Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts

Abstract

Early observations1,2 indicated that the Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts could be separated into an inner zone dominated by high-energy protons and an outer zone dominated by high-energy electrons. Subsequent studies3,4 showed that electrons of moderate energy (less than about one megaelectronvolt) often populate both zones, with a deep ‘slot’ region largely devoid of particles between them. There is a region of dense cold plasma around the Earth known as the plasmasphere, the outer boundary of which is called the plasmapause. The two-belt radiation structure was explained as arising from strong electron interactions with plasmaspheric hiss just inside the plasmapause boundary5, with the inner edge of the outer radiation zone corresponding to the minimum plasmapause location6. Recent observations have revealed unexpected radiation belt morphology7,8, especially at ultrarelativistic kinetic energies9,10 (more than five megaelectronvolts). Here we analyse an extended data set that reveals an exceedingly sharp inner boundary for the ultrarelativistic electrons. Additional, concurrently measured data11 reveal that this barrier to inward electron radial transport does not arise because of a physical boundary within the Earth’s intrinsic magnetic field, and that inward radial diffusion is unlikely to be inhibited by scattering by electromagnetic transmitter wave fields. Rather, we suggest that exceptionally slow natural inward radial diffusion combined with weak, but persistent, wave–particle pitch angle scattering deep inside the Earth’s plasmasphere can combine to create an almost impenetrable barrier through which the most energetic Van Allen belt electrons cannot migrate.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: A 20-month overview of electron fluxes within the Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts.
Figure 2: Electron colour-coded data showing the sharp inner edge observed for ultrarelativistic electrons.
Figure 3: Electron flux radial profiles for selected outer Van Allen zone passages.
Figure 4: A comparison between the timescales for scattering loss and inward radial diffusion.

References

  1. 1

    Van Allen, J. A., Ludwig, G. H., Ray, E. C. & McIlwain, C. E. Observation of high intensity radiation by satellites 1958 alpha and gamma. Jet Propuls. 28, 588–592 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Van Allen, J. A. & Frank, L. A. Radiation around the Earth to a radial distance of 107,400 km. Nature 183, 430–434 (1959)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Johnson, M. H. & Kierein, J. Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES): spacecraft and mission. J. Spacecr. Rockets 29, 556–563 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Blake, J. B., Baker, D. N., Turner, N., Ogilvie, K. W. & Lepping, R. P. Correlation of changes in the outer-zone relativistic electron population with upstream solar wind and magnetic field measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 927–929 (1997)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Lyons, L. R. & Thorne, R. M. Equilibrium structure of radiation belt electrons. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2142–2149 (1973)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Li, X., Baker, D. N., O’Brien, P., Xie, L. & Zong, Q. G. Correlation between the inner edge of outer radiation belt electrons and the innermost plasmapause location. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L14107 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Baker, D. N. et al. A long-lived relativistic electron storage ring embedded in Earth’s outer Van Allen belt. Science 340, 186–190 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Thorne, R. M. et al. Rapid local acceleration of relativistic radiation belt electrons by magnetospheric chorus. Nature 504, 411–414 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Baker, D. N. et al. The Relativistic Electron-Proton Telescope (REPT) instrument on board the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) spacecraft: characterization of Earth’s radiation belt high-energy particle populations. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 337–381 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Spence, H. E. et al. Science goals and overview of the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (ECT) suite on NASA’s Van Allen Probes mission. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 311–336 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Mauk, B. H. et al. Science objective and rationale for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes mission. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 3–27 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Blake, J. B., Kolasinski, W. A., Fillius, R. W. & Mullen, E. G. Injection of electrons and protons with energies of tens of MeV into L < 3 on March 24, 1991. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 821–824 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Baker, D. N. et al. An extreme distortion of the Van Allen belt arising from the ‘Hallowe’en’ solar storm in 2003. Nature 432, 878–881 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G., Horne, R. B., Meredith, N. P. & Glauert, S. A. Low-altitude measurements of 2–6 MeV electron trapping lifetimes at 1.5 ≤ L ≤ 2.5. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L20110 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Zhao, H. & Li, X. Inward shift of outer radiation belt electrons as a function of Dst index and the influence of the solar wind on electron injections into the slot region. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 756–764 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Kletzing, C. A. et al. The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) on RBSP. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 127–181 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Roederer, J. G. Dynamics of Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation (Springer, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Vampola, A. L. & Kuck, G. A. Induced precipitation of inner zone electrons, 1. Observations. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 2543–2551 (1978)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Koons, H. C., Edgar, B. C. & Vampola, A. L. Precipitation of inner zone electrons by Whistler mode waves from the VLF transmitters UMS and NWC. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 640–648 (1981)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Abel, R. W. & Thorne, R. M. Electron scattering loss in Earth’s inner magnetosphere: 1. Dominant physical processes. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 2385–2396 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Li, X. et al. Simulation of the prompt energization and transport of radiation particles during the March 23, 1991 SSC. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2423–2426 (1993)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Baker, D. N. et al. Gradual diffusion and punctuated phase space density enhancements of highly relativistic electrons: Van Allen Probes observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1351–1358 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Ni, B., Bortnik, J., Thorne, R. M., Ma, Q. & Chen, L. Resonant scattering and resultant pitch angle evolution of relativistic electrons by plasmaspheric hiss. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 7740–7751 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Thorne, R. M. et al. Evolution and slow decay of an unusual narrow ring of relativistic electrons near L 3.2 following the September 2012 magnetic storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3507 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Eastlund, B. J., Miller, B. & Michel, F. C. Emission from closed and filled magnetospheric shells and its application to the Crab pulsar. Astrophys. J. 483, 857–867 (1997)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Coordinated Data Analysis Web, http://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp_public/ (11 September 2014)

  27. 27

    Brautigam, D. H. & Albert, J. Radial diffusion analysis of outer radiation belt electrons during the October 9, 1990 magnetic storm. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 291–309 (2000)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Goldsten, J. O. et al. The Engineering Radiation Monitor for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 179, 485–502 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Li, X. et al. First results from CSSWE CubeSat: characteristics of relativistic electrons in the near-Earth environment during the October 2012 magnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 6489–6499 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the entire Van Allen Probes mission team for suggestions about this work. Data access was provided through the Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Lab Mission Operations Center and the Los Alamos National Laboratory Science Operations Center. This work was supported by JHU/APL contract 967399 under NASA’s prime contract NAS5-01072. All Van Allen Probes data used are publicly available at http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.N.B. developed the project, directed the data analysis and was primarily responsible for writing the paper. A.N.J., V.C.H. and S.G.K. analysed REPT data and produced related figures. R.M.T. provided theoretical guidance. J.C.F. and P.J.E. provided ground-based data for context. J.F.F. provided access to supplementary Van Allen Probes particle data. X.L., L.B. and Q.S. provided REPTile data. D.M.M. provided plasmapause location from EFW data. J.R.W. provided electric field data and W.K. provided EMFISIS data access. W.L. performed hiss data statistical analysis. Q.M. performed particle scattering and diffusion lifetime calculations. A.G. and L.J.L. provided ERM data from the Van Allen Probes mission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. N. Baker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Induced charge monitor current density measured by Van Allen Probes spacecraft A.

The first seven months of the mission are shown as a function of dipole L shell. Time is measured from 1 January 2013. The charge plate of the Environmental Radiation Monitor28 (ERM) from which the data shown here were acquired consists of a 10 cm2 plate under 1 mm-thick aluminium, and is thus able to detect penetrating electrons of more than 0.7 MeV and protons of more than 15 MeV. Note that no enhanced charging was observed below L ≈ 3 for solar active periods throughout October 2012 (about day −80) and April 2013 (about day +80). Similar results (not shown) were observed in charge monitor 2, which was under 3.8 mm of aluminium and was thus able to detect penetrating electrons of more than 2 MeV and protons of more than 30 MeV. Source data

Extended Data Figure 2 Data from the Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment CubeSat mission in low-Earth orbit.

The REPT integrated little experiment (REPTile) >3.8 MeV electron data are portrayed in a latitude–longitude Mercator projection format showing that the electron inner edge of the outer zone is well separated from the SAA (which is dominated for this energy range in REPTile by inner-zone protons)29.Data are from ref. 26.

Extended Data Figure 3 Pitch angle data exhibiting the behaviour of high-energy-electron angular distributions.

This figure shows illustrative data26 in the storage ring region and at the inner edge of the outer zone for an entire Van Allen Probe A orbital pass for February 2013 from 21:30 ut on 15 February to about 5:00 ut on 16 February. a, Colour-coded directional fluxes for 2.0 MeV electrons. b, Similar data for 2.8 MeV electrons. c, Similar data for 4.5 MeV electrons. d, Similar data for 5.6 MeV electrons. e, Similar data for 7.2 MeV electrons.

Extended Data Figure 4 Differential directional flux values versus pitch angle values.

Data measured by REPT-A for 15–18 February 2013 for different spacecraft orbit numbers are colour-coded according to the inset in c. a, Distributions seen right at the inner edge of the trapping boundary at L = 2.8. b, Distributions taken in the higher-flux regions at L = 3.0. c, Distributions taken even further out in the trapping region at L = 3.2. Source data

Extended Data Figure 5 A colour-coded geographic representation of ultrarelativistic electron fluxes.

The orbital tracks of Van Allen Probe B for the REPT-B sensor fluxes from 1 September to 28 September 2013 are projected onto the geographical equatorial plane. As the spacecraft precesses in its elliptical orbit around the Earth, it forms a ‘Spirograph’ pattern in the geographically fixed, Earth-centred coordinate system. The resulting orbital pattern shows the relatively stable (during this 4-week period) band of 7.2 MeV electrons from a radius of about 2.8 Earth radii (RE) out to about 3.5RE. Inside 2.8RE there is an almost complete absence of electrons, resulting in the slot region. Note also that there is hardly any discernible population of electrons at these energies in the inner zone (L ≤ 2) during this period. The superimposed circle at 2.8RE shows how sharp and distinctive the inner boundary is for ultrarelativistic electrons and how generally symmetric this boundary is all around the Earth. Source data

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, D., Jaynes, A., Hoxie, V. et al. An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts. Nature 515, 531–534 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13956

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing