–774 (2013)

  26. 26

    Tielens, A. G. G. M. et al. The physics of grain-grain collisions and gas-grain sputtering in interstellar shocks. Astrophys. J. 431, 321–340 (1994)

  27. 27

    Spahn, F. et al. Cassini dust measurements at Enceladus and implications for the origin of the E ring. Science 311, 1416–1418 (2006)

  28. 28

    Horányi, M., Burns, J. & Hamilton, D. G. Dynamics of Saturn’s E ring particles. Icarus 97, 248–259 (1992)

  29. 29

    Horányi, M., Juhász, A. & Morfill, G. E. Large-scale structure of Saturn’s E-ring. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04203 (2008)

  30. 30

    Horányi, M. Dust streams from Jupiter and Saturn. Phys. Plasmas 7, 3847–3850 (2000)

  31. 31

    Burton, M. E., Dougherty, M. K. & Russell, C. T. Saturn’s internal planetary magnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L24105 (2010)

  32. 32

    Jurac, S., Johnson, R. E. & Richardson, J. D. Saturn’s E ring and production of neutral torus. Icarus 149, 384–396 (2001)

  33. 33

    Johnson, R. E. et al. Sputtering of ice grains and icy satellites in Saturn’s inner magnetosphere. Planet. Space Sci. 56, 1238–1243 (2008)

  34. 34

    Shi, M. et al. Sputtering of water ice surfaces and the production of extended neutral atmospheres. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 26387–26395 (1995)

  35. 35

    Hornung, K. & Kissel, J. On shock wave impact ionization of dust particles. Astron. Astrophys. 291, 324–336 (1994)

  36. 36

    Hornung, K., Malama, Y. & Kestenboim, K. Impact vaporization and ionization of cosmic dust particles. Astrophys. Space Sci. 274, 355–363 (2000)

  37. 37

    Postberg, F. et al. Composition of Jovian dust stream particles. Icarus 183, 122–134 (2006)

  38. 38

    Stephan, T. TOF-SIMS in cosmochemistry. Planet. Space Sci. 49, 859–906 (2001)

  39. 39

    Fiege, K. et al. Compositional analysis of interstellar dust as seen by the Cassini Cosmic Dust Analyser. In 76th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting,http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2013/pdf/5087.pdf (2013)

  40. 40

    Hsu, H.-W. et al. Probing IMF using nanodust measurements from inside Saturn’s magnetosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2902–2906 (2013)

  41. 41

    Shibuya, T. et al. Reactions between basalt and CO2-rich seawater at 250 and 350°C, 500 bars: implications for the CO2 sequestration into the modern oceanic crust and composition of hydrothermal vent fluid in the CO2-rich early ocean. Chem. Geol. 359, 1–9 (2013)

  42. 42

    Seyfried, W. E., Jr, Foustoukos, D. I. & Fu, Q. Redox evolution and mass transfer during serpentinization: an experimental and theoretical study at 200°C, 500 bar with implications for ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal systems at mid-ocean ridges. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 3872–3886 (2007)

  43. 43

    McCollom, T. M. & Seewald, J. S. Experimental constraints on the hydrothermal reactivity of organic acids and acid anions: I. Formic acid and formate. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 3625–3644 (2003)

  44. 44

    Vance, S. et al. Hydrothermal systems in small ocean planets. Astrobiology 7, 987–1005 (2007)

  45. 45

    Nakamura, T. et al. Chondrulelike objects in short-period comet 81P/Wild 2. Science 321, 1664–1667 (2008)

  46. 46

    Brearley, A. J. in Meteorites and the Early Solar System II (eds Lauretta, D. S. & McSween, H. Y. ) 587–624 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2006)

  47. 47

    Ozima, M. Growth of orthoenstatite crystals by the flux method. J. Jpn Assoc. Mineral. Petrol. Econ. Geol. 3 (suppl), 97–103 (1982); in Japanese with English abstract

  48. 48

    Tachibana, S., Tsuchiyama, A. & Nagahara, H. Experimental study of incongruent evaporation kinetics of enstatite in vacuum and in hydrogen gas. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66, 713–728 (2002)

  49. 49

    Johnson, J. W., Oelkers, E. H. & Helgeson, H. C. SUPCRT92: a software package for calculating the standard molal thermodynamic properties of minerals, gases, aqueous species, and reactions from 1 to 5000 bar and 0 to 1000°C. Comput. Geosci. 18, 899–947 (1992)

  50. 50

    Icenhower, J. P. & Dove, P. M. The dissolution kinetics of amorphous silica into sodium chloride solution: effects of temperature and ionic strength. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64, 4193–4203 (2000)

  51. 51

    Martens, H. R. et al. Observations of molecular oxygen ions in Saturn’s magnetosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20103 (2008)

  52. 52

    Christon, S. P. et al. Saturn suprathermal O2+ and mass-28+ molecular ions: long-term seasonal and solar variation. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3446–3463 (2013)

  53. 53

    Kempf, S. et al. The electrostatic potential of E ring particles. Planet. Space Sci. 54, 999–1006 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the CDA team, the Cassini project, and NASA. This research was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and by the Astrobiology Program of the National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Japan. This work was partly supported by the DLR grant 50 OH1103. We thank J. Schmidt, M. Y. Zolotov and D. J. Tobler for discussions, and E. S. Guralnick, J. K. Hillier, A. Rasca and T. Munsat for advice on writing this Letter. Y.S. thanks A. Okubo for her technical help in taking FE-SEM images.

Author information

H.-W.H., F.P. and Y.S. outlined the study and wrote the Letter. H.-W.H. performed the CDA dynamic analyses with assistance from A.J., M.H. and S.K.; F.P. and S.K. performed the CDA composition analyses; S.K., G.M.-K. and R.S. performed the CDA measurements and initial data processing; F.P. and N.A. performed the CDA mass spectra data acquisition and data reduction; Y.S. performed the experiments and calculations simulating Enceladus’ ocean conditions; T.S. designed the hydrothermal experiments and the analysis system; S.T. synthesized starting minerals for the experiments; K.S., Y.M. and T.K. contributed to performing fluid and solid analyses in the experiments; and S.-i.S. estimated the lifetime of silica nanoparticles in Enceladus’ ocean. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Correspondence to Hsiang-Wen Hsu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Maps of grain density, sputtering erosion rate, and stream particle production rate in the E-ring region.

a, The total E-ring ice grain surface area map in the ρz frame, where ρ and z are distance to Saturn’s rotation axis and to the ring plane, respectively. Note that each bin integrates azimuthally over the entire torus, meaning that the outer bins contain a much larger volume than do the inner ones. b, Plasma sputtering erosion rate of E-ring ice grains in torus segments. The total sputtering rate is 8.6 × 1024 H2O molecules per second, lower but still comparable to the 4.5 × 1025 H2O molecules per second derived in ref. 32. c, Normalized nanoparticle production rate in particles per second. RS, Saturn radius.

Extended Data Figure 2 Ejection probability of 5-nm particles from the E ring.

a, For silica nanoparticles, the ejection probability is mostly close to unity (except within 4.5RS). The higher local plasma density there leads to negative dust potential and thus reduces the ejection probability7. The typical timescale for silica nanoparticles to acquire sufficient kinetic energy to escape is of the order of a day7. b, Water ice nanoparticles have lower secondary emission and are charged less positively and thus are less likely to be ejected. This ‘forbidden region’ (the black region) extends further outward to 5.5 RS, consistent with the CDA measurements53.

Extended Data Figure 3 Stream particle emission patterns.

a, Ejection region (ER) profiles, derived from the nanodust and solar wind measurements (blue)7 and the ejection model (red), both peak at 7–9RS. The uncertainty of both profiles stems from the adopted co-rotation fraction of Saturn’s magnetosphere (80–100%), which determines the electromagnetic acceleration amplitude. The location of the outer rim of Saturn’s A ring and the orbits of icy satellites are marked by grey dashed lines. b, Latitudinal-dependent ejection pattern. Scatter and binned stream particle rates (normalized to 25RS distance) are shown in blue squares and crosses, respectively. The vertical length of the crosses represents the standard deviation of the stream particle rate in the corresponding bin. Our model (red) reproduces the measured trend. c, d, Modelled patterns assuming direct ejection from Enceladus. While the ER profile is similar, these particles are only ejected along the ring plane.

Extended Data Figure 4 Energy dispersive spectrum of clustered silica nanoparticles formed from the fluid sample.

See Methods for details.

Extended Data Table 1 Stream particle flux measurements

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, H., Postberg, F., Sekine, Y. et al. Ongoing hydrothermal activities within Enceladus. Nature 519, 207–210 (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14262

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.