Abstract
Memory formation is a multi-stage process that initially requires cellular consolidation in the hippocampus, after which memories are downloaded to the cortex for maintenance, in a process termed systems consolidation1. Epigenetic mechanisms regulate both types of consolidation2,3,4,5,6,7, but histone variant exchange, in which canonical histones are replaced with their variant counterparts, is an entire branch of epigenetics that has received limited attention in the brain8,9,10,11,12 and has never, to our knowledge, been studied in relation to cognitive function. Here we show that histone H2A.Z, a variant of histone H2A, is actively exchanged in response to fear conditioning in the hippocampus and the cortex, where it mediates gene expression and restrains the formation of recent and remote memory. Our data provide evidence for H2A.Z involvement in cognitive function and specifically implicate H2A.Z as a negative regulator of hippocampal consolidation and systems consolidation, probably through downstream effects on gene expression. Moreover, alterations in H2A.Z binding at later stages of systems consolidation suggest that this histone has the capacity to mediate stable molecular modifications required for memory retention. Overall, our data introduce histone variant exchange as a novel mechanism contributing to the molecular basis of cognitive function and implicate H2A.Z as a potential therapeutic target for memory disorders.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Accession codes
References
Wang, S. H. & Morris, R. G. Hippocampal-neocortical interactions in memory formation, consolidation, and reconsolidation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61, 49–79 (2010)
Lesburgueres, E. et al. Early tagging of cortical networks is required for the formation of enduring associative memory. Science 331, 924–928 (2011)
Levenson, J. M. et al. Regulation of histone acetylation during memory formation in the hippocampus. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 40545–40559 (2004)
Lubin, F. D., Roth, T. L. & Sweatt, J. D. Epigenetic regulation of bdnf gene transcription in the consolidation of fear memory. J. Neurosci. 28, 10576–10586 (2008)
Miller, C. A., Campbell, S. L. & Sweatt, J. D. DNA methylation and histone acetylation work in concert to regulate memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 89, 599–603 (2008)
Miller, C. A. et al. Cortical DNA methylation maintains remote memory. Nature Neurosci. 13, 664–666 (2010)
Miller, C. A. & Sweatt, J. D. Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation. Neuron 53, 857–869 (2007)
Pina, B. & Suau, P. Changes in histones H2A and H3 variant composition in differentiating and mature rat brain cortical neurons. Dev. Biol. 123, 51–58 (1987)
Santoro, S. W. & Dulac, C. The activity-dependent histone variant H2BE modulates the life span of olfactory neurons. Elife 1, e00070 (2012)
Michod, D. et al. Calcium-dependent dephosphorylation of the histone chaperone DAXX regulates H3.3 loading and transcription upon neuronal activation. Neuron 74, 122–135 (2012)
Bargaje, R. et al. Proximity of H2A.Z containing nucleosome to the transcription start site influences gene expression levels in the mammalian liver and brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 8965–8978 (2012)
Schauer, T. et al. CAST-ChIP maps cell-type-specific chromatin states in the Drosophila central nervous system. Cell Rep 5, 271–282 (2013)
Jones, P. A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 484–492 (2012)
Bonisch, C. & Hake, S. B. Histone H2A variants in nucleosomes and chromatin: more or less stable? Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 10719–10741 (2012)
Weber, C. M., Ramachandran, S. & Henikoff, S. Nucleosomes are context-specific, H2A.Z-modulated barriers to RNA polymerase. Mol. Cell 53, 819–830 (2014)
Bellucci, L., Dalvai, M., Kocanova, S., Moutahir, F. & Bystricky, K. Activation of p21 by HDAC inhibitors requires acetylation of H2A.Z. PLoS ONE 8, e54102 (2013)
Valdes-Mora, F. et al. Acetylation of H2A.Z is a key epigenetic modification associated with gene deregulation and epigenetic remodeling in cancer. Genome Res. 22, 307–321 (2012)
Hardy, S. et al. The euchromatic and heterochromatic landscapes are shaped by antagonizing effects of transcription on H2A.Z deposition. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000687 (2009)
Gevry, N., Chan, H. M., Laflamme, L., Livingston, D. M. & Gaudreau, L. p21 transcription is regulated by differential localization of histone H2A.Z. Genes Dev. 21, 1869–1881 (2007)
Chauhan, S. & Boyd, D. D. Regulation of u-PAR gene expression by H2A.Z is modulated by the MEK-ERK/AP-1 pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 600–613 (2012)
Nock, A., Ascano, J. M., Barrero, M. J. & Malik, S. Mediator-regulated transcription through the +1 nucleosome. Mol. Cell 48, 837–848 (2012)
Smith, A. P. et al. Histone H2A.Z regulates the expression of several classes of phosphate starvation response genes but not as a transcriptional activator. Plant Physiol. 152, 217–225 (2010)
Millar, C. B., Xu, F., Zhang, K. & Grunstein, M. Acetylation of H2AZ Lys 14 is associated with genome-wide gene activity in yeast. Genes Dev. 20, 711–722 (2006)
Watanabe, S., Radman-Livaja, M., Rando, O. J. & Peterson, C. L. A histone acetylation switch regulates H2A.Z deposition by the SWR-C remodeling enzyme. Science 340, 195–199 (2013)
Conerly, M. L. et al. Changes in H2A.Z occupancy and DNA methylation during B-cell lymphomagenesis. Genome Res. 20, 1383–1390 (2010)
Baptista, T. et al. Regulation of histone H2A.Z expression is mediated by sirtuin 1 in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 4, 1673–1685 (2013)
Gao, J. et al. A novel pathway regulates memory and plasticity via SIRT1 and miR-134. Nature 466, 1105–1109 (2010)
Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Academic Press, 1997)
Acknowledgements
The authors’ work is supported by DARPA grant HR0011-12-1-0015 and NIH grants MH091122, MH57014 (J.D.S.) and NSERC-PDF grant PDF 387473-10 (I.B.Z.). We would like to thank F. Sultan for providing RNA primers and K. Alison Margolies for providing the immunohistochemistry images.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.D.S. and I.B.Z. conceived the experiments. I.B.Z. conducted the experiments and B.S.P. and D.M.E. assisted in performing the experiments. J.J.D. analysed the next-generation sequencing data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Hippocampal H2A.Z is expressed throughout the hippocampus and is inhibited 30 min after fear conditioning.
a, b, Chromogenic staining of H2A.Z (a) and negative control (b). c, Fluorescent staining of H2A.Z (red) and DAPI (blue) shows H2A.Z distribution in CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG). d, e, H2afz mRNA expression (d; n mice per group: N = 4; C = 7; S = 2; CS = 5) and H2A.Z protein expression (e; n mice per group: N = 3; C = 3; S = 4; CS = 3) 30 min after training. f, DNA methylation at the H2afz promoter 30 min after fear conditioning (n mice per group: N = 7; C = 9; S = 5; CS = 4). N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 2 H2A.Z exchange in CA1.
H2A.Z binding at −1 nucleosome (first column for each time point) and +1 nucleosome (second column for each time point) of Egr1, Fos, Bdnf IV and Ppp1cc 30 min (left; n mice per group for Egr1 and Bdnf IV: N = 7; C = 5; S = 4; CS = 6; Ppp3ca: N = 4, C = 3, S = 3, CS = 3; n mice per group for Fos and Ppp1cc: N = 4, C = 3, S = 3, CS = 3) or 2 h (right; n mice per group: N = 10; C = 2; CS = 4; S = 6) after training. Gene expression is shown in the third column for each time point (n mice per group: N = 5, C = 6; S = 2; CS = 6; for Fos and Ppp1cc: N = 3; C = 3; S = 2; CS = 2). Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 3 Acetylated H2A.Z binding at the −1 and +1 nucleosomes 30 min after fear conditioning in CA1.
H2A.Zac binding was investigated at the −1 nucleosome (displayed in the first column for each set of genes) and the +1 nucleosome (displayed in the second column for each set of genes) of Npas4, Egr2, Arc and Ppp3ca (left) and Egr1, Fos, Bdnf IV and Ppp1cc genes (right) 30 min after fear conditioning. n mice per group: N = 3, C = 2; S = 4; CS = 3. N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 4 H2A.Z expression in the mPFC after training.
a, b, H2afz expression was investigated in the mPFC 30 min (a; n mice per group: N = 2; C = 3; S = 3; CS = 3) or 2 h (b; n mice per group: N = 8; C = 5; S = 4; CS = 8) after fear conditioning. N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m.
Extended Data Figure 5 H2A.Z exchange in the mPFC.
H2A.Z binding was investigated at the −1 nucleosome (displayed in the first column for each time point) and the +1 nucleosome (displayed in the second column for each time point) of Egr1, Egr2, Arc and Ppp3ca genes 2 h (left; n mice per group: N = 4; C = 4; S = 3; CS = 5), 7 days (middle; n = 4 mice per group; n for −1 Arc and +1 Ppp3ca: N = 7; C = 6; S = 4; CS = 8) or 30 days (right; n mice per group: N = 2; C = 3; S = 3; CS = 3) after fear conditioning. N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 6 H2A.Z exchange in the mPFC.
H2A.Z binding was investigated at the −1 nucleosome (displayed in the first column for each time point) and the +1 nucleosome (displayed in the second column for each time point) of Npas4, Fos, Bdnf IV and Ppp1cc genes 2 h (left; n mice per group: N = 4; C = 2; S = 4; CS = 6), 7 days (middle; n = 4 mice per group) or 30 days (right; n mice per group: N = 2; C = 3; S = 3; CS = 3) after fear conditioning. N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 7 Acetylated H2A.Z binding at the −1 and +1 nucleosomes 2 h after fear conditioning in the mPFC.
H2A.Zac binding was investigated at the −1 nucleosome (displayed in the first column for each set of genes) and the +1 nucleosome (displayed in the second column for each set of genes) of Egr1, Egr2, Arc and Ppp3ca (left) and Npas4, Fos, Bdnf IV and Ppp1cc genes (right) 2 h after fear conditioning; n mice per group: N = 2; C = 4; S = 3; CS = 5. N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 8 Acetylated H2A.Z binding at the −1 and +1 nucleosomes 7 days after fear conditioning in the mPFC.
H2A.Zac binding was investigated at the −1 nucleosome (displayed in the first column for each set of genes) and the +1 nucleosome (displayed in the second column for each set of genes) of Egr1, Egr2, Arc and Ppp3ca (left) and Npas4, Fos, Bdnf IV and Ppp1cc genes (right) 7 days after fear conditioning; n mice per group: N = 4; C = 3; S = 4; CS = 4. N, naive; C, context; S, shock; CS, context plus shock. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. *Follow-up comparisons with P < 0.05.
Extended Data Figure 9 Open field test in mice receiving intra-cortical scramble or H2A.Z AAV.
a, Summary of experimental design. b, There were no differences in locomotor activity between H2A.Z mice and scramble controls. c, No group differences were found in movement velocity. d, No differences were found in vertical activity. e, There were no differences in the time spent in the centre, a widely used index of anxiety (n = 8 mice per group). Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table 1
A list of differentially expressed genes in untrained mice 2 weeks after receiving intra-CA1 injections of scramble AAV or H2A.Z AAV. The results of directional, PolyA+ RNA sequencing identified 451 differentially expressed genes, of which 272 were increased and 179 were decreased in response to H2A.Z depletion. (XLSX 56 kb)
Supplementary Table 2
A list of differentially expressed genes in mice receiving intra-CA1 H2A.Z AAV injections with and without training. The results of directional, PolyA+ RNA sequencing identified 202 differentially expressed genes, of which 66 were increased and 136 were decreased 30 min after fear conditioning. (XLSX 32 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zovkic, I., Paulukaitis, B., Day, J. et al. Histone H2A.Z subunit exchange controls consolidation of recent and remote memory. Nature 515, 582–586 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13707
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13707
This article is cited by
-
Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Epigenetic Changes: Novel Therapeutic Targets
Molecular Neurobiology (2024)
-
The H2A.Z-KDM1A complex promotes tumorigenesis by localizing in the nucleus to promote SFRP1 promoter methylation in cholangiocarcinoma cells
BMC Cancer (2022)
-
Histone macroH2A1 is a stronger regulator of hippocampal transcription and memory than macroH2A2 in mice
Communications Biology (2022)
-
Differential effects of chronic immunosuppression on behavioral, epigenetic, and Alzheimer’s disease-associated markers in 3xTg-AD mice
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy (2021)
-
Multiple roles of H2A.Z in regulating promoter chromatin architecture in human cells
Nature Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.