Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cobalt-56 γ-ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J

Nature volume 512, pages 406–408 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

A type Ia supernova is thought to be a thermonuclear explosion of either a single carbon–oxygen white dwarf or a pair of merging white dwarfs. The explosion fuses a large amount of radioactive 56Ni (refs 1–3). After the explosion, the decay chain from 56Ni to 56Co to 56Fe generates γ-ray photons, which are reprocessed in the expanding ejecta and give rise to powerful optical emission. Here we report the detection of 56Co lines at energies of 847 and 1,238 kiloelectronvolts and a γ-ray continuum in the 200–400 kiloelectronvolt band from the type Ia supernova 2014J in the nearby galaxy M82. The line fluxes suggest that about 0.6 ± 0.1 solar masses of radioactive 56Ni were synthesized during the explosion. The line broadening gives a characteristic mass-weighted ejecta expansion velocity of 10,000 ± 3,000 kilometres per second. The observed γ-ray properties are in broad agreement with the canonical model of an explosion of a white dwarf just massive enough to be unstable to gravitational collapse, but do not exclude merger scenarios that fuse comparable amounts of 56Ni.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Gamma-ray lines from Co decay at 847 and 1,238 keV in the spectrum of SN 2014J.
Figure 2: Signatures of 56Co lines at 847 and 1,238 keV in SPI images.
Figure 3: Appearance of a new hard (100–600 keV) X-ray source at the position of SN 2014J.
Figure 4: Broadening of the 847 and 1,238 keV lines.

References

  1. Nomoto, K., Thielemann, F.-K. & Yokoi, K. Accreting white dwarf models of Type I supernovae. III - Carbon deflagration supernovae. Astrophys. J. 286, 644–658 (1984)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. The physics of supernova explosions. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 205–253 (1986)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hillebrandt, W. & Niemeyer, J. C. Type Ia supernova explosion models. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 38, 191–230 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whelan, J. & Iben, I., Jr Binaries and supernovae of type I. Astrophys. J. 186, 1007–1014 (1973)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iben, I., Jr & Tutukov, A. V. Supernovae of type I as end products of the evolution of binaries with components of moderate initial mass (M not greater than about 9 solar masses). Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 54, 335–372 (1984)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilfanov, M. & Bogdán, Á. An upper limit on the contribution of accreting white dwarfs to the type Ia supernova rate. Nature 463, 924–925 (2010)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Röpke, F. K. et al. Constraining type Ia supernova models: SN 2011fe as a test case. Astrophys. J. 750, L19 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malone, C. M. et al. The deflagration stage of Chandrasekhar mass models for type Ia supernovae. I. Early evolution. Astrophys. J. 782, 11 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moll, R., Raskin, C., Kasen, D. & Woosley, S. E. Type Ia supernovae from merging white dwarfs. I. Prompt detonations. Astrophys. J. 785, 105 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. The, L.-S. & Burrows, A. Expectations for the hard X-ray continuum and gamma-ray line fluxes from the type Ia supernova SN 2014J in M82. Astrophys. J. 786, 141 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sunyaev, R. et al. Discovery of hard X-ray emission from supernova 1987A. Nature 330, 227–229 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dotani, T., Hayashida, K., Inoue, H., Itoh, M. & Koyama, K. Discovery of an unusual hard X-ray source in the region of supernova 1987A. Nature 330, 230–231 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matz, S. M., Share, G. H., Leising, M. D., Chupp, E. L. & Vestrand, W. T. Gamma-ray line emission from SN1987A. Nature 331, 416–418 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teegarden, B. J., Barthelmy, S. D., Gehrels, N., Tueller, J. & Leventhal, M. Resolution of the 1,238-keV γ-ray line from supernova 1987A. Nature 339, 122–123 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Isern, J. et al. Observation of SN2011fe with INTEGRAL. I. Pre-maximum phase. Astron. Astrophys. 552, A97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fossey, S. Cooke, B. Pollack, G., Wilde, M. & Wright, T. Supernova 2014J in M82 = Psn J09554214+6940260. CBET 3792, (2014)

  17. Zheng, W. & Filippenko, A. V. Prediscovery KAIT/LOSS detections of SN 2014J. Astron. Telegr. 5822, (2014)

  18. Karachentsev, I. D. & Kashibadze, O. G. Masses of the local group and of the M81 group estimated from distortions in the local velocity field. Astrophysics 49, 3–18 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Winkler, C. et al. The INTEGRAL mission. Astron. Astrophys. 411, L1–L6 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sazonov, S. Y., Lutovinov, A. A. & Krivonos, R. A. Cutoff in the hard X-ray spectra of the ultraluminous X-ray sources HoIX X-1 and M82 X-1. Astron. Lett. 40, 65–74 (2014)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arnett, W. D. Type I supernovae. I - Analytic solutions for the early part of the light curve. Astrophys. J. 253, 785–797 (1982)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Margutti, R. et al. No X-rays from the very nearby Type Ia SN2014J: constraints on its environment. Astrophys. J. 790, 52 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Amanullah, R. et al. The peculiar extinction law of SN2014J measured with The Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 788, L21 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nadyozhin, D. K. The properties of NI to CO to Fe decay. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 92, 527–531 (1994)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dwarkadas, V. V. & Chevalier, R. A. Interaction of type IA supernovae with their surroundings. Astrophys. J. 497, 807–823 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Woosley, S. E., Kasen, D., Blinnikov, S. & Sorokina, E. Type Ia supernova light curves. Astrophys. J. 662, 487–503 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sunyaev, R. A. et al. Hard X-radiation from supernova 1987A: Roentgen Observatory observations from 1987 to 1989. Sov. Astron. Lett. 16, 171–176 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Badenes, C., Bravo, E., Borkowski, K. J. & Domínguez, I. Thermal X-ray emission from shocked ejecta in type Ia supernova remnants: prospects for explosion mechanism identification. Astrophys. J. 593, 358–369 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoeflich, P. & Khokhlov, A. Explosion models for type Ia supernovae: a comparison with observed light curves, distances, H0, and q0 . Astrophys. J. 457, 500–528 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. in Supernovae (eds Audouze, J., Bludman, S., Mochkovitch, R. & Zinn-Justin, J. ) 63–154 (Elsevier, 1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuulkers, E. INTEGRAL target of opportunity observations of the type Ia SN2014J in M82. Astron. Telegr. 5835, (2014)

  32. Vedrenne, G. et al. SPI: the spectrometer aboard INTEGRAL. Astron. Astrophys. 411, L63–L70 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Churazov, E., Sunyaev, R., Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M. & Varshalovich, D. Positron annihilation spectrum from the Galactic Centre region observed by SPI/INTEGRAL. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 357, 1377–1386 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Churazov, E., Sazonov, S., Tsygankov, S., Sunyaev, R. & Varshalovich, D. Positron annihilation spectrum from the Galactic Centre region observed by SPI/INTEGRAL revisited: annihilation in a cooling ISM? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 1727–1743 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weidenspointner, G. et al. First identification and modelling of SPI background lines. Astron. Astrophys. 411, L113–L116 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Churazov, E., Gilfanov, M., Forman, W. & Jones, C. Mapping the gas temperature distribution in extended X-ray sources and spectral analysis in the case of low statistics: application to ASCA observations of clusters of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 471, 673–682 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ubertini, P. et al. IBIS: the imager on-board INTEGRAL. Astron. Astrophys. 411, L131–L139 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lebrun, F. et al. ISGRI: the INTEGRAL Soft Gamma-Ray Imager. Astron. Astrophys. 411, L141–L148 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. INTREGAL. Science Data Centre. INTEGRAL http://isdc.unige.ch/integral (2014)

  40. Nielsen, M. T. B. Gilfanov, M. Bogdán, Á., Woods, T. E. & Nelemans, G. Upper limits on the luminosity of the progenitor of type Ia supernova SN 2014J. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, 3400–3406 (2014)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kelly, P. L. et al. Constraints on the progenitor system of the type Ia supernova 2014J from pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope imaging. Astrophys. J. 790, 3 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Perez-Torres, M. A. et al. Constraints on the progenitor system and the environs of SN 2014J from deep radio observations. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4702 (2014)

  43. Foley, R. J. et al. Extensive HST ultraviolet spectra and multi-wavelength observations of SN 2014J in M82 indicate reddening and circumstellar scattering by typical dust. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3677 (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was based on observations with INTEGRAL, an ESA project with instruments and a science data centre funded by ESA member states (especially the principal investigator countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland and Spain) and with the participation of Russia and the United States. We are grateful to the ESA INTEGRAL team and E. Kuulkers for their prompt reaction to the SN 2014J event. E.C., R.S. and S.G. wish to thank the Russian INTEGRAL advisory committee for allocating an additional 106 s of time from a regular programme to SN 2014J observations. R.S., S.G. and S.S. are partly supported by grant no. 14-22-00271 from the Russian Scientific Foundation. J.I. is supported by MINECO-FEDER and Generalitat de Catalunya grants. The SPI project has been completed under the responsibility and leadership of CNES, France. ISGRI has been realized by CEA with the support of CNES. We thank P. Höflich, K. Nomoto and S. Woosley for making available their supernova explosion models HED6, W7 and DD4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Space Research Institute (IKI), Profsouznaya 84/32, Moscow 117997, Russia,

    E. Churazov, R. Sunyaev, S. Grebenev & S. Sazonov

  2. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 1, 85741 Garching, Germany,

    E. Churazov & R. Sunyaev

  3. Institute for Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC/IEEC), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain,

    J. Isern

  4. Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, Toulouse, France,

    J. Knödlseder & P. Jean

  5. CNRS, IRAP, 9 Avenue colonel Roche, BP 44346, F-31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France,

    J. Knödlseder & P. Jean

  6. APC, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/Irfu, Observatoire de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France,

    F. Lebrun

  7. Institute of Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 48 Pyatnitskaya Street, 119017 Moscow, Russia,

    N. Chugai

  8. ETSAV, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Carrer Pere Serra 1-15, 08173 Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain,

    E. Bravo

  9. Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky pereulok 9, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia,

    S. Sazonov

  10. LUPM, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS/IN2P3, CC 72, Place Eugène Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France,

    M. Renaud

Authors
  1. E. Churazov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Sunyaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Isern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Knödlseder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Jean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Lebrun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. N. Chugai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. Grebenev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. E. Bravo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. S. Sazonov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. M. Renaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.C.: reduction and modelling of the INTEGRAL observations, simulations of the emerging γ-ray emission, interpretation, manuscript preparation; R.S.: principal investigator of one of the observations, observation planning, interpretation and manuscript preparation; J.I.: principal investigator of one of the observation proposals, observation planning, modelling of observations, interpretation and manuscript preparation; J.K.: reduction and analysis of SPI data, manuscript review; P.J.: reduction and spectral analysis of SPI observations, manuscript review; F.L.: reduction of the IBIS/ISGRI observations, manuscript preparation; N.C.: determination of 56Ni mass from the optical data, manuscript review; S.G.: reduction of the IBIS/ISGRI observations, manuscript review; E.B.: theoretical modelling, manuscript review; S.S.: principal investigator of the M82 observations, manuscript review; M.R.: reduction of the IBIS/ISGRI observations, manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Churazov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Variations in the particle background during INTEGRAL observations.

Anti-coincidence-system count rate is shown as a function of time, expressed through the revolution number. One revolution lasts about 3 days. Periods of very high and variable background (shown in blue) due to solar flares were omitted from the analysis. Periods of quiescent background (red) were used to derive the spectrum of SN 2014J.

Extended Data Figure 2 Comparison of the SPI background spectrum and the expected type Ia supernova emission.

Typical quiescent background (black) and supernova model (red, convolved with SPI energy resolution) spectra.

Extended Data Figure 3 Predicted spectra for days 50, 75 and 100 after explosion.

The 3PAR model spectrum calculated for day 75 is used for comparison with the INTEGRAL data obtained between day 50 and 100 since the explosion. Weak lines below 200 keV correspond to 56Ni (day 50) and 57Co (day 100).

Extended Data Figure 4 Contributions of various components to the model spectrum.

The lines are formed by γ-rays escaping the ejecta without interactions. The low-energy tail of each line is due to Compton down-scattering of the photons because of the recoil effect. The ‘humps’ in the tails correspond to the scattering by 180°. The magenta line shows the contribution of the ortho-positronium annihilation. Annihilation of para-positronium contributes to 511 keV line.

Extended Data Figure 5 Confidence contours for our three-parameter model.

The cross shows the best-fit values. Contours are plotted at Δχ2 = 1 with respect to the best-fit value and characterize the 1 s.d. confidence interval for a single parameter of interest.

Extended Data Table 1 Parameters of the observed gamma-ray lines of 56Co
Full size table
Extended Data Table 2 Comparison of typical type Ia supernova explosion models with the data
Full size table

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Churazov, E., Sunyaev, R., Isern, J. et al. Cobalt-56 γ-ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J. Nature 512, 406–408 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13672

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13672

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing