Letter | Published:

Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps

Nature volume 522, pages 7780 (04 June 2015) | Download Citation

Abstract

Exceptionally preserved fossils from the Palaeozoic era provide crucial insights into arthropod evolution, with recent discoveries bringing phylogeny and character homology into sharp focus1,2,3,4. Integral to such studies are anomalocaridids, a clade of stem arthropods whose remarkable morphology illuminates early arthropod relationships5,6 and Cambrian ecology7,8,9. Although recent work has focused on the anomalocaridid head6,7,8,9,10, the nature of their trunk has been debated widely5,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Here we describe new anomalocaridid17 specimens from the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota of Morocco19, which not only show well-preserved head appendages providing key ecological data, but also elucidate the nature of anomalocaridid trunk flaps, resolving their homology with arthropod trunk limbs. The new material shows that each trunk segment bears a separate dorsal and ventral pair of flaps, with a series of setal blades attached at the base of the dorsal flaps. Comparisons with other stem lineage arthropods16,20,21,22 indicate that anomalocaridid ventral flaps are homologous with lobopodous walking limbs and the endopod of the euarthropod biramous limb, whereas the dorsal flaps and associated setal blades are homologous with the flaps of gilled lobopodians (for example, Kerygmachela kierkegaardi, Pambdelurion whittingtoni) and exites of the ‘Cambrian biramous limb’23. This evidence shows that anomalocaridids represent a stage before the fusion of exite and endopod into the ‘Cambrian biramous limb’5,16,23, confirming their basal placement in the euarthropod stem4,5,6, rather than in the arthropod crown24 or with cycloneuralian worms14. Unlike other anomalocaridids, the Fezouata taxon combines head appendages convergently9 adapted for filter-feeding with an unprecedented body length exceeding 2 m, indicating a new direction in the feeding ecology of the clade. The evolution of giant filter-feeding anomalocaridids may reflect the establishment of highly developed planktic ecosystems during the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event25.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Complex brains and optic lobes in an early Cambrian arthropod. Nature 490, 258–261 (2012)

  2. 2.

    , , & Specialized appendages in fuxianhuiids and the head organization of early euarthropods. Nature 494, 468–471 (2013)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Chelicerate neural ground pattern in a Cambrian great appendage arthropod. Nature 502, 364–367 (2013)

  4. 4.

    A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 417, 271–275 (2002)

  5. 5.

    , , , & The Burgess Shale anomalocaridid Hurdia and its significance for early euarthropod evolution. Science 323, 1597–1600 (2009)

  6. 6.

    , , , & Brain structure resolves the segmental affinity of anomalocaridid appendages. Nature 513, 538–542 (2014)

  7. 7.

    & New anomalocaridid appendages from the Burgess Shale, Canada. Palaeontology 53, 721–738 (2010)

  8. 8.

    et al. Acute vision in the giant Cambrian predator Anomalocaris and the origin of compound eyes. Nature 480, 237–240 (2011)

  9. 9.

    , , & A suspension-feeding anomalocarid from the Early Cambrian. Nature 507, 496–499 (2014)

  10. 10.

    & The oral cone of Anomalocaris is not a classic “peytoia”. Naturwissenschaften 99, 501–504 (2012)

  11. 11.

    & The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 309, 569–609 (1985)

  12. 12.

    Opabinia and Anomalocaris, unique Cambrian ‘arthropods’. Lethaia 19, 241–246 (1986)

  13. 13.

    , & Evidence for monophyly and arthropod affinity of Cambrian giant predators. Science 264, 1304–1308 (1994)

  14. 14.

    , & Anomalocaris and other large animals in the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Fauna of southwest China. GFF 117, 163–183 (1995)

  15. 15.

    The “evolution” of Anomalocaris and its classification in the arthropod class Dinocarida (nov) and order Radiodonta (nov). J. Paleontol. 70, 280–293 (1996)

  16. 16.

    The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem-group. Lethaia 29, 1–14 (1996)

  17. 17.

    & A giant Ordovician anomalocaridid. Nature 473, 510–513 (2011)

  18. 18.

    & Morphology of Anomalocaris canadensis from the Burgess Shale. J. Paleontol. 88, 68–91 (2013)

  19. 19.

    et al. Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465, 215–218 (2010)

  20. 20.

    A Cambrian gilled lobopod from Greenland. Nature 364, 709–711 (1993)

  21. 21.

    The morphology and phylogenetic significance of Kerygmachela kierkegaardi Budd (Buen Formation, Lower Cambrian, N Greenland). Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 89, 249–290 (1999)

  22. 22.

    & The lobes and lobopods of Opabinia regalis from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Lethaia 45, 83–95 (2012)

  23. 23.

    & The clonal composition of biramous and uniramous arthropod limbs. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1023–1028 (2008)

  24. 24.

    , , , & Functional morphology, ontogeny and evolution of mantis shrimp-like predators in the Cambrian. Palaeontology 55, 369–399 (2012)

  25. 25.

    , , , & The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): the palaeoecological dimension. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 294, 99–119 (2010)

  26. 26.

    & The nature and significance of the appendages of Opabinia from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Lethaia 40, 161–173 (2007)

  27. 27.

    , & Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod. Biol. Lett. 4, 106–109 (2008)

  28. 28.

    & Arthropleura und Diplopoda (Arthropoda) aus dem Unter-Rotliegend (Unter-Perm, Assel) des Thüringer Waldes (Südwest-Saale-Senke). Veröff. Naturhist. Mus. Schleusingen 13, 19–36 (1998)

  29. 29.

    et al. 100-million-year dynasty of giant planktivorous bony fishes in the Mesozoic seas. Science 327, 990–993 (2010)

  30. 30.

    & Climate, critters, and cetaceans: Cenozoic drivers of the evolution of modern whales. Science 327, 993–996 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

M. and B. ‘Ou Said’ Ben Moula discovered the specimens and provided support in the field. S. Beardmore, D. Field, A. Little, R. Racicot and O. E. Tetlie assisted with fieldwork in 2011. L. Ben Moula and B. Tahiri provided practical assistance. J.-B. Caron loaned specimens of Hurdia from ROM collections. S. Butts and J. Utrup, K. Hollis and D. Erwin curated specimens and facilitated access to the collections at the YPM and USNM respectively. N. Utrup built custom cradles to support the articulated specimens. J. Vinther and P. Hull discussed filter-feeding and gigantism, and J. Lamsdell eurypterid book gills and phylogenetic methodology. E. Martin made available precise biostratigraphical data for the localities. G. Edgecombe provided unpublished observations on Cucumericrus. M. Collins discussed appendage function and prepared the digital reconstruction (Fig. 3). M. Fox advised on preparation and consolidation techniques and provided equipment. C. Graham and J. Slawski provided support and access to digital imaging facilities. The initial part of the research was done while P.V.R. was at Ghent University and in receipt of a mobility grant from the Biology Commission of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). A.C.D. was financially supported by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) and the Oxford University Museum of Natural History. The research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant EAR-1053247 and by the Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, YPM.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • Peter Van Roy
    •  & Derek E. G. Briggs
  2. Research Unit Palaeontology, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

    • Peter Van Roy
  3. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

    • Allison C. Daley
  4. Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK

    • Allison C. Daley
  5. Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • Derek E. G. Briggs

Authors

  1. Search for Peter Van Roy in:

  2. Search for Allison C. Daley in:

  3. Search for Derek E. G. Briggs in:

Contributions

All authors, led by P.V.R., participated in the interpretation of the material and reconstruction of A. benmoulae and contributed to writing and editing the manuscript. P.V.R. and A.C.D. examined the material of P. nathorsti at the USNM and conducted the phylogenetic analyses. P.V.R. conducted fieldwork in Morocco, prepared and photographed Fezouata specimens, made preliminary reconstructions and composed the figures. A.C.D. photographed Burgess Shale specimens, prepared all explanatory specimen drawings and made the Burgess Shale figure.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Van Roy.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains additional detailed description and interpretation; discussion of functional morphology, mode of life, presence of dorsal flaps and trunk limbs in other anomalocaridids, and phylogenetic position; comparison with other taxa; a list of previously figured Aegirocassis benmoulae specimens and Supplementary References.

Text files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data

    This file contains the phylogenetic matrix used for the phylogenetic analysis, including the data matrix.

Videos

  1. 1.

    Video clarifying the position of the separate block and the relationship of dorsal and ventral flaps in the complete holotype YPM 237172, and the relationship between the lateral and central carapace elements in paratype YPM 525437.

    This video clarifies the position of the separate block and the relationship of dorsal and ventral flaps in the complete holotype YPM 237172, and the relationship between the lateral and central carapace elements in paratype YPM 525437.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14256

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.