Nature 456, 344–349 (2008); doi:10.1038/nature07404  Corrigendum Nature 460, 1044 (2009); doi:10.1038/nature08353 Brief Communication Arising Nature 465, E1 (2010; doi: 10.1038/nature09089)

The authors have provided new data to correct errors presented in this Article. Nature has peer-reviewed all evidence provided by the authors to the editors. The images presented in the original version of the Article made the data appear more robust than newly conducted experiments show. The new data have brought to light that the original conclusions are not as robust as presented in the original paper. Nature does not dispute the main claim that the cells are pluripotent to some level, but the level of proof of pluripotency shown is not in line with regular criteria for such papers in Nature. Consequently, the authors have agreed to retract their manuscript.

Author information

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Skutella.


About this article

Publication history




  1. Search for Sabine Conrad in:

  2. Search for Markus Renninger in:

  3. Search for Jörg Hennenlotter in:

  4. Search for Tina Wiesner in:

  5. Search for Lothar Just in:

  6. Search for Michael Bonin in:

  7. Search for Wilhelm Aicher in:

  8. Search for Hans-Jörg Bühring in:

  9. Search for Ulrich Mattheus in:

  10. Search for Andreas Mack in:

  11. Search for Hans-Joachim Wagner in:

  12. Search for Stephen Minger in:

  13. Search for Matthias Matzkies in:

  14. Search for Michael Reppel in:

  15. Search for Jürgen Hescheler in:

  16. Search for Karl-Dietrich Sievert in:

  17. Search for Arnulf Stenzl in:

  18. Search for Thomas Skutella in:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.