Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

CEACAM1 regulates TIM-3-mediated tolerance and exhaustion

Nature volume 517, pages 386–390 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 09 February 2024

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 16 March 2016

This article has been updated

Abstract

T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3, also known as HAVCR2) is an activation-induced inhibitory molecule involved in tolerance and shown to induce T-cell exhaustion in chronic viral infection and cancers1,2,3,4,5. Under some conditions, TIM-3 expression has also been shown to be stimulatory. Considering that TIM-3, like cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD-1), is being targeted for cancer immunotherapy, it is important to identify the circumstances under which TIM-3 can inhibit and activate T-cell responses. Here we show that TIM-3 is co-expressed and forms a heterodimer with carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1), another well-known molecule expressed on activated T cells and involved in T-cell inhibition6,7,8,9,10. Biochemical, biophysical and X-ray crystallography studies show that the membrane-distal immunoglobulin-variable (IgV)-like amino-terminal domain of each is crucial to these interactions. The presence of CEACAM1 endows TIM-3 with inhibitory function. CEACAM1 facilitates the maturation and cell surface expression of TIM-3 by forming a heterodimeric interaction in cis through the highly related membrane-distal N-terminal domains of each molecule. CEACAM1 and TIM-3 also bind in trans through their N-terminal domains. Both cis and trans interactions between CEACAM1 and TIM-3 determine the tolerance-inducing function of TIM-3. In a mouse adoptive transfer colitis model, CEACAM1-deficient T cells are hyper-inflammatory with reduced cell surface expression of TIM-3 and regulatory cytokines, and this is restored by T-cell-specific CEACAM1 expression. During chronic viral infection and in a tumour environment, CEACAM1 and TIM-3 mark exhausted T cells. Co-blockade of CEACAM1 and TIM-3 leads to enhancement of anti-tumour immune responses with improved elimination of tumours in mouse colorectal cancer models. Thus, CEACAM1 serves as a heterophilic ligand for TIM-3 that is required for its ability to mediate T-cell inhibition, and this interaction has a crucial role in regulating autoimmunity and anti-tumour immunity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: TIM-3 and CEACAM1 are co-expressed on T cells during induction of tolerance.
Figure 2: CEACAM1 and TIM-3 heterodimerize and serve as heterophilic ligands.
Figure 3: TIM-3 regulation of mucosa-associated inflammation requires CEACAM1.
Figure 4: CEACAM1 determines TIM-3 regulation of anti-tumour immune responses.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Monney, L. et al. Th1-specific cell surface protein Tim-3 regulates macrophage activation and severity of an autoimmune disease. Nature 415, 536–541 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sabatos, C. A. et al. Interaction of Tim-3 and Tim-3 ligand regulates T helper type 1 responses and induction of peripheral tolerance. Nature Immunol. 4, 1102–1110 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sánchez-Fueyo, A. et al. Tim-3 inhibits T helper type 1-mediated auto- and alloimmune responses and promotes immunological tolerance. Nature Immunol. 4, 1093–1101 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, R. B. et al. Tim-3 expression defines a novel population of dysfunctional T cells with highly elevated frequencies in progressive HIV-1 infection. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2763–2779 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sakuishi, K. et al. Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2187–2194 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nagaishi, T. et al. SHP1 phosphatase-dependent T cell inhibition by CEACAM1 adhesion molecule isoforms. Immunity 25, 769–781 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray-Owen, S. D. & Blumberg, R. S. CEACAM1: contact-dependent control of immunity. Nature Rev. Immunol. 6, 433–446 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iijima, H. Specific regulation of T helper cell 1-mediated murine colitis by CEACAM1. J. Exp. Med. 199, 471–482 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boulton, I. C. & Gray-Owen, S. D. Neisserial binding to CEACAM1 arrests the activation and proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes. Nature Immunol. 3, 229–236 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, L. et al. The short isoform of the CEACAM1 receptor in intestinal t cells regulates mucosal immunity and homeostasis via Tfh cell induction. Immunity 37, 930–946 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kearney, E. R., Pape, K. A., Joh, D. Y. & Jenkins, M. K. Visualization of peptide-specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity 1, 327–339 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Söderberg, O. et al. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nature Methods 3, 995–1000 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cao, E. et al. T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 crystal structure reveals a galectin-9-independent ligand-binding surface. Immunity 26, 311–321 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan, K. et al. Crystal structure of murine sCEACAM1a[1,4]: a coronavirus receptor in the CEA family. EMBO J. 21, 2076–2086 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, C. et al. The Tim-3 ligand galectin-9 negatively regulates T helper type 1 immunity. Nature Immunol. 6, 1245–1252 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dardalhon, V. et al. Tim-3/galectin-9 pathway: regulation of Th1 immunity through promotion of CD11b+Ly-6G+ myeloid cells. J. Immunol. 185, 1383–1392 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rangachari, M. et al. Bat3 promotes T cell responses and autoimmunity by repressing Tim-3–mediated cell death and exhaustion. Nature Med. 18, 1394–1400 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, J. et al. Phosphotyrosine-dependent coupling of Tim-3 to T-cell receptor signaling pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 3963–3974 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barber, D. L. et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature Cell Biol. 439, 682–687 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirahara, K. et al. Interleukin-27 priming of T cells controls IL-17 production in trans via induction of the ligand PD-L1. Immunity 36, 1017–1030 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Collison, L. W. et al. The inhibitory cytokine IL-35 contributes to regulatory T-cell function. Nature 450, 566–569 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fridman, W. H., Pagès, F., Sautès-Fridman, C. & Galon, J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nature Rev. Cancer 12, 298–306 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, A. Y. et al. The immunodominant major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigen of a murine colon tumor derives from an endogenous retroviral gene product. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9730–9735 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leung, N. et al. Deletion of the carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (Ceacam1) gene contributes to colon tumor progression in a murine model of carcinogenesis. Oncogene 25, 5527–5536 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bansal-Pakala, P., Jember, A. G. & Croft, M. Signaling through OX40 (CD134) breaks peripheral T-cell tolerance. Nature Med. 7, 907–912 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeon, M.-S. et al. Essential role of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b in T cell anergy induction. Immunity 21, 167–177 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moon, J. J. et al. Tracking epitope-specific T cells. Nature Protocols 4, 565–581 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, C.-J. & Shively, J. E. The cell-cell adhesion molecule carcinoembryonic antigen-related cellular adhesion molecule 1 inhibits IL-2 production and proliferation in human T cells by association with Src homology protein-1 and down-regulates IL-2 receptor. J. Immunol. 172, 3544–3552 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patel, P. C. et al. Inside-out signaling promotes dynamic changes in the carcinoembryonic antigen-related cellular adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) oligomeric state to control its cell adhesion properties. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 29654–29669 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, A. L. et al. Monoclonal antibody to the receptor for murine coronavirus MHV-A59 inhibits viral replication in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 163, 879–882 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gallagher, T. M. A role for naturally occurring variation of the murine coronavirus spike protein in stabilizing association with the cellular receptor. J. Virol. 71, 3129–3137 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morales, V. M. et al. Regulation of human intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte cytolytic function by biliary glycoprotein (CD66a). J. Immunol. 163, 1363–1370 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watt, S. M. Homophilic adhesion of human CEACAM1 involves N-terminal domain interactions: structural analysis of the binding site. Blood 98, 1469–1479 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, D. et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cellular adhesion molecule 1 isoforms alternatively inhibit and costimulate human T cell function. J. Immunol. 172, 3535–3543 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hastings, W. D. et al. TIM-3 is expressed on activated human CD4+ T cells and regulates Th1 and Th17 cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 2492–2501 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pertel, T. et al. TRIM5 is an innate immune sensor for the retrovirus capsid lattice. Nature 472, 361–365 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Holst, J., Vignali, K. M., Burton, A. R. & Vignali, D. A. A. Rapid analysis of T-cell selection in vivo using T cell-receptor retrogenic mice. Nature Methods 3, 191–197 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Persons, D. A. et al. Retroviral-mediated transfer of the green fluorescent protein gene into murine hematopoietic cells facilitates scoring and selection of transduced progenitors in vitro and identification of genetically modified cells in vivo. Blood 90, 1777–1786 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, X., Schwartz, J.-C. D., Almo, S. C. & Nathenson, S. G. Expression, refolding, purification, molecular characterization, crystallization, and preliminary X-ray analysis of the receptor binding domain of human B7-2. Protein Expr. Purif. 25, 105–113 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Battye, T. G. G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H. R. & Leslie, A. G. W. iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 271–281 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235–242 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mizuguchi, K. & Go, N. Seeking significance in three-dimensional protein structure comparisons. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5, 377–382 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J. & Higgins, D. G. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 2, Unit 2.3 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lyskov, S. & Gray, J. J. The RosettaDock server for local protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W233–W238 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kaufmann, K. W., Lemmon, G. H., DeLuca, S. L., Sheehan, J. H. & Meiler, J. Practically useful: what the ROSETTA protein modeling suite can do for you. Biochemistry 49, 2987–2998 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lennard-Jones, J. E. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl.170, 2–6 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Truelove, S. C. & Pena, A. S. Course and prognosis of Crohn’s disease. Gut 17, 192–201 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Krawczak, M. et al. PopGen: population-based recruitment of patients and controls for the analysis of complex genotype-phenotype relationships. Community Genet. 9, 55–61 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M. J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ye, K. et al. Phospholipase Cγ1 is a physiological guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the nuclear GTPase PIKE. Nature 415, 541–544 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Powrie, F., Leach, M. W., Mauze, S., Caddle, L. B. & Coffman, R. L. Phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+ T cells induce or protect from chronic intestinal inflammation in C. B-17 scid mice. Int. Immunol. 5, 1461–1471 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Okayasu, I., Ohkusa, T., Kajiura, K., Kanno, J. & Sakamoto, S. Promotion of colorectal neoplasia in experimental murine ulcerative colitis. Gut 39, 87–92 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Neufert, C., Becker, C. & Neurath, M. F. An inducible mouse model of colon carcinogenesis for the analysis of sporadic and inflammation-driven tumor progression. Nature Protocols 2, 1998–2004 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Adolph, T. E. et al. Paneth cells as a site of origin for intestinal inflammation. Nature 503, 272–276 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Gallagher, M. Yoshida and K. Holmes for essential reagents, R. Gali for statistical assistance, C. Chen, T. Wesse, S. Sabet, S. Greve, T. Henke, D. Tan, K. Sakuishi and J. Sullivan for technical assistance, E. Greenfield and C. Bencsics for core services, and J. H. Wang, E. Reinherz, R. Grenha, H. Iijima, J. Shively, A. Kaser, T. E. Adolph, K. Baker, D. Ringe and S. Zeissig for discussions. We thank the staff of the Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center monoclonal antibody core for purification of proteins used in X-ray crystallography and beam line X25 and X6A of the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS), Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA. The NSLS is supported by the US Department of Energy. This work was supported by the American Cancer Society grant RSG-11-057-01-LIB (A.C.A.); the Norwegian PSC research center and the Unger Vetlesen Medical Fund (E.M.); Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America fellowship grant (Y.-H.H.); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Cluster of Excellence ‘Inflammation at Interfaces’ Award (A.F. and B.-S.P.); Harvard Clinical Translational Science Center, UL1 TR001102 (R. Gali); the National Basic Research Program of China No. 2010CB529906 (Q.C.); Canadian Institute of Health Research (K.L.C. and N.B.); Canadian Institute of Health Research grant MOP-93787 (M.A.O.); AACR-Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (H.L.P. and S.K.D.); National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant GM32415 (G.A.P.); NIH grants AI073748, NS045937, AI039671 and AI056299 (V.K.K.); NIH grants DK044319, DK051362, DK053056, DK088199, the Harvard Digestive Diseases Center (HDDC) DK0034854 and High Point Foundation (R.S.B.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chen Zhu and Yasuyuki Kondo: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA,

    Yu-Hwa Huang, Yasuyuki Kondo, Amit Gandhi, Espen Melum, Michal Pyzik & Richard S. Blumberg

  2. Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA,

    Chen Zhu, Ana C. Anderson, Thomas Pertel & Vijay K. Kuchroo

  3. Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA,

    Andrew Russell & Gregory A. Petsko

  4. Whitehead Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02142, Massachusetts, USA

    Stephanie K. Dougan & Hidde L. Ploegh

  5. Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel 24105, Germany,

    Britt-Sabina Petersen & Andre Franke

  6. Division of Cancer Medicine, Norwegian PSC Research Center, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0424, Norway,

    Espen Melum

  7. Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S1A8, Canada,

    Kiera L. Clayton & Mario A. Ostrowski

  8. Department of Pathology, Cell Signalling Section, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK,

    Monika Raab & Christopher E. Rudd

  9. State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Qiang Chen

  10. Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal H3G 1Y6, Canada,

    Nicole Beauchemin

  11. Beckman Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, 91010, California, USA

    Paul J. Yazaki

  12. Keenan Research Centre of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5S1A8, Canada,

    Mario A. Ostrowski

  13. GI Pathology, Miraca Life Sciences, Newton, 02464, Massachusetts, USA

    Jonathan N. Glickman

Authors
  1. Yu-Hwa Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chen Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasuyuki Kondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana C. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amit Gandhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrew Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stephanie K. Dougan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Britt-Sabina Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Espen Melum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Thomas Pertel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kiera L. Clayton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Monika Raab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Qiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Nicole Beauchemin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Paul J. Yazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Michal Pyzik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Mario A. Ostrowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Jonathan N. Glickman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Christopher E. Rudd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Hidde L. Ploegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Andre Franke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Gregory A. Petsko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Vijay K. Kuchroo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Richard S. Blumberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.-H.H., C.Z. and Y.K. performed most experiments and helped prepare the manuscript. B.-S.P., E.M. and A.F. provided expertise in the genetic assessment for TIM-3. J.N.G. assessed all pathology. A.C.A. designed and directed tumour experiments. T.P. designed shRNA experiments. M.R. and C.E.R. performed proximity ligation analysis. S.K.D. and H.L.P. conducted and analysed pulse-chase biosynthetic labelling experiments. A.G., A.R., Q.C. and G.A.P. performed X-ray crystallography or structural analysis. K.L.C. and M.A.O. conducted immune synapse experiments. M.P. and P.J.Y. assisted with the single chain protein analysis. N.B. assisted in generation of Ceacam1−/− Rag2−/− mice and in analyses of data. R.S.B. and V.K.K. devised and coordinated the project, and together with Y.-H.H., C.Z. and Y.K. wrote the manuscript and designed the experiments. R.S.B. and V.K.K. share senior authorship on this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard S. Blumberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.K.K. and A.C.A. are consultants to Novartis, which is developing immune modulators for the treatment of cancer; R.S.B. and all other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 CEACAM1 is essential for TIM-3 mediated T cell tolerance.

a, Schematic diagram of OVA antigen-specific tolerance induction model. b, Schematic diagram of OVA immunization. c, Tracking in vivo antigen-specific T-cell responses of CFSE-labelled OT-II transgenic Rag2−/− T cells in total lymphocyte gate of mesenteric lymph nodes, peripheral lymph node or spleen of wild-type or Ceacam1−/− recipients after gating on CFSE-positive cells and staining for CEACAM1 in PBS and OVA323–339 immunized mice. Hyper-responsiveness of OT-II transgenic Rag2−/− T cells in Ceacam1−/− mice was not due to decreased regulatory T-cell induction (data not shown) or increased initial parking on the basis of cell numbers shown. d, TIM-3 expression on CEACAM1-positive and -negative CFSE+ cells as in c. e, Schematic diagram of SEB-induced T-cell tolerance model. f, mCEACAM1 and mTIM-3 expression on CD4+ Vβ8+ T cells after SEB tolerance induction. g, hCEACAM1 and hTIM-3 expression on activated primary human T cells defined by staining with indicated antibodies. h, CEACAM1 expression on TIM-3-silenced primary human T cells after re-activation by flow cytometry. Relative TIM-3, CEACAM1 or CD4 expression on T cells expressing control shRNA (lacZ control, red) or three independent shRNAs directed at TIM3 (overlay, blue). shRNA target sequences shown. i–l, CEACAM1 and TIM-3 expression and functional consequences on T cells in HIV infection. CD4+ IFN-γ+ T cells are decreased among CEACAM1+TIM-3+CD4+ T cells in HIV infection in response to Gag peptides (i). Although proportions of CEACAM1+TIM-3+CD8+ T cells are similar in HIV-infected and -uninfected subjects (j), CEACAM1+TIM-3+CD8+ T cells express little IFN-γ after stimulation with HIV Gag peptides or SEB relative to TIM-3+CEACAM1−CD8+ T cells (k, l). C, hCEACAM1; T, hTIM-3 (n = 4 per group, mean ± s.e.m.). m–o, In situ proximity ligation analysis (PLA) of CEACAM1 and TIM-3. m, HEK293T cells transiently co-transfected with Flag–hCEACAM1 or HA–hTIM-3. Cells stained with DAPI (left), anti-tubulin (middle), anti-HA (rabbit) and anti-Flag (mouse) (middle right) or merged (right). Several examples of a positive PLA signal (middle right and right panels: red fluorescent dots) indicative of a maximum distance of 30–40 nm between hCEACAM1 and hTIM-3. n, Negative control, co-expression of Flag–PLK1 (protein kinase I) and HA–TIM-3 failed to generate fluorescent dots (that is, PLA negative). Cells stained with DAPI, anti-tubulin, anti-HA/anti-Flag or merged as in m. o, Negative control, co-expression of HA–ADAP (adhesion and degranulation promoting adaptor protein) failed to show a signal (that is, PLA negative) with staining as in m. p, q, CEACAM1 and TIM-3 colocalization at immunological synapse of primary human CD4 and CD8 T cells. Confocal microscopy of hTIM-3+hCEACAM1+ primary CD4+ and CD8+ T cells forming conjugates with SEB-loaded B cells. DIC, differential interference contrast. Blue denotes B cell; red denotes CD3; purple denotes CEACAM1; green denotes TIM-3. White indicates colocalization between CEACAM1 and TIM-3 (p). Average Pearson correlation coefficients for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were 0.543 and 0.566, respectively, representing strong co-localization (q). Data are mean ± s.e.m. and representative of five (f, g), four (p, q), three (c, d, m–o) and two (h) independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Extended Data Figure 2 Structural similarities between CEACAM1 and TIM-3 IgV-like N-terminal domains and biochemical association.

a–c, Interaction between TIM-3–Ig fusion protein and membrane protein of 60 kDa after deglycosylation derived from surface-biotinylated TK-1 cells. TIM-3–Ig fusion proteins and human IgG-precipitated proteins were deglycosylated by PNGase F and separated by SDS–PAGE. TIM-3–Ig-binding membrane proteins detected by immunoblot. A 60-kDa membrane protein (red circles) and 32-kDa protein consistent with galectin-9 (black circles) are found specifically associated with soluble (s) TIM-3–Ig fusion protein (a, lane 5) and full-length (f) TIM-3–Ig proteins (b, lane 5), but not with the pre-clear controls (lanes 3 and 4) or human IgG (lanes 2 and 6). c, sTIM-3–Ig and full-length (fl)TIM-3–Ig interacting proteins were de-glycosylated by PNGase F and separated by SDS–PAGE. Proteins detected by silver staining. A band of 60 kDa (red circle) is specifically associated with sTIM-3–Ig proteins (lane 2), but not with human IgG (lane 5), or TIM-1–Ig or TIM-4–Ig (lanes 3, 4, 6–10). d, Superimposition of previously described IgV-like domains of mCEACAM1 and mTIM-3 demonstrate structural similarity with a score of 2.42 by the structural alignment and root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) calculated by Pymol. e, Sequence alignment of the IgV-like domains of mCEACAM1 and mTIM-3 on the basis of the secondary structure alignment in d. f, Sequence alignments of IgV domain sequences of CEACAM1 and overall mTIM and hTIM family members. α helices (orange) and β strands (blue) denoted as underlined segments in hCEACAM1 and mTIM-3. β strands labelled with upper- and lower-case letters for hCEACAM1 and mTIM-3, respectively. Conserved residues are shaded red. Mutated residues are shaded violet for hCEACAM1, and green for hTIM-3. Asterisk (*) indicates positions having a single, fully conserved residue; a dagger (†) indicates conservation between groups of weakly similar residues; a double-dagger (‡) indicates conservation between groups of strongly similar residues. g, Computational modelling as defined by energy calculations (score) relative to r.m.s. values of docking models to define potential cis and trans interfaces between mCEACAM1 and mTIM-3 as described in Supplementary Information and amino acids involved. h, CEACAM1 expression on mouse fibroblast 3T3 cells used to identify a galectin-9-independent ligand. i, CEACAM1 expression on mouse TK-1 cells as in a–c. Representative of three (a–c, h, i) independent experiments.

Extended Data Figure 3 Biochemical characterization of interactions between CEACAM1 and TIM-3.

a, hTIM-3 does not co-immunoprecipitate (co-IP) with ITGA5 despite interactions with hCEACAM1. HEK293T cells transfected with Flag–ITGA5 and HA–TIM-3 (ITGA5Tw) or Flag–CEACAM1 and HA–TIM-3 (CwTw). Immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibody and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-Flag antibody are shown. Input represents anti-Flag immunoblot of lysates. b, Co-immunoprecipitation of human TIM-3 and CEACAM1 from activated primary human T cells after N-glycanase treatment of lystates followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-human TIM-3 antibodies (2E2, 2E12 or 3F9) or IgG as control and immunoblotted with anti-human CEACAM1 antibody (5F4). Protein lystates from HeLa-CEACAM1 transfectants treated with N-glycanase followed by immunoprecipitation with 5F4 and the immune complex used as positive control (pos). c, mTIM-3 interacts with mCEACAM1 in mouse T cells. Splenocytes from Ceacam1-4STg Ceacam1−/− and Ceacam1-4LTg Ceacam1−/− mice cultured with anti-CD3 (1 μg ml−1) or anti-CD3 (1 μg ml−1) and anti-CD28 (1 μg ml−1) or medium for 96 h. Cell lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-mCEACAM1 antibody (cc1) or with mIgG and IB with 5D12 (anti-mTIM-3 antibody) are shown. Locations of mTIM-3 protein variants are indicated. CHO, carbohydrate. d, Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot as in a with tunicamycin treated, wild-type HA–hTIM-3 and Flag–hCEACAM1 co-transfected HEK293T cells. Arrowhead denotes core CEACAM1 protein. e, Potential hCEACAM1-interacting residues on hTIM-3 highlighted in blue. f, HEK293 T cells transiently co-transfected with Flag–hCEACAM1 and HA–hTIM-3 mutants. Immunoblotting of anti-HA were used to analyse hTIM-3 expression in HEK293T transfectants. Except for Pro50Ala mutation displaying enhanced overall protein expression, all other mutations in the IgV domain of hTIM-3 are equally detected by anti-HA antibody. g, Quantification of association of hTIM-3 mutants associated with wild-type hCEACAM1 shown in Fig. 2c summing all experiments performed. Association between wild-type hCEACAM1 and hTIM-3 core protein are depicted as reference (set as 1, n = 3, mean ± s.e.m. shown, unpaired Student’s t-test). h, Immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag (hCEACAM1) and immunoblot with anti-HA (hTIM-3) or anti-Flag of wild-type hCEACAM1 and mutant hTIM-3 proteins are shown. i, Quantification of h as performed in g. j, HEK293T cells co-transfected with Flag–hCEACAM1 wild-type and HA–hTIM-3 mutants and immunoprecipitation/immunblot as in h revealing no effects of Cys52Ala or Cys63Ala mutations in hTIM-3 in affecting association with hCEACAM1 in contrast to Cys109Ala mutation of hTIM-3 that disrupts interactions with hCEACAM1. k, Potential hTIM-3-interacting-residues around the FG–CC′ cleft of hCEACAM1 highlighted in red. l, HEK293T cells transiently co-transfected with Flag–hCEACAM1 mutants and wild-type HA–hTIM-3. Immunoblot with anti-Flag antibody was used to analyse hCEACAM1 expression in HEK293T co-transfectants. All hCEACAM1 mutations in IgV domain equally detected. m, Densitometric quantification of IgV domain hCEACAM1 mutations associating with wild-type HA–hTIM-3 described in Fig. 2d. n–p, Analysis of Gly47Ala mutation of hCEACAM1 in hTIM-3 co-transfected HEK293T cells by immunoprecipitation with anti-HA (hTIM-3) and immunoblot with anti-Flag (hCEACAM1) to detect association (n), IB with anti-Flag to confirm similarity of hCEACAM1 transfection (o) and quantification of associated hCEACAM1 of n as shown in m. q–s, Analysis of hCEACAM1 mutants Asn42Ala and Arg43Ala association with hTIM-3 (q), similarity of transfections (r) and quantification of q as in n–p. Representative of four (d, h), three (f, g, i, l–s), two (a–c) and one (j) independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < .001.

Extended Data Figure 4 Structural analysis of hCEACAM1 and hTIM-3 protein interactions.

a, Schematic diagram of single-chain construct consisting of hCEACAM1 IgV-domain (amino acids 1–107), a linker consisting of (GGGGS)4 and hTIM-3 IgV-domain (amino acids 1–105) and C-terminal hexahistidine tag. b–e, Surface plasmon resonance analyses of hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 single-chain interaction with GST–hTIM-3. b, Representative sensorgrams of serial dilutions of hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 single chain flowed over immobilized GST–hTIM-3 or GST alone. c, Representative sensorgrams of 600 nM hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 single-chain flowed over immobilized GST–hTIM-3 in presence of various concentrations of blocking hTIM-3 specific peptide (amino acids 58–77) or control scrambled peptide. d, Representative sensorgrams as in b in presence of various concentrations of anti-hCEACAM1 monoclonal antibody (26H7) or control isotype antibody (mIgG1, MOPC). e, Bar graphs represent resonance units upon equilibrium (RUEq) of above treatments with mean ± s.e.m. shown from >three runs. GST–hTIM-3 immobilized by amine coupling. Dilutions of hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 single chain, hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 single chain with either blocking hTIM-3-specific peptide, control scrambled peptide, and 26H7 antibody or control MOPC antibody were injected over immobilized GST–hTIM-3 at 25 °C. Flow rate was 25 μl min−1. f, g, 2Fo − Fc maps contoured at 0.9σ showing electron densities for X-ray crystal structure of single chain hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 (PDB code 4QYC). h, Summary of crucial amino acid residues defined biochemically and structurally. i–k, Similarity between apo-hCEACAM1 and hTIM-3-associated CEACAM1. Structure of CEACAM1 homodimer at 2.0 Å resolution (PDB code 4QXW) (i). Homophilic ‘YQQN’ concavity indicated consisting of residues Tyr 34, Gln 44, Gln 89 and Asn 97 at hCEACAM1 (IgV)–hCEACAM1 (IgV) interface (j). Superimposition of IgV domain of hCEACAM1 monomer (orange) from i on hCEACAM1 (green) from hCEACAM1–hTIM-3 heterodimer in Fig. 2e (k). Representative of three (b–e) independent experiments. ***P < 0.001.

Extended Data Figure 5 CEACAM1 determines TIM-3 expression and function.

a, HEK293T cells transiently co-transfected with Flag–hCEACAM1 and wild-type or mutants of HA–hTIM-3. Flow cytometry detecting HA–hTIM-3 (detected with anti-HA) and Flag–hCEACAM1 (detected with 5F4) proteins at cell surface (top), Golgi apparatus (middle) or endoplasmic reticulum (bottom) using monensin and brefeldin A, respectively. b, Cellular distribution of wild-type or mutant hTIM-3 when co-expressed with wild-type hCEACAM1. Total counts of hTIM-3 at surface, Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum summed up to 100%. Depicted as percentage of hTIM-3. c, HEK293T cells transiently co-transfected with wild-type HA–hTIM-3 (detected with 2E2) and wild-type or mutant Flag–hCEACAM1 (detected with anti-Flag). Flow cytometry analyses as in a. d, Cellular distribution of c, as in b. Depicted as percentage of hTIM-3. e, Immunoblot for wild-type or Thr101Ile variant of hTIM-3 showing maturation status in presence of wild-type or mutated (Gln44Leu) hCEACAM1. f, Normal association of Thr101Ile variant of hTIM-3 with hCEACAM1. g, Analysis of CD4+Vβ8+ T cells after SEB tolerance induction from experimental mice of indicated genotypes. h, Galectin-9 induction of apoptosis. Annexin V+ propidium iodide staining of TH1 cells polarized from Tim3Tg or Tim3Tg Ceacam1−/− mice after treatment with galectin-9 (2 μg ml−1) for 8 h. Note decreased apoptosis in Tim3Tg Ceacam1−/− T cells. i, Schematic diagram of protocol used for protein pull-down using in-column IgV domain of GST–hTIM-3 incubated with hCEACAM1 protein derived from transfected HEK293T cells as in Fig. 2m. j, GST or GST–hTIM-3 staining of hCEACAM1-4L-transfected Jurkat T cells. k, Wild-type CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 and/or anti-CD28 in the presence or absence of mCEACAM1 NFc, or IgG1-Fc as control, and cells analysed for secretion of IFN-γ and IL-2. l, m, Characterization of tolerance in SEB model. Tim3Tg (l) and Tim3Tg Ceacam1−/− (m) mice treated with SEB with schedule described in Extended Data Fig. 1e. Lymph node cells collected after SEB treatment and re-stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 at indicated doses and IL-2 measured by ELISA after 72 h. Note tolerance in Tim3Tg but not Tim3Tg Ceacam1−/− mice. n = 3 per group. n, Anti-mTIM-3 blockade with 2C12 antibody of mCEACAM1 NFc or control IgG-Fc staining of CD4+ T cells from indicated genotypes expressed as levels relative to Ceacam1−/− mice. o, p, Analysis of mTIM-3 cytoplasmic tail function in transmitting mCEACAM1-induced signals. Activated mouse CD4+ T cells from wild-type (o) or Ceacam1−/− (p) mice were retrovirally transduced, sorted and stimulated with anti-CD3 with either human IgG-Fc (IgG, control) or mCEACAM1 N-terminal domain as NFc and TNF-α secretion assessed by ELISA after 72 h. Note ability of CEACAM1 N-terminal domain to transduce a signal associated with inhibition of TNF-α secretion in wild-type but not Ceacam1−/− T cells. n = 3 per group. Data are mean ± s.e.m. and represent three (f, g, k–p) and two (a–e, h, j) independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Extended Data Figure 6 CEACAM1 and TIM-3 cooperatively regulate inflammation and anti-tumour immunity.

a, Representative haematoxylin and eosin staining of groups described in Fig. 3e. Scale bar, 50 μm. b, Flow cytometry for intracellular cytokine assessment of TNF-α expression from infiltrating CD4+ T cells from inflamed colonic lamina propria of Ceacam1−/− Rag2−/− recipients, 6 weeks after transfer with naive CD4+CD44loCD62Lhigh T cells from indicated genotypes. c, Anorectal prolapse of indicated genotypes. d, Representative haematoxylin and eosin staining of groups described in Fig. 3g. Scale bar, 50 μm. e, RNA expression defined by nanostring of lamina propria mononuclear cells in indicated groups (mean of n = 3 per group). f, Schematic overview of protocol for AOM/DSS colitis-associated cancer model. g, Representative haematoxylin and eosin staining of colon from wild-type mice in AOM/1.5% DSS model. Scale bar, 50 μm; h, Representative photograph of distal colons of wild-type mice (n = 3 per group, anorectal junction at left end) in AOM/1.5% DSS model. Vertical arrows show the sites for dissection of the polyps (black) and the vicinity of the polyps (red). i, Representative flow cytometry analyses on infiltrating lymphocytes of invading distal colonic polyps or from the vicinity of the polyps or from mesenteric lymph nodes for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and expression of CEACAM1 and TIM-3 or PD-1 and TIM-3. Note that vicinity of polyps exhibit highest numbers of T cells with an exhausted phenotype. j, Summary of flow cytometry on infiltrating lymphocytes from invading distal colonic polyps or from vicinity of polyps and from mesenteric lymph nodes for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing CEACAM1 and TIM-3 or PD-1 and TIM-3 (n = 3, median shown). k, Representative pathology in AOM/1.5% DSS model. Scale bar, 60 μm. HGD, high grade dysplasia. Representative of three independent experiments (a–e, g–k).

Extended Data Figure 7 Blockade of CEACAM1 and TIM-3 or genetic loss of CEACAM1 increases anti-tumour immunity.

a, Schematic presentation of antibody blockade protocol described in Fig. 4g. b, Schematic presentation of antibody blockade protocol referred to in panel c. c, Prevention of CT26 tumour growth with indicated combinations of antibodies as in (b) (n = 5 per group, post-hoc Dunnett’s correction followed by Friedman test). d, Schematic of schedule used for therapeutic antibody administration as described in e. e, Synergy of CEACAM1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in a therapeutic protocol as described in d was performed in wild-type BALB/c mice that received a subcutaneous inoculation of CT26 tumour cells. Mean tumour size (n = 5 per group, with linear regression analysis). Note synergistic increase in anti-tumour effect when CEACAM1 and PD-L1 co-blockade was performed. f, TILs were analysed for the relative proportion of CD4+ T cells that produced IL-10 as in Fig. 4g (n = 4, unpaired Student’s t-test with Mann–Whitney U correction). g, Percentages of CD8+ T cells from spleen show that antibody treatments have no effects on total CD8+ T cell numbers (n = 7/8, unpaired two-tailed t-test). h, Negative correlation of the numbers of AH1 tet+ CD8+ T cells and the size of tumours in the draining lymph nodes from the tumour-bearing mice in Fig. 4g (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.9560, P = 0.044). i, Representative flow cytometry for tumour-specific (AH1-tetramer, tet+) CD8+ T cells in draining lymph nodes of mice from the indicated genotypes. Data are mean ± s.e.m. and represent three (f–i), two (e) and one (c) independent experiments. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

Extended Data Table 1 Primers for site-directed mutagenesis of hTIM-3 and hCEACAM1
Full size table
Extended Data Table 2 Crystal information, data collection and refinement parameters
Full size table
Extended Data Table 3 Genotype analysis for human TIM3 alleles in inflammatory bowel disease
Full size table

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text. (PDF 133 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, YH., Zhu, C., Kondo, Y. et al. CEACAM1 regulates TIM-3-mediated tolerance and exhaustion. Nature 517, 386–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13848

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing