Numerous telescopes and techniques have been used to find and study extrasolar planets, but none has been more successful than NASA's Kepler space telescope. Kepler has discovered most of the known exoplanets, the smallest planets to orbit normal stars and the planets most likely to be similar to Earth. Most importantly, Kepler has provided us with our first look at the typical characteristics of planets and planetary systems for planets with sizes as small as, and orbits as large as, those of Earth.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 24 May 2021
Scientific Reports Open Access 03 February 2020
Nature Communications Open Access 24 September 2018
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Borucki, W. J. et al. Kepler planet-detection mission: introduction and first results. Science 327, 977–980 (2010). This is the primary paper describing the Kepler mission, its goals and first planetary discoveries.
Koch, D. G. et al. Kepler mission design, realized photometric performance, and early science. Astrophys. J. 713, L79–L86 (2010). This article provides a description of the spacecraft, how the hardware relates to the scientific goals of the mission, and early technical performance.
Gilliland, R. L. et al. Kepler mission stellar and instrument noise properties. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 197, 6 (2011).
Batalha, N. M. et al. Kepler's first rocky planet: Kepler-10b. Astrophys. J. 729, 27 (2011).
Lissauer, J. J. et al. A closely packed system of low-mass, low-density planets transiting Kepler-11. Nature 470, 53–58 (2011). This paper reports the first flat, tightly packed, close-in planetary system and the first small planets found with low densities.
Doyle, L. R. et al. Kepler-16: a transiting circumbinary planet. Science 333, 1602–1606 (2011). This article describes the first transiting circumbinary planet.
Carter, J. A. et al. Kepler-36: A pair of planets with neighboring orbits and dissimilar densities. Science 337, 556–559 (2012). The authors of this article describe a system of two planets with very different densities on remarkably close orbits that is precisely characterized using TTVs.
Jontof-Hutter, D., Lissauer, J. J., Rowe, J. F. & Fabrycky, D. C. Kepler-79's low density planets. Astrophys. J. 785, 15 (2014).
Marcy, G. W. et al. Masses, radii, and orbits of small Kepler planets: the transition from gaseous to rocky planets. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 210, 20 (2014). This paper describes the masses of dozens of small Kepler planets using radial velocities measured at the Keck Observatory.
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S. & Barnes, J. W. Planetary radii across five orders of magnitude in mass and stellar insolation: application to transits. Astrophys. J. 659, 1661–1672 (2007).
Dressing, C. D. & Charbonneau, D. The occurrence rate of small planets around small stars. Astrophys. J. 767, 95 (2013).
Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. The planet-metallicity correlation. Astrophys. J. 622, 1102–1117 (2005).
Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M. & Udry, S. Spectroscopic stellar parameters for 582 FGK stars in the HARPS volume-limited sample. Revising the metallicity-planet correlation. Astron. Astrophys. 533, A141 (2011).
Buchhave, L. A. et al. An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities. Nature 486, 375–377 (2012). This article demonstrates that the occurrence rate of small planets does not depend strongly on the chemical composition of the star.
Wang, J. & Fischer, D. A. The metal-rich stars get richer in planets for all but planets with RP ≤2 RE. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.7830 (2013).
Ricker, G. R. et al. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite mission. J. Am. Assoc. Variable Star Observers 42, 234 (2014).
Demory, B.-O. The albedos of Kepler's close-in super-Earths. Astrophys. J. 789, L20 (2014).
Angerhausen, D., DeLarme, E. & Morse, J. A. A comprehensive study of Kepler phase curves and secondary eclipses — temperatures and albedos of confirmed Kepler giant planets. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4348 (2014).
Holman, M. J. et al. Kepler-9: a system of multiple planets transiting a Sun-like star, confirmed by timing variations. Science 330, 51–54 (2010).
Lissauer, J. J. et al. All six planets known to orbit Kepler-11 have low densities. Astrophys. J. 770, 131 (2013).
Dreizler, S. & Ofir, A. Kepler-9 revisited 60% the mass with six times more data. http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1372 (2014).
Borucki, W. J. et al. Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler. II. Analysis of the first four months of data. Astrophys. J. 736, 19 (2011). This is the first major catalogue of Kepler's planet candidates.
Batalha, N. M. et al. Planetary candidates observed by Kepler. III. Analysis of the first 16 months of data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 204, 24 (2013). This is the second major catalogue of Kepler's planet candidates.
Burke, C. J. et al. Planetary candidates observed by Kepler IV: planet sample from Q1–Q8 (22 months). Astrophys. J. Suppl. 210, 19 (2014). This is the third major catalogue of Kepler's planet candidates.
Batalha, N. M. et al. Pre-spectroscopic false-positive elimination of Kepler planet candidates. Astrophys. J. 713, L103–L108 (2010).
Morton, T. D. & Johnson, J. A. On the low false positive probabilities of Kepler planet candidates. Astrophys. J. 738, 170 (2011).
Santerne, A. et al. SOPHIE velocimetry of Kepler transit candidates. VII. A false-positive rate of 35% for Kepler close-in giant candidates. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A76 (2012).
Fressin, F. et al. The false positive rate of Kepler and the occurrence of planets. Astrophys. J. 766, 81 (2013). This paper estimates false-positive rates in Kepler catalogues and calculates planetary occurrence rates.
Fischer, D. A. et al. Planet hunters: the first two planet candidates identified by the public using the Kepler public archive data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 2900–2911 (2012).
Sanchis-Ojeda, R. et al. A study of the shortest-period planets found with Kepler. Astrophys. J. 787, 47 (2014). This is a catalogue of Kepler planet candidates with an orbital period <1 day.
Torres, G. et al. Modeling Kepler transit light curves as false positives: rejection of blend scenarios for Kepler-9, and validation of Kepler-9d, a super-Earth-size planet in a multiple system. Astrophys. J. 727, 24 (2011).
Morton, T. D. An efficient automated validation procedure for exoplanet transit candidates. Astrophys. J. 761, 6 (2012).
Lissauer, J. J. et al. Validation of Kepler's multiple planet candidates. II. Refined statistical framework and descriptions of systems of special interest. Astrophys. J. 784, 44 (2014).
Ballard, S. et al. The Kepler-19 system: a transiting 2.2 R⊕ planet and a second planet detected via transit timing variations. Astrophys. J. 743, 200 (2011).
Nesvorny, D. et al. The detection and characterization of a nontransiting planet by transit timing variations. Science 336, 1133–1136 (2012).
Lopez, E. D. & Fortney, J. J. The role of core mass in controlling evaporation: the Kepler radius distribution and the Kepler-36 density dichotomy. Astrophys. J. 776, 2 (2013).
Deck, K. M. et al. Rapid dynamical chaos in an exoplanetary system. Astrophys. J. Lett. 755, L21 (2012); erratum 774, L15 (2013).
Winn, J. N. et al. Spin-orbit alignment for the circumbinary planet host Kepler-16 A. Astrophys. J. 741, L1 (2011).
Orosz, J. A. et al. Kepler-47: a transiting circumbinary multiplanet system. Science 337, 1511–1514 (2012).
Fressin, F. et al. Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20. Nature 482, 195–198 (2012).
Muirhead, P. S. et al. Characterizing the cool KOIs. III. KOI 961: a small star with large proper motion and three small planets. Astrophys. J. 747, 144 (2012).
Barclay, T. et al. A sub-mercury-sized exoplanet. Nature 494, 452–454 (2013).
Rappaport, S. et al. Possible disintegrating short-period super-mercury orbiting KIC 12557548. Astrophys. J. 752, 1 (2012).
Sanchis-Ojeda, R. et al. Transits and occultations of an Earth-sized planet in an 8.5 hr orbit. Astrophys. J. 774, 54 (2013).
Howard, A. W. et al. A rocky composition for an Earth-sized exoplanet. Nature 503, 381–384 (2013).
Pepe, F. et al. An Earth-sized planet with an Earth-like density. Nature 503, 377–380 (2013).
Kopparapu, R. K. et al. Habitable zones around main-sequence stars: new estimates. Astrophys. J. 765, 131 (2013).
Borucki, W. J. et al. Kepler-62: a five-planet system with planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth radii in the habitable zone. Science 340, 587–590 (2013).
Borucki, W. J. et al. in Transiting Extrasolar Planets Workshop (eds Afonso, C., Weldrake, D. & Henning, T.) (Astro. Soc. Pacif. Conf., 2007).
Chaplin, W. J. & Miglio, A. Asteroseismology of solar-type and red-giant stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 353–392 (2013).
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. The new era of asteroseismology. EAS Publications Series 63, 91–104 (2013).
Prsa, A. et al. Kepler eclipsing binary stars. I. Catalog and principal characterization of 1879 eclipsing binaries in the first data release. Astron. J. 141, 83 (2011).
Tabachnik, S. & Tremaine, S. Maximum-likelihood method for estimating the mass and period distributions of extrasolar planets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 335, 151–158 (2002).
Youdin, A. N. The exoplanet census: a general method applied to Kepler. Astrophys. J. 742, 38 (2011).
Howard, A. W. et al. Planet occurrence within 0.25 AU of solar-type stars from Kepler. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 201, 15 (2012).
Dong, S. & Zhu, Z. Fast rise of 'Neptune-size' planets (4–8 R⊕) from P ∼ 10 to ∼250 days — statistics of Kepler planet candidates up to ∼0.75 AU. Astrophys. J. 778, 53 (2013).
Jenkins, J. M. et al. Overview of the Kepler science processing pipeline. Astrophys. J. 713, L87–L91 (2010).
Tenenbaum, P. et al. Detection of potential transit signals in the first three quarters of Kepler mission data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 199, 24 (2012).
Christiansen, J. L. et al. Measuring transit signal recovery in the Kepler pipeline. I. Individual events. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 207, 35 (2013).
Petigura, E. A. & Marcy, G. W. Identification and removal of noise modes in Kepler photometry. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 124, 1073–1082 (2012).
Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W. & Marcy, G. W. Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19273–19278 (2013).
Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W. & Howard, A. W. A plateau in the planet population below twice the size of Earth. Astrophys. J. 770, 69 (2013).
Batalha, N. Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA's Kepler mission. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304196111 (2014).
Wright, J. T. et al. The frequency of hot Jupiters orbiting nearby solar-type stars. Astrophys. J. 753, 160 (2012).
Dawson, R. I. & Murray-Clay, R. A. Giant planets orbiting metal-rich stars show signatures of planet-planet interactions. Astrophys. J. 767, L24 (2013).
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W. & Morton, T. D. Exoplanet population inference and the abundance of Earth analogs from noisy, incomplete catalogs. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.3020 (2014).
Lopez, E. D. & Fortney, J. J. Understanding the mass-radius relation for sub-neptunes: radius as a proxy for composition. Astrophys. J. 792, 1 (2014).
Lithwick, Y., Xie, J. & Wu, Y. Extracting planet mass and eccentricity from TTV data. Astrophys. J. 761, 122 (2012).
Hadden, S. & Lithwick, Y. Densities and eccentricities of 139 Kepler planets from transit time variations. Astrophys. J. 787, 80 (2014).
Rogers, L. Most 1.6 Earth-radii planets are not rocky. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4457 (2014).
Wu, Y. & Lithwick, Y. Density and eccentricity of Kepler planets. Astrophys. J. 772, 74 (2013).
Weiss, L. M. & Marcy, G. W. The mass-radius relation for 65 exoplanets smaller than 4 Earth radii. Astrophys. J. 783, L6 (2014).
Borucki, W. J. et al. Kepler-22b: a 2.4 Earth-radius planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star. Astrophys. J. 745, 120 (2012).
Morton, T. D. & Swift, J. The radius distribution of small planets around cool stars. Astrophys. J. 791, 10 (2014).
Lissauer, J. J. et al. Almost all of Kepler's multiple-planet candidates are planets. Astrophys. J. 750, 112 (2012).
Fabrycky, D. C. et al. Architecture of Kepler's multi-transiting systems: II. New investigations with twice as many candidates. Astrophys. J. 790, 146 (2014). This article characterizes the orbital properties of Kepler's multi-planet systems.
Tremaine, S. & Dong, S. The statistics of multi-planet systems. Astron. J. 143, 94 (2012).
Dawson, R. I. et al. Large eccentricity, low mutual inclination: the three-dimensional architecture of a hierarchical system of giant planets. Astrophys. J. 791, 89 (2014).
Ida, S. Stirring and dynamical friction rates of planetesimals in the solar gravitational field. Icarus 88, 129–145 (1990).
Moorhead, A. V. et al. The distribution of transit durations for Kepler planet candidates and implications for their orbital eccentricities. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 197, 1 (2011).
Plavchan, P., Bilinski, C. & Currie, T. Investigation of Kepler objects of interest stellar parameters from observed transit durations. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 126, 34–47 (2014).
Kipping, D. M. Characterizing distant worlds with asterodensity profiling. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440, 2164–2184 (2014).
Kipping, D. M., Dunn, W. R., Jasinski, J. M. & Manthri, V. P. A novel method to photometrically constrain orbital eccentricities: multibody asterodensity profiling. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1166–1188 (2012).
Dawson, R. I. & Johnson, J. A. The photoeccentric effect and proto-hot Jupiters. I. Measuring photometric eccentricities of individual transiting planets. Astrophys. J. 756, 122 (2012).
Zakamska, N. L., Pan, M. & Ford, E. B. Observational biases in determining extrasolar planet eccentricities in single-planet systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 1895–1910 (2011).
Rafikov, R. R. & Slepian, Z. S. Dynamical evolution of thin dispersion-dominated planetesimal disks. Astron. J. 139, 565–579 (2010).
Albrecht, S. et al. Obliquities of hot Jupiter host stars: evidence for tidal interactions and primordial misalignments. Astrophys. J. 757, 18 (2012).
Fabrycky, D. & Tremaine, S. Shrinking binary and planetary orbits by Kozai cycles with tidal friction. Astrophys. J. 669, 1298–1315 (2007).
Tremaine, S. On the origin of the obliquities of the outer planets. Icarus 89, 85–92 (1991).
Heller, C. H. Encounters with protostellar disks. I. Disk tilt and the nonzero solar obliquity. Astrophys. J. 408, 337–346 (1993).
Batygin, K. A primordial origin for misalignments between stellar spin axes and planetary orbits. Nature 491, 418–420 (2012).
Sanchis-Ojeda, R. et al. Alignment of the stellar spin with the orbits of a three-planet system. Nature 487, 449–453 (2012).
Hirano, T. et al. Measurements of stellar inclinations for Kepler planet candidates. II. Candidate spin-orbit misalignments in single- and multiple-transiting systems. Astrophys. J. 783, 9 (2014).
Gladman, B. Dynamics of systems of two close planets. Icarus 106, 247 (1993).
Smith, A. W. & Lissauer, J. J. Orbital stability of systems of closely-spaced planets. Icarus 201, 381–394 (2009).
Lissauer, J. J. et al. Architecture and dynamics of Kepler's candidate multiple transiting planet systems. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 197, 8 (2011).
Holman, M. J. A possible long-lived belt of objects between Uranus and Neptune. Nature 387, 785–788 (1997).
Evans, N. W. & Tabachnik, S. A. Structure of possible long-lived asteroid belts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 333, L1–L5 (2002).
Fang, J. & Margot, J.-L. Are planetary systems filled to capacity? A study based on Kepler results. Astrophys. J. 767, 115 (2013).
Eggenberger, A. in EAS Publications Series (eds Gozdziewski, K., Niedzielski, A. & Schneider, J.) Vol 42. 19–37 (2010).
Raghavan, D. et al. A survey of stellar families: multiplicity of solar-type stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 190, 1–42 (2010).
Wang, J., Fischer, D. A., Xie, J.-W. & Ciardi, D. R. Influence of stellar multiplicity on planet formation. II. Planets are less common in multiple-star systems with separations smaller than 1500 AU. Astrophys. J. 791, 111 (2014).
Tamuz, O. et al. The CORALIE survey for southern extra-solar planets. XV. Discovery of two eccentric planets orbiting HD 4113 and HD 156846. Astron. Astrophys. 480, L33–L36 (2008).
Holman, M. J. & Wiegert, P. A. Long-term stability of planets in binary systems. Astron. J. 117, 621–628 (1999).
Kipping, D. M. & Bakos, G. A., Buchhave, L., Nesvorny, D. & Schmitt, A. The hunt for exomoons with Kepler (HEK). I. Description of a new observational project. Astrophys. J. 750, 115 (2012).
Kipping, D. M. et al. The hunt for exomoons with Kepler (HEK). II. Analysis of seven viable satellite-hosting planet candidates. Astrophys. J. 770, 101 (2013).
Santos, N. C., Israelian, G. & Mayor, M. The metal-rich nature of stars with planets. Astron. Astrophys. 373, 1019–1031 (2001).
Santos, N. C., Israelian, G. & Mayor, M. Spectroscopic [FeH] for 98 extra-solar planet-host stars. Exploring the probability of planet formation. Astron. Astrophys. 415, 1153–1166 (2004).
Chiang, E. & Laughlin, G. The minimum-mass extrasolar nebula: in situ formation of close-in super-Earths. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, 3444–3455 (2013).
Hansen, B. M. S. & Murray, N. Testing in situ assembly with the Kepler planet candidate sample. Astrophys. J. 775, 53 (2013).
Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J. & Seager, S. Formation and structure of low-density exo-Neptunes. Astrophys. J. 738, 59 (2011).
Swift, J. J. et al. Characterizing the cool KOIs. IV. Kepler-32 as a prototype for the formation of compact planetary systems throughout the Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 764, 105 (2013).
Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. Disk-satellite interactions. Astrophys. J. 241, 425–441 (1980).
Baruteau, C. et al. Planet-disc interactions and early evolution of planetary systems. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4293 (2013).
Peale, S. J. Orbital resonances in the Solar System. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 215–246 (1976).
Rein, H. Period ratios in multiplanetary systems discovered by Kepler are consistent with planet migration. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427, L21–L24 (2012).
Goldreich, P. & Schlichting, H. E. Overstable librations can account for the paucity of mean motion resonances among exoplanet pairs. Astron. J. 147, 32 (2014).
Petrovich, C., Tremaine, S. & Rafikov, R. Scattering outcomes of close-in planets: constraints on planet migration. Astrophys. J. 786, 101 (2014).
Lithwick, Y. & Wu, Y. Resonant repulsion of Kepler planet pairs. Astrophys. J. 756, L11 (2012).
Petrovich, C., Malhotra, R. & Tremaine, S. Planets near mean-motion resonances. Astrophys. J. 770, 24 (2013).
Schlaufman, K. C. Tests of in situ formation scenarios for compact multiplanet systems. Astrophys. J. 790, 91 (2014).
Smith, J. C. et al. Kepler presearch data conditioning II. A Bayesian approach to systematic error correction. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 124, 1000–1014 (2012).
Stumpe, M. C. et al. Kepler presearch data conditioning I. Architecture and algorithms for error correction in Kepler light curves. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 124, 985–999 (2012).
Steffen, J. H. et al. Kepler constraints on planets near hot Jupiters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7982–7987 (2012).
Dong, S. et al. On the metallicities of Kepler stars. Astrophys. J. 789, L3 (2014).
Wright, J. T. et al. The exoplanet orbit database. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 123, 412–422 (2011).
Latham, D. W. et al. A first comparison of Kepler planet candidates in single and multiple systems. Astrophys. J. 732, L24 (2011).
Lopez, E. D., Fortney, J. J. & Miller, N. How thermal evolution and mass-loss sculpt populations of super-Earths and sub-Neptunes: application to the Kepler-11 system and beyond. Astrophys. J. 761, 59 (2012).
This research has made use of the Exoplanet Orbit Database at http://exoplanets.org and the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia at http://exoplanets.eu. We are grateful to the Kepler Science Team for their extensive efforts in producing the high-quality data set that has made possible the results reviewed here. We thank W. Borucki, E. Chiang, S. Dong, E. Lee, E. Lopez, L. Rogers, J. Rowe, A. Youdin and K. Zahnle for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. R.I.D. and S.T. gratefully acknowledge funding from the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science at the University of California, Berkeley.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
About this article
Cite this article
Lissauer, J., Dawson, R. & Tremaine, S. Advances in exoplanet science from Kepler. Nature 513, 336–344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13781
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2021)
Scientific Reports (2020)
Extremophilic models for astrobiology: haloarchaeal survival strategies and pigments for remote sensing
Nature Communications (2018)