Letter | Published:

Climate change selects for heterozygosity in a declining fur seal population

Nature volume 511, pages 462465 (24 July 2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

Global environmental change is expected to alter selection pressures in many biological systems1,2,3, but the long-term molecular and life history data required to quantify changes in selection are rare4. An unusual opportunity is afforded by three decades of individual-based data collected from a declining population of Antarctic fur seals in the South Atlantic. Here, climate change has reduced prey availability and caused a significant decline in seal birth weight. However, the mean age and size of females recruiting into the breeding population are increasing. We show that such females have significantly higher heterozygosity (a measure of within-individual genetic variation) than their non-recruiting siblings and their own mothers. Thus, breeding female heterozygosity has increased by 8.5% per generation over the last two decades. Nonetheless, as heterozygosity is not inherited from mothers to daughters, substantial heterozygote advantage is not transmitted from one generation to the next and the decreasing viability of homozygous individuals causes the population to decline. Our results provide compelling evidence that selection due to climate change is intensifying, with far-reaching consequences for demography as well as phenotypic and genetic variation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669 (2006)

  2. 2.

    & Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011)

  3. 3.

    & Genetics of climate change adaptation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 185–208 (2012)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol. Ecol. 17, 167–178 (2008)

  5. 5.

    , , , & A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 18, 2746–2765 (2009)

  6. 6.

    & A case of stress related heterozygote superiority in nature. Evolution 37, 646–649 (1983)

  7. 7.

    , , & The correlation between the individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring. Heredity 71, 59–63 (1993)

  8. 8.

    , & Exploring the relationship between parental relatedness and male reproductive success in the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella. Evolution 58, 2087–2099 (2004)

  9. 9.

    , , & Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated. Nature 445, 912–914 (2007)

  10. 10.

    , & Getting long in the tooth: a strong positive correlation between canine size and heterozygosity in the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella. J. Hered. 101, 527–538 (2010)

  11. 11.

    et al. Climatically driven fluctuations in Southern Ocean ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 3057–3067 (2007)

  12. 12.

    , , & The effects of global climate variability in pup production of antarctic fur seals. Ecology 86, 2408–2417 (2005)

  13. 13.

    , , , & On the interannual variability of ocean temperatures around South Georgia, Southern Ocean: Forcing by El Niño/Southern Oscillation and the Southern Annular Mode. Deep-Sea Res. II 55, 2007–2022 (2008)

  14. 14.

    , & Life history buffering in Antarctic mammals and birds against changing patterns of climate and environmental variation. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 2473–2488 (2008)

  15. 15.

    , & What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Mol. Ecol. 15, 4659–4665 (2006)

  16. 16.

    A paradigm for population analysis of long-lived vertebrates. Ecology 83, 2841–2854 (2002)

  17. 17.

    Matrix Population Models 2nd edn (Sinauer Associates, 2001)

  18. 18.

    , , , & The population growth consequences of variation in individual heterozygosity. PLoS ONE 6, e19667 (2011)

  19. 19.

    , & Size-specific sensitivity: applying a new structured population model. Ecology 81, 694–708 (2000)

  20. 20.

    , & Using evolutionary demography to link life history theory, quantitative genetics and population ecology. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 1226–1240 (2010)

  21. 21.

    , , , & An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266, 271–273 (1994)

  22. 22.

    , , , & Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non-model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 12, 861–872 (2012)

  23. 23.

    , & Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64, 1202–1217 (2010)

  24. 24.

    et al. High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3775–3780 (2014)

  25. 25.

    & Rapid climate change in the ocean west of the Antarctic Peninsula during the second half of the 20th century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L19604 (2005)

  26. 26.

    & Environmental stress as an evolutionary force. Bioscience 50, 217–226 (2000)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the many fieldworkers who have contributed to data collection over the years. We are also grateful to W. Amos, J. Bascompte, M. Boerner, K. Dasmahapatra, O. Krüger and I. Staniland for advice and feedback on the manuscript, together with T. Coulson for helpful referee comments. This work contributes to the Long Term Monitoring and Survey project and Ecosystems project of the British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, part of the Polar Science for Planet Earth programme. The genetic work was supported by a Marie Curie FP7-Reintegration-Grant within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (PCIG-GA-2011-303618) and a Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft standard grant (HO 5122/3-1) awarded to J.I.H.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK

    • Jaume Forcada
  2. Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany

    • Joseph Ivan Hoffman

Authors

  1. Search for Jaume Forcada in:

  2. Search for Joseph Ivan Hoffman in:

Contributions

J.F. conceived, designed and conducted the biometric, mark–recapture, demographic and population modelling and subsequent phenotypic and evolutionary demographic analysis; J.I.H. generated and analysed the genetic data. The authors jointly interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaume Forcada.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13542

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.