Letter | Published:

An ultraluminous quasar with a twelve-billion-solar-mass black hole at redshift 6.30

Nature volume 518, pages 512515 (26 February 2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

So far, roughly 40 quasars with redshifts greater than z = 6 have been discovered1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Each quasar contains a black hole with a mass of about one billion solar masses (109 )2,6,7,9,10,11,12,13. The existence of such black holes when the Universe was less than one billion years old presents substantial challenges to theories of the formation and growth of black holes and the coevolution of black holes and galaxies14. Here we report the discovery of an ultraluminous quasar, SDSS J010013.02+280225.8, at redshift z = 6.30. It has an optical and near-infrared luminosity a few times greater than those of previously known z > 6 quasars. On the basis of the deep absorption trough15 on the blue side of the Lyman-α emission line in the spectrum, we estimate the proper size of the ionized proximity zone associated with the quasar to be about 26 million light years, larger than found with other z > 6.1 quasars with lower luminosities16. We estimate (on the basis of a near-infrared spectrum) that the black hole has a mass of 1.2 × 1010 , which is consistent with the 1.3 × 1010 derived by assuming an Eddington-limited accretion rate.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. A survey of z > 5.7 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. II. Discovery of three additional quasars at z > 6. Astron. J. 125, 1649–1659 (2003)

  2. 2.

    et al. Gemini near-infrared spectroscopy of luminous z 6 quasars: chemical abundances, black hole masses, and Mg II absorption. Astron. J. 134, 1150–1161 (2007)

  3. 3.

    et al. Four quasars above redshift 6 discovered by the Canada-France high-z quasar survey. Astron. J. 134, 2435–2450 (2007)

  4. 4.

    et al. A survey of z 6 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey deep stripe. I. A flux-limited sample at zAB < 21. Astron. J. 135, 1057–1066 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. The Canada-France high-z quasar survey: nine new quasars and the luminosity function at redshift 6. Astron. J. 139, 906–918 (2010)

  6. 6.

    et al. A luminous quasar at a redshift of z = 7.085. Nature 474, 616–619 (2011)

  7. 7.

    et al. Discovery of three z > 6.5 quasars in the VISTA Kilo-Degree Infrared Galaxy (VIKING) Survey. Astrophys. J. 779, 24–36 (2013)

  8. 8.

    et al. Discovery of eight z 6 quasars from Pan-STARRS. Astron. J. 148, 14–25 (2014)

  9. 9.

    , & A 3 × 109 black hole in the quasar SDSS J1148+5251 at z = 6.41. Astrophys. J. 587, L15–L18 (2003)

  10. 10.

    et al. Black hole masses and enrichment of z 6 SDSS quasars. Astrophys. J. 669, 32–44 (2007)

  11. 11.

    et al. Eddington-limited accretion and the black hole mass function at redshift 6. Astron. J. 140, 546–560 (2010)

  12. 12.

    et al. Evidence for non-evolving Fe II/Mg II ratios in rapidly accreting z 6 QSOs. Astrophys. J. 739, 56–69 (2011)

  13. 13.

    et al. Black hole mass estimates and emission-line properties of a sample of redshift z >6.5 quasars. Astrophys. J. 790, 145–158 (2014)

  14. 14.

    The formation and evolution of massive black holes. Science 337, 544–547 (2012)

  15. 15.

    & On the density of neutral hydrogen in intergalactic space. Astrophys. J. 142, 1633–1641 (1965)

  16. 16.

    , & Observational constraints on cosmic reionization. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 415–462 (2006)

  17. 17.

    et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: technical summary. Astron. J. 120, 1579–1587 (2000)

  18. 18.

    et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 131, 1163–1183 (2006)

  19. 19.

    et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010)

  20. 20.

    et al. SDSS quasars in the WISE preliminary data release and quasar candidate selection with optical/infrared colours. Astron. J. 144, 49–59 (2012)

  21. 21.

    et al. A catalog of quasar properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7. Astrophys. J. 194 (suppl.). 45–65 (2011)

  22. 22.

    et al. The discovery of a high-redshift quasar without emission lines from Sloan Digital Sky Survey commissioning data. Astrophys. J. 526, L57–L60 (1999)

  23. 23.

    et al. Thermal emission from warm dust in the most distant quasars. Astrophys. J. 687, 848–858 (2008)

  24. 24.

    et al. Composite quasar spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astron. J. 122, 549–564 (2001)

  25. 25.

    et al. Ionization near zones associated with quasars at z 6. Astrophys. J. 714, 834–839 (2010)

  26. 26.

    & The cosmological evolution of quasar black hole masses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 352, 1390–1404 (2004)

  27. 27.

    et al. Central masses and broad-line region sizes of active galactic nuclei. II. A homogeneous analysis of a large reverberation-mapping database. Astrophys. J. 613, 682–699 (2004)

  28. 28.

    et al. Two ten-billion-solar-mass black holes at the centres of giant elliptical galaxies. Nature 480, 215–218 (2011)

  29. 29.

    et al. Constraining reionization with the evolution of the luminosity function of Lyα emitting galaxies. Astron. J. 623, 627–631 (2005)

  30. 30.

    et al. Molecular gas in z 6 quasar host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 714, 699–712 (2010)

  31. 31.

    et al. The multi-object double spectrographs for the Large Binocular Telescope. Proc. SPIE 7735, 9–16 (2010)

  32. 32.

    & An empirical ultraviolet template for iron emission in quasars as derived from I Zwicky 1. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 134, 1–33 (2001)

  33. 33.

    et al. The black hole mass-galaxy bulge relationship for QSOs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 3. Astrophys. J. 662, 131–144 (2007)

  34. 34.

    & Mass functions of the active black holes in distant quasars from the Large Bright Quasar Survey, the Bright Quasar Survey, and the color-selected sample of the SDSS Fall Equatorial Stripe. Astrophys. J. 699, 800–816 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

X.-B.W. thanks the NSFC (grant nos 11033001 and 11373008), the Strategic Priority Research Program ‘The Emergence of Cosmological Structures’ of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB09000000), and the National Key Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2014CB845700) for support. X.F., R.W. and I.D.M. thank the US NSF (grant nos AST 08-06861 and AST 11-07682) for support. R.W. thanks the NSFC (grant no. 11443002) for support. We acknowledge the support of the staff of the Lijiang 2.4-m telescope. Funding for the telescope was provided by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the People’s Government of Yunnan Province. This research uses data obtained through the Telescope Access Program (TAP), which has been funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program ‘The Emergence of Cosmological Structures’ (grant no. XDB09000000), National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Special Fund for Astronomy from the Ministry of Finance of China. We thank D. Osip for help with Magellan/FIRE spectroscopy, and Y.-L. Ai, L. C. Ho, Y. Shen and J.-G. Wang for suggestions about data analyses. We acknowledge the use of SDSS, 2MASS and WISE data, and of the MMT, LBT, Gemini and Magellan telescopes; detailed acknowledgments of these facilities can be found in Supplementary Information.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    • Xue-Bing Wu
    • , Feige Wang
    • , Jinyi Yang
    •  & Qian Yang
  2. Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    • Xue-Bing Wu
    • , Feige Wang
    • , Xiaohui Fan
    • , Linhua Jiang
    • , Ran Wang
    • , Jinyi Yang
    •  & Qian Yang
  3. Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0065, USA

    • Xiaohui Fan
    •  & Ian D. McGreer
  4. Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China

    • Weimin Yi
  5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    • Weimin Yi
  6. Key Laboratory for the Structure and Evolution of Celestial Objects, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China

    • Weimin Yi
  7. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China

    • Wenwen Zuo
  8. Mount Stromlo Observatory, Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Weston Creek, Australian Capital Territory 2611, Australia

    • Fuyan Bian
  9. Large Binocular Telescope Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

    • David Thompson
  10. Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Colina el Pino, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile

    • Yuri Beletsky

Authors

  1. Search for Xue-Bing Wu in:

  2. Search for Feige Wang in:

  3. Search for Xiaohui Fan in:

  4. Search for Weimin Yi in:

  5. Search for Wenwen Zuo in:

  6. Search for Fuyan Bian in:

  7. Search for Linhua Jiang in:

  8. Search for Ian D. McGreer in:

  9. Search for Ran Wang in:

  10. Search for Jinyi Yang in:

  11. Search for Qian Yang in:

  12. Search for David Thompson in:

  13. Search for Yuri Beletsky in:

Contributions

X.-B.W., F.W. and X.F. planned the study, and wrote the draft version of the paper. All other co-authors contributed extensively and equally to the observations, data analyses and writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue-Bing Wu.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains additional acknowledgments.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14241

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.