The timing and strength of wind-driven coastal upwelling along the eastern margins of major ocean basins regulate the productivity of critical fisheries and marine ecosystems by bringing deep and nutrient-rich waters to the sunlit surface, where photosynthesis can occur1,2,3. How coastal upwelling regimes might change in a warming climate is therefore a question of vital importance4,5. Although enhanced land–ocean differential heating due to greenhouse warming has been proposed to intensify coastal upwelling by strengthening alongshore winds6, analyses of observations and previous climate models have provided little consensus on historical and projected trends in coastal upwelling7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Here we show that there are strong and consistent changes in the timing, intensity and spatial heterogeneity of coastal upwelling in response to future warming in most Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems (EBUSs). An ensemble of climate models shows that by the end of the twenty-first century the upwelling season will start earlier, end later and become more intense at high but not low latitudes. This projected increase in upwelling intensity and duration at high latitudes will result in a substantial reduction of the existing latitudinal variation in coastal upwelling. These patterns are consistent across three of the four EBUSs (Canary, Benguela and Humboldt, but not California). The lack of upwelling intensification and greater uncertainty associated with the California EBUS may reflect regional controls associated with the atmospheric response to climate change. Given the strong linkages between upwelling and marine ecosystems14,15, the projected changes in the intensity, timing and spatial structure of coastal upwelling may influence the geographical distribution of marine biodiversity.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Chavez, F. P. & Messié, M. A comparison of Eastern Boundary Upwelling Ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 80–96 (2009)
Barth, J. A. et al. Delayed upwelling alters nearshore coastal ocean ecosystems in the northern California current. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3719–3724 (2007)
Menge, B. A. & Menge, D. N. L. Dynamics of coastal meta-ecosystems: the intermittent upwelling hypothesis and a test in rocky intertidal regions. Ecol. Monogr. 83, 283–310 (2013)
Harley, C. D. G. et al. The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol. Lett. 9, 228–241 (2006)
Doney, S. C. et al. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 11–37 (2012)
Bakun, A. Global climate change and intensification of coastal ocean upwelling. Science 247, 198–201 (1990)
McGregor, H. V., Dima, M., Fischer, H. W. & Mulitza, S. Rapid 20th-century increase in coastal upwelling off northwest Africa. Science 315, 637–639 (2007)
García-Reyes, M. & Largier, J. Observations of increased wind-driven coastal upwelling off central California. J. Geophys. Res. 115, C04011 (2010)
Narayan, N., Paul, A., Mulitza, S. & Schulz, M. Trends in coastal upwelling intensity during the late 20th century. Ocean Sci. 6, 815–823 (2010)
Barton, E. D. D., Field, D. B. B. & Roy, C. Canary current upwelling: more or less? Prog. Oceanogr. 116, 167–178 (2013)
Mote, P. W. & Mantua, N. J. Coastal upwelling in a warmer future. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2138 (2002)
Snyder, M. A., Sloan, L. C., Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Bell, J. L. Future climate change and upwelling in the California Current. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1823 (2003)
Wang, M., Overland, J. E. & Bond, N. A. Climate projections for selected large marine ecosystems. J. Mar. Syst. 79, 258–266 (2010)
Blanchette, C. A. et al. Biogeographical patterns of rocky intertidal communities along the Pacific coast of North America. J. Biogeogr. 35, 1593–1607 (2008)
Fenberg, P. B., Menge, B. A., Raimondi, P. T. & Rivadeneira, M. M. Biogeographic structure of the northeastern Pacific rocky intertidal: the role of upwelling and dispersal to drive patterns. Ecography 38, 83–95 (2015)
Pauly, D. & Christensen, V. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374, 255–257 (1995)
Iles, A. C. et al. Climate-driven trends and ecological implications of event-scale upwelling in the California Current System. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 783–796 (2012)
Gutiérrez, D. et al. Coastal cooling and increased productivity in the main upwelling zone off Peru since the mid-twentieth century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L07603 (2011)
Santos, F., Gomez-Gesteira, M., DeCastro, M. & Alvarez, I. Differences in coastal and oceanic SST trends due to the strengthening of coastal upwelling along the Benguela current system. Cont. Shelf Res. 34, 79–86 (2012)
Lemos, R. T. & Pires, H. O. The upwelling regime off the West Portuguese Coast, 1941–2000. Int. J. Clim. 24, 511–524 (2004)
Sydeman, W. J. et al. Climate change and wind intensification in coastal upwelling ecosystems. Science 345, 77–80 (2014)
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012)
Schwing, F. B., Murphree, T., deWitt, L. & Green, P. M. The evolution of oceanic and atmospheric anomalies in the northeast Pacific during the El Niño and La Niña events of 1995–2001. Prog. Oceanogr. 54, 459–491 (2002)
Di Lorenzo, E. et al. North Pacific Gyre Oscillation links ocean climate and ecosystem change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L08607 (2008)
Chenillat, F., Rivière, P., Capet, X., Di Lorenzo, E. & Blanke, B. North Pacific Gyre Oscillation modulates seasonal timing and ecosystem functioning in the California Current upwelling system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L01606 (2012)
Jacox, M. G., Moore, A. M., Edwards, C. A. & Fiechter, J. Spatially resolved upwelling in the California Current System and its connections to climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3189–3196 (2014)
Cropper, T. E., Hanna, E. & Bigg, G. R. Spatial and temporal seasonal trends in coastal upwelling off Northwest Africa, 1981–2012. Deep-Sea Res. I 86, 94–111 (2014)
Belmadani, A., Echevin, V., Codron, F., Takahashi, K. & Junquas, C. What dynamics drive future wind scenarios for coastal upwelling off Peru and Chile? Clim. Dyn. 43, 1893–1914 (2014)
Grantham, B. A. et al. Upwelling-driven nearshore hypoxia signals ecosystem and oceanographic changes in the northeast Pacific. Nature 429, 749–754 (2004)
Roemmich, D. &McGowan, J. Climatic warming and the decline of zooplankton in the California Current. Science 267, 1324–1326 (1995)
Trenberth, K. E., Large, W. G. & Olson, J. G. The mean annual cycle in global ocean wind stress. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 20, 1742–1760 (1990)
Schwing, F. B., O’Farrell, M., Steger, J. M. & Baltz, K. Coastal Upwelling Indices, West Coast of North America, 1946-1995. NOAA Tech. Mem. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-231 (US Dept of Commerce, 1996)
Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996)
Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011)
Schwing, F. B. et al. Delayed coastal upwelling along the U.S. West Coast in 2005: a historical perspective. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L22S01 (2006)
Bograd, S. J. et al. Phenology of coastal upwelling in the California Current. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L01602 (2009)
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (Cambridge University Press)
Tebaldi, C., Arblaster, J. M. & Knutti, R. Mapping model agreement on future climate projections. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L23701 (2011)
Rykaczewski, R. R. & Checkley, D. M. Influence of ocean winds on the pelagic ecosystem in upwelling regions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1965–1970 (2008)
Pickett, M. H. & Schwing, F. B. Evaluating upwelling estimates off the west coasts of North and South America. Fish. Oceanogr. 15, 256–269 (2006)
Pickett, M. H. & Paduan, J. D. Ekman transport and pumping in the California Current based on the U.S. Navy’s high-resolution atmospheric model (COAMPS). J. Geophys. Res. 108, 3327 (2003)
This work was funded by grants from Northeastern University’s Interdisciplinary Research Program and the US National Science Foundation’s Expeditions in Computing program (award no. 1029711). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Program’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling, which is responsible for CMIP5, and we thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP5 the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Also shown are Aqua MODIS mean ocean chlorophyll a concentrations for 2002–2013 (colour scale) and mean QuikSCAT ocean surface vector winds for 1999–2009 (white arrows) for the CalCS (a), CanCS (b), HCS (c) and BCS (d). The longitudes, latitudes and coast angles of all the locations (open stars) are given in Extended Data Table 1.
Multimodel mean (solid lines) and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shading) of linear trends in the onset date (a, b) and termination date (c, d) of the upwelling season for 1950–2099 in all four EBUSs. Filled circles represent trends that are robust across climate models (that is, at least 50% of the models show a statistically significant trend and at least 80% of those agree on the sign of the trend). The bootstrap confidence intervals were computed from 999 samples.
a–d, Generalized least-squares linear trends of upwelling duration for 1950–2099 in the CalCS (a), CanCS (b), HCS (c) and BCS (d). Red and blue respectively indicate positive and negative trend values. Crosses denote trend values that are statistically significant (P value <0.05). The first 22 columns are 22 CMIP5 models; the last column is the multimodel mean. e–h, Same as a–d but for the onset date of the upwelling season. i–l, Same as a–d but for the termination date of the upwelling season. m–p, Same as a–d but for upwelling intensity.
Multimodel mean (thick lines) and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shading) of the spatial standard deviation of the onset date (a) and termination date (b) of the upwelling season for 1950–2099 in all four EBUSs. The thin straight lines indicate linear trends of the multimodel mean time series. The bootstrap confidence intervals are computed from 999 samples.
Extended Data Figure 5 Trends in the spatial heterogeneity of coastal upwelling for individual CMIP5 models.
a–d, Linear trends of the spatial standard deviation of the upwelling duration for 1950–2099 in the CalCS (a), CanCS (b), HCS (c) and BCS (d). Error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals. The first 22 bars are 22 CMIP5 models; the last bar is the multimodel mean. e–h, Same as a–d but for the onset date of the upwelling season. i–l, Same as a–d but for the termination date of the upwelling season. m–p, Same as a–d but for the upwelling intensity.
Multimodel mean (thick lines) and 95% confidence intervals (shading) of the latitudinal slope coefficients of the duration (a; day per degree latitude), onset date (b; day per degree latitude) and termination date (c; day per degree latitude) of the upwelling season, and of the upwelling intensity (d; m2 s−1 per degree latitude) for 1950–2099 in all four EBUSs. The thin straight lines indicate linear trends of the multimodel mean time series.
Multimodel mean daily offshore Ekman transport for 1950–1999 (blue curve) and 2050–1099 (red curve) averaged over the three highest latitudes in the CalCS (a), CanCS (b), HCS (c) and BCS (d). Positive and negative temporal trends in the daily Ekman transport occur when the red curve is above and, respectively, below the blue curve. These increases and decreases in upwelling transport are also highlighted by the red and, respectively, blue shading between the curves. The onset and termination of the upwelling season correspond to the times of the year when the daily Ekman transport first and, respectively, last reaches zero.
a–d, 50-year median change in the upwelling duration for 1950–1999 and 2050–2099 in the CalCS (a), CanCS (b), HCS (c) and BCS (d). Red and blue respectively indicate positive and negative trend values. Crosses denote changes that are statistically significant (P value <0.05) according to the Mann–Whitney U test. The first 22 columns are 22 CMIP5 models; the last column is the multimodel mean. e–h, Same as a–d but for the onset date of the upwelling season. i–l, Same as a–d but for the termination date of the upwelling season. m–p, Same as a–d but for the upwelling intensity.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, D., Gouhier, T., Menge, B. et al. Intensification and spatial homogenization of coastal upwelling under climate change. Nature 518, 390–394 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14235
Return of the “age of dinoflagellates” in Monterey Bay: Drivers of dinoflagellate dominance examined using automated imaging flow cytometry and long-term time series analysis
Limnology and Oceanography (2020)
Ecological change in dynamic environments: Accounting for temporal environmental variability in studies of ocean change biology
Global Change Biology (2020)
Phytoplankton response to nutrient pulses in an upwelling system assessed through a microcosm experiment (Algarrobo Bay, Chile)
Ocean & Coastal Management (2020)
Effects of upwelling duration and phytoplankton growth regime on dissolved-oxygen levels in an idealized Iberian Peninsula upwelling system
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (2020)