Letter | Published:

Subduction-driven recycling of continental margin lithosphere

Nature volume 515, pages 253256 (13 November 2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

Whereas subduction recycling of oceanic lithosphere is one of the central themes of plate tectonics, the recycling of continental lithosphere appears to be far more complicated and less well understood1. Delamination and convective downwelling are two widely recognized processes invoked to explain the removal of lithospheric mantle under or adjacent to orogenic belts2,3,4,5. Here we relate oceanic plate subduction to removal of adjacent continental lithosphere in certain plate tectonic settings. We have developed teleseismic body wave images from dense broadband seismic experiments that show higher than expected volumes of anomalously fast mantle associated with the subducted Atlantic slab under northeastern South America and the Alboran slab beneath the Gibraltar arc region6,7; the anomalies are under, and are aligned with, the continental margins at depths greater than 200 kilometres. Rayleigh wave analysis8,9 finds that the lithospheric mantle under the continental margins is significantly thinner than expected, and that thin lithosphere extends from the orogens adjacent to the subduction zones inland to the edges of nearby cratonic cores. Taking these data together, here we describe a process that can lead to the loss of continental lithosphere adjacent to a subduction zone. Subducting oceanic plates can viscously entrain and remove the bottom of the continental thermal boundary layer lithosphere from adjacent continental margins. This drives surface tectonics and pre-conditions the margins for further deformation by creating topography along the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary. This can lead to development of secondary downwellings under the continental interior, probably under both South America and the Gibraltar arc8,10, and to delamination of the entire lithospheric mantle, as around the Gibraltar arc11. This process reconciles numerous, sometimes mutually exclusive, geodynamic models proposed to explain the complex oceanic-continental tectonics of these subduction zones12,13,14,15,16,17.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Recycling deep cratonic lithosphere and generation of intraplate magmatism in the North China Craton. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 270, 41–53 (2008)

  2. 2.

    & in Continental Reactivation and Reworking (eds , , & ) 13–38 (Spec. Publ. 184, Geological Society of London, 2001)

  3. 3.

    et al. Active foundering of a continental arc root beneath the southern Sierra Nevada in California. Nature 431, 41–46 (2004)

  4. 4.

    & Delamination and delamination magmatism. Tectonophysics 219, 177–189 (1993)

  5. 5.

    et al. Continuing Colorado plateau uplift by delamination-style convective lithospheric downwelling. Nature 472, 461–465 (2011)

  6. 6.

    , & Subduction in the southern Caribbean: Images from finite-frequency P wave tomography. J. Geophys. Res. 115 B12333 (2010)

  7. 7.

    et al. Evidence for slab rollback in westernmost Mediterranean from improved upper mantle imaging. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 368, 51–60 (2013)

  8. 8.

    , , & Lithospheric expressions of Cenozoic subduction, Mesozoic rifting and the Precambrian Shield in Venezuela. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett (in the press)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Finite-frequency Rayleigh wave tomography of the western Mediterranean. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 140–160 (2014)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Piecewise delamination of Moroccan lithosphere from beneath the Atlas Mountains. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 975–985 (2014)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Ongoing lithospheric removal in the Western Mediterranean: Ps receiver function results from the PICASSO project. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 1113–1127 (2014)

  12. 12.

    & Origin of the Betic-Rif mountain belt. Tectonics 16, 504–522 (1997)

  13. 13.

    & Extensional collapse of thickened continental lithosphere: a working hypothesis for the Alboran Sea and Gibraltar arc. Geology 17, 540–543 (1989)

  14. 14.

    , , & Magmatic evolution of the Alboran region: the role of subduction in forming the western Mediterranean and causing the Messinian Salinity Crisis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 218, 91–108 (2004)

  15. 15.

    & in The Geology and Evolution of the Region Between North and South America (eds , & ) 1–55 (Spec. Publ. 328, Geological Society of London, 2009)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath continental South America. J. Geophys. Res. 108 2043 (2003)

  17. 17.

    , , & Geodynamic evolution of the lithosphere and upper mantle beneath the Alboran region of the western Mediterranean: constraints from travel time tomography. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 10871–10898 (2000)

  18. 18.

    Tectonic evolution of the Caribbean. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 16, 201–230 (1988)

  19. 19.

    & Lithosphere tearing at STEP faults: response to edges of subduction zones. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 505–523 (2005)

  20. 20.

    et al. Eastern Venezuelan tectonics driven by lithospheric tear geodynamics, not oblique collision. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9 Q11004 (2008)

  21. 21.

    , , , & Foundations of Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean evolution: eight controversies resolved. Geol. Acta 4, 303–341 (2006)

  22. 22.

    , , , & in Sedimentary Basins of the World Vol. 4 (ed. ) 33–59 (Elsevier, 1999)

  23. 23.

    Thermal effects of the formation of Atlantic continental margins by continental break up. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 24, 325–350 (1971)

  24. 24.

    , & Oceans and continents: similarities and differences in the mechanisms of heat loss. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 11535–11552 (1981)

  25. 25.

    Tectonic Reconstruction of the Alpine Orogen in the Western Mediterranean Region PhD thesis, Monash Univ. (2003)

  26. 26.

    Evolution of retreating subduction boundaries formed during continental collision. Tectonics 12, 629–638 (1993)

  27. 27.

    , , & Geophysical evidence for lithospheric delamination beneath the Alboran Sea and Rif-Betic mountains. Nature 379, 785–790 (1996)

  28. 28.

    , , , & Active surface deformation and sub-lithospheric processes in the western Mediterranean constrained by numerical models. Geology 38, 823–826 (2010)

  29. 29.

    et al. Evidence for active subduction beneath Gibraltar. Geology 30, 1071–1074 (2002)

  30. 30.

    et al. Delamination in the Betic Range: deep structure, seismicity, and GPS motion. Geology 41, 307–310 (2013)

  31. 31.

    et al. Crustal thickness and velocity structure across the Moroccan Atlas from long offset wide-angle reflection seismic data: the SIMA experiment. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 1698–1717 (2014)

  32. 32.

    & Ablative subduction: a two-sided alternative to convectional subduction model. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 8877–8904 (1992)

  33. 33.

    & Dynamics of lithospheric thinning and mantle melting by edge-driven convection: application to Moroccan Atlas mountains. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 3175–3189 (2014)

  34. 34.

    & in Seismic Earth: Array Analysis of Broadband Seismograms (eds & ) 81–97 (Geophys. Monogr. Ser. Vol. 157, American Geophysical Union, 2005)

  35. 35.

    & Rayleigh wave phase velocities, small-scale convection and azimuthal anisotropy beneath southern California. J. Geophys. Res. 111 B07306 (2006)

  36. 36.

    Upper mantle imaging with array recordings of converted and scattered teleseismic waves. Surv. Geophys. 30, 377–405 (2009)

  37. 37.

    & Mantle discontinuity structure from midpoint stacks of converted P to S waves across the Yellowstone hotspot track. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 8313–8327 (1997)

  38. 38.

    & Evolutionary aspects of lithospheric discontinuity structure in the western U.S. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13 Q0AK07 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Govers for suggestions that improved the clarity and quality of the manuscript, and E. Engquist for aid in using the Rice DAVinCI Visualization Laboratory. We especially thank M. Harnafi and the Scientific Institute of Rabat for their contributions to the project. This research was supported by US National Science Foundation grants EAR 0003572, 0607801 and 0808939 (A.L.), EAR 0808931 (E.D.H.), EAR 0809023 and 1054638 (M.S.M.), the Venezuelan National Fund for Science, Technology and Innovation grant G-2002000478 and PDVSA-INTEVEP-FUNVISIS cooperative agreement 2004-141 (M.S.), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation grants CSD2006-00041, CGL2009-09727 and CGL2010-15146 (J.G. and R.C.), and by an A. v. Humboldt Foundation Research Prize (A.L.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Earth Science Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892, USA

    • A. Levander
    • , F. Niu
    • , I. Palomeras
    • , S. M. Thurner
    •  & J. Masy
  2. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97043, USA

    • M. J. Bezada
    •  & E. D. Humphreys
  3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0231, USA

    • M. J. Bezada
  4. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, and Unconventional Natural Gas Institute, China, University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

    • F. Niu
  5. Fundación Venezolana de Investigaciones Sismológicas, Caracas 1073, Venezuela

    • M. Schmitz
  6. Institut de Cièncias de la Terra Jaume Almera, CSIC, Barcelona 08028, Spain

    • J. Gallart
    •  & R. Carbonell
  7. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, USA

    • M. S. Miller

Authors

  1. Search for A. Levander in:

  2. Search for M. J. Bezada in:

  3. Search for F. Niu in:

  4. Search for E. D. Humphreys in:

  5. Search for I. Palomeras in:

  6. Search for S. M. Thurner in:

  7. Search for J. Masy in:

  8. Search for M. Schmitz in:

  9. Search for J. Gallart in:

  10. Search for R. Carbonell in:

  11. Search for M. S. Miller in:

Contributions

M.S., J.G., R.C., E.D.H., F.N., M.S.M. and A.L. oversaw different aspects of the field data acquisition. A.L., F.N., S.M.T., J.M., M.S. and R.C. contributed to the receiver function data analysis. I.P., F.N., J.M., M.S.M., J.G. and A.L. contributed to the Rayleigh tomography analysis. M.J.B., E.D.H. and A.L. contributed to the body wave tomography analysis. M.S., R.C. and J.G. provided geologic, tectonic and geophysical background, which allowed A.L. and E.D.H. to pose the lithosphere removal hypothesis for testing. M.J.B., I.P., S.M.T., J.M. and A.L. constructed and interpreted the 3D images. A.L primarily wrote the manuscript, with substantive input from E.D.H., M.J.B. and F.N. and with additional input from all of the co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Levander.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13878

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.