Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Physical mechanism for gating and mechanosensitivity of the human TRAAK K+ channel


Activation of mechanosensitive ion channels by physical force underlies many physiological processes including the sensation of touch, hearing and pain1,2,3,4,5. TRAAK (also known as KCNK4) ion channels are neuronally expressed members of the two-pore domain K+ (K2P) channel family and are mechanosensitive6. They are involved in controlling mechanical and temperature nociception in mice7. Mechanosensitivity of TRAAK is mediated directly through the lipid bilayer—it is a membrane-tension-gated channel8. However, the molecular mechanism of TRAAK channel gating and mechanosensitivity is unknown. Here we present crystal structures of TRAAK in conductive and non-conductive conformations defined by the presence of permeant ions along the conduction pathway. In the non-conductive state, a lipid acyl chain accesses the channel cavity through a 5 Å-wide lateral opening in the membrane inner leaflet and physically blocks ion passage. In the conductive state, rotation of a transmembrane helix (TM4) about a central hinge seals the intramembrane opening, preventing lipid block of the cavity and permitting ion entry. Additional rotation of a membrane interacting TM2–TM3 segment, unique to mechanosensitive K2Ps, against TM4 may further stabilize the conductive conformation. Comparison of the structures reveals a biophysical explanation for TRAAK mechanosensitivity—an expansion in cross-sectional area up to 2.7 nm2 in the conductive state is expected to create a membrane-tension-dependent energy difference between conformations that promotes force activation. Our results show how tension of the lipid bilayer can be harnessed to control gating and mechanosensitivity of a eukaryotic ion channel.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Structures of TRAAK in non-conductive and conductive conformations.
Figure 2: Redox-dependent activation of a TRAAK double cysteine mutant between TM2 and TM4.
Figure 3: Conformational changes in conductive TRAAK structures expand the channel cross-sectional area.
Figure 4: Model for TRAAK gating and physical basis of mechanosensitivity.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank


  1. Arnadóttir, J. & Chalfie, M. Eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Ann. Rev. Biophysics 39, 111–137 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bautista, D. M. & Lumpkin, E. A. Probing mammalian touch transduction. J. Gen. Physiol. 138, 291–301 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Delmas, P. & Coste, B. Mechano-gated ion channels in sensory systems. Cell 155, 278–284 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nilius, B. & Honore, E. Sensing pressure with ion channels. Trends Neurosci. 35, 477–486 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anishkin, A., Loukin, S. H., Teng, J. & Kung, C. Feeling the hidden mechanical forces in lipid bilayer is an original sense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7898–7905 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink, M. et al. A neuronal two P domain K+ channel stimulated by arachidonic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids. EMBO J. 17, 3297–3308 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Noël, J. et al. The mechano-activated K+ channels TRAAK and TREK-1 control both warm and cold perception. EMBO J. 28, 1308–1318 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brohawn, S. G., Su, Z. & MacKinnon, R. Mechanosensitivity is mediated directly by the lipid membrane in TRAAK and TREK1 K+ channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3614–3619 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kung, C., Martinac, B. & Sukharev, S. I. Mechanosensitive channels in microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 313–329 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sukharev, S. I., Blount, P., Martinac, B. & Kung, C. Mechanosensitive channels of Escherichia coli: the MscL gene, protein, and activities. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59, 633–657 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perozo, E., Cortes, D. M., Sompornpisut, P., Kloda, A. & Martinac, B. Open channel structure of MscL and the gating mechanism of mechanosensitive channels. Nature 418, 942–948 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brohawn, S. G., del Mármol, J. & MacKinnon, R. Crystal structure of the human K2P TRAAK, a lipid- and mechano-sensitive K+ ion channel. Science 335, 436–441 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brohawn, S. G., Campbell, E. B. & MacKinnon, R. Domain-swapped chain connectivity and gated membrane access in a Fab-mediated crystal of the human TRAAK K+ channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2129–2134 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, A. N. & Long, S. B. Crystal structure of the human two–pore domain potassium channel K2P1. Science 335, 432–436 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. del Camino, D. & Yellen, G. Tight steric closure at the intracellular activation gate of a voltage-gated K+ channel. Neuron 32, 649–656 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, Y. et al. The open pore conformation of potassium channels. Nature 417, 523–526 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harinath, S. & Sikdar, S. K. Trichloroethanol enhances the activity of recombinant human TREK-1 and TRAAK channels. Neuropharmacology 46, 750–760 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips, R., Ursell, T., Wiggins, P. & Sens, P. Emerging roles for lipids in shaping membrane-protein function. Nature 459, 379–385 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Opsahl, L. R. & Webb, W. W. Lipid–glass adhesion in giga-sealed patch-clamped membranes. Biophys. J. 66, 75–79 (1994)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ursell, T., Kondev, J., Reeves, D., Wiggins, P. A. & Phillips, R. in Mechanosensitive Ion Channels (eds Kamkin, A. & Kiseleva, I. ) 1, 37–70 (Springer, 2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Enyedi, P. & Czirják, G. Molecular background of leak K+ currents: two-pore domain potassium channels. Physiol. Rev. 90, 559–605 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Honoré, E., Patel, A. J., Chemin, J., Suchyna, T. & Sachs, F. Desensitization of mechano-gated K2P channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6859–6864 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maksaev, G., Milac, A., Anishkin, A., Guy, H. R. & Sukharev, S. I. Analyses of gating thermodynamics and effects of deletions in the mechanosensitive channel TREK-1: comparisons with structural models. Channels 5, 26–34 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chemin, J. et al. A phospholipid sensor controls mechanogating of the K+ channel TREK-1. EMBO J. 24, 44–53 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murbartián, J., Lei, Q., Sando, J. J. & Bayliss, D. A. Sequential phosphorylation mediates receptor- and kinase-induced inhibition of TREK-1 background potassium channels. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30175–30184 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel, A. J. et al. A mammalian two pore domain mechano-gated S-like K+ channel. EMBO J. 17, 4283–4290 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Honoré, E., Maingret, F., Lazdunski, M. & Patel, A. J. An intracellular proton sensor commands lipid- and mechano-gating of the K+ channel TREK-1. EMBO J. 21, 2968–2976 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bagriantsev, S. N., Clark, K. A. & Minor, D. L. Metabolic and thermal stimuli control K2P2.1 (TREK-1) through modular sensory and gating domains. EMBO J. 31, 3297–3308 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aryal, P., Abd-Wahab, F., Bucci, G., Sansom, M. S. P. & Tucker, S. J. A hydrophobic barrier deep within the inner pore of the TWIK-1 K2P potassium channel. Nature Commun. 5, 4377 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Minor, W., Cymborowski, M., Otwinowski, Z. & Chruszcz, M. HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution–from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 859–866 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Karplus, P. A. & Diederichs, K. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030–1033 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Cryst. D66, 12–21 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Read, R. J. & McCoy, A. J. Using SAD data in Phaser. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 338–344 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brooks, B. R. et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1545–1614 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jo, S., Kim, T. & Im, W. Automated builder and database of protein/membrane complexes for molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS ONE 2, e880 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smart, O. S., Goodfellow, J. M. & Wallace, B. A. The pore dimensions of gramicidin A. Biophys. J. 65, 2455–2460 (1993)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D. & Huang, C. C. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Computational Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank staff at APS beamlines 23-IDB/D, especially R. Sanishvili and S. Corcoran and at 24-IDC/E, especially I. Kourinov, D. Neau and K. Rajashankar for assistance at the synchrotron and members of the MacKinnon laboratory for discussions. S.G.B. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute postdoctoral fellow of the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation and R.M. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.G.B designed and performed the experiments. E.B.C. performed hybridoma cell culture. R.M. supervised the project. S.G.B and R.M. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roderick MacKinnon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

The X-ray crystallographic coordinates and structure factors for the non-conductive conformation of TRAAK in K+ (4WFF) and Tl+ (4WFH) and the conductive conformation of TRAAK in K+ (4WFE) and Tl+ (4WFG) are available at the Protein Data Bank.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 The central cavity in conductive and non-conductive TRAAK conformations.

a, b, View from the membrane plane of the TRAAK central cavity in the non-conductive (a) and conductive (b) conformations. The exposed surface of hydrophobic amino acids are colored white, arginine and lysine are blue, glutamate and aspartate are red, and polar residues are green. The positions of K+ ions in the filter are outlined and residue T277 in TM4 is indicated with an asterisk. c, Diameter of the ion conduction pathway as a function of distance through the membrane for non-conductive TRAAK (red), conductive TRAAK (blue) and TWIK1 (grey, PDB: 3UKM). The green box indicates the position of the selectivity filter and dashed grey lines are the approximate boundaries of the lipid membrane. The 10 Å diameter constriction formed partially by T277 is indicated with an asterisk. The pore diameter is larger in TRAAK than in TWIK1 and expands below T277 in the conductive conformation.

Extended Data Figure 2 Reconstituted TRAAK activity in different lipids.

a, Current recorded from TRAAK proteoliposome patches as a function of holding voltage (mean ± s.e.m., n = 9 patches each from three separate experiments). Current through TRAAK reconstituted in phosphatidylcholine lipids with branched acyl chains (1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, DPhPC) was significantly higher than in non-branched acyl chains (egg l-α-phosphatidylcholine, PC) at each voltage measured (5.0-fold higher at 0 mV, P < 0.0001, Student’s t-test). b, c, Representative recording of pressure (lower trace) activation of TRAAK current (upper trace) in PC (b) or DPhPC (c) lipids. d, Quantification of pressure activation of TRAAK in PC and DPhPC (mean fold pressure activation at 0 mV ± s.e.m., n = 9 patches each from three separate experiments, ***P < 0.0001, Student’s t-test).

Extended Data Figure 3 Representative electrophysiological recordings from wild-type TRAAK and TRAAK(I159C, R284C).

In these experiments and those in Fig. 2, inside-out patches from cells expressing wild-type or mutant TRAAK channels were excised and perfused with reducing bath solution (with 10 mM DTT). After stabilization of the patch (TRAAK channels exhibit a gradual run-up of current following excision to an equilibrium value, for example, Extended Data Fig. 4), the perfusion solution was switched to oxidizing bath solution (no DTT). a, b, Representative voltage family from a TRAAK(I159C, R284C) patch during perfusion of reducing (a) and oxidizing (b) solution. The voltage family protocol is illustrated. c, d, Same as a, b, but from a wild-type TRAAK patch. e, f, Current response (upper) to pressure application (lower) at 0 mV from the same TRAAK(I159C, R284C) patch during perfusion of reducing (e) or oxidizing (f) bath solution. g, h, Same as e, f, but from a wild-type TRAAK patch. Scale is shown between each pair of recordings in reducing and oxidizing bath solutions.

Extended Data Figure 4 Basal activity and tension activation of TRAAK.

a, Whole cell current from a TRAAK-expressing cell during a voltage step protocol in a tenfold gradient of [K+] (EK+ = −59 mV, holding voltage = −80 mV, ΔV = 10 mV, indicated steps shown). Red dashed line indicates zero current level. b, Current–voltage relationship from experiment in a. c, Currents (upper traces) recorded from an outside-out patch excised from the same cell as in a, b. The voltage protocol in a was used with an additional pressure step (lower trace) during each voltage step. d, Current–voltage relationship from data in b (mean current 5 min after patch excision before pressure (red) and peak current during pressure step (grey)) and a recording immediately after pulling the patch (red dashes). The excised patch contains < 1% of the whole cell membrane area, but gives 25% of the whole cell current before and similar current during a pressure step. This is explained by very low basal activity of TRAAK with near-zero membrane tension (whole cell) and channel activation by increasing membrane tension over a broad range (intermediate tension in an excised patch to high tension in a pressurized patch).

Extended Data Figure 5 Detailed view of TM2–TM3 rotation in TRAAK.

Stereo view from the cytoplasm of an overlay of non-conductive (red) and conductive TM2–TM3 rotated (blue) conformations. Amino acids that sterically prevent TM2–TM3 rotation when TM4 is down are shown as sticks. TM2–TM3 rotates about hinges at positions G169 and G205. This rotation can only occur if TM4 is up because amino acids L172, F201 and G205 on TM2–TM3 shift (0.75–2.1 Å) to a position that would sterically clash with amino acids Y271 and V275 on TM4 in a down conformation. Translation of Y271 and V275 3.1–4.1 Å in TM4 up conformations creates space for the TM2–TM3 rotation.

Extended Data Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics
Extended Data Table 2 Pairwise root mean square deviation (Å) between conformationally static regions between TRAAK structures
Extended Data Table 3 Summary of TRAAK channel conformations in crystal structures

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brohawn, S., Campbell, E. & MacKinnon, R. Physical mechanism for gating and mechanosensitivity of the human TRAAK K+ channel. Nature 516, 126–130 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing